| 词条 | R v Mabula |
| 释义 |
R v Mabula[1] is an important case in South African law. It was heard in the Appellate Division in Bloemfontein in October 1926. The judges were Innes CJ, De Villiers JA, Kotz JA, Wessels JA and Gardiner AJA. FactsThe case turned on whether a thatch-roofed structure, used as a dwelling for the accommodation of six or seven persons, and whose walls were built of sods resting directly upon the ground, there being no foundations or other attachment, constituted immovable property. JudgmentThe court held that the structure was indeed immovable property, and so warranted a charge and conviction for arson. See also
ReferencesCase law
Notes1. ^1927 AD 159. {{SouthAfrica-case-law-stub}} 4 : 1926 in South African law|1926 in case law|Appellate Division (South Africa) cases|Arson in Africa |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。