请输入您要查询的百科知识：

　

词条 Territorial waters
释义

  1. Baseline

  2. Internal waters

  3. Territorial sea

  4. Contiguous zone

  5. Exclusive economic zone

  6. Continental shelf

      Definition    Rights over the continental shelf  

  7. Background

  8. Miscellaneous

  9. Territorial sea claim

      Special cases  

  10. Contiguous zone claims

  11. Extended continental shelf claims

      Submissions with recommendations    Other submissions  

  12. See also

  13. References

  14. External links

{{Redirect|Coastal waters|geographical aspects|coast}}{{Short description|Coastal waters that are part of a nation-state's sovereign territory}}{{More citations needed|date=January 2016}}

The term territorial waters is sometimes used informally to refer to any area of water over which a state has jurisdiction, including internal waters, the territorial sea (see below), the contiguous zone, the exclusive economic zone and potentially the continental shelf. In a narrower sense, the term is used as a synonym for the territorial sea.

Baseline

{{main|Baseline (sea)}}

Normally, the baseline from which the territorial sea is measured is the low-water line along the coast as marked on large-scale charts officially recognized by the coastal state. This is either the low-water mark closest to the shore, or alternatively it may be an unlimited distance from permanently exposed land, provided that some portion of elevations exposed at low tide but covered at high tide (like mud flats) is within {{convert|12|nmi}} of permanently exposed land. Straight baselines can alternatively be defined connecting fringing islands along a coast, across the mouths of rivers, or with certain restrictions across the mouths of bays. In this case, a bay is defined as "a well-marked indentation whose penetration is in such proportion to the width of its mouth as to contain land-locked waters and constitute more than a mere curvature of the coast. An indentation shall not, however, be regarded as a bay unless its area is as large as, or larger than, that of the semi-circle whose diameter is a line drawn across the mouth of that indentation". The baseline across the bay must also be no more than {{convert|24|nmi}} in length.

Internal waters

{{main|Internal waters}}

Waters landward of the baseline are defined as internal waters, over which the state has complete sovereignty: not even innocent passage is allowed without explicit permission from said state. Lakes and rivers are considered internal waters. All "archipelagic waters" within the outermost islands of an archipelagic state such as Indonesia or the Philippines are also considered internal waters, and are treated the same with the exception that innocent passage through them must be allowed. However, archipelagic states may designate certain sea lanes through these waters.

Territorial sea

Territorial sea, as defined by the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea,[1] is a belt of coastal waters extending at most {{convert|12|nmi|1|lk=on}} from the baseline (usually the mean low-water mark) of a coastal state. The territorial sea is regarded as the sovereign territory of the state, although foreign ships (military and civilian) are allowed innocent passage through it, or transit passage for straits; this sovereignty also extends to the airspace over and seabed below. Adjustment of these boundaries is called, in international law, maritime delimitation.

A state's territorial sea extends up to {{convert|12|nmi|1}} from its baseline. If this would overlap with another state's territorial sea, the border is taken as the median point between the states' baselines, unless the states in question agree otherwise. A state can also choose to claim a smaller territorial sea.

Conflicts have occurred whenever a coastal nation claims an entire gulf as its territorial waters while other nations only recognize the more restrictive definitions of the UN convention. Claims which draw baseline in excess of 24 nautical miles (two 12 NM limits) are judged excessive by the U.S. Two conflicts occurred in the Gulf of Sidra where Libya drew a line in excess of 230 NM and claimed the entire enclosed gulf as its territorial waters. The U.S. exercised freedom of navigation rights twice, in the 1981 and 1989 Gulf of Sidra incidents.

In the U.S. federal system, individual states exercise ownership (subject to federal law) up to 3 nautical miles (9 nautical miles for Texas and Florida) from shore, while the federal government exercises sole territorial jurisdiction further out (see Tidelands).

Contiguous zone

The contiguous zone is a band of water extending farther from the outer edge of the territorial sea to up to {{convert|24|nmi|1}} from the baseline, within which a state can exert limited control for the purpose of preventing or punishing "infringement of its customs, fiscal, immigration or sanitary laws and regulations within its territory or territorial sea". This will typically be {{convert|12|nmi}} wide, but could be more (if a state has chosen to claim a territorial sea of less than 12 nautical miles), or less, if it would otherwise overlap another state's contiguous zone. However, unlike the territorial sea, there is no standard rule for resolving such conflicts and the states in question must negotiate their own compromise. The United States invoked a contiguous zone out to 24 nmi from the baseline on 29 September 1999.[2]

Exclusive economic zone

{{main|Exclusive economic zone}}

An exclusive economic zone extends from the baseline to a maximum of {{convert|200|nmi|1}}, thus it includes the contiguous zone.[3] A coastal nation has control of all economic resources within its exclusive economic zone, including fishing, mining, oil exploration, and any pollution of those resources. However, it cannot prohibit passage or loitering above, on, or under the surface of the sea that is in compliance with the laws and regulations adopted by the coastal State in accordance with the provisions of the UN Convention, within that portion of its exclusive economic zone beyond its territorial sea. Before the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 1982, coastal nations arbitrarily extended their territorial waters in an effort to control activities which are now regulated by the exclusive economic zone, such as offshore oil exploration or fishing rights (see Cod Wars). Indeed, the exclusive economic zone is still popularly, though erroneously, called a coastal nation's territorial waters.

Continental shelf

Definition

Article 76[4] gives the legal definition of continental shelf of coastal countries. For the physical geography definition, see the article continental shelf.

The continental shelf of a coastal nation extends out to the outer edge of the continental margin but at least {{convert|200|nmi}} from the baselines of the territorial sea if the continental margin does not stretch that far. Coastal states have the right of exploration and exploitation of the seabed and the natural resources that lie on or beneath it, however other states may lay cables and pipelines if they are authorised by the coastal state. The outer limit of a country's continental shelf shall not stretch beyond {{convert|350|nmi}} of the baseline, or beyond {{convert|100|nmi}} from the {{convert|2500|m}} isobath, which is a line connecting the depths of the seabed at 2,500 meters.

The outer edge of the continental margin for the purposes of this article is defined as:

*a series of lines joining points not more than {{convert|60|nmi}} apart where the thickness of sedimentary rocks is at least 1% of the height of the continental shelf above the foot of the continental slope; or

*a series of lines joining points not more than 60 nautical miles apart that is not more than 60 nautical miles from the foot of the continental margin.

The foot of the continental slope is determined as the point of maximum change in the gradient at its base.

The portion of the continental shelf beyond the 200 nautical mile limit is also known as the extended continental shelf. Countries wishing to delimit their outer continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles have to submit scientific information for the basis of their claim to the UN Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf. The Commission then validates or makes recommendations on the scientific basis for the extended continental shelf claim. The scientific judgement of the Commission shall be final and binding. If validated extended continental shelf claims overlap any demarcation between two or more parties are decided by bilateral or multilateral negotiation, not by the Commission.

Countries have ten years after ratifying UNCLOS to lodge their submissions to extend their continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles, or by 13 May 2009 for countries where the convention was ratified before 13 May 1999. As of 1 June 2009, 51 submissions have been lodged with the Commission, of which eight have been deliberated by the Commission and have had recommendations issued. The eight are (in the order of date of submission): Russian Federation; Brazil; Australia; Ireland; New Zealand; the joint submission by France, Ireland, Spain and the United Kingdom; Norway and Mexico.

For full list, see below

Rights over the continental shelf

Articles 77 to 81 define the rights of a country over its continental shelf.

A coastal nation has control of all resources on or under its continental shelf, living or not, but no control over any living organisms above the shelf that are beyond its exclusive economic zone. This gives it the right to conduct hydrocarbon exploration and drilling works.

Background

Territorial waters claims by coastal states in 1960[5]
Breadth claimNumber of states
3-mile limit 26
4-mile limit 3
5-mile limit 1
6-mile limit 16
9-mile limit 1
10-mile limit 2
12-mile limit 34
More than 12-miles 9
Unspecified 11

From the eighteenth century until the mid twentieth century, the territorial waters of the British Empire, the United States, France and many other nations were three nautical miles (5.6 km) wide. Originally, this was the length of a cannon shot, hence the portion of an ocean that a sovereign state could defend from shore. However, Iceland claimed two nautical miles (3.7 km), Norway and Sweden claimed four nautical miles (7.4 km), and Spain claimed {{convert|6|nmi}} during this period. During incidents such as nuclear weapons testing and fisheries disputes some nations arbitrarily extended their maritime claims to as much as fifty or even two hundred nautical miles. Since the late 20th century the "12 mile limit" has become almost universally accepted. The United Kingdom extended its territorial waters from three to twelve nautical miles (22 km) in 1987.

During the League of Nations Codification Conference in 1930, the issue of establishing international legislation on territorial waters was raised, but no agreement was reached.[6]

Claims by legislation to the adjacent continental shelf and fishing was first made by the United States government immediately following the Second World War. On September 28, 1945, US President Harry S. Truman issued two proclamations that established government control of natural resources in areas adjacent to the coastline. One of these proclamation was titled "Policy of the United States With Respect to the Natural Resources of the Subsoil and

Sea Bed of the Continental Shelf", and stipulated in its operative clause:

the Government of the United States regards the natural resources of the subsoil and sea bed of the continental shelf beneath the high seas but contiguous to the coasts of the United States as appertaining to the United States, subject to its jurisdiction and control.[7]

The second proclamation was titled "Policy of the United States With Respect to Coastal Fisheries in Certain Areas of the High Seas", and stated in its operative clause:

the Government of the United States regards it as proper to establish conservation zones in those areas of the high seas contiguous to the coasts of the United States wherein fishing activities have been or in the future may be developed and maintained on a substantial scale.[8]

Following the US Presidential proclamation, the issue of legally determining territorial waters by international agreement was raised, and in its first session in 1949, the International Law Commission of the United Nations added the subject to its agenda.

The important issue of the breadth of territorial waters could not be resolved at either the UNCLOS I (1956-1958) or UNCLOS II (1960) conferences, with neither the two major contenders of a 3-mile or 12-mile limit reaching the required two-thirds support. This lack of agreement had the potential to lead to serious international disputes.[5] It was only at the UNCLOS III (1973-1982) conference, whose provisions did not come into force until 1994, that this issue was resolved at twelve nautical miles.

Miscellaneous

Pirate radio broadcasting from artificial marine fixtures or anchored ships can be controlled by the affected coastal nation or other nations wherever that broadcast may originate, whether in the territorial sea, exclusive economic zone, the continental shelf or even on the high seas.[9]

Thus a coastal nation has total control over its internal waters, slightly less control over territorial waters, and ostensibly even less control over waters within the contiguous zones. However, it has total control of economic resources within its exclusive economic zone as well as those on or under its continental shelf.

Throughout this article, distances measured in nautical miles are exact legal definitions, while those in kilometres are approximate conversions that are not stated in any law or treaty.

Federal nations, such as the United States, divide control over certain waters between the federal government and the individual states. (See tidelands.)

Territorial sea claim

{{main|List of territorial disputes}}

Maritime controversies involve two dimensions: (a) territorial sovereignty, which are a legacy of history; and (b) relevant jurisdictional rights and interests in maritime boundaries, which are mainly due to differing interpretations of the law of the sea.[10]

  • {{convert|3|nmi|1}}: Jordan, Palau.
  • {{convert|10|nmi|1}}: Greece, Turkey (note: This is in dispute. Turkey claims 6 mi for Greece in the Aegean)
  • {{convert|12|nmi|1}}: Albania, Algeria, Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Australia, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belgium, Belize, Brazil, Brunei, Bouvet Island,[11] Bulgaria, Cambodia, Cameroon, Canada, Cape Verde, Chile, People's Republic of China, Republic of China, Colombia, Comoros, Cook Islands, Costa Rica, Côte d'Ivoire, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Denmark,[12] Djibouti, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador,[13] Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Estonia, Faroe Islands,[14] Fiji, Finland, France, Gabon, Gambia, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Iceland,[15] India, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Ireland, Israel, Jamaica, Japan, Kenya, Kiribati, Kuwait, Latvia, Lebanon, Liberia,[16] Libya, Lithuania, Madagascar, Malaysia, Maldives, Malta, Marshall Islands, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico, Micronesia, Monaco, Montenegro, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nauru, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Niue, Norway,[17] Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Republic of Korea, Romania, Russia, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Samoa, São Tomé and Príncipe, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Solomon Islands, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Sweden, Syria, Thailand, Timor-Leste, Tonga, Trinidad and Tobago, Turkey (in the Black sea and Mediterranean), Tuvalu, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United Republic of Tanzania, United States of America, Uruguay, Vanuatu, Venezuela, Vietnam, Yemen.
  • 12 nautical miles/DLM:[18] Slovenia.
  • {{convert|13|nmi|2}}: Italy-Tunisia[19]
  • {{convert|30|nmi|1}}: Togo.[20]
  • {{convert|200|nmi|1}}: Benin, El Salvador, Peru, Somalia.[20]

Special cases

  • Australia: A treaty with Papua New Guinea defines the territorial sea boundaries between the islands of Aubusi, Boigu and Moimi and Papua New Guinea on the one hand and the islands of Dauan, Kaumag and Saibai and Papua New Guinea on the other hand, as well as a section of the border of the territorial sea of Saibai. The territorial seas of the islands known as Anchor Cay, Aubusi Island, Black Rocks, Boigu Island, Bramble Cay, Dauan Island, Deliverance Island, East Cay, Kaumag Island, Kerr Islet, Moimi Island, Pearce Cay, Saibai Island, Urnagain Island and Turu Cay do not extend beyond 3 nautical miles from the baselines.
  • Belize: 3 nautical miles limit applies from the mouth of Sarstoon River to Ranguana Caye.
  • Cameroon: See article 45 of Law 96-06 of 18 January 1996 on the revision of the Constitution of 2 June 1972.
  • Denmark: Act No. 200 of 7 April 1999 on the delimitation of the territorial sea does not apply to the Faroe Islands (the act applies to the Faroe Islands from 1 June 2002) and Greenland but may become effective by Royal Decree for those parts of the Kingdom of Denmark with the amendments dictated by the special conditions prevailing in the Faroe Islands and Greenland. As far as Greenland is concerned, the outer limit of the external territorial waters may be measured at a distance shorter than {{convert|12|nmi|1}} from the baselines.
  • Estonia: In some parts of the Gulf of Finland, defined by coordinates.
  • Finland: Extends, with certain exceptions, to {{convert|12|nmi|1}}, unless defined by geographical coordinates. In the Gulf of Finland, there is a strip of international waters regardless of the 12 nmi limit: the outer limit of the territorial sea shall at no place be closer to the midline than {{convert|3|nmi|1}}.[21] Bogskär, a remote island, has only {{convert|3|nmi|1}} territorial waters.[22]
  • Greece: {{convert|10|nmi|1}} limit applies for the purpose of regulating civil aviation (See also Aegean dispute)
  • India: {{convert|13|nmi|1}} limit includes Andaman, Nicobar Lakshadweep and SriLanka.
  • Japan: {{convert|3|nmi|1}} limit applies to the Soya Strait, the Tsugaru Strait, the eastern and western channels of the Korea Strait and the Osumi Straits only.
  • New Zealand: {{convert|12|nmi|1}} limit includes Tokelau.
  • Papua New Guinea: {{convert|3|nmi|1}} in certain areas.
  • Peru: The {{convert|200|nmi|1}} territorial sea is called "Maritime Dominion" in article 54 of the 1993 Constitution: "... In its maritime dominion, Peru exercises sovereignty and jurisdiction, without prejudice to the freedoms of international communication, in accordance with the law and the treaties ratified by the State ..."
  • The Philippines claims a rectangle, defined by coordinates; the total claim extends beyond 12 nautical miles.{{citation needed|date=October 2013}}
  • Turkey: {{convert|6|nmi|1}} in the Aegean Sea, {{convert|12|nmi|1}} in the Black and Mediterranean Seas.[23][24]
  • United Kingdom and British Crown: The limit remains at {{convert|3|nmi|1}} in some of its overseas territories: British Indian Ocean Territory, Gibraltar, Montserrat and Pitcairn; the limit is now at {{convert|12|nmi|1}} in the United Kingdom and its overseas territories of Anguilla, Bermuda, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Falkland Islands, Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha, South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands, and Turks and Caicos Islands, as well as in two possessions of the British Crown freely associated to the United Kingdom, i.e. Isle of Man and the Bailiwick of Jersey, but not in the Bailiwick of Guernsey where the limit remains at 3 nmi.

Contiguous zone claims

  • None: Albania, the Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Benin, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brunei, Cameroon, Colombia, Comoros, Congo, Cook Islands, Costa Rica, Côte d'Ivoire, Croatia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ecuador, El Salvador, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Estonia, Fiji, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Iceland, Indonesia, Iran, Ireland, Israel, Jordan, Kenya, Kiribati, Kuwait, Latvia, Lebanon, Libya, Lithuania, Macedonia, Malaysia, Mauritius, Micronesia, Monaco, Montenegro, Nigeria, Niue, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Peru, the Philippines, Poland, São Tomé and Príncipe, Singapore, Slovenia, Solomon Islands, Somalia, Suriname, Sweden, Togo, Tonga, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom, Tanzania
  • {{convert|14|nmi|1}}: Finland
  • {{convert|15|nmi|1}}: Venezuela
  • {{convert|18|nmi|1}}: Bangladesh, Gambia, Saudi Arabia, Sudan
  • {{convert|24|nmi|1}}: Algeria, Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Cambodia, Canada, Cape Verde, Chile, People's Republic of China, Cuba, Cyprus, Denmark, Djibouti, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Egypt, France, Gabon, Ghana, Haiti, Honduras, India, Iran, Jamaica, Japan, Liberia,[16] Madagascar, Maldives, Malta, Marshall Islands, Mauritania, Mexico, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nauru, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Portugal, Qatar, Republic of Korea, Romania, Russia, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Samoa, Senegal, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Syria, Thailand, Timor-Leste, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Tuvalu, United Arab Emirates, United States of America, Uruguay, Vanuatu, Vietnam, Yemen
  • {{convert|30|nmi|1}}: Italy
  • {{convert|50|nmi|1}}: Democratic People's Republic of Korea; 50 nautical miles Military Boundary Zone. Army Command Announcement of 1 August 1977.[25][26]

Extended continental shelf claims

As of 13 May 2009, 51 submissions by 44 countries have been lodged for claims over their extended continental shelf. Some countries have multiple submissions and joint submissions with other countries. Recommendations have been given for 8 of the submissions.

Submissions with recommendations

List with date of submission and adoption of recommendation by the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf.[30]

  • United Kingdom – Ascension Island (submission: 9 May 2008; recommendation: 15 April 2010) (application to extend beyond 200NM failed)[27]
  • Australia (15 November 2004, 9 April 2008)[28]
  • Barbados (submission: 8 May 2008; recommendation: 15 April 2010)
  • Brazil (17 May 2004, 4 April 2007)
  • France – in respect of the areas of French Guiana and New Caledonia (22 May 2007, 2 September 2009)
  • Joint submission by France, Ireland, Spain and the United Kingdom – in the area of the Celtic Sea and the Bay of Biscay (19 May 2006, 24 March 2009)
  • Ireland – Porcupine Abyssal Plain (25 May 2005, 5 April 2007)[29][30]
  • Mexico – in respect of the western polygon in the Gulf of Mexico (13 December 2007, 31 March 2009)
  • New Zealand (19 April 2006, 22 August 2008)[31][32]
  • Norway – in the North East Atlantic and the Arctic (27 November 2006, 27 March 2009)
  • Russia (20 December 2001, 27 June 2002)

Other submissions

List in order of date of submission, with date of submission.[33]

  • France – areas of the French Antilles and the Kerguelen Islands (5 February 2009)
  • Indonesia – North west of Sumatra Island (16 June 2008)
  • Japan (12 November 2008)
  • Joint submission by the Republic of Mauritius and the Republic of Seychelles – in the region of the Mascarene Plateau (1 December 2008)
  • Suriname (5 December 2008)
  • Myanmar (16 December 2008)
  • Somalia (17 April 2009)[34]
  • Yemen – in respect of south east of Socotra Island (20 March 2009)
  • United Kingdom – in respect of Hatton Rockall Area (31 March 2009)
  • Ireland – in respect of Hatton-Rockall Area (31 March 2009)
  • Uruguay (7 April 2009)
  • Philippines – in the Benham Plateau region (8 April 2009)
  • The Cook Islands – concerning the Manihiki Plateau[35] (16 April 2009)
  • Fiji (20 April 2009)
  • Argentina (21 April 2009)
  • Ghana (28 April 2009)
  • Iceland – in the Ægir Basin area and in the western and southern parts of Reykjanes Ridge (29 April 2009)
  • Denmark – in the area north of the Faroe Islands (29 April 2009)
  • Pakistan (30 April 2009)
  • Norway – in respect of Bouvetøya and Dronning Maud Land (4 May 2009)
  • South Africa – in respect of the mainland of the territory of the Republic of South Africa (5 May 2009)
  • Joint submission by the Federated States of Micronesia, Papua New Guinea and Solomon Islands – concerning the Ontong Java Plateau (5 May 2009)
  • Joint submission by Malaysia and Viet Nam – in the southern part of the South China Sea (6 May 2009)
  • Joint submission by France and South Africa – in the area of the Crozet Archipelago and the Prince Edward Islands (6 May 2009)
  • Kenya (6 May 2009)
  • Mauritius – in the region of Rodrigues Island (6 May 2009)
  • Vietnam – in North Area (of the South China Sea) (7 May 2009)
  • Nigeria (7 May 2009)
  • Seychelles – concerning the Northern Plateau Region (7 May 2009)
  • France – in respect of La Réunion Island and Saint-Paul and Amsterdam Islands (8 May 2009)
  • Palau (8 May 2009)
  • Côte d'Ivoire (8 May 2009)
  • Sri Lanka (8 May 2009)
  • Portugal (11 May 2009)
  • United Kingdom – in respect of the Falkland Islands, and of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands (11 May 2009)
  • Tonga (11 May 2009)
  • Spain – in respect of the area of Galicia (11 May 2009)
  • India (11 May 2009)
  • Trinidad and Tobago (12 May 2009)
  • Namibia (12 May 2009)
  • Cuba (1 June 2009)
  • Angola (6 December 2013)

See also

{{col-begin}}{{col-break}}
  • Aegean dispute
  • Baseline
  • Boundary delimitation
{{col-break|gap=4em}}
  • Freedom of the seas
  • International waters
  • Intra fauces terra
  • Littoral zone
{{col-break|gap=4em}}
  • Ocean colonization
  • Territorial claims in the Arctic
  • Territorial disputes in the South China Sea
{{col-end}}

References

1. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/part2.htm|title=UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA|publisher=|accessdate=27 April 2016}}
2. ^{{cite web|url=http://clinton4.nara.gov/CEQ/990902a.html|title=New Action to Protect & Preserve U.S. Shores & Oceans|publisher=|accessdate=27 April 2016}}
3. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/part5.htm|title=PREAMBLE TO THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA|publisher=|accessdate=27 April 2016}}
4. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/part6.htm|title=PREAMBLE TO THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA|publisher=|accessdate=27 April 2016}}
5. ^1 {{cite journal |url=https://www.jagcnet.army.mil/DOCLIBS/MILITARYLAWREVIEW.NSF/20a66345129fe3d885256e5b00571830/b3197adca4437e4d85256e5b0057ee6a/$FILE/MLR%2027-100-82%2019781001.pdf |title=The Seizure and Recovery of the S.S. Mayaguez: Legal Analysis of United States Claims, Part 1 |author=Major Thomas E. Behuniak |journal=Military Law Review |volume=82 |publisher=Department of the Army |year=Fall 1978 |issn=0026-4040 |pages=114–121 |accessdate=21 July 2014 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20161228203240/https://www.jagcnet.army.mil/DOCLIBS/MILITARYLAWREVIEW.NSF/20a66345129fe3d885256e5b00571830/b3197adca4437e4d85256e5b0057ee6a/$FILE/MLR%2027-100-82%2019781001.pdf |archivedate=28 December 2016 |df= }}
6. ^Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 1949, p. 43
7. ^text in Department of State Bulletin, September 30, 1945, p. 485
8. ^text in Department of State Bulletin, September 30, 1945, p. 486
9. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/part7.htm|title=PREAMBLE TO THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA|publisher=|accessdate=27 April 2016}}
10. ^Ji, Guoxing. (1995). http://escholarship.org/uc/item/7rq2b069 "Maritime Jurisdiction in the Three China Seas" (abstract), UC Berkeley: UC Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation; retrieved 15 Nov 2010.
11. ^Lov om Norges territorialfarvann og tilstøtende sone §7
12. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.retsinformation.dk/Forms/R0710.aspx?id=22799|title=Lov om afgrænsning af søterritoriet – retsinformation.dk|publisher=|accessdate=27 April 2016}}
13. ^Accession of Ecuador to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS)
14. ^{{cite web|url=http://logir.fo/Anordning/240-fra-30-04-2002-om-ikrafttraeden-for-Faeroerne-af-lov-om-afgraensning-af-soterritoriet|title=Lógasavn|publisher=|accessdate=27 April 2016}}
15. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.althingi.is/lagas/nuna/1979041.html|title=41/1979: Lög um landhelgi, efnahagslögsögu og landgrunn|work=Alþingi|accessdate=27 April 2016}}
16. ^1 Executive order no. 48, Liberia Government, January 2013.
17. ^Lov om Norges territorialfarvann og tilstøtende sone §2
18. ^DLM means that "the national legislation establishes the limits of a given zone only by reference to the delimitation of maritime boundaries with adjacent or opposite States, or to a median (equidistant) line in the absence of a maritime boundary delimitation agreement".
19. ^Legge 3 giugno 1978 n. 347
20. ^1 http://www.un.org/depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/table_summary_of_claims.pdf
21. ^Act amending the Act on the Limits of the Territorial Waters of Finland (981/95)
22. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/1956/19560463|title=Laki Suomen aluevesien rajoista 463/1956 - Ajantasainen lainsäädäntö - FINLEX ®|publisher=|accessdate=27 April 2016}}
23. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/20051m_062305/turkey.doc |title=DoD Issuances Website: 404 Error Page |publisher= |accessdate=27 April 2016 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120920202457/http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/20051m_062305/turkey.doc |archivedate=September 20, 2012 }}
24. ^{{cite web|title=LIMITS IN THE SEAS NO. 32 STRAIGHT BASELINES : TURKEY|url=https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/61548.pdf|publisher=U.S. Department of State|accessdate=18 June 2016|language=en|format=pdf|date=25 March 1971}}
25. ^{{cite journal |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-journal-of-international-law/article/div-classtitlethe-50-mile-military-boundary-zone-of-north-koreadiv/111417221EB6C214E8EBD3D559C3F5D4 |title=The 50-Mile Military Boundary Zone of North Korea |last=Park |first=Choon-ho |journal=American Journal of International Law |volume=72 |issue=4 |date=October 1978 |accessdate=25 November 2017}}
26. ^{{cite news |url=https://thediplomat.com/2017/09/would-north-korea-shoot-down-a-us-b-1b-bomber-yes-could-it/ |title=Would North Korea Shoot Down a US B-1B Bomber? Yes. Could It? |last=Panda |first=Ankit |publisher=The Diplomat |date=26 September 2017 |accessdate=25 November 2017}}
27. ^[https://www.un.org/Depts/los/clcs_new/submissions_files/gbr08/gbr_asc_isl_rec_summ.pdf Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf] Summary of recommendations re: Ascension Island
28. ^UN confirms Australia’s rights over extra 2.5 million square kilometres of seabed. {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091025165652/http://minister.ret.gov.au/TheHonMartinFergusonMP/Pages/UNCONFIRMSAUSTRALIA%E2%80%99SRIGHTSOVEREXTRA.aspx |date=2009-10-25 }} Minister for Resources and Energy, The Hon Martin Ferguson AM MP, Media Release, 21 April 2008. With map {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090514182059/http://minister.ret.gov.au/TheHonMartinFergusonMP/Documents/colour-cs-map-with-names3.pdf |date=2009-05-14 }} of areas.
29. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.rte.ie/news/2007/1023/marine.html?rss|title=Ireland extends its underwater territory|date=23 October 2007|work=RTE.ie|accessdate=27 April 2016}}
30. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2007/0407/breaking1.htm|title=Ireland can extend territorial waters|date=7 April 2007|work=The Irish Times|accessdate=27 April 2016}}
31. ^UN confirms NZ’s extended seabed claim, New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade. Updated 20 January 2009. Retrieved 29 May 2009.
32. ^{{cite web |url=https://www.un.org/Depts/los/clcs_new/submissions_files/submission_nzl.htm |title=Submission by New Zealand |publisher=United Nations Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf |date=8 April 2009 |accessdate=29 May 2009}}
33. ^1 {{cite web |url=https://www.un.org/Depts/los/clcs_new/commission_submissions.htm |title=Submissions, through the Secretary-General of the United Nations, to the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf, pursuant to article 76, paragraph 8, of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 |publisher=United Nations Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf |date=30 October 2009 |accessdate=9 December 2009}}
34. ^[https://www.un.org/Depts/los/clcs_new/submissions_files/preliminary/som_2009_preliminaryinfo.pdf Continental shelf of Somalia]
35. ^Gronewold, Nathanial. [https://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2009/09/14/14greenwire-a-peek-inside-the-uns-continental-shelf-commis-64606.html A Peek Inside the U.N.'s Continental Shelf Commission], New York Times, 14 September 2009.

External links

{{Commons category|Territorial waters}}
  • [https://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/closindx.htm UN Convention on the Law of the Sea]
{{Authority control}}{{DEFAULTSORT:Territorial Waters}}

5 : Administrative territorial entities by type|Hydrography|Law of the sea|Fisheries law|Maritime boundaries
随便看

　

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

　

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间：2024/11/14 7:46:43