请输入您要查询的百科知识:

 

词条 Osmose New Zealand Ltd v Wakeling
释义

  1. Background

  2. Held

  3. References

{{Orphan|date=September 2015}}{{Infobox court case
| name = Osmose New Zealand Ltd v Wakeling
| court = High Court of New Zealand
| date_filed =
| image = Coat of arms of New Zealand.svg
| date decided = 19 December 2006
| full name = Osmose New Zealand Ltd v R N WAKELING First Defendant AND N R SMITH Second Defendant AND TELEVISION NEW ZEALAND First Named Third Party AND RADIO NEW ZEALAND Second Named Third Party AND APN NEW ZEALAND LTD Third Named Third Party AND FAIRFAX NEW ZEALAND LTD Fourth Named Third Party
| citations = [2007] 1 NZLR 841
| judges = Harrison J
| prior actions =
| subsequent actions =
| opinions =
| transcripts = [https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/pdf/jdo/46/alfresco/service/api/node/content/workspace/SpacesStore/40e41ead-3880-4e3a-a19b-890043580f15/40e41ead-3880-4e3a-a19b-890043580f15.pdf forms.justice.govt.nz]
| Keywords = negligence
}}Osmose New Zealand Ltd v Wakeling [2007] 1 NZLR 841 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding claims in defamation and the defence of free speech.[1]

Background

Osmose New Zealand Limited manufactured and sold a timber treatment product that Dr Wakeling and Dr Smith in their opinions as scientists, claimed did not work as it should have, contributing to the "leaky homes crisis". Wakeling's statements on the matter were repeated on Radio New Zealand and in The New Zealand Herald.

Osmose subsequently sued Wakeling for defamation for $14,737,778, and Wakelin sought to have RNZ and the Herald joined as co-defendants on the defamation claim, and they claim that re-publication of Wakelings original statements was protected by privilege, as well as under "Lange".

Held

The High Court ruled that in the absence of any malice, the mere republication of statements was privileged, and so was not defamation.

References

1. ^{{cite book |title=Butterworths Student Companion Torts |edition=6th |last1=McLay |first1=Geoff |publisher=LexisNexis |ISBN=9781877511400|year=2010 |page=}}

4 : High Court of New Zealand cases|New Zealand tort case law|2007 in case law|2007 in New Zealand law

随便看

 

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

 

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间:2024/9/22 20:24:00