| 词条 | Reproductive coercion |
| 释义 |
The most common forms of reproductive coercion are pregnancy pressure, pregnancy coercion, and birth control sabotage; they can exist independently or occur simultaneously. Not complying with the partner's wishes may result in the partner acting out violently.[1] Pregnancy pressurePregnancy pressure is enacted by a woman's sexual partner when he pressures her into having unprotected sex in order to become pregnant, or into continuing or terminating the pregnancy.[1] It might involve pregnancy coercion, which are threats or acts of violence if the woman does not comply with the perpetrator's demands or wishes.[3][3] [4] Reproductive pressure behaviors may result in several unintended pregnancies that are then followed by multiple coerced abortions. Women who seek abortions are nearly three times as likely to have experienced reproductive pressure by a partner in the past year, compared to women continuing their pregnancies.[3] A Guttmacher Institute policy analysis states that forcing a woman to terminate a pregnancy she wants or to continue a pregnancy she does not want violates the basic human right of her reproductive health.[5] Pregnancy pressure may also be exerted by a woman with a strong desire to have children, either to raise them or to influence a man to maintain a relationship with her or agree to marriage. She may try to pressure a man to get her pregnant, even when he is reluctant to become a father and incur the responsibilities of fatherhood. Birth control sabotageReproductive coercion can take the form of birth control sabotage, either as verbal sabotage, behavioral sabotage, and/or acts as an active interference with contraceptive methods. Direct actions are taken to ensure the failure of birth control (such as poking holes in or breaking condoms) or complete removal of contraception (such as flushing birth control pills down the toilet or removing contraceptive rings or patches from the body). Partners can also forbid women from using family planning or force them to have sex without protection.[1][3] Birth control sabotage is frequently associated with physical or sexual violence, and is a contributor to high pregnancy rates—especially teenage pregnancy rates—among abused, disadvantaged women and teenagers.[3] Studies on the birth control sabotage performed by males against female partners have indicated a strong correlation between domestic violence and birth control sabotage. These studies have identified two main classes of the phenomenon:[15]
14% of surveyed young mothers reported undergoing birth control sabotage.[6] A separate study found that 66% of teen mothers on public assistance who had recently experienced intimate partner violence disclosed birth control sabotage by a dating partner. When women did try to negotiate condom use with their abusive partners, 32% said they were verbally threatened, 21% reported physical abuse, and 14% said their partners threatened abandonment.[3] Gender and sexual power dynamics and coercion associated with sexual power dynamics are both linked to condom nonuse.[7] Even women with high STI knowledge are more likely to use condoms inconsistently than women with low STI knowledge when there is a high level of fear for abuse.[3] Reproductive coercion can also occur when a woman sabotages birth control in order to get pregnant without her partner's knowledge or consent. Once she becomes pregnant, she may proceed to take her pregnancy to term, thus forcing her partner to become the parent of a child, pay child support, and compel him to do other things, often enforced by law.[8] She may also mislead her partner into a belief that her pregnancy was due to him, even if it was due to someone else, and thus deceive him into accepting parental responsibilities.[9] PrevalenceDomestic violence, also called "intimate partner violence", is monitored by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Their survey on domestic violence measures five types of domestic violence, including control of reproductive health, citing pregnancy pressure and birth control sabotage specifically.[10] While research remains fragmentary, women in abusive relationships appear to be at higher risk of reproductive coercion and unintended pregnancies.[11]The Center for Disease Control found that:[10]
Prevalence in teen pregnancyTeenage girls in physically violent relationships are 3.5 times more likely to become pregnant and are 2.8 times more likely to fear the possible consequences of negotiating condom use than non-abused girls. They are also half as likely to use condoms consistently compared to non-abused girls, and teenage boys perpetrating dating violence are also less likely to use condoms.[3] There are actions girls and women can take if their contraception has been stealthed or sabotaged:[12] In the US, Plan B (the morning after pill) can be acquired by girls 15 years or older. When taken within 72 hours, it can help prevent an unwanted pregnancy. It is approximately 95% effective when taken within 24 hours and is approximately 89% effective when taken within 72 hours. Teenage mothers are nearly twice as likely to have a repeat pregnancy within 2 years if they experienced abuse within three months after delivery.[3] 26% of abused teenage girls reported that their boyfriends were trying to get them pregnant.[13] Assessment and interventionA typical assessment of women's reproductive health includes the following questions:[14]
Due to the findings related to reproductive coercion and its prevalence, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has called for its members to be vigilant for reproductive coercion.[1] Clinical implications discovered through case studies are the following: to assess for reproductive coercion as a part of a routine family planning care; to assess reproductive coercion before discussing contraceptive options; to offer discreet birth control methods; and to assess safety.[14] Some believe that all reproductive health care settings should have a written protocol for identifying and responding to domestic violence that includes reproductive coercion, and agencies that already have a protocol should be reviewed and expanded to address reproductive coercion.[14] LawIn Mexico, the law permits abortion, which is otherwise illegal, for women who have been coerced into pregnancy.[15] See also{{div col|colwidth=20em}}
References1. ^1 2 3 4 5 {{cite journal | vauthors = | title = ACOG Committee opinion no. 554: reproductive and sexual coercion | journal = Obstetrics and Gynecology | volume = 121| issue = 2 Pt 1 | pages = 411–5 | date = February 2013 | pmid = 23344307 | doi = 10.1097/01.AOG.0000426427.79586.3b | url = https://www.acog.org/Resources-And-Publications/Committee-Opinions/Committee-on-Health-Care-for-Underserved-Women/Reproductive-and-Sexual-Coercion | ref = harv | publisher = LWW | postscript = . }} 2. ^{{cite journal | vauthors = Coker AL | title = Does physical intimate partner violence affect sexual health? A systematic review | journal = Trauma, Violence & Abuse | volume = 8 | issue = 2 | pages = 149–77 | date = April 2007 | pmid = 17545572 | doi = 10.1177/1524838007301162 | url = https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838007301162 | ref = harv | publisher = Sage | postscript = . }} 3. ^{{cite web | first = Alexandra | last = Sueda | name-list-format = vanc | publisher = Department of Ob/Gyn, Kaiser Permanente | url = http://www.stoptheviolence.org/files/Alexa_Sueda_-_Reproductive_Coercion.pdf | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20160517210158/https://domesticviolenceactioncenter.org/files/Alexa_Sueda_-_Reproductive_Coercion.pdf | archive-date = 3 January 2012 | dead-url = yes | title = Contraceptive Coercion }} 4. ^{{cite journal | vauthors = Miller E, Silverman JG | title = Reproductive coercion and partner violence: implications for clinical assessment of unintended pregnancy | journal = Expert Review of Obstetrics & Gynecology | volume = 5 | issue = 5 | pages = 511–515 | date = September 2010 | pmid = 22355296 | pmc = 3282154 | doi = 10.1586/eog.10.44 }} 5. ^{{cite journal | last = Barot | first = Sneha | name-list-format = vanc | title = Governmental coercion in reproductive decision making: see it both ways | journal = Guttmacher Policy Review | volume = 15 | issue = 4 | publisher = Guttmacher Institute| date = Fall 2012 | url = http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/gpr/15/4/gpr150407.html | ref = harv }} 6. ^1 Domestic Violence and Birth Control Sabotage: A Report from the Teen Parent Project. Chicago: Center for Impact Research, 2000. 7. ^{{cite journal | vauthors = Hendriksen ES, Pettifor A, Lee SJ, Coates TJ, Rees HV | title = Predictors of condom use among young adults in South Africa: the Reproductive Health and HIV Research Unit National Youth Survey | journal = American Journal of Public Health | volume = 97 | issue = 7 | pages = 1241–8 | date = July 2007 | pmid = 17538062 | pmc = 1913066 | doi = 10.2105/AJPH.2006.086009 }} 8. ^{{cite web |url= https://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/06/12/is-forced-fatherhood-fair/ |title= Is Forced Fatherhood Fair? |last= Shrage |first= Laurie |date=12 June 2013 |website=Opinionator |publisher=The New York Times |access-date=27 January 2019}} 9. ^{{cite web |url= http://www.eligiblemagazine.com/2012/08/08/not-the-biological-parent-but-still-have-to-pay-support/ |title=I Am Not The Biological Parent. Do I Still Have To Pay Support? |last= Fine |first= Lorne |date=8 August 2012 |publisher= Eligible Magazine |access-date= 27 January 2019}} 10. ^1 {{cite book | first1 = Michele C. | last1 = Black | first2 = Kathleen C. | last2 = Basile | first3 = Matthew J. | last3 = Breiding | first4 = Sharon G. | last4 = Smith | first5 = Mikel L. | last5 = Walters | first6 = Melissa T. | last6 = Merrick | first7 = Jieru | last7 = Chen | first8 = Mark R. | last8 = Stevens | name-list-format = vanc | title =The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS) | url = https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/NISVS_Executive_Summary-a.pdf | publisher = National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: 48 | location = Atlanta, GA | date = 2011}} 11. ^{{cite journal | vauthors = Paterno MT, Jordan ET | title = A review of factors associated with unprotected sex among adult women in the United States | journal = Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing | volume = 41 | issue = 2 | pages = 258–74 | date = March 2012 | pmid = 22376055 | doi = 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2011.01334.x }} 12. ^{{cite news|last1=Brocail|first1=McKinzie | name-list-format = vanc |title=Stealthing & Sabotaging Condoms: What You Need To Know|url=https://www.stdcheck.com/blog/stealthing-legal-what-to-do-after/|access-date=21 May 2017|work=STDcheck|date=10 May 2017|language=en}} 13. ^Futures Without Violence. Feb 27, 2012 Teen Dating Violence and Reproductive Coercion: Innovative Opportunities for Programs and Partnerships 14. ^1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 {{cite web | last1 = Chamberlain | first1 = Linda | first2 = Rebecca | last2 = Levenson | name-list-format = vanc | url = http://www.futureswithoutviolence.org/userfiles/file/HealthCare/Repro_Guide.pdf | title = Reproductive Health and Partner Violence Guidelines: An Integrated Response to Intimate Partner Violence and Reproductive Coercion | location = San Francisco | publisher = Family Violence Prevention Fund | date = 2010 }} 15. ^{{cite journal | last1 = Cusack | first1 = Carmen M. | name-list-format = vanc | year = 2011 | title = Consensual Insemination, An Analysis of Social Deviance within Gender, Family, or the Home | url = http://www.lsd-journal.net/archives/Volume2/Consensual%20Insemination.pdf | format = PDF | journal = Journal of Law & Social Deviance | volume = 2 | issue = | page = 158 }} External links
5 : Reproductive rights|Sexual abuse|Condoms|Sex crimes|Sexual health |
| 随便看 |
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。