| 词条 | Paradigm case argument |
| 释义 |
In analytic philosophy, the paradigm case argument is an argument which is applied as a rebuttal to the claim that certain concepts, such as free will or knowledge are meaningless. The paradigm case argument is that if a term, such as "knowledge", is regularly applied to some cases and not to others, then that term (and the concept it refers to) cannot truly be undefined, as it clearly has some kind of definition in practice.[1] The argument is so named because it often takes the form of pointing out a paradigm case—a case which unambiguously falls under the common definition of the term, and so can be taken as a definite instance of the supposedly non-existent concept.[2] This argument was commonly applied during the flourishing of linguistic philosophy.[1] References1. ^1 {{cite encyclopedia |last=Lacey |first=Alan |editor-first=Ted |editor-last=Honderich |encyclopedia=The Oxford Companion to Philosophy |title=paradigm case argument |year=1995 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=9780198661320 |pages=642}} {{Metaphysics-stub}}{{semantics-stub}}2. ^{{cite encyclopedia |last=Donnellan |first=Keith |editor-first=Donald |editor-last=Borchert |encyclopedia=Encyclopedia of Philosophy |title=Paradigm-Case Argument |url=http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G2-3446801492.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150328211901/http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G2-3446801492.html |dead-url=yes |archive-date=28 March 2015 |accessdate=10 November 2014 |year=2006 |publisher=Thomson Gale |pages= }} 5 : Analytic philosophy|Philosophical arguments|Semantics|Metaphysics|Philosophy of language |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。