| 词条 | Members of the Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Community v Victoria |
| 释义 |
| name = Member the Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Community v Victoria | italic title = no | court = High Court of Australia | image = Coat of Arms of Australia.svg | date decided = 12 December 2002 | full name = | citations = {{Cite AustLII|HCA|58|2002|litigants= |parallelcite=(2002) 214 CLR 422}} | transcripts =14 Dec {{cite AustLII|HCATrans|657|2001}} Special Leave 23 May {{cite AustLII|HCATrans|251|2002}} 24 May {{Cite AustLII|HCATrans|252|2002}} | judges=Gleeson CJ, Gaudron, McHugh, Gummow, Kirby, Hayne and Callinan JJ | prior actions ={{Cite AustLII|FCA|1606|1998|courtname=Federal Court}} {{Cite AustLII|FCA|45|2001|courtname=Federal Court (Full Court)}} | subsequent actions = | opinions=(5:2) the finding that claimants had ceased to occupy lands in accordance with traditional laws and customs meant that their claim failed per Gleeson CJ, McHugh, Gummow, Hayne & Callinan JJ. Gaudron & Kirby JJ dissenting }} Yorta Yorta v Victoria was a native title claim by the Yorta Yorta indigenous people of north central Victoria, Australia which was dismissed by Justice Olney of the Federal Court of Australia in 1998. Appeals to the Full Bench of the Federal Court of Australia in 2001 and the High Court of Australia in 2002 were also dismissed. The determination by Justice Olney in 1998 ruled that the ‘tide of history’ had ‘washed away’ any real acknowledgement of traditional laws and any real observance of traditional customs by the applicants.[1] An appeal was made to the full bench of the Federal Court on the grounds that "the trial judge erroneously adopted a ‘frozen in time’ approach" and "failed to give sufficient recognition to the capacity of traditional laws and customs to adapt to changed circumstances". The Appeal was dismissed in a majority 2 to 1 decision.[2] The case was taken on appeal to the High Court of Australia but also dismissed in a 5 to 2 majority ruling in December 2002.[3][4] In consequence of the failed native title claim, in May 2004 the Victorian Government led by Premier Steve Bracks signed an historic co-operative management agreement with the Yorta Yorta people covering public land, rivers and lakes in north-central Victoria. The agreement gives the Yorta Yorta people a say in the management of traditional country including the Barmah State Park, Barmah State Forest, Kow Swamp and public land along the Murray and Goulburn rivers. Ultimate decision making responsibility was retained by the Environment Minister[5] References1. ^{{Cite AustLII|FCA|1606|1998|litigants=Members of the Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Community v Victoria |date=18 December 1998 |courtname=Federal Court}}. {{Victorian Aborigines}}{{Indigenous Australians}}2. ^{{Cite AustLII|FCA|45|2001|litigants=Members of the Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Community v State of Victoria |date=8 February 2001 |courtname=Federal Court (Full Court)}}. 3. ^{{Cite AustLII|HCA|58|2002|litigants=Members of the Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Community v Victoria |parallelcite=(2002) 214 CLR 422}} {{cite web|url=http://www.hcourt.gov.au/assets/publications/judgment-summaries/2002/hca58-2002-12-12.pdf |title=Judgment Summary |publisher=High Court |date=12 December 2002}} 4. ^The World Today, Reporter: Louise Yaxley, Yorta Yorta lose native title case, Australian Broadcasting Corporation, 12 December 2002. Accessed 11 September 2011 5. ^Fergus Shiel, Yorta Yorta win historic deal, The Age, 1 May 2004. Accessed 11 September 2011 9 : Native title case law in Australia|High Court of Australia cases|1998 in case law|1998 in the environment|2001 in case law|2002 in case law|History of Victoria (Australia)|1998 in Australian law|2002 in Australian law |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。