词条 | Organizational expedience |
释义 |
There are several key aspects underlying the concept of organizational expedience. Firstly, organizational expedience describes a worker’s actions but not their intentions. For example, if a shop assistant is considering giving a loyal customer a deeper discount than is permitted but decides not to do so after seeing her supervisor, then this shop assistant didn’t engage in expedience. Secondly, such definition requires workers to knowingly engage in expedience. If the rules are not known or well understood, or are accidentally broken, this behavior doesn’t qualify as expedience. For example, if a long haul driver drove over the time limit because he doesn’t know about the time limit rule, misunderstood the time limit rule, or forgot to look at the watch and accidentally broke the time limit rule, such behavior does not qualify as expedience. Work characteristics that may lead to organizational expedienceMcLean Parks, Ma, and Gallagher (2010) proposed three role stressors as the theoretical antecedents of organizational expedience:
Mechanisms through which different role stressors lead to organizational expedience
Work context factors that may affect the strength of the linkage between role stressors and organizational expedience
Theoretical outcomes of expedience
Psychological factors of workers that may affect the strength of the linkage between organizational expedience and outcomes
Related constructs
References1. ^1 McLean Parks, J., Ma, L., & Gallagher, D. G. 2010. Elasticity in the “rules” of the game: Exploring organizational expedience. Human Relations, 63(5): 701–730. 2. ^1 2 3 Örtqvist D., Wincent J. (2006). Prominent consequences of role stress: A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Stress Management 13(4): 399–422. 3. ^Leiter MP, Maslach C (1988) The impact of interpersonal environment on burnout and organizational commitment. Journal of Organizational Behavior 9(4): 297–308. 4. ^Simons T. (2002) Behavioral integrity: The perceived alignment between managers’ words and deeds as a research focus. Organization Science 13(1): 18–35. 5. ^Zhou J., George J.M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expres¬sion of voice. Academy of Management Journal 44(4): 682–696. 6. ^Rusbult C.E., Farrell D., Rogers G., and Mainous A.G., III. (1988) Impact of exchange variables on exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: An integrative model of responses to declining job satisfac¬tion. Academy of Management Journal 31(3): 599–627. 7. ^Pierce J.L., Kostova T., and Dirks K.T. (2001). Toward a theory of psychological ownership in orga-nizations. Academy of Management Review 26(2): 298–310. 8. ^Skarlicki D.P., Folger R. (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology 82(3): 434–443. 9. ^Kidwell R.E., Jr, Bennett N. (1993). Employee propensity to withhold effort: A conceptual model to intersect three avenues of research. Academy of Management Review 18(3): 429–456. 2 : Organizational behavior|Industrial and organizational psychology |
随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。