| 词条 | Shouting fire in a crowded theater |
| 释义 |
"Shouting fire in a crowded theater" is a popular metaphor for speech or actions made for the principal purpose of creating panic. The phrase is a paraphrasing of Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.'s opinion in the United States Supreme Court case Schenck v. United States in 1919, which held that the defendant's speech in opposition to the draft during World War I was not protected free speech under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. The paraphrasing differs from Holmes's original wording in that it typically does not include the word falsely, while also adding the word "crowded" to describe the theatre. The original wording used in Holmes's opinion ("falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic") highlights that speech that is dangerous {{em|and}} false is not protected, as opposed to speech that is dangerous but also true. The Schenck case{{main|Schenck v. United States}}DecisionHolmes, writing for a unanimous Court, ruled that it was a violation of the Espionage Act of 1917 (amended by the Sedition Act of 1918), to distribute flyers opposing the draft during World War I. Holmes argued this abridgment of free speech was permissible because it presented a "clear and present danger" to the government's recruitment efforts for the war. Holmes wrote: {{quote|The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic. [...] The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent.}}LegacyThe First Amendment holding in Schenck was later partially overturned by Brandenburg v. Ohio in 1969, which limited the scope of banned speech to that which would be directed to and likely to incite imminent lawless action (e.g. a riot). The test in Brandenburg is the current Supreme Court jurisprudence on the ability of government to proscribe speech after that fact. Despite Schenck being limited, the phrase "shouting fire in a crowded theater" has since come to be known as synonymous with an action that the speaker believes goes beyond the rights guaranteed by free speech, reckless or malicious speech, or an action whose outcomes are obvious. CriticismChristopher M. Finan, Executive Director of the National Coalition Against Censorship, writes that Justice Holmes began to doubt his decision due to criticism received from free-speech activists. He also met the legal scholar Zechariah Chafee and discussed his Harvard Law Review article "Freedom of Speech in War Times".[1] According to Finan, Holmes's change of heart influenced his decision to join the minority and dissent in the Abrams v. United States case. Abrams was deported for issuing flyers saying the US should not intervene in the Russian Revolution. Holmes and Brandeis said that "a silly leaflet by an unknown man" should not be considered illegal.[2] Chafee argued in Free Speech in the United States that a better analogy in Schenk might be a man who stands in a theatre and warns the audience that there are not enough fire exits.[3][4] In his introductory remarks to a 2006 debate in defense of free speech, writer Christopher Hitchens parodied the Holmes judgement by opening "{{em|Fire!}} Fire, fire ... fire. Now you've heard it", before condemning the famous analogy as "the fatuous verdict of the greatly over-praised Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes." Hitchens argued that the socialists imprisoned by the court's decision "were the ones shouting fire when there really {{em|was}} a fire in a very crowded theatre indeed.... [W]ho's going to decide?"[5][6] Literal examplesPeople have indeed falsely shouted "Fire!" in crowded public venues and caused panics on numerous occasions, such as at the Royal Surrey Gardens Music Hall of London in 1856, a theater in New York's Harlem neighborhood in 1884,[7] and in the Italian Hall disaster of 1913, which left 73 dead. In the Shiloh Baptist Church disaster of 1902, over 100 people died when "fight" was misheard as "fire" in a crowded church causing a panic and stampede. In contrast, in the Brooklyn Theatre fire of 1876, the actors initially falsely claimed that the fire was part of the performance, in an attempt to avoid a panic. However, this delayed the evacuation and made the resulting panic far more severe. See also
References1. ^{{cite journal |last=Chafee |first=Zechariah |authorlink=Zechariah Chafee |coauthors= |year=1919 |month= |title=Freedom of Speech in Wartime |journal=Harvard Law Review |volume=32 |issue=8 |pages=932–973 |doi=10.2307/1327107 }} 2. ^William E. Leuchtenburg, The Perils of Prosperity, 1914-32 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958), 43 3. ^{{cite book |title=Free Speech in the United States |last=Chafee |first=Zechariah |publisher=Harvard University Press |year=1067 |page=15}} 4. ^{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Vu-hxQypyjkC&pg=PA366&lpg=PA366&dq=%22PEOPLE%27S+HISTORY+OF+THE+UNITED+STATES%22+%22oliver+wendell+holmes%22+fire&source=bl&ots=1TthSKTrty&sig=nfYUz_XZHPSOnXpXViLKyaLw5ig&hl=en&sa=X&ei=enriT_iaAaOU2wWfprXlCw&ved=0CFUQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q&f=false |title=A People's History of the United States |last=Zinn |first=Howard |authorlink=Howard Zinn |publisher=HarperCollins |date=August 2, 2005 |page=366 |isbn=0060838655 |accessdate=June 20, 2012}} 5. ^{{cite video |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3Hg-Y7MugU |title=Christopher Hitchens -- Free Speech Part 1 |last=Hitchens |first=Christopher |authorlink=Christopher Hitchens |publisher=YouTube |time=00:00:00 |accessdate=June 20, 2012}} 6. ^{{cite web |url=http://documents.ariadacapo.net/borrowed/2006_11_christopher_hitchens/christopher_hitchens_2006_11_talk_transcript.pdf |title=Fire in a Crowded Theatre |last=Hitchens |first=Christopher |date=November 15, 2006 |accessdate=June 20, 2012}} 7. ^{{cite news | newspaper=The New York Times| page = 4| title=A Cry of Fire in a Crowded Theater.| date=September 25, 1884| url=https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1884/09/25/109777936.pdf| format=PDF }} }} Further reading
6 : Illegal speech in the United States|American legal terminology|First Amendment to the United States Constitution|1919 works|American English idioms|Analogy |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。