| 词条 | Roebuck v NUM (Yorkshire Area) No 2 |
| 释义 |
| name = Roebuck v NUM (Yorkshire Area) No 2 | court = High Court | image = | caption = | date decided = | full name = | citations = [1978] ICR 676 | judges = | prior actions = | subsequent actions = | opinions = | transcripts = | keywords = Trade union, collective bargaining }} Roebuck v NUM (Yorkshire Area) No 2 [1978] ICR 676 is a UK labour law case, concerning trade union regulation. FactsUnion members gave evidence for the Sheffield Star in a libel action by Mr Arthur Scargill. They were disciplined by their union under its rules, prompted by Mr Scargill who chaired the disciplinary panel. They were found in breach and disqualified from office for two years. JudgmentTempleman J held that the disciplinaries were unlawful. He noted that ‘all members of a domestic tribunal where the interests of their own organisation are at stake, have a general inclination to defend the union and its officers against attack from any source.’ Scargill’s role as chairman ‘undoubtedly gave the impression that the dice were loaded against... the appearance of bias was inevitable.’ The question is ‘whether a reasonable man with no inside knowledge might well think that it might be biased.[1] Here it was obvious. See also{{Clist unions}}
Notes1. ^Hannam v Bradford Corporation [1970] 1 WLR 937, 979 ReferencesExternal links 1 : United Kingdom labour case law |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。