词条 | Proportional approval voting | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
释义 |
DescriptionPAV works by looking at how "satisfied" each voter is with each potential result or outcome of the election. The calculated satisfaction with any particular result for an individual voter is a function of how many of the elected candidates the individual originally voted for.[1] Under PAV, to calculate the satisfaction of an individual, only the elected candidates that the individual voted for are counted - the unsuccessful candidates that they voted for, as well as the elected candidates that they did not vote for are not taken into account. Assuming that an individual voted for n candidates that were successful, their satisfaction would be calculated using the formula[2] Summing the satisfaction across all voters with any potential result gives the population's total satisfaction with that result. The total satisfaction is calculated for every possible set of candidates, and the set of candidates with the highest total satisfaction is deemed to be the winning set. In an election with only one winner, PAV operates in exactly the same way as normal approval voting. If on the other hand, each voter voted exclusively for all of the candidates within a single party, PAV would function in the same way as the D'Hondt method of party-list proportional representation. Counting the votes in PAV is NP-hard, making it a very computationally demanding voting method as the number of candidates and seats increase.[3] If there were c candidates and s seats, then there would be combinations of candidates to compare with each election,[4] for example if there were 24 candidates for 4 seats, there would be 10,626 combinations to calculate total satisfaction for. An election requiring this many calculations would necessitate vote counting by computer. Example2 seats to be filled, four candidates: Andrea (A), Brad (B), Carter (C), and Delilah (D), and 30 voters. The ballots are:
There are 6 possible results: AB, AC, AD, BC, BD, and CD.
Andrea and Carter are elected. See also
Advantages and disadvantagesMost systems of proportional representation use party lists. The system was designed to have both proportional representation and personal votes (voters vote for candidates, not for a party list). It deserves to be call a "proportional" system because if votes turn out to follow a partisan scheme (each voter votes for all candidates from a party and no other) then the system elects a number of candidates in each party that is proportional to the number of voters who chose this party[5] References1. ^{{cite arxiv|eprint=1407.8269|last1=Aziz|first1=Haris|title=Justified Representation in Approval-Based Committee Voting|last2=Brill|first2=Markus|last3=Conitzer|first3=Vincent|last4=Elkind|first4=Edith|last5=Freeman|first5=Rupert|last6=Walsh|first6=Toby|class=cs.MA|year=2014}} {{voting systems}}2. ^1 {{cite book |last=Kilgour |first=D. Marc |editor=Jean-François Laslier; M. Remzi Sanver |title=Handbook on Approval Voting |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mQBEAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA114 |date=2010 |publisher=Springer |isbn=978-3-642-02839-7 |pages=105–124 |chapter=Approval Balloting for Multi-winner Elections}} 3. ^{{cite book |last1=Aziz |first1=Haris |author2=Serge Gaspers, Joachim Gudmundsson, Simon Mackenzie, Nicholas Mattei, Toby Walsh |title=Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems |chapter=Computational Aspects of Multi-Winner Approval Voting |arxiv=1407.3247 |pages=107–115 |isbn=978-1-4503-3413-6}} 4. ^Enric Plaza: "Technologies for political representation and accountability": p9 5. ^{{cite arxiv|eprint=1611.08691|last1=Brill|first1=Markus|title=Multiwinner Approval Rules as Apportionment Methods|last2=Laslier|first2=Jean-François|last3=Skowron|first3=Piotr|class=cs.GT|year=2016}} 3 : Electoral systems|Semi-proportional electoral systems|Cardinal electoral systems |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。