| 词条 | News Media Ownership v Findlay |
| 释义 |
}}{{Infobox court case | name = News Media Ownership v Findlay | court = Court of Appeal of New Zealand | date_filed = | image = Coat of arms of New Zealand.svg | date decided = 4 June 1970 | full name = News Media Ownership v Findlay | citations = [1970] NZLR 1089 | judges = North P, Turner J, Haslam J | prior actions = | subsequent actions = | opinions = | transcripts = | Keywords = negligence }}News Media Ownership v Findlay [1970] NZLR 1089 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding the defence of fair comment / honest opinion to a claim involving defamation.[1] BackgroundNews Media's newspaper Truth ran a campaign to bring back caning. In the process, they made allegations against opposition MP Findlay that his views to the contrary were based on the fact that as he was a lawyer, he was more interested in the extra legal fees an anti-caning policy would bring him, rather than any perceived interest in victims of domestic violence. Findlay, later sued for defamation, and was later awarded $15,000. NMO appealed. HeldThe Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal. References1. ^{{cite book |title=Butterworths Student Companion Torts |edition=4th |last1=McLay |first1=Geoff |publisher=LexisNexis |ISBN=0-408-71686-X|year=2003 |page=}} {{NewZealand-case-law-stub}} 4 : Court of Appeal of New Zealand cases|New Zealand tort case law|1970 in New Zealand law|1970 in case law |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。