| 词条 | R v Hughes |
| 释义 |
| name = R v Hughes | court = Judicial Committee of the Privy Council | image = | caption = | date decided = 11 March 2002 | full name = The Queen, Appellant v Peter Hughes, Respondent | citations = [2002] UKPC 12, [2002] 2 AC 259, [2002] 2 WLR 1058 | judges = | prior actions = Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court (from Saint Lucia) | subsequent actions = | opinions = Lord Rodger of Earlsferry | transcripts = | keywords = Capital punishment; inhuman or degrading punishment }} R v Hughes is a 2002 Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) case in which it was held that it was unconstitutional in Saint Lucia for capital punishment to be the mandatory sentence for murder. The JCPC held that because the Constitution of Saint Lucia prohibits "inhuman or degrading punishment", following a murder conviction, a trial judge must have discretion to impose a lesser penalty than death by hanging; capital punishment may be applied only in those cases that contain aggravating factors as compared to other murder cases. The case was decided with Reyes v R and Fox v R, cases on the same issue on appeal from Belize and Saint Kitts and Nevis. See also
External links
6 : 2002 in case law|2002 in Saint Lucia|Death penalty case law|Judicial Committee of the Privy Council cases on appeal from Saint Lucia|Prisoners sentenced to death by Saint Lucia|Murder in Saint Lucia |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。