| 词条 | Spijkers v Gebroeders Benedik Abattoir CV |
| 释义 |
| name = Spijkers v Gebroeders Benedik Abattoir CV | court = European Court of Justice | image = | caption = | date decided = | full name = | citations = (1986) C-24/85, [1986] ECR 1119 | judges = | prior actions = | subsequent actions = | opinions = | transcripts = | keywords = Transfer of undertakings }} Spijkers v Gebroeders Benedik Abattoir CV (1986) C-24/85 is a Dutch and EU labour law case concerning transfers of undertakings, and the job security rights of employees. FactsMr Spijkers worked for a slaughterhouse owned by Colaris in Ubach over Worms. They transferred the business to Benedik in December, and only he and another were not retained. Operations ceased in December 1982, and Colaris was insolvent by March 1983. Good will and customers had already disappeared. Attorney General Slynn gave an opinion before the Court decision. He said the ‘essential question is whether the transferee is put in a position, as a result of a legal transfer, whereby he can carry on the undertaking or business or part thereof.’ JudgmentThe European Court of Justice held that the ‘decisive question… is whether the entity in question retains its identity.’[1] This means a whole range of factors, including customers, goodwill, buildings, tangible assets and employees should be considered. Sale of assets (means of production, as argued Mr Spijkers) is not necessarily enough by itself. One should ask, is the business ‘disposed of as a going concern’?[2] See also{{Clist transfer}}References1. ^(1986) C-24/85, [11] 2. ^(1986) C-24/85, [15] 6 : 1986 in the European Economic Community|1986 in West Germany|1986 in case law|German case law|Court of Justice of the European Union case law|European Union labour case law |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。