“Marital power”的意思、由来-开放百科全书

In civil law jurisdictions, marital power ({{lang-la|potestas maritalis}}, {{lang-nl|maritale macht}}, {{lang-af|maritale mag}}) was a doctrine in terms of which a wife was legally an incapax under the usufructory tutorship (tutela usufructuaria) of her husband. The marital power included the power of the husband to administer both his wife's separate property and their community property. A wife was not able to leave a will, enter into a contract, or sue or be sued, in her own name or without the permission of her husband.^[1] It is very similar to the doctrine of coverture in the English common law, as well as to the Head and Master law property laws.

Historical origins

The marital power derives from the Germanic, and not the Roman, sources of the Roman-Dutch law. While in the earlier Roman law, a wife came under the manus (guardianship) of her husband, this was abandoned in the later Roman law and wives had legal independence.^[2] However, under the Germanic law as described by Johann Gottlieb Heineccius:

From the Germanic tribes it became part of the law of the Netherlands. When Dutch colonists settled at the Cape in the 17th century, they brought along the Roman-Dutch law, which managed to survive the British conquest in 1805. The spread of the Roman-Dutch law introduced the marital power doctrine so that it eventually formed part of the law of marriage in South Africa, Lesotho, Swaziland, Namibia, Botswana and Southern Rhodesia (as Zimbabwe was then known).

20th and 21st century restriction and abolition

Of the Southern African countries that apply Roman-Dutch law, every one except Swaziland has abolished the marital power.^[3]

In Southern Rhodesia the marital power was abolished in 1928 by the Married Persons' Property Act, which also abolished community of property.^[1]

In France, marital power (puissance maritale) was abolished in 1938. However, the legal repeal of the specific doctrine of marital power does not necessarily grant married women the same legal rights as their husbands (or as unmarried women) as has notably been the case in France, where the legal subordination of the wife (primarily coming from the Napoleonic Code) was gradually abolished with women obtaining full equality in marriage only in the 1980s.^[4]

In South Africa, the report of the Women's Legal Disabilities Commission in 1949 led to the enacting of the Matrimonial Affairs Act in 1953, which restricted but did not abolish the marital power.^[5] The Matrimonial Property Act of 1984 abolished it prospectively (i.e. for marriages contracted after the act came into force) but not for marriages between black people. An amendment in 1988 abolished it prospectively for marriages of black people under the civil law, but not for marriages contracted under customary law. A further amendment in 1993 repealed the marital power for all civil marriages, whenever they were contracted.^[5] The marital power persisted, however, in the Transkei (which was nominally independent from 1976 to 1994) but it was held to be unconstitutional for civil marriages by the Transkei High Court in 1999.^[5] In 2000 the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act abolished the marital power for all marriages under customary law throughout South Africa.

In Namibia the marital power was abolished in 1996 by the Married Persons Equality Act; in Botswana it was abolished in 2004 by the Abolition of Marital Power Act; and in Lesotho it was abolished in 2006 by the Married Persons Equality Act.

In Swaziland, the marital power has recently been restricted, but not abolished (Sihlongonyane v Sihlongonyane (470/2013) [2013] SZHC 144 (18 July 2013) ^[6]).

See also

References

1. ^¹{{cite book |first=Robert Warden |last=Lee |title=An introduction to Roman-Dutch law |edition=4th |location=Oxford |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1946 |pages=64–68 |url=https://archive.org/stream/introductiontoro00leeruoft#page/64/mode/2up |accessdate=25 January 2012}}
2. ^¹{{cite book |first=J. W. |last=Wessels |title=History of the Roman-Dutch law |location=Grahamstown |publisher=African Book Company |year=1908 |pages=450–453 |url=https://archive.org/stream/historyromandut00unkngoog#page/n472/mode/2up |accessdate=25 January 2012}}
3. ^{{cite book |first1=Mary |last1=Hallward-Driemeier |first2=Tazeen |last2=Hasan |title=Empowering Women: Legal Rights and Economic Opportunities in Africa |publisher=World Bank |location=Washington, D.C. |year=2012 |isbn=978-0-8213-9533-2 |page=61 |url=http://issuu.com/world.bank.publications/docs/9780821395332 |accessdate=25 January 2012}}
4. ^Although marital power was abolished in France in 1938, married women in France obtained the right to work without their husbands' permission only in 1965, {{cite web|url=http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/explore/cmcf-vsi-women-in-france.pdf |title=Archived copy |accessdate=2016-04-03 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304092212/http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/explore/cmcf-vsi-women-in-france.pdf |archivedate=2016-03-04 |df= }} and the paternal authority of a man over his family was ended in 1970 (before that parental responsibilities belonged solely to the father who made all legal decisions concerning the children). Furthermore, it was only in 1985 that a legal reform abolished the stipulation that the husband had the sole power to administer the children's property.
5. ^¹²{{cite book |title=Boberg's law of persons and the family |publisher=Juta Law |location=Cape Town |edition=2nd |year=1999 |isbn=9780702151163 |pages=161–164}}
6. ^http://www.swazilii.org/sz/judgment/high-court/2013/144-0