词条 | Pukkuksong-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
释义 |
|is_missile=yes |name=Pukkŭksŏng-1 |origin= North Korea |image= |caption= |type=Submarine Launched Ballistic Missile |variants=Land-based mobile intermediate-range ballistic missile (Pukkŭksŏng-2)[1] |used_by= North Korea |manufacturer= North Korea |unit_cost= |propellant=Unknown |production_date= 2015 (First known test year) |service= 2016 / 2017 (South Korea estimates) 2018 (US estimates) |engine=Solid fuel rocket[2] |engine_power= |weight= |length= |height= |diameter= |wingspan= |speed= |vehicle_range=
|ceiling= |altitude= |filling=nuclear |filling_weight= |guidance= |detonation= |launch_platform=Sinpo-class submarine }}{{ Infobox Korean name |context=north |title=Korean name |color=green |fontcolor=white |tablewidth=280 |hangul={{linktext|북극성|1|호|}} |hanja={{linktext|北極星|1|号|}} |rr=Bukgeukseong-1 |mr=Pukkŭksŏng-1 }} The Pukkŭksŏng-1 or Bukgeukseong-1 (Hangul: 북극성1호, Hanja: 北極星1号, literally Polaris-1), alternatively KN-11 in intelligence communities outside North Korea is a North Korean, submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM) that was successfully flight tested on 24 August 2016 and is expected by South Korean military sources to reach operational deployment as early as 2017.[6] Pukkŭksŏng-1 is officially recognized by North Korea, South Korea and the United States as a missile that went through a complete, successful test on 24 August 2016.[7] North Korea has never announced the actual operational range and payload as this technical information is probably considered classified. Most countries do this, e.g. the United States considers the exact operational range of its current SLBM, UGM-133 Trident II, as classified information as well.[8] List of tests
Strategic implicationsThe Pukkuksong-1 is the first sign of a North Korean sea-based nuclear deterrent, which complicates the U.S. and South Korean ability to preemptively destroy the country's nuclear capabilities by threatening a second strike. While there is a chance to take out land-based nuclear sites, ballistic missile submarines ensure that a retaliatory strike could still be launched before it can be found and neutralized. North Korea's unique circumstances limit the ways such a capability could be employed. The Korean People's Navy has no nuclear submarines, and no diesel-electric submarines equipped with air independent propulsion (AIP), so the launch submarine's range (and by extension the missile's) is limited and assuredly prevents it from threatening America's western seaboard. Given their submarines' insufficient power to outrun U.S. Navy nuclear attack submarines and lack of aerial and surface coverage to protect them out to long distances, they cannot venture far out to sea, although a scenario where a missile-equipped sub travels into the Sea of Japan (East Sea of Korea) on a "suicide mission" to fire the Pukkuksong-1 before it expects to inevitably get destroyed is not implausible given the loyalty of the elite crewmen of the submarine force. A more likely scenario would be deployment along the Korean coastline within North Korean local air and surface cover and silent movement into or out of various hiding spots like bays, inlets, and outer isles before achievement of a pre-designated position, with quiet submerged operation on battery power; because of its finite power capacity, the sub would have to surface or snorkel for air to recharge its batteries if it remains hiding for an extended period, making it vulnerable to anti-submarine warfare (ASW) efforts.[20] A land based, mobile derivative of the Pukkuksong-1 would significantly complicate U.S, Japan and South Korean defenses. Unlike the liquid fueled Rodong or SCUD derivatives, the solid fueled Pukkuksong-1 can be fired at a much shorter notification time.[42] The North Korean have since achieved this Pukkuksong-2 land-based, mobile derivative of the Pukkuksong-1 milestone in their 12th test of the missile on 12 February 2017.[1] First completely successful testOn 24 August 2016 at around 5:30am (Pyongyang Standard Time), North Korea successfully tested the Pukkuksong-1 as the missile flew 500 km into Japan's ADIZ without issue.[39] Unlike the recent successful Musudan flight,[43] KCNA did not officially announce the test until a day later, calling it a great success on the part of Kim Jong Un. The entire development has since been published worldwide.[44][45][46][47][48] In light of recent development of the Pukkuksong-1, South Korean military sources concluded that the first successful Pukkuksong-1 test was in fact launched in lofted trajectory. This is without confirmation of the actual apogee, and therefore the range could have been at least 1,000 km or more had the missile launched in normal trajectory and could be operationally deployed as early as 2017.[6] Hawkish forces in South Korea have renewed calls for South Korea to construct nuclear submarines to counter North Korea's 'provocation'.[49] However, the US-Korea Institute at Johns Hopkins University rejected South Korean claims that the Pukkuksong-1 could be operationally deployed before 2017, suggesting its initial operational capability will not be achieved before June 2018.[50] Specifically, North Korea still faces significant technological challenges, including building a new class of submarine to carry 3 such missiles at once.[50] On 30 August 2016, David Wright, a missile expert and co-director of the Union of Concerned Scientists' Global Security Program, suggested that the apogee achieved by this test was 550 km and the range would have been 1,250 km, assuming the same payload on standard trajectory.[3] On the same day, the South Korean media reported that Jeffrey Lewis, director of the East Asia Nonproliferation Program at the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies (CNS), since recommends that South Korea deploy 2 batteries of THAAD instead of 1 in order to counter the possibility of North Korea's firing a Pukkuksong-1 outside its 120-degree field of vision.[51][52] However, Lewis also stressed that it does little to address the possibility of lofted attack, because the missile's reentry in lofted trajectory will be at very high speeds and at a very steep angle, the ability of THAAD interception depending on the missile range. He also noted that THAAD was never field tested against an intermediate-range target or on an unusual angle of attack.[51][52] With this in mind, he ended by suggesting it is time to use diplomatic measures for dissuading North Korea from enhancing such capabilities and defense measures. This is a very ineffective strategy, since North Korea has the ability to use numerous counter-measures for every measures the US and South Korea have.[51][52] Suspected Chinese involvement in the proliferation of SLBM technologies of North KoreaOn 3 September 2016, US expert Bruce Bechtol, a North Korea expert at Angelo State University, and another South Korean national security researcher, Shin Jong-woo, claimed that China must have provided North Korea with the relevant SLBM technologies, since it took a mere 4 months from the first successful Cold launch Test (23 April 2016) to the first complete test (24 August 2016) and further claimed that the Pukkuksong-1 is a carbon-copy of first China's first SLBM, JL-1.[53] In comparison, China took 15 years to develop JL-1.[53] Bruce Bechtol also stated his analysis is supported by space program expert Tal Inbar of Israel's Fisher Institute.[53] However, Dave Schmerler of the James Martin Center of Non Proliferation Studies noted that the North Korean missile used a single engine design (the JL-1 used 4 engines) and grid fins for flight stability, features not found on the Chinese JL-1, and urged caution in jumping to conclusions. He added that the single-engine design had more in common with the Iranian Sejjil MRBM than the JL-1.[54] Response from China to alleged proliferation activitiesOn 5 September 2016, the Chinese media refuted the report by citing that the People's Republic of China as a Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty signatory state and stating that one of the permanent members of United Nations Security Council would never proliferate by providing or selling nuclear and missile-related technologies to North Korea (The actual excerpts are as follows: 作为联合国安理会常任理事国、《核不扩散条约》缔约国,中国绝对不会向朝鲜提供或者出售与核武器和弹道导弹相关的装备和技术。.[55] This report also states that some US experts and think-tanks have all along been irresponsible in making defamatory statements about China, as they unreasonably link North Korea's nuclear capability to China and have sought to use media influence to pressure China. This report does not contain actual evidence of supposed proliferation on China's part. (The actual excerpts read as follows: 一些美国媒体和智库一向很擅长将朝鲜的涉核问题与中国进行无端挂钩,就是希望通过这种方式向中国施压,而这些说法通常没有任何证据,是很不负责任的。)[55] See also
References1. ^1 2 3 4 {{cite web|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-northkorea-missiles-nk-idUSKBN15R10O|title=New nuclear-capable missile test a success, North Korea says|date=14 February 2017|publisher=|via=Reuters}} 2. ^(LEAD) N. Korea claims successful launch of SLBM - Yonhap, 24 April 2016 3. ^1 Range of the North Korean KN-11 Sub-Launched Missile - Union of Concerned Scientists 4. ^{{cite web|url=http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2017-02/13/c_136052998.htm|title=S. Korea confirms DPRK's development of new missile - Xinhua - English.news.cn|website=news.xinhuanet.com}} 5. ^(News Focus) S. Korea building up anti-submarine defense amid North's SLBM advances - Yonhap, 26 April 2016 6. ^1 2 (2nd LD) N.K. leader calls SLBM launch success, boasts of nuke attack capacity - Yonhap, 25 August 2016 08:17am 7. ^{{cite web|url=https://missilethreat.csis.org/missile/kn-11/|title=KN-11 (Pukkuksong-1) - Missile Threat|publisher=}} 8. ^[https://fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/slbm/950811-cr.htm DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 1996 (Senate - August 11, 1995)] - FAS, AMENDMENT NO. 2398 9. ^1 North Korea Conducts Ejection Test of Sub-Launched Missile - The Washington Free Beacon, November 21, 2014 5:00 am 10. ^North Korea Test-Fired Another Submarine-Launched Ballistic Missile In December: Report - International Business Times 11. ^[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UPzTP3wiIyM North Korean Submarine Launches Missile Test] - YouTube 12. ^DPRK SLBM TEST - Jeffrey Lewis 13. ^N.K. continues saber-rattling over holiday - The Korea Herald, 2015-02-22 14. ^Bill Gertz "North Korea Conducts Ejection Test of New Submarine Missile" Washington Free Beacon. 5 May 2015. 15. ^{{cite news |url=http://38north.org/2015/05/jbermudez051315/ |title=Underwater Test-fire of Korean-style Powerful Strategic Submarine Ballistic Missile |author=Joseph S. Bermudez |publisher=U.S.-Korea Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies |work=38 North |date=13 May 2015 |accessdate=19 May 2015}} 16. ^{{cite news |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/pyongyang-says-it-has-technology-to-make-small-submarined-mounted-nuclear-warheads/2015/05/20/0e96d0bc-fec0-11e4-833c-a2de05b6b2a4_story.html |title=North Korea says it has technology to make mini-nuclear weapons |author=Anna Fifield |newspaper=Washington Post |date=20 May 2015 |accessdate=21 May 2015}} 17. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MEsSf9TNqk0|title=VIDEO of Kim Jong Un watching submarine missile launch! [North Korea]|first=|last=stimmekoreas|date=4 June 2015|publisher=|via=YouTube}} 18. ^1 {{cite news |url=http://thediplomat.com/2015/05/a-first-north-korea-tests-polaris-1-slbm/ |title=A First: North Korea Tests 'Polaris-1' SLBM |author=Ankit Panda |work=The Diplomat |date=10 May 2015 |accessdate=19 May 2015}} 19. ^{{cite web|url=http://rt.com/news/257153-north-korea-missile-test/|title=N. Korea says it tested submarine-launched ballistic missile|publisher=}} 20. ^1 Koh Swee Lean Collin, "How to Demolish the North Korean Submarine Missile Threat", The National Interest, 18 May 2015. 21. ^1 Ankit Panda, "North Korea's Submarine-Launched Ballistic Missile Test Fails" The Diplomat, 30 November 2015. 22. ^North Korea's Submarine-Launched Ballistic Missile Test Fails - The Diplomat 23. ^Institute: N. Korea continues to develop sub missile despite setback - KoreatimesUS.com, 5 January 2016 24. ^{{cite news |url=http://freebeacon.com/national-security/north-korea-conducts-successful-submarine-missile-test/ |title=North Korea Conducts Successful Submarine Missile Test |author=Bill Gertz |work=Free Beacon |date=5 Jan 2016 |accessdate=10 Jan 2016}} 25. ^{{cite news |url=http://www.armscontrolwonk.com/archive/1200759/video-analysis-of-dprk-slbm-footage/ |title=Video Analysis of North Korean SLBM Footage |author=Catherine Dill |work=Armscontrolwonk |date=12 Jan 2016 |accessdate=13 Jan 2016}} 26. ^How Far Along Are North Korea's Submarine-Launched Ballistic Missiles? - Thediplomat.com, 11 January 2016 27. ^North Korea Tests a Submerged-Launch Ballistic Missile, Take 3 - Thediplomat.com, 14 January 2016 28. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AjhkJ58_f2c|title=북한 동해서 SLBM 1발 발사..."30km 비행" / YTN|first=|last=YTN NEWS|date=23 April 2016|publisher=|via=YouTube}} 29. ^{{cite web|url=http://news.goo.ne.jp/topstories/world/171/3e2b2c9e13e93643796999bcb5acf0e4.html?isp=00002|title=- goo ニュース|publisher=}} 30. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-36119159|title=North Korea 'fires submarine-launched ballistic missile'|date=23 April 2016|publisher=|via=www.bbc.com}} 31. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2016/04/19/North-Korea-SLBM-launch-successful-South-Korean-source-says/4021461118442/|title=North Korea SLBM launch successful, South Korean source says|publisher=}} 32. ^{{cite web|url=http://english.yonhapnews.co.kr/northkorea/2016/04/24/0401000000AEN20160424000451315.html|title=(LEAD) N. Korea claims successful launch of SLBM|publisher=}} 33. ^1 2 {{cite web|url=http://english.yonhapnews.co.kr/northkorea/2016/04/25/88/0401000000AEN20160425007651315F.html|title=(LEAD) N. Korea aims to build new 3,000-ton sub armed with 3 SLBMs: experts|publisher=}} 34. ^1 2 (3rd LD) N. Korea's latest submarine-launched ballistic missile test unsuccessful: S. Korea - Yonhap, 9 July 2016 14:27 (GMT+9) 35. ^[https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2016/07/09/north-korea-fires-submarine-launched-missile-south-korea/86891530/ North Korea fires submarine-launched missile] - USA Today, 9 July 2016 4:58am EDT 36. ^U.S. sanctions North Korean leader for first time over human rights abuses - CNN, 8 July 2016 37. ^[https://www.reuters.com/article/us-southkorea-usa-thaad-idUSKCN0ZO084 South Korea, U.S. to deploy THAAD missile defense, drawing China rebuke] - Reuters, 8 July 2016 23:41 EDT 38. ^{{cite web|url=http://english.yonhapnews.co.kr/news/2016/08/24/0200000000AEN20160824000351315.html|title=(LEAD) N. Korea test-fires SLBM in waters off east coast: JCS|publisher=}} 39. ^1 2 3 4 5 [https://www.reuters.com/article/us-northkorea-missiles-idUSKCN10Y2B0 North Korea fires submarine-launched ballistic missile toward Japan] - Reuters, Aug 23, 2016 9:02pm EDT 40. ^1 {{cite web|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/north-korea-fires-ballistic-missile-first-since-trump-elected-in-us/2017/02/11/42d6cb57-d187-4b2a-bafb-6834c97799b0_story.html|title=North Korea fires ballistic missile, first since Trump elected in U.S.|publisher=}} 41. ^Kim Jong Un hints at North Korea test of intercontinental ballistic missile, CBS News - January 1, 2017, 8:06 AM 42. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.armscontrolwonk.com/archive/1201857/kn-11-and-thaad/|title=KN-11 and THAAD|publisher=}} 43. ^[https://kcnawatch.co/newstream/1472077250-45659128/kim-jong-un-guides-strategic-submarine-underwater-ballistic-missile-test-fire/ Kim Jong Un Guides Strategic Submarine Underwater Ballistic Missile Test-fire] - KCNAWatch, A user friendly interface for viewing NK media 44. ^North Korea’s latest ballistic missile launch reveals its alarming progress - Business Insider Singapore, 24 Aug 2016 8:50pm 45. ^Kim Jong Un declara lançamento de míssil de submarino 'o maior sucesso' - Globo, 24 Aug 2016 8:35pm 46. ^Corée du Nord: le tir de missile a été un immense succès, affirme Kim Jong-Un - Romandie, 25 Aug 2016 1:07am 47. ^Triều Tiên phóng tên lửa đạn đạo từ tàu ngầm về hướng Nhật - PLO, 24 Aug 2016 7:44pm 48. ^North Korea's leader Kim Jong Un says latest missile test was 'greatest success': KCNA - Straits Times, 25 Aug 2016 08:15am 49. ^Saenuri hawks renew call for nuclear submarine after NK SLBM launch - The Korea Herald, 29 Aug 2016 50. ^1 North Korea submarine missiles not ready until 2018: Experts - The Straits Times, 27 Aug 2016 5:09PM Singapore Standard Time 51. ^1 2 Two THAAD batteries necessary for S. Korea to better defend against N.K. SLBMs: U.S. expert - Yonhap, 30 Aug 2016 02:01 52. ^1 2 US expert says THAAD can’t intercept North Korea’s SLBM - The Hankyoreh, 31 Aug 2016 16:08 Korean Standard Time 53. ^1 2 Experts Suspect Chinese Assistance in N. Korean Submarine Missile Development - KBS World Radio, 3 Sep 2016 14:51:54 54. ^https://www.nknews.org/pro/what-did-we-learn-from-north-koreas-latest-kn-11-test/ 55. ^1 韩媒妄称朝潜射导弹与巨浪1完全一样 我军专家驳斥 (South Korean media thinking that the North Korean SLBM is the exact carbon copy of Julang-1 China military experts refute) - In Chinese language only - 5 September 2016, 09:01 GMT+8 External links
3 : Submarine-launched ballistic missiles|Ballistic missiles of North Korea|Submarine-launched ballistic missiles of North Korea |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。