“Supply management (Canada)”的意思、由来-开放百科全书

Supply management ({{Lang-fr|Gestion de l'offre}}) (SM) is a national agricultural policy framework used in Canada that coordinates supply and demand of dairy, poultry and eggs through production and import control and pricing mechanisms designed to prevent shortages and surpluses, to ensure farmers a fair rate of return and Canadian consumer access to a high-quality, stable, and secure supply of these sensitive products.

The supply management system was authorized by the 1972 Farm Products Agencies Act, which established the two national agencies that oversee the system. Five national supply management organizations, the SM-5 Organizations — Egg Farmers of Canada (EFC), Turkey Farmers of Canada (TFC), Chicken Farmers of Canada (CFC), the Canadian Hatching Egg Producers (CHEP) and the Ottawa-based Canadian Dairy Commission (CDC), a Crown corporation — in collaboration with provincial and national governing agencies, organizations and committees, administer the supply management system.^[1] The Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada federal department is responsible for both the Canadian Dairy Commission and its analogue for eggs, chicken and turkey products, the Farm Products Council of Canada. In the dairy industry, the supply management system implements the federated provincial policy through the CMSMC, CDC, three regional milk pools — Newfoundland's, the five eastern province (P5) and four western provinces — and provincial milk marketing boards. Since 1970, the CMSMC has set the yearly national industrial raw milk production quota or Market Sharing Quota (MSQ) and the MSQ share for each province to ensure Canada to match production with domestic need and to remain self-sufficient in milk fat. Each province allocates MSQs to individual dairy farmers.

Supply management mechanisms such as import controls were recognized as a valid practice and protected under Article XI of the 1947 General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). During the Uruguay round of negotiations (1986-1993), Article XI was lost and tariffs were introduced to protect Canada's domestic dairy. The Canadian dairy industry was not part of trade negotiations in 1994 when the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) came into effect. As a result of Canada's forced removal of some export subsidies with the establishment of the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 1995, the federal government and the CDC updated the pricing system to be more stringent, a system that remains in place in 2018. During the 2004 WTO Doha Development Round (DDA) trade negotiations in Geneva, that had begun in 2001, Canada's supply management system was under attack by almost all their trading partners for the first time.

Of the 193,492 farms in Canada in 2017,^[1] 16,351, representing approximately 12 per cent, were under supply management. The controls provided by supply management have allowed the federal and provincial governments to avoid subsidizing the sectors directly, in contrast to general practice in the European Union and the United States.^[2]

Supply management's supporters say that the system offers stability for producers, processors, service providers and retailers.^[4]{{rp|2}} Detractors have criticized tariff-rate import quotas, price-control and supply-control mechanisms used by provincial and national governing agencies, organizations and committees. The policy has been described as regressive and protectionist and costly with money transferred from consumers to producers through higher prices on milk, poultry and eggs which some label as a subsidy. Canada's trade partners posit that SM limits market access.^[5]{{rp|18}}^[4]{{rp|2}}^[5]{{rp|18}}

While many federal and provincial politicians from major parties "have long maintained support for a supply-managed system for dairy, poultry and egg farmers,"^[8] there has been ongoing debate about SM.^[3] A 2018 report based on government data and the 2017 Nielsen's Fresh Milk Price Report, showed that although it has always been claimed that Canadians pay higher dairy prices than other countries, the price of 1 litre of liquid milk in Canadian dollars in Canada was $1.50 compared to $1.57 in Australia, $1.61 in the USA a litre (of rBST -free milk), and $1.83 in New Zealand.^[10]^[11]

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) maintained in 2017 that Canada's "export growth would be boosted if Canada phased out its Canadian dairy supply management policies."^[4]

Supply management was one of many issues in Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA), a free-trade agreement between Canada, the European Union and its member states^[5]{{rp|3}} and Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) negotiations and the United States Mexico Canada Agreement (USMCA).^[6] Under the October 1, 2018 United States Mexico Canada Agreement, the supply management system remained intact, Canada opened the domestic market by 3.6% and Class 7 was eliminated.

Mandate

Canada's supply management system, which encompasses "five types of products: dairy, chicken and turkey products, table eggs, and broiler hatching eggs", "coordinates production and demand while controlling imports as a means of setting stable prices for both farmers and consumers."^[7]

In Canada, the dairy supply management system is administered by the federal government through the Ottawa-based Canadian Dairy Commission (CDC) a Crown corporation. The Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada federal department is responsible for both the Canadian Dairy Commission and its analogue for eggs, chicken and turkey products, the Farm Products Council of Canada.

Supply-managed sectors

In total, there are about 12,000 dairy farms,^[8] 2,800 chicken farmers,^[9] 1,000 regulated egg farmers who produce table eggs and broiler hatching eggs,^[10] and 551 turkey farmers,^[11] that operate under supply management. According to the 2016 Canadian Census of Agriculture, there are 193,492 farms in Canada;^[1] about 12 per cent of Canadian farms are under supply management.^[10]

Regulatory framework

There are five national organizations, known jointly as the SM-5 Organizations, that administer or support agricultural supply management systems.^[12] According to a CBC article, "The SM-5 Organizations say federal-provincial agreements for each of the supply-managed sectors weave together the legislative jurisdiction of both levels of government to 'ensure a seamless regulatory scheme'... "designed to enable farmers to get a reasonable return while stabilizing the supply of agricultural products to Canadian consumers."^[12]

The supply management system was authorized in 1972 through the Farm Products Agencies Act and subsequently the national agencies that established the system were created.^[7] The Canadian Milk Supply Management Committee, which is chaired by CDC is "responsible for the administration of supply management for the dairy industry".^[7] By 1983 all provinces except Newfoundland had signed the National Milk Marketing Plan (NMMP) which replaced the 1971 Interim Comprehensive Milk Marketing Plan.^[13]{{rp|9}} The goal of the NMMP agreement was to manage the supply of raw industrial milk to meet Canadian needs, to establish provincial MSQs and to raise fees to remove surplus.^[13]{{rp|9}}

In 1972, the national marketing agency to administer the supply management system for eggs, Egg Farmers of Canada (EFC), was established.^[14] In 1974 one was set up for turkey farmers, Turkey Farmers of Canada (TFC), and the chicken marketing agency, Chicken Farmers of Canada (CFC), was created in 1978,^[7] and the Canadian Hatching Egg Producers (CHEP) agency was established in 1986.^[15]

The National Farm Products Marketing Council, now the Farm Products Council of Canada, established by the 1972 Farm Products Agencies Act, oversees the national supply management system agencies for eggs, chicken, and turkey.^[7]

The Farm Products Council of Canada "oversees the various agencies in an effort to promote an efficient and competitive agricultural sector while ensuring that the marketing system operates well, in the interests of producers and consumers."^[7]

In Ontario, for example, the 2017 Agricultural Products Marketing Act (FPMA) "allows the Minister of Agriculture and Food to enter into contracts with the federal government to have national marketing agencies perform marketing functions within Ontario on behalf of the Ontario government" through the Ontario Farm Products Marketing Commission.^[16]

Milk supply-management

The milk supply management system is a "federated provincial policy"^[34] with four governing agencies, organizations and committees—Canadian Dairy Commission, Canadian Milk Supply Management Committee (CMSMC), regional milk pools, and provincial milk marketing boards.^[17]{{rp|8}}

Canadian Dairy Commission (CDC)

The Ottawa-based Canadian Dairy Commission (CDC) composed mostly of dairy farmers, was created in 1966. The federal government is involved in SM through the CDC in the administration of imports and exports.^[34] The CDC establishes "support prices for butter and skim milk powder (SMP) and operates surplus removals at the support prices, removing butterfat and SMP from the market for export or later sale. It also facilitates the process for the setting of Market Sharing Quota (MSQ) for industrial milk nationally."^[34] According to the CDC website, it operates as an agency supporting "farmers, processors and consumers." CDC, under CEO Serge Riendeau—a former farmer, dairy producer and Agropur Cooperative Director—also "manages programs that target the industry, upholds milk quality standards and supports Canadians working in the dairy industry".^[18] Riendeau is responsible for "cooperating and negotiating with dairy industry stakeholders to reconcile their interests and maintain compliance with the supply management system". Riendeau, who was a farmer and dairy producer before becoming President of Agropur Cooperative in 1992, advocates for the "supply management system" and "was instrumental in the establishment of a national strategy to promote the use of Canadian dairy ingredients."^[18]

The Canadian Milk Supply Management Committee (CMSMC)

In 1970, the Canadian Milk Supply Management Committee (CMSMC), was established to set the national industrial milk Market Sharing Quota (MSQ) which is then allocated among the provinces.^[40]{{rp|31}} The national MSQs "ensure that Canada is self-sufficient in milk fat."^[40]{{rp|31}}

The CMSMC, which is chaired by the Ottawa-based Canadian Dairy Commission (CDC), administers SM for the dairy sector with the CDC performing a role of supervision, support and regulation.^[7]

Regional milk pools

There are three regional milk pools—Newfoundland's, the Eastern Canadian Milk Pooling P5 Agreement which includes Prince Edward Island, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Québec and Ontario and the Western Milk Pooling Agreement (WMP) which includes Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta and British Columbia, that operate under the supervision of the CDC. They pool milk sale revenues, costs and markets, and harmonize pricing and establish daily quotas.^[19]

Under GATT's Article XI supply management enjoyed an exemption. When Article XI was lost during the Uruguay round of negotiations (1986-1993), tariffs were introduced to protect Canada's domestic dairy. The loss of Article XI was one of the driving forces behind the formation of a milk pooling agreement. When the WTO replaced GATT in 1995, it was recognized by Canada's Dairy Industry Advisory Committee that expanded regional milk pools would be needed to adapt to changes.^[13]{{rp|10}}

Provincial marketing boards

Dairy producers must hold a quota or permit to sell their products to a processing plant.^[7] These quotas, or Market Sharing Quota (MSQ), avoid overproduction.^[46] In the SM system, provincial marketing boards, allocate production quotas or MSQs on milk for example, based on regional milk pools recommendations which include daily milk quotas.^[19]^[48]

The provincial milk marketing boards are responsible for most of the regulation of milk marketing, organization of dairy producers, quota administration and transfers, and producer-processor settlement. Individual provinces regulate their own marketing systems with marketing boards that may engage in product promotion, collective sales, and price negotiation. Marketing boards have regulatory control over the feeding, treatment, and conditions of animals on farms, as the board is in direct control of the quota allotted and can directly sanction farms who violate board policy.{{citation needed|date=June 2018}} In Ontario the FPMA authorizes the province to control and regulate the production and marketing of Ontario farm products [except dairy products] including their prohibition.^[16] The Dairy Farmers of Ontario regulate the dairy marketing system.^[16]

During the 2015 TPP negotiations, as the United States, New Zealand and Australia called for an end to SM, the role of the provincial marketing boards was challenged. By October 2015, however, it was agreed that in exchange for an opening the market to other countries, marketing boards could continue to perform their decision-making role in production quotas and farm gate prices.^[51]

Background

A 2001 "NAFTA - Report Card on Agriculture", traces the history of trade disputes to the 1930s. After the United States enacted the Smoot–Hawley Tariff Act in 1930, US tariffs rose to record levels. This devastated the Canadian economy and resulted in implementation of protectionism at a global level.^[20] By 1932, Canadian exports dropped from $515 million to $235 million.^[20] Canada, the United States, and many other countries erected "high and discriminatory barriers" in the pursuit of "beggar-thy-neighbor" policies.^[21]{{rp|254}} The signing of the first liberal trade agreement, the 1936 Canada–US agreement, by President Franklin D. Roosevelt and Prime Minister Mackenzie King represented the start of an economic relationship between the two countries that resulted in the steady decline of trade barriers such as tariffs.^[20]^[22]

During the economic crisis of the 1930s, Canadian Dairy Farmers’ Federation (now the Dairy Farmers of Canada), the Saint-Hubert, Québec-based Agropur Cooperative, along with hundreds of other dairy cooperatives in Québec at that time, were established.^[23]

By 1942, the Dairy Farmers of Canada (DFC)'s mandate was to stabilize the dairy market and increase revenues for dairy farmers.^[24]

Post-WWII, following the collapse of world trade, negotiators of multilateral trade agreements, including advocates of free trade and protectionism, carved out the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), first signed by 23 countries in 1947. Through GATT markets were freer and less discriminatory, market competition became global, benefiting all signatories.^[21]

Supply management in its current form dates from Federal legislation passed in December 1971 under the Pierre Elliot Trudeau government. Trudeau had expressed support for the system since 1949 when he was as an assistant to Robert Gordon Robertson.^[25]

Through the 1958 federal Agricultural Stabilization Act (ASA), an agricultural commodity could be designated by the ASA for direct deficiency payments if the price dropped 80% below the price averaged over the preceding decade. This was the first act of its kind in Canada and a majority of ASA cash subsidies to farmers went to the dairy industry for industrial milk—milk used in making cheese, milk powder and butter.^[26]{{rp|13}}

In the 1950s and 1960s there was volatility in dairy prices, dairy producers had more bargaining power relative to dairy farmers, and the United Kingdom was poised to enter the European Common Market, resulting in the loss of Canada's largest dairy export customer.^[62] As low milk prices continued into the 1960s, the Canadian Dairy Commission Act was passed in 1967, establishing the Canadian Dairy Commission (CDC).^[26]{{rp|13}} The CDC's mandate was to ensure producers received a fair return on investment, and to ensure the quality and supply of milk.^[62]

The Canadian Milk Supply Management Committee (CMSMC) was first introduced in 1970 as the body responsible for setting the national Market Sharing Quota (MSQ).^[27]{{rp|31}} By 1974 every province except Newfoundland had signed on. The dairy industry was the first in Canada to be operated through the national supply management system.^[28] Following dairy, a national supply management system was implemented for eggs in 1972, turkey in 1974, chicken in 1978 and chicken hatching eggs in 1986.^[67] The national agencies for eggs,^[14] turkeys,^[7] and chickens^[7] were also established in the 1970s.

When the European Economic Community (EEC) adopted Canada's model in introducing its own quotas in April 1984, they were motivated by a milk supply surplus. In Canada, where there was no milk surplus in the 1970s—the MSQs were designed to "guarantee a fair level of return for producers and to promote a stable supply of high-quality dairy products for consumers."^[27]{{rp|31}}

Under the 1947 General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), "imposing import controls on commodities subject to supply management [was] a valid and recognized practice. Such controls prevent[ed] the displacement of significant quantities of Canadian dairy products on the Canadian market, and thus protect[ed] [Canadian] producers against losses incurred through having to export all production in excess of domestic demand.^[27]

In 1981, American economist Thomas Borcherding published his 117-page report entitled "The Egg Marketing Board" for the Fraser Institute in which he used the phrase, the "egg marketing cartel".^[29]{{rp|xi}} In the same year, based on his report, he also wrote several 1981 articles and editorials in The Globe and Mail about the artificially high-prices of eggs in Canada allegedly caused by a supply management mechanism, egg marketing boards, which Borcherding called an "egg marketing cartel".^[30]^[31]^[32]^[33] According to Simon Fraser University professor emeritus, Donald Gutstein^[34] in his 2014 publication Harperism, this marked the beginning of an aggressive campaign by the Fraser Institute and other think tanks, that he described as neo-liberal, to eliminate supply management in the ensuing decades.^[35]{{rp|39–44}}^[36]

The historic Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement (CUSFTA) came into force on January 1, 1989.^[37] CUSTFA, which built on GATT rights and obligations,^[82]{{rp|5}} was the largest trade agreement concluded between two countries up to that time.^[38]{{rp|xi}}

When the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) came into force on January 1, 1994, the Canadian dairy system was not part of negotiations.^[84]

Following the establishment of the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 1995, when Canada was forced to remove some of its export subsidies, dairy farmers underwent a major consolidation. The federal government and the CDC created the a new more stringent pricing system which was still in place in 2018.^[39] The four sectors in 1995 were grains and oilseeds with 90,000 farmers, beef and hog farmers with 75,000 farmers, supply-managed dairy, poultry and egg sectors with 30,000 farmers, and horticulture with 9000 farmers.^[40]{{rp|56}}

Canada participated in the WTO Doha Development Round (DDA) of trade-negotiations that began in 2001 with the objective of facilitating global trade by lowering trade barriers. By 2004, whereas previously, Canada's supply management system had some support from other countries, in Geneva, the system was under attack. "In terms of supply management, and in the case of the Wheat Board...we were under attack. It was one against 146. We had absolutely no allies at the negotiating table."^[41]{{rp|6}}

A WTO panel ruled in 2002 that Canada "breached its trade obligations through its dairy support, siding with the United States. The result of the WTO ruling is that Canada is not allowed to export much dairy."^[42]^[43]

In 2005, "MPs voted unanimously in favour of a motion reiterating" their support for supply management. All the parties say it "necessary so farmers can earn a decent living." Liberals published a press release to tell Conservatives that they "must protect supply management." "Canadian politicians have long maintained support for a supply-managed system for dairy, poultry and egg farmers."^[8] I

In December 2006, in an interview with the Western Producer, Trade Minister David Emerson under Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper predicted that the SM would limit Canada's trading ability and in the end Canada would lose in trade negotiations. In March 2007, Emerson walked back his statement, and reiterated the Harper administration's support for supply management.^[44]

In the 2008 OECD policy brief, "Economic survey of Canada 2008: Modernising Canada's agricultural policies", was highly critical of supply managed sectors especially dairy farming.^[5]{{rp|18}}

A November 2009 report by the Standing Committee on International Trade (CIIT), in preparation for TPP talks, recommended that "the Government of Canada affirm its unequivocal support of, and commitment to defend, Canada's supply management system."^[45] The House of Commons "unanimously passed a resolution instructing Canadian negotiators to defend supply management".^[94] This "unanimous support for supply management among Canada’s main political parties" was explained in part by the fact that supply-managed sectors employed 232,000 across Canada and contributed "over $13 billion to GDP annually.^[46]{{rp|13}}

In April 2010, the Globe and Mail reported that Canada was denied a seat at the TPP negotiating table because New Zealand opposed Canada's "official position in support of supply managed poultry, egg and dairy sectors."^[47]^[46]{{rp|13}} In 2010, it was expected that in the TPP negotiations, agriculture would be the "game-changer affecting hundreds of thousands of farmers particularly in Canada, particularly in the supply-managed sectors."^[46]{{rp|12}}

Against the backdrop of the TPP talks, a series of articles were published that were "highly critical of milk supply management" and supporters of supply management responded with counter-arguments.^[48]{{rp|12}}^[49] David E. Bond, the retired chief economist of HSBC Bank Canada, published an opinion piece in the Globe and Mail^[50]^[51] stating that the "government sanctioned" National Dairy Policy resulted in a "wealth transfer of more than $2.4-billion annually from consumers and food processors to dairy farmers. That's more than $175,000 for each dairy farmer."^[50] Ed Mussell of the George Morris Centre^[49] and Maurice Doyon, a professor in the Department of Agricultural Economics and Consumer Science at Laval University^[48] described the series of articles and their counter-arguments from supporters of supply management, as "a great deal of rhetoric, simplistic arguments and invalid and untested assumptions".^[48]{{rp|12}}

Martha Hall Findlay ran for the Liberal Party leadership of the Liberal Party in the 2013 race, on a "mostly one-issue campaign", abolishing supply management. According to the Washington Post, "her taboo-breaking crusade inspired a deluge of favorable editorials that helped make supply management — the Canadian jargon for dairy protectionism — a household phrase."^[56] Hall Findlay's widely cited June 2012 paper, uploaded to the School of Public Policy, University of Calgary site, where she was an Executive Fellow, called for an end to Canada's supply management system.^[57]^[56] Hall Findlay published a number of articles based on her report in Macleans.^[58]^[57] At the same time, other think tanks, such as the Macdonald-Laurier Institute and the Fraser Institute, released their studies on the negative effect supply management had on the Canadian economy.^[59]{{rp|249}}

In his 2014 paper published by Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI), University of Waterloo by researcher Bruce Muirhead and cited in the Library of Parliament, "supply management benefits all Canadians." Muirhead wrote, "To lose it, however, would be a tragedy — it has served dairy farmers, consumers and processors well over the years, providing cost-effective, safe and secure dairy products in a world where those realities are increasingly difficult to guarantee".^[117]{{rp|15}}^[60]^[7]

In March 2015 University of Manitoba professors Professors Ryan Cardwell, Chad Lawley, along with then-PhD student, Di Xiang, published an article in the Canadian Public Policy (CPP) journal entitled "Milked and Feathered: The Regressive Welfare Effects of Canada’s Supply Management".^[61]^[62] They concluded that supply management was regressive and placed a greater burden on lowest income households with children, representing up to $592 more annually for dairy and poultry based on Statistics Canada data from 2001.^[63] Their award-winning article generated much media attention. ^[64]^[65]

By October 2015, as part of its commitment under the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), Canada, under the Harper administration, had agreed to cut back both dairy tariffs and import quotas.^[66]^[67] In return Canada kept its SM policies in place with provincial marketing boards still deciding the farm gate price of milk and production quotas, but with some adjustments for opening up the Canadian dairy market by 3.25%. The U.S. had asked for 10%.^[68] When the U.S. under the Trump administration withdrew from TPP on January 24, 2017,^[69] the tariff-rate quotas (TRQ) on dairy products remained in effect. No U.S. exports ever pay the 200 to over 300% TRQs because US dairy products are never imported to Canada outside the TRQ.^[66]

In April 2017, President Trump, while visiting Wisconsin, said he would "stand up for our dairy farmers" against Canada's "unfair” practices" without specifying which "parts of Canada’s tariff-protected dairy sector he wanted to change, nor what measures [Trump] would take to make it happen". As a result, Australia and New Zealand "re-ignited" their calls for a "fresh complaint to the world trade organization.^[70] It evolved into the end of such surplus sales and called for the dismantling of the supply-management system within 10 years, or, at least concessions, to allow greater market access for their country’s products.{{citation needed|date=July 2018}}

Following his June 3, 2018 interview on NBC's Meet the Press with Chuck Todd, in which Prime Minister Trudeau clarified Canada's position on newly imposed tariffs, the Dairy Farmers of Canada (DFC) wrote Trudeau to advise against concluding an agreement that would "negatively impact the dairy farming community."^[71] Trudeau has mentioned that the US "want a better deal on their auto sector from Mexico, and I think they want more access on certain agriculture products like dairy to Canada. We--We're moving towards, you know, flexibility in those areas that I thought was very, very promising."^[72]

On June 13, against the backdrop of NAFTA re-negotiations, Andrew Scheer, the leader of the opposition—the Conservative Party of Canada—removed Maxime Bernier, MP of the Beauce, from his shadow cabinet, allegedly for his party disloyalty for his April 2018 online publication of a chapter from his postponed book Doing Politics Differently: My Vision for Canada. In the chapter, "Live or die with supply management", Bernier explained why ending supply management was one of his major campaign issues when he ran unsuccessfully in 2016-2017 for leadership of the Conservative Party.^[73]^[74] In January 2017, a Québécois farmer, Jacques Roy, created a Facebook group, "Les amis de la Gestion de L'offre et des Régions"^[75] (Friends of Supply Management and Rural Communities) with Martin Nichols, to promote the "selection of a pro-supply management Conservative Party leader" in the 2017 CPC race. They became CPC members and encouraged others to join. By July 2017, the group had about 10,000 members.^[76] Bernier wrote that the group, which he said, supported Andrew Scheer as CPC leader,^[77] had joined the CPC party just before the election were "fake Conservatives".^[78]^[79]^[80]^[81]

Bernier said that he was dismissed from the cabinet because of his view of SM. On June 13, during Question Period, Liberal ministers, Diane Lebouthillier and Chrystia Freeland, said that Bernier was clear proof that Conservatives would not defend it.^[82]

In a June 15, 2018 press statement, U.S. Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue at Lawrence MacAulay's family farm, Perdue said that he was not attempting to convince Canada to abolish the SM system. He said, "We all have our interests and Canada has an embedded supply management system in their dairy industry, and it's not our desire to do away with that, just to regulate it in a way that does not depress world prices."^[83] Back in Wisconsin, Perdue clarified that while the U.S. should not request that Canada eliminate SM, it would be difficult to reach a NAFTA agreement with Class 7 in place.^[84]

By July 2018, with Canada and the U.S. "locked in an unprecedented, cross-border trade fight", President Trump said that he would not commit to any new NAFTA agreement until after the November 2018 congressional midterm elections.^[85] Trump "has frequently attacked Canadian trade barriers on agriculture — dairy products in particular — as unfairly hurting American farmers...Trudeau has insisted the U.S. president's complaints about Canada's trade barriers are the result of Canada's refusal to give in to Trump's demands to do away with the country's supply-management system, which is designed to protect dairy, poultry and egg producers."^[85] However, a "vocal contingent" of American dairy farmers support the Canadian supply and management system.^[86] In March 2018, both the Wisconsin Farmers Union (WFU)^[148] and Dairy Farmers of America (DFA) were looking at Canada's supply management system to resolve their own problems of low prices resulting in farm failures.^[149]

In 2017, the federal government established a five-year $250 million Dairy Farm Investment Program (DFIP), to lessen the impacts of CETA's implementation on dairy farmers. The first round of funds were distributed to eligible licensed dairy farms in 2018.^[87] Each applicant is eligible for up to $250,000 in DFIP funds over the five-year period to upgrade milk production equipment.^[88]

After the Conservative convention in August 2018, Scheer denied an allegation that the Dairy Farmers of Canada worked with his office to block a motion changing the party stance on supply management after a binder from the Dairy Farmers of Canada was found by a delegate.^[89]

Policy

The national supply management system has three basic pillars: production control, pricing mechanism, and import control.^[7]

The five sectors operate in a similar way, even though they operate under separate provincial marketing boards and national organizations.^[90]{{rp|3}} All five systems have the following elements in common. A quota system controls production volume, through the Market Sharing Quota (MSQ), for example. Through tariff-rate quotas (TRQs), the volume of imported product is limited. Pricing mechanisms that control the farm gate price that producers receive based on cost of production, are coordinated through provincial marketing boards and national organizations.^[90]{{rp|3}}

Production Control

National agencies, such as the Egg Farmers of Canada (EFC), Turkey Farmers of Canada (CFC), Chicken Farmers of Canada (CFC), Canadian Hatching Egg Producers (CHEP), and the Canadian Dairy Commission (CDC), are mandated to "prevent surpluses and shortages that can cause significant price fluctuations" by "setting the national production level based on provincial demand." Under the authority of the Farm Products Agencies Act the individual national agencies can "restrict production", "set provincial production quotas" and "impose penalties for overproduction or underproduction".^[7] It is the role of each provincial board to set "minimum quotas and quota transfer rules", to negotiate prices with buyers, for example, the three major processors, Parmalat, Saputo Inc and Agropur, and to allocate production among farmers. If farmers fail to produce within their "allotted quota" they may face penalties.^[7]

Market Sharing Quota (MSQ)

A permit to sell under supply management caps is called a Market Sharing Quota (MSQ). By 2001, all Canadian provinces were signatories to the National Milk Marketing Plan (NMMP) which fixes a yearly production quota for industrial raw milk across Canada and each province's share of the Market Sharing Quota (MSQ). In some provinces, fluid milk quotas were managed separately by provincial marketing boards, while industrial raw milk was managed by CDC's MSQs. Most provinces roll fluid quota and MSQ into a single production quota, held by dairy producers.^[49]{{rp|3}} The production quota system was designed to prevent overproduction. Each province then allocates MSQs to individual dairy farmers according to provincial policies and based on pooling agreements.^[91] Since the 1970s the Canadian dairy industry SM system matches production with domestic market needs.^[92]

MSQs can be inherited for free or sold, subject to regulations from the respective board.^[161]

In Ontario, from 2000 to 2010, quota values increased to $25,000/kg of butterfat, a significant leap. This represents the quota or permit required for one dairy cow's production and therefore represents the right to keep a single dairy cow.^[49]{{rp|3}} By 2015, a MSQ was valued at $30,000.^[93] By 2018, the combined value of MSQs was $CDN35 billion. "Farmers use quota as collateral, and total farm debt across Canada amounts to $102 billion — nearly one-third of it lent through a federal agency."^[94] An average dairy farm of 70 cattle would hold quotas worth 2,100,000.

According to the annual Dairy Farm Accounting Project report, Ontario dairy farmers saw their net farm profit drop from C$178,601 in 2012 to C$90,114 in 2016,^[165] the lowest point since 2006.^[95] The June 2018 report, showed the that the net farm income in 2017 was C$128,230, the first increase since 2012.^[96]^[97] According to a 2008 OECD policy brief, the median gross income in 2007, before expenses, for a dairy farmer was C$250,000 a year.^[98] In 2006, milk quota values on their balance sheets soared to over C$26 billion" or about 2% of total GDP. OECD says that SM's very high milk quota created "barriers to entry for young producers."^[4]{{rp|2}} For farmers wishing to enter the market, the price of the quota can be up to 75% of start-up costs. This can leave farmers entering the industry with a heavy debt burden, or effectively exclude them from ever starting.^[171] A Conference Board of Canada report estimated the book value of dairy quota at about $3.6 to $4.7 billion. Speaking at a GrowCanada 2014 agricultural conference, Mulroney said "we should consider "a careful, innovative and generous phase-out of our supply managed programs for dairy and poultry.^[99]

Pricing mechanisms

To establish a "fair price", the CDC consults with "dairy producers, processors, further processors, restaurateurs and consumers" each fall, then completes an annual study to determine the support price for industrial raw milk. Along with the study, Commissioners also consider factors such as "arguments presented by various stakeholders, an evaluation of the processors' margin, and economic indicators such as the consumer price index". The support price is posted each December and effective in February of the following year.^[100]

Producers create the goods (milk, poultry or eggs), and sell them to either processors or consumers at farm gate prices. Farm gate prices are set by negotiations between the farmers and downstream processors and ratified by the Local Marketing Board (one for each Province or Territory).{{citation needed|date=June 2018}} The farm gate price that the processors or consumer pay is the minimum legal price, but the farmer could negotiate a higher price with one or more of their customers.{{citation needed|date=June 2018}}

End-use classifying price system

In 1993 multiple component pricing was implemented with dairy farmers were no longer paid based on volume of milk, they were paid based on butterfat, protein and other milk solids.^[13]{{rp|9}} In 1995 changes were made in to the Canadian Dairy Commission (CDC) Act to allow the CDC to operate revenue sharing milk pools resulting in a national harmonized milk classification system using end-use pricing.^[13]{{rp|9}}

Both the Canadian and American dairy industries apply end-use classified pricing systems.^[101]{{rp|3}} In Canada, for example, prices of raw industrial milk purchased by milk processors are based on end-use−fluid consumption, yogurt, ice cream, cottage cheese, butter,^[34]^[178]{{rp|46}} whole milk powder, skim milk and milk protein concentrates (MPCs). The highest price is for Class A or Class 1 for fluid consumption and the lowest price is for milk products in 'Special Milk Class 7', a new class Canada introduced in February/March 2017. By 2005, the United States had four classes^[102]{{rp|46}} and by 2016 Canada had five.^[34] In Canada industrial raw milk is sold to three major processors, Parmalat, Saputo Inc and Agropur.^[34] Class 1 included fluid liquid products; Class 2 included yogurt, ice cream, soft products; Class 3 included Cheese; Class 4 included butter, milk powders and Class 5 included exports under access, permits 5(d) subsidized exports. In April 2016, Ontario began to implement a new milk price (Class 6) and Manitoba did the same in August 2016.^[103]

By June 2015, skim milk processing plants hit their capacity in Ontario, Québec and the Maritimes. The Dairy Farmers of Nova Scotia, the producers' marketing board, that purchases pools of raw milk from farmers to sell to dairy milk processors, raised their milk quota in March 2015, in response to an "unprecedented" increase in demand for butter and cream. They were left with a surplus of skimmed milk.^[104]^[105]

Canada's supply management system attracted media attention in 2016, when the province of Ontario responded to the exponential increase of the imports of diafiltered milk (UV) from the United States. In April 2016, the Dairy Farmers of Ontario created a new class of milk designed to encourage processors to invest in new facilities in Canada. They adjusted prices for certain milk ingredients such as MPIs, to compete with U.S. proteins.^[185]^[106]

The Global Dairy Ingredients Market^[107] is booming and expected to increase^[108] as these relatively new milk products, specifically milk protein isolates (MPIs), milk protein concentrates (MPCs), also known as ultrafiltered milk (UV) or diafiltered milk, entered the marketplace.^[109] MPC's are produced in facilities in the U.S. along the CA-US border. Compared with raw milk, MPIs are inexpensive and easier to ship and more efficient in cheese production. Because the technology was invented post-NAFTA, and because they were listed as proteins by Canada's border agency,^[185] not milk, at the Canadian border U.S. MPI were both tariff and quota free. The MPIs were a "cheap alternative to skim milk for Canadian processors such as Saputo Inc and Parmalat Canada Inc, who must meet federal standards for milk and protein content in cheese".^[110] By October 2008, the TRQ for MPIs was put in place and there was a very strong import demand in 2009.^[192] By 2010, MPIs were placed under Re-export Program (IREP).^[111] By 2011, the TRQs for MPCs were always filled and the demand for Re-export Program (IREP) was strong.^[111] Over a five-year period ending in January 2016, the quantity of U.S. milk protein isolates imports rose to 2,700 tonnes—an increase of ten times by volume, representing about $150 million a year.

In response to the new Class 6 introduced by Ontario in 2016, Agropur cancelled its MPIs (diafiltered milk) contracts with American facilities, such as Cayuga Milk Ingredients, who claimed they lost $30 million in exports.^[195] Cayuga, Wisconsin-based Grassland Dairy Products Inc^[110] and other US facilities in turn cancelled contracts with dozens of dairy farmers in Wisconsin and the New York.^[112] There are concerns that "thousands of [US] family farms could be lost without access to Canada's processors' contracts. Politicians in affected states blamed Canada for the threats to dairy farms and asked for intervention from the Trump administration.^[113] In June 2016, federal Agriculture Minister Lawrence MacAulay responded to concerns from Canadian dairy farmers that US MPIs caused a "reduced demand for domestic milk."^[110]

Class 7

In March 2017, the Canadian dairy industry implemented a Canada-wide domestic policy, creating a lower-priced class of industrial milk, Class 7, as part of Canada's National Ingredient Strategy negotiated between Canadian processors and producers, to address the surplus of 'non-fat solids' which include milk ingredients such as whole milk powder, skim milk and milk protein concentrates (MPCs)^[114] as "fast-rising volumes of U.S. milk proteins not subject to high tariffs" flowed into Canada.^[42] Class 7 promotes the production of protein substances in Canada using Canadian milk and benefits the domestic cheese-manufacturing sector. According to the media outlets in October 2017, in the list of U.S. requests in the NAFTA negotiations, the phasing out of SM over a ten-year period and the elimination of the Class 7 mechanism, were included.^[101]{{rp|2}}^[115] In April 2018, a 68-member bi-partisan group of members of Congress wrote a letter to U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer calling for the removal of Class 7 and other Canadian dairy policies.^[116] In their July 2018 report, Canadian agrifood economists, Al Mussell and Douglas Hedley, explained how Canada's SM system, which was bound by a butterfat quota, would become bound by a skim quota because of the "structural surplus of skim" which threatens to overpower the SM system.^[103]{{rp|2–3}}

Ten dairy industry organisations, including the Dairy Companies Association of New Zealand (DCANZ) and other dairy industry leaders from the US, EU, Argentina, Australia, and Mexico, co-signed a letter to request that their governments intervene in ending Canada's "new and harmful" 'Special Milk Class 7' mechanism by potentially entering a complaint through the WTO's Dispute Settlement System (DSS),^[117] a process which could take several years to conclude.

In 2016, before Class 7 was introduced, Canada exported less than 24,000 tonnes of skim milk powder (SMP). Although the organizations expressed concerns that as Canada moves its surplus skim milk powder onto the global market at low prices in "significant" volumes, this could distort and depress global prices,^[117] Statistic Canada reported in 2017 that Canada exported 71,880 tonnes which is valued at C$173 million ($133 million USD) and represents an increase of 47,880 tonnes over 2016.^[118] The US exports "five times more dairy to Canada than vice-versa". Agri-Food Economic Systems' research lead, Al Mussell, said "concerns about Class 7 are overblown" as Canadian SMP sales are "a drop in the bucket." Even though there was an increase in SMP exports in 2017 and 2018, that "growth cannot continue because Canada’s system restricts production".^[42] The price of Class 7 SMP was about $0.5488 USD a lb. in March 2017.

Retail price of milk

In April 2018 Export Action Global report, co-authored by Adam Taylor, who was a senior advisor for Ed Fast, Minister for International Trade (2011-2015) under Stephen Harper during negotiations for the Canada-EU trade deal and the TPP, said that, "We’ve always been told this as though it’s actual, verifiable fact — that Canada has higher dairy prices because of supply management. We now know that that is factually not true."^[119] The 44-page document by Taylor and Fion Anastassiades was based on Canadian government data and the 2017 Nielsen's Fresh Milk Price Report. According to AC Nielson Fresh Milk Price Report, which compared the global retail fluid milk price per litre for 12 months ending October 2017, the price of 1 litre of liquid milk in Canadian dollars in Canada was $1.50. In Australia it was $1.57, in the USA a litre of rBST-free milk was $1.61, in France, $1.77, and in New Zealand, $1.83.^[120]{{rp|30}}

While farm gate prices are decided by SM mechanisms, other factors affect retail prices across the country. In Québec, the minimum retail price of milk had been frozen for two years by the Régie des marchés agricoles et alimentaires du Québec, which regulates all agricultural and food retail prices in Québec in general and milk in particular. In February 2018, the Régie approved an increase of about 1.2% or c. 2 cents per liter for 2018. Retailers had successfully lobbied for the price increase under the leadership of Association des détaillants en alimentation (ADA) and its CEO Florent Gravel.^[121] CTV News reported that in Québec City and Montreal consumers could pay from $1.76 ($1.34) to $1.92 ($1.46 USD) a litre for homo milk and from $1.56 (1.18 USD) to $1.72 (1.31 USD) a 1 litre of skim milk.^[122] A 2017 study by AC Nielson, a global marketing research firm, "commissioned by the Dairy Farmers of Canada, suggests that the prices Canadians pay for milk, for example, are comparable to those in many countries throughout the world, at an average retail price of around $1.30 per litre."^[214]

Import control

SM limits milk imports through tariff-rate quota (TRQ) to prevent the Canadian market from being flooded by much larger food-producing nations who now have milk surplus.^[215] Only seven per cent of all milk produced globally is exported with ninety three per cent "consumed in the country of origin".^[123]{{rp|3}} The DFO says that most countries, including Canada produce milk for domestic consumers.^[123]{{rp|3}}

In 2015, the three top dairy imports into the country were specialty cheeses, milk protein substance and whey products. The largest suppliers into Canada were the United States, New Zealand, France and Italy.^[124]

Tariff-rate quotas (TRQ)

A tariff-rate quota (TRQ) is an international trade policy tool that combines import quotas and tariffs. By 2013, there were approximately 1200 WTO TRQs in the agricultural sector annually among supplying countries under GATT Article XIII.^[125]^[220] TRQs are a result of the "current market access requirements" and the "minimum market access requirements" forming the basis of the "Uruguay Round country schedules for agriculture."^[126] TRQs are two-tiered tariffs in which quotas of certain sensitive domestic products are assigned a quantitative threshold or WTO "minimum access commitments" for imports during a designated time period.^[102]{{rp|254}} Tariffs for imports that are at or below the threshold, are either nonexistent or very low.^[102]{{rp|254}} Imports above the quantitative threshold, are much higher, making the cost of importation intentionally prohibitive.^[102]{{rp|254}} Once imports exceed the "minimum access commitments" as required by the World Trade Organization (WTO), which allow for imports at no or lower tariffs, in Canada imports face prohibitive tariffs such as 168% for eggs, 285% for chicken, 246% for cheese and over 300% for butter.^[171] These steep tariffs have been often cited to criticize SM for creating barriers to free trade and artificially raising prices by SM critics such as David E. Bond (2010),^[50] Andrew Coyne (2011),^[171] Hall Findlay (2012)^[67] and President Trump in 2016.

TRQs came into use after World Trade Organization (WTO)'s 1995 Uruguay Round Agreement with 123 nations as contractual parties.^[102]{{rp|254}} By 2018 the United States's quantitative TRQ threshold for the import of milk products is 3% and Canada's is 10%.^[127] By 2018, about 41 countries, including Canada and the U.S., had WTO approved tariff-rate quotas.^[128]

High TRQs are only placed on imports above the quota, not on all the dairy products sold to Canada. Below the quantitative threshold, Canadian TRQs on dairy products are often zero or less than 5%.^[66] Canada's milk quota system is butterfat-based so the highest TRQ is on butter at 298.5%. The threshold in 2005 for butter was 3,274 tonnes, of which 2,000 tonnes was allocated to New Zealand. Imports above the quota for butter would pay the steep tariff.^[129] Brookings noted that "[as] a practical matter, no dairy products are sold to Canada outside the quota, so no U.S. exports really pay a high tariff.^[66]

Prior to 1995 Canada employed agricultural import controls in use since the 1983 World Trade Organization's Agreement on Agriculture (AoA). These were converted to TRQs after 1995.^[130] By 2011, Canada's WTO-authorized TRQ represented 8% of the cheese market and 1% of the yogurt market.^[67]^[131]^[132]

The Canadian supply management system uses these TRQs to ensure that the majority of Canadian dairy and poultry are supplied by Canadian farms shielding Canadian farmers against the "heavily subsidized dairy coming into Canada".^[127] Canada has classified the dairy, poultry and egg sectors as "sensitive" and this has been accepted under WTO trading rules. It established a quota of allowable imports in these sensitive sectors of 4% to fulfill minimum access commitments at low tariffs.^[67]{{rp|4}} The allowable quota for cheese was 8% of the domestic market and 1% for yogurt.^[41]{{rp|3}}^[67]{{rp|4}} In 2009, in preparation for entry into TPP negotiations, Canada was calling for a minimum 6% TRQ threshold on designated 'sensitive' products, dairy, poultry and egg, as opposed to the existing 4% TRQ, which they said was necessary to adequately protect supply management.^[45]{{rp|3}} At that time, it was proposed "to designate 6% of tariff lines as sensitive in exchange for raising its TRQ threshold on those products – effectively allowing more foreign supply to enter the Canadian market. That proposal was not acceptable to Canada’s supply managed industries."^[45]{{rp|3}} By October 2015, Canada had agreed to open the dairy market by 3.5% while retaining the SM system.

When the U.S. under the Trump administration withdrew from TPP on January 24, 2017,^[69] the tariff-rate quotas (TRQ) on dairy products remained in effect.^[66]

In 2015, the three top dairy imports into Canada were specialty cheeses, milk protein concentrates (MPCs) and whey products. The largest suppliers into Canada were the United States, New Zealand, France and Italy.^[124]

The Business Council of Canada (BCC) reported in 2012 that, beginning in 2000, New Zealand and Australia phased out their dairy supply management programs and as a result, their dairy industries increased productivity and efficiency and became global industry leaders.^[133] Muirhead explained that from 2007 to 2014, the demand for New Zealand's milk intensified with "new consumers in China, India and Indonesia" raising the price by 50 percent.^[60]{{rp|14}}

With the supply management system, processors of dairy, poultry, and eggs benefit from predictable supply from the system, while having to pay higher prices for their inputs, which can generally be passed on to the consumer. However, this means they are at a disadvantage on the international market, because their inputs are comparatively expensive. Total dairy exports in Canada amount to only 5% of production. New Zealand by contrast, which has phased out subsidies and does not have supply management, 95% of dairy is exported. New Zealand's share in world milk markets jumped from 5.8 per cent in 1995 to 16.7 per cent in 2014. Canada's share fell from 0.9 per cent to 0.45 per cent. In 2014, New Zealand produced 21 million tonnes and Australia produced 9.5-million tonnes of milk, compared with Canada's 8.4-million tonnes.^[134]^[135] In his 2014 article University of Waterloo's Bruce Muirhead wrote that the liberalized market benefited New Zealand in terms of food exports and economy, but the price of milk for New Zealanders rose so much, a price freeze was placed in 2011 and farmers lost income.^[60]{{rp|14}}

Quality

One of the mandates of the Canadian Dairy Commission is to "ensure the quality and supply of milk".^[136] According to Hall Findlay, though the responsibility of milk is under the Canadian Food Inspection Agency to ensure proper oversight of dairy production and to guarantee that strict standards of biosecurity are upheld."The Council of Canadians cautioned that, "Given the subsidized U.S. industrialized farming industry, allowing U.S. farms more market access [by eliminating supply management] would mean Canadian small farmers would be in competition with larger industrialized U.S. farms. The market would expand to include milk from U.S. farms that may have Bovine Growth Hormone (BGH) in it, unlike the milk here in Canada, which doesn’t allow BGH."^[137] In an August 21, 2017 article in the Globe and Mail, Martha Hall Findlay wrote that, Canada could demand milk to be hormone-free like Europe does with Canadian beef.^[255]

Inter provincial restrictions

In a 2013 report by the George Morris Centre, the authors recommended reforms in supply-management system to align with changes in its environment related to market growth, improved efficiency, reduction in costs and liberalized pricing.^[17] To improve efficiency they suggested the elimination of the provincial "balkanization" of the dairy market and the liberalization of milk quota transfers.^[17]

Critics claim the supply system has been a major barrier in free trade negotiations, including in inter-provincial trade in Canada.^[143]^[144]

International trade agreements

While supply management was one of many issues in Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA), a free-trade agreement between Canada, the European Union and its member states^[145]{{rp|3}} and Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) negotiations, and the United States Mexico Canada Agreement (USMCA)^[146] the system remained intact.

The United States Mexico Canada Agreement (USMCA) was reached on October 1, 2018.^[147] Under USMCA, supply management remains in place, the US was granted an expanded 3.6% market access to the domestic dairy market, similar to what it would have accessed, had the US remained in the CPP, (3.6% vs 3.25%),^[148] and Class 7 was eliminated.

Supply management debate

Supply management policies provide "stability and wealth" for "primary producers, processors, retailers and input and service providers like equipment manufacturers and financial institutions." They have been "criticized for being costly and regressive tools to transfer dollars from consumers to producers and for creating barriers to entry for young producers." Canada's trade partners say that supply management curbs market access.^[149]{{rp|2}}

In a 2014 article by Barrie McKenna, former Prime Minister, Brian Mulroney, who served as Prime Minister from 1984 to 1993 suggested during the 2014 CETA

negotiations that abolishing supply management would "bolster Canada's case for concessions from the U.S. on government purchasing (Buy America), non-tariff barriers (country labelling for meat) and on agricultural export subsidies." Barrie McKenna notes that "Many Conservative MPs grumble privately about supply management. But on the record, they and members of every other federal party stand as a monolithic block in defence of the status quo."^[150] ^[151]^[152]^[153]^[99] Apart from Bernier, the leaked binder from that Conservative MPs, David Anderson, Kevin Sorenson, Dan Albas, Alupa Clarke, Tony Clement, Tom Kmeic, Alex Nuttall and Len Webber as not being supportive towards Supply Management.^[154]

One of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's Policy Advisors for the Minister of International Trade's Global Affairs Canada, Simon Beauchemin, had published an opinion piece in La Presse in 2014, in which he stated that Canada's supply management system disadvantaged us in the TPP negotiations particularly in relation to the US, who have been seeking greater access to the Canadian dairy and poultry market for many years. Beauchemin suggested that Canada revisit our commitment to supply management.^[155] When this was publicized in 2018, Trudeau's senior press secretary Chantal Gagnon said that Beauchemin "now fully supports the Liberal government's policy on supply management.^[156]

In its 2008 review, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) was highly critical of the supply-managed system, particularly relating to the dairy industry.^[98] In their 2017 review they again called for a phase out of the supply management system to improve Canada's export growth in 2008.^[4]^[98] Think tanks such as the Broadbent Institute,^[157]^[158] the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives,^[144] The Council of Canadians,^[137] and the Parkland Institute^[159] support supply management. Others, such as the C.D. Howe Institute,^[160]^[161]^[41] and the Fraser Institute,^[162] Business Council of Canada (BCC),^[133] the Canada West Foundation,^[163]^[164]^[165] the Frontier Centre for Public Policy,^[166] Montreal Economic Institute (MEI),^[296] Macdonald-Laurier Institute ^[167]^[168] and the Conference Board of Canada^[169] have been publishing in-depth articles since the early 2000s that are critical of supply management. A 2012 Globe and Mail commentary adds that Other countries have either eliminated or drastically reduced dairy subsidies, and taken advantage of growing global opportunities for their dairy products, while Canadian dairy farmers are limited to a smaller market.^[170]

In their most recent poll in May 2018, Ipsos commissioned by the Dairy Farmers of Canada,^[171] reported that three-quarters of Canadians "agree that the federal government should defend Canada’s dairy farmers in the NAFTA renegotiation."^[172] An April 2017 poll by Abacus Data showed that 92% of Canadians were "happy with the range and quality of dairy products available in Canada". Two-thirds of Canadians answered that they were "satisfied with prices." Only 23% said that Canada should change the rules to allow more foreign dairy products to compete with Canadian dairy to potentially lower prices and have more dairy products available.^[173] Angus Reid market research poll published on August 2, 2017 indicated that most Canadians admitted they knew "nothing at all" about the supply management system. In spite of that, 29% were committed to keeping SM in place for farmers even if the US retaliated in the 2017 NAFTA negotiations. Forty-five per cent would consider using SM in tough trade negotiations but only as a "last resort." Only twenty-six per cent would scrap SM outright.^[174]

Free trade vs protectionism

In 2010, the BCC also noted that Canada's wine industry was "shielded from foreign competition" prior to the 1988 Canada–United States Free Trade Agreement (CUSFTA).^[41]{{rp|6–7}} The wine industry phased out "tariff and non-tariff barriers" to free trade and "flourished". "Canadian wines are now internationally renowned. Output, exports, productivity and employment have all increased, while labour and producer incomes have doubled."^[133]^[175]^[176] Findlay claimed in 2013 that the supply management system was a major barrier in free trade negotiations,^[168]^[163]^[131]^[177] including free trade with the European Union,^[178] free trade with India,^[163]^[131] and inter-provincial trade in Canada.It has not prevented these agreements from being completed.^[179] Ed Fast, MP and former federal minister of International Trade, wrote that "supply management focuses on regulating domestic production; it’s not necessarily synonymous with free trade."^[180]

The Canadian government says that "every country supports its agriculture sector in some way.^[157] Supporters state that other countries use subsidies to support their dairy farmers on the global market. However, critics have stated that Australia, New Zealand, and the United States have either eliminated or drastically reduced dairy subsidies, and taken advantage of growing global opportunities for their dairy products, which have restricted Canada dairy farmers to a small market.^[170] When Britain in the 1980s and the European Union in 2015, ended their milk quotas it resulted in overproduction and milk surpluses, the collapse or milk prices and dairy farms.^[181]

The Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA), a free-trade agreement between Canada, the European Union and its member states was provisionally applied in 2017.^[5] The federal government relaxed its supply-management system, agreeing to tariff rate quotes for 18 million kilograms of annual cheese imports.^[182] The EU pursued increased access to the Canadian cheese market and requested that provincial representatives, particularly Québec and Ontario, who are specifically concerned by potential challenges to the supply management system.^[183] The increase which nearly doubles the amount of duty-free EU cheese imports duty-free, is the first time it has raised the cheese quota since the 1970s.^[184]

In March 2018, Canada signed its most recent trade agreement, the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), which includes ten countries.^[185]^[186]^[2] In 2011, Australia and New Zealand moved to exclude Canada from participation in the TPP trade negotiations because of its Supply management system.^[187] Once Canada agreed to negotiate on the supply management system, Canada was invited to fully participate in the TPP negotiations, but faced protests from supply management supporters.The TPP only managed to open 3.25 percent for dairy, 2.3 percent for eggs, 2.1 percent for chicken, 2 percent for turkey, and 1.5 percent for broiler hatching eggs in market access.^[188]

Supply management was one of many issues in negotiations such as the re-negotiation of NAFTA in 2018,^[189] Some American farmers such as the Wisconsin Farmers Union, the National Family Farm Coalition and Institute for Agricultural & Trade Policy and others, would leave the Canadian system alone instead of fighting it as expected.^[86] In its June 2017 report on Canada, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) projected that Canada's export growth could generally decrease with NAFTA re-negotiations but "renegotiation of trade agreements could boost inclusive growth if it led to a phasing-out of Canadian dairy supply management policies."^[4]{{rp|128}} Wheat and barley farmers in the Prairies and particularly in Alberta raised similar concerns about the talks.^[333]

In the context of NAFTA talks, Jean Charest has suggested scrapping Supply Management in exchange for the United States scrapping their farm subsidies.^[190] Stanely Hartt argued that if supply management was ended New co-operatives, like Agropur, could emerge providing ownership interests and employment to the owners of small farms dedicated to those product lines and, with proper adjustment programs, the resulting growth would increase our prosperity and standard of living.^[191]

Farmers

Supporters said that supply management is effective at keeping revenue stable for farmers. For this reason, farmers lobby to protect supply management from any challenges, both domestic and international.^[163]

Supporters have stated that supply management protects farmers but critics say that there are other ways for the government to impact farmers without removing supply management, such as changing Canada's Food Guide to shift from a dairy-based diet to a plant-based diet.^[192]

According to a 2015 Boston Consulting Group study, New Zealand's production costs are half those of North American dairy farmers whose cattle spend most of their lives indoors, because New Zealand's "free-roaming", "grass-eating cows" live outdoors year-round.^[105] Critics state that New York and Wisconsin have colder climates than Canada and their industries are thriving without supply management.{{citation needed|date=July 2018}}

Supporters of supply management say that it protects customers from US milk produced by cattle injected with growth hormones that enables United States dairy farms to be more productive than those in Canada. John Barber, a supporter says that family farms in Canada that milk an average of 80 cows a day.^[193] Critics say that the state of Washington (whose own cows are rbST-Free) produces {{convert|10800|kg|lb}} milk per year per cow compared to Wisconsin (which permits the use of hormones) at {{convert|10000|kg|lb}} per cow. Canada produces {{Convert|8500|kg|lb}} of milk per year per cow.^[194]^[100]^[195]

Taxpayers do not pay direct subsidies to supply-managed industry products, such as dairy, poultry and egg farmers. Agricultural subsidies are common in many developed countries. The majority of Canadian farmers in sectors that are not supply-managed, including grain, beef, pork, food oils and pulses, receive few if any subsidies.{{citation needed|date=June 2018}} The OECD estimated the subsidy equivalent in 2012 (producer support estimate) in all Canadian agriculture represented 18% of the value of the industry with most of this amount going to supply managed sectors which represent only a percentage of Canadian agriculture. Critics say that this results in a "much higher effective subsidy" for supply-managed industries.{{citation needed|date=June 2018}} According to Hall Findlay's 2012 study, in the European Union, the effective subsidies were 27%,{{citation needed|date=June 2018}} with the United States at 10%,{{citation needed|date=June 2018}} Australia (6%),{{citation needed|date=June 2018}} New Zealand (1%),{{citation needed|date=June 2018}} Brazil (6%),{{citation needed|date=June 2018}} and China at 9%.{{citation needed|date=June 2018}}^[163]

Legal principles

Calgary-based lawyer, Michael Osborne wrote in a July 2018 Financial Post article that "Supply management may be lawful, but it is undoubtedly an equal assault on the market...The only difference between supply management and price-fixing cartels is the web of federal and provincial laws that support the first and make the second a criminal offence."^[344] Osborne cited the example of a 2012 decision on auto parts price-fixing by Federal Court Judge Paul Crampton in which Crampton described price-fixing cartels, in general, as "an assault on our open-market economy."^[196]

Critics such as the Frontier Centre for Public Policy's Eric Merkley,^[166] Canada West Foundation's Martha Hall Findlay,^[163] Bloombergs Stephen Mihm,^[197] and Maxime Bernier^[198] have described SM as a "cartel".^[166] Jonathan Kay called it a "milk racket."^[199] Bernier explained in his chapter that “The word cartel applies to a system, not to individuals, and it doesn’t necessarily describe criminal behaviour,”^[200]

Articles in and the Globe and Mail in 2017 and in the Toronto Star in 2018 compared supply management to the bread price-fixing in Canada scandal. The Star editors wrote that consumers are "penalized through the absolutely legal, indeed highly valued, practice of supply management."^[201]

Protecting farms

Proponents of supply management claim that it is effective at keeping small family farms viable instead of having them crowded out by large factory farms.^[202]

The number of dairy farms decreased from 500,000 just after WWII to 18,500 in 2005.^[41]{{rp|8}} According to Hall Findlay, the numbers continued to decrease from 135,000 in 1971 to 13,000 in 2011, representing a 91 percent loss. The number of chicken farms has declined 88 percent; while in the same period of time in the United States, the number of dairy farms dropped by 88 percent.^[163]^[203] Supply-managed farms represent 8% to 13% of all farms in the country.^[204] Hall Findlay says that even with supply management, "[t]here has been more consolidation in dairy, poultry and eggs than in almost every other agricultural sector".^[205]^[206] Supporters, such as the Broadbent Institute, say that the supply management system "allows Canada a degree of food security and food sovereignty that is remarkable". The "global dairy is in the throes of a massive downturn, which has created havoc everywhere" except Canada. Without the stability of the supply management system, farmers could lose their livelihood while "consumers do not necessarily benefit from lower prices given the activities of supermarkets (and others) to keep prices as high as possible."^[158]^[157] Though Hall Findlay has stated hypocritical to support supply management and claim to support "progressive, "social justice" values.^[207]

In her 2014 Maclean's article Hall Findlay wrote that the "average dairy farm’s net worth was well more than $2.5 million" in 2010 and "the average poultry/egg farm’s net worth was almost $4 million—far more than all other Canadian farmers, and far, far more than the average Canadian family."^[208]

Lobbyisim

One of the lobby groups that oppose supply management as an impediment to the pursuit of "reciprocal trade and investment liberalization" is the Business Council of Canada (BCC)—Canadian Council of Chief Executives (CCCE)— a registered lobbyist on Canadian public policy. Since at least 2012, when Harper announced his intention to enter into TPP trade talks, the former Liberal deputy prime minister John Manley as BCC CEO, has led the call for review and reform of Canada's supply management system to increase productivity, exports, and employment.^[209]

The Canadian Dairy Commission (CDC), a Crown corporation composed mainly of dairy farmers, and its analogue for eggs, chicken and turkey products, the Farm Products Council of Canada, are just some of the organizations that defend supply management. DFC partners who publish articles in support of supply management include the Canadian Federation of Agriculture, the GO5, Coalition for a Fair Farming Model, Supply Management, FarmGate5, and the five national marketing agencies that administer or support agricultural supply management systems, known jointly as the SM-5 Organizations, such as, Dairy Farmers of Canada (DFC),^[2] Egg Farmers of Canada (EFC),^[14] Turkey Farmers of Canada (TFC), Chicken Farmers of Canada (CFC)^[7] Canadian Hatching Egg Producers (CHEP) support the system.^[210] Other supporters include Québec Federation of Milk Producers, and the Union of Agricultural Producers (UPA) that represent dairy farmers and turn up at protests.^[8] In March 2018, the Wisconsin Farmers Union (WFU) hosted events for Wisconsin dairy farmers and lawmakers in five Wisconsin cities in which Dairy Farmers of Ontario (DFO) representatives explained Canada's dairy supply management system.^[211]^[212]{{rp|4}} At the end of the presentation, by a show of hands 70 to 80% of participants indicated that there were elements of Canada's SM "that would make sense in the U.S." When asked if they believed Canada caused the "challenges dairy farmers in the U.S. [were] experiencing, there were "no hands raised at any of the five meetings."^[211] Hall Findlay described the dairy lobby as a small group with out-sized power, that pose a threat to the political careers of those who oppose SM.^[213]^[163]{{rp|11}}

The Dairy Farmers of America (DFA), the largest cooperative of milk-producers in the United States, representing 14,000 farmers, faced with the increasing number of dairy farm bankruptcies, low milk prices, voted at their annual meeting in March 2018, to look into Canada's supply management system.^[214]

Agropur, which is one of three milk processors in Canada that control 80% of production−the others are Montreal-based Saputo Inc and Parmalat Canada−defends the "supply management system, both in the public arena and with various levels of government."^[215] In preparation for TPP negotiations, Agropur had commissioned the Boston Consulting Group to produce the 2015 report, "Analysis of the potential impacts of the end of supply management on the Canadian dairy industry", and distributed it widely, which they said, "had a significant impact on decision makers and the media alike."^[216]^[215]{{rp|9}} The report estimated that a complete and abrupt abolition of supply management would put 40% of Canadian dairy production at risk, resulting in the loss of about 5,000 dairy farms.^[216]{{rp|51,54}} "Agropur Cooperative and Saputo Inc., have expanded into the U.S. or even Brazil to boost revenues."^[39]

Dairy farmers have greater political influence because "[as] producers, [they] are very involved in [their] regional economy and regional politics. Each producer has more impact than the average voter, because [they] buy supplies from local companies, [they] sell to local processors, [they] are at the base of the regional economy."^[217] Dairy farmers have been major players in international trade talks such as NAFTA and TPP talks.^[217] In 2015, during TPP negotiations, dairy farmers and their cows "converged on Parliament Hill to protest the mere possibility that supply management would be significantly affected by TPP negotiations."^[217]

A 2015 Maclean's article, "Why the dairy lobby is so powerful", described an incident during the September 28, 2015 federal leaders Munk Debate on foreign affairs, then-NDP Leader Tom Mulcair asked Stephen Harper if they could assure the Union des producteurs agricoles du Québec (UPA) President Marcel Groleau, reached out to the New Democrats, Liberals and Bloc Québécois, of his full support for supply management. Harper immediately complied. In his 2018 on-line political memoir, Maxime Bernier grouped together supporters of supply-managed sectors under a combined dairy lobby. Bernier described the UPA as an "extension" of Québec's Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. He wrote that the combined dairy lobby funds millions of dollars in university graduate programs and research on "collective marketing of agricultural products" across the country in support of SM policies.^[218]

According to the Federal lobbyist registry, from January to September 2012, the Chicken Farmers of Canada had 92 contacts with federal officials making it on the list of top ten lobby groups with the most contacts that year. They lobbied on poultry import tariffs, medicated feed mixing regulations, meat inspection regulations and food safety programs.^[219]

Dairy industry-related jobs

According to their 2015 Boston Consulting Group comprehensive report, there are about 12,000 dairy farms in Canada that produce about 8 billion litres of milk annually which is sent for "treatment and processing to approximately 450 dairy plants".^[216]{{rp|5}} Critics state supply management can be used to deter manufacturing jobs away from Canada. In 2010, 22,650 people were employed in the dairy processing sector. Critics state that number could be, and should be, much higher.^[163]

Another study stated an estimate for dairy input "costs of Canadian manufacturers, which produce everything from frozen pizza to ready-made lasagna, to be between five and 30 percent higher than those of U.S. companies."^[39]

In 2017, the Chinese corporation, Feihe International, invested $225 million to construct an infant formula plant in Kingston, Ontario in 2017, citing one of the main reasons for choosing Canada, was the supply management system though it was mainly for the quality of milk.^[220]^[221]^[222]{{rp|A1}}^[223] In 2013, Chobani, a yogurt maker from the US, abandoned plans to build a $76 million plant in Kingston, which would have created 1,300 direct and indirect jobs based on quota limitation.^[224]^[225]

Critics state that the high cost associated with supply management had led to Canada's food processing industry bleeding "market share to U.S. competitors and several major companies such as Campbell Soup Co, Kraft Heinz Co., and Kellogg Co. closing Canadian plants in recent years."^[39] In addition, they state that dairy processors establish operations outside the country to meet global demand due saturation in the Canadian market caused by the tariffs.^[296]

Butter 2015 crisis

In Canada, starting in 2015 there was also an "unprecedented" demand for butter (and cream) in Canada resulting in a brief but "severe butter shortage" that some blamed on supply management.^[226]^[229] Provincial marketing boards raised their milk quotas to respond to demand.^[104] By April 2017, there was enough growth in the Canadian domestic butterfat output to meet demand.^[230]

Consumers

Supply management limits the production of dairy product in Canada, and imposes tariffs on imports. The direct consequence of these policies is to increase the retail prices of dairy products. According to the Conference Board of Canada's March 2014 report, "Canada's Reforming Dairy Supply Management: The Case for Growth", Canadian households paid on average about $276 more annually than those from other countries for dairy products because of SM.^[231] According to the CPP 2015 article "Milked and Feathered", the average cost for Canadian households was $444 annually based on StatsCan's 2001 data.^[61] The OECD estimated that the consumer support estimate (CSE)^[232] from 2001 to 2011 represented about $2.6 billion annually. Based on a rough estimate of 9.4 million households in 2011, this represented about $276 per household annually.^[233]^[231]

Hall Findlay has been saying since 2012 that Canadian consumers pay one and a half to three times as much for dairy, poultry and eggs than they otherwise would without the supply management system, or pay up to around C$450/year per household and $600/year for households with children.^[163]^[194] This has been criticized as a regressive tax on the poor (around 37 cents per litre),^[194] for whom food is a large portion of their budget, and who are in effect subsidizing well-off farmers.^[234]

In addition, a study pointed out that supply management was costing Canadian consumers $2.6 billion per year (compare to supply management dairy product bringing in $970 Million into the economy). The study stated that supply management impacts the poorest households five times (2.4% of income or almost 25% of income on food) more than wealthy families (0.5% of income or almost 6% of income on food) in relative household income, while another study point to that around 133,032 to 189,278 Canadians (or 67,000 to 79,000 households) are pushed into poverty due to burden of SM.^[235]^[236]^[237]

Farmers not covered by supply management

Canadians farm products that are not supply managed do as well as their American or European competitors, who receive more support from their government.^[238] Nearly 60% of Canada's agricultural and agri-food production is bound for foreign markets, with nearly half of this going to the U.S. market.^[238] Hall Findlay wrote that "other agricultural sectors in Canada (grain, beef, pork, etc.) do not have similar controls or subsidies, and for the most part compete as a normal product on the international market.^[239]

Montreal Economic Institute's public policy analyst, Alexandre Moreau, said that Canadian farmers who are not under SM would "pay the price" if President Trump is unable to deliver on his 2017 promise related to NAFTA re-negotiations, to increase "market access to U.S. dairy farmers" in a direct "aim at Canada's supply management."^[333] Wheat farmer Kevin Auch, former chair of the Alberta Wheat Commission does not want the 90% of Canadian farmers who are not under SM to put at risk to preserve SM for the 10% who are.^[240] In other sectors of agriculture. There are ten times more farmers that benefit from increased trade.^[203]

Supply management make farmers poorer by limiting options for farmers when selling dairy products as well as missing opportunities to prevent food shortages when supplying the growing population.^[241]

In a 2015 anti-SM article by the Ottawa-based Centre for International Policy Studies' Alan Freeman described SM as a "bizarre system of agricultural market protection that seems to have been lifted from a five-year economic plan in 1950s Communist Romania". Freeman cited the University of Guelph’s Food Institute's Sylvain Charlebois, who is also a "trenchant" SM critic, saying Canadian dairy farmers under SM are not as productive as their American counterparts and it costs them twice as much to produce milk as it does in the United States.^[242] Canada's supply management forces Canada, Canadian farmers, and Canadians to give up billions in GDP, exports, prosperity, jobs, and tax revenue.^[216]

See also

Notes

1. ^¹{{cite web |url=http://www.foodandfarming.ca/census-of-agriculture/ |title=Decline in # of farms & operators, Rise in farm size & age, and more from the Census of Agriculture |date=August 3, 2017 |access-date=July 9, 2018}} 2016 Canadian Census of Agriculture
2. ^¹²{{cite web|title=Myths & Realities of Supply Management|publisher=Dairy Farmers of Canada (DFC)|url=https://www.dairyfarmers.ca/what-we-do/supply-management/myths-realities|access-date=June 12, 2018 |date=nd}}
3. ^{{cite thesis |last=Gambling |first=Samantha Jane |year=2016 |url=https://open.library.ubc.ca/cIRcle/collections/ubctheses/24/items/1.0228575 |title=Canadian supply management: a food sovereignty policy? British Columbia and New Zealand industry stakeholder” |work=MSc Thesis. Integrated Studies in Land and Food Systems Vancouver: University of British Columbia Library |access-date=June 21, 2018}}
4. ^¹²{{cite report|url=https://www.oecd.org/eco/outlook/economic-forecast-summary-canada-oecd-economic-outlook-june-2017.pdf|title=Canada|date=June 2017|publisher=OECD|access-date=June 22, 2018|format=PDF|series=Developments in Individual OECD and Selected Non-member Economies}}
5. ^¹{{cite book |url=http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2017/september/tradoc_156062.pdf |title=Guide to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership |pages=35 |date=July 2017 |isbn=978-92-79-68000-7 |doi=10.2781/647649}}
6. ^{{cite news |url=https://www.timescolonist.com/trump-approves-of-new-continental-trade-deal-as-winners-and-losers-are-assessed-1.23447871 |title=Trump approves of new continental trade deal as winners and losers are assessed |first=Mike |last=Blanchfield |newspaper=Times Colonist via The Canadian Press |date=October 1, 2018 |access-date=October 1, 2018}}
7. ^¹²³⁴⁵⁶⁷⁸⁹¹⁰¹¹¹²¹³¹⁴¹⁵{{cite web |url=http://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2016/bdp-lop/eb/YM32-5-2015-138-eng.pdf |date=December 17, 2015 |title=Canada's Supply Management System |first=Khamla |last=Heminthavong |series=Library of Parliament Research Publications|publisher=Economics, Resources and International Affairs Division |access-date=June 21, 2018 }}
8. ^¹{{cite web |url=https://www.dairyfarmers.ca/who-we-are/about-us |title=About us |publisher=Dairy Farmers |date=nd |access-date=July 9, 2018}}
9. ^{{cite web |url=https://www.chickenfarmers.ca/about-us/ |title=About us |work=Chicken Farmers of Canada |date=nd |access-date=July 9, 2018}}
10. ^¹{{cite web |url=http://www.eggfarmers.ca/about-us/ |title=About us |work=Egg Farmers |date=nd |access-date=July 9, 2018 |quote="produce close to 732 million dozen eggs annually"}}
11. ^{{cite web |title=Canada's Turkey Industry |url=https://www.turkeyfarmersofcanada.ca/industry-information/industry-statistics/ |date= |access-date=July 9, 2018}}
12. ^¹{{Cite news|first=Bobbi-Jean |last=MacKinnon |url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/border-alcohol-supreme-court-intervene-new-brunswick-1.4291667|title=Tracadie man's beer case before Supreme Court overflows with potential interveners|work=CBC News|access-date=June 22, 2018|date=September 26, 2017|language=en}}
13. ^¹²³⁴{{cite conference |url=https://wcds.ualberta.ca/wp-content/uploads/sites/57/2018/05/Kennelly-2017-WCDS-Past-Present-and-Future.pdf |format=PDF |title=Canadian Dairy Industry, Past, Present and Future |first1=John J. |last1=Kennelly |first2=Mike |last2=Southwood |first3=Bruce |last3=Beattie |conference=Western Canadian Dairy Seminar (WCDS) |journal=WCDS Advances in Dairy Technology |date=2017 |volume=29 |pages=3–16 |location=Edmonton, Alberta}}
14. ^¹²{{cite web |url=http://www.eggfarmers.ca/2018/01/roger-pelissero-in-the-hill-times-supply-management-protects-family-farming/ |title=Roger Pelissero in the Hill Times: "Supply management protects family farming" |date=January 19, 2018 |access-date=June 22, 2018 |work=Egg Farmers of Canada (EFC)}}
15. ^National agencies
16. ^¹²{{cite web |url=http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/farmproducts/factsheets/2overview.htm |title=Overview of the Farm Products Marketing Act |publisher=Queen's printer for Ontario |date=May 2017 |access-date=July 18, 2018}}
17. ^¹²{{cite report|title=Canada’s Supply-Managed Dairy Policy: An Agenda for Reform |first1=Al |last1=Mussell |first2=Bob |last2=Seguin |first3=Janalee |last3=Sweetland |url=http://www.georgemorris.org/publications/Milk_SM_Recommendations_for_Reform_Mar-13_Final.pdf |format=PDF |date=March 5, 2013 |access-date=July 13, 2018 |publisher=George Morris Centre |pages=14}}
18. ^¹{{cite web |url=https://www.agropur.com/en/nouvelles/serge-riendeau-pr%C3%A9sident-Agropur-de-2002-%C3%A0-2016-est-nomm%C3%A9-au-poste-de-chef-de-la-direction-de-la-Commission-canadienne-du-lait |publisher=AgroPur Cooperative |year=2017 |title=Serge Riendeau to head Canadian Dairy Commission |access-date=June 21, 2018}}
19. ^¹{{cite web |url=http://www.cdc-ccl.gc.ca/CDC/index-eng.php?id=3810 |title=Milk pools |work=CDC |date=nd |access-date=July 13, 2018}}
20. ^¹²{{cite encyclopedia |last=Crane |first= David |year=2009–2015 |title=Canada–US Economic Relations: Economic relations between Canada and the US are of paramount importance to Canada |work= Historica Canada }}
21. ^¹Cox, Tom L., Le Roy, Danny G., Goddard, and Ellen W. (2001). “Dairy Disputes in North America: a Case Study.” NAFTA – Report Card on Agriculture. AgCon Research in Agricultural & Applied Economics.
22. ^{{cite web |last=Mihm |first=Stephen |date=June 14, 2018 |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-06-14/trade-war-history-is-not-on-justin-trudeau-s-side |title=Trade War History is not on Justin Trudeau's Side: Tariffs could batter the U.S. economy, embolden Canadian nationalists and enrich China |work=Bloomberg |access-date=July 10, 2018}}
23. ^Content from the Wikipedia Agropur article. June 21, 2018.
24. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.dairyfarmers.ca/who-we-are/our-history|title=Our History|publisher=Dairy Farmers of Canada|accessdate=October 19, 2013}}
25. ^{{Cite news|url=http://www.macleans.ca/politics/ottawa/a-novice-bureaucrat-and-future-pm-on-supply-management/|title=A novice bureaucrat (and future PM) on supply management|work=Maclean's|date=November 15, 2017|language=en-CA |first=John |last=Geddes |access-date=June 26, 2018 }}
26. ^¹{{cite web |url=https://caes.usask.ca/meetings/the-evolution-of-agricultural-support-policy-in-canada.pdf |title=The Evolution of Agricultural Support Policy in Canada |series=CAES Fellows Paper |year=2015 |number=2015-1 |first=Douglas D. |last=Hedley |pages=38 |access-date=July 18, 2018}}
27. ^¹²³⁴{{cite web |url=https://lop.parl.ca/Content/LOP/ResearchPublicationsArchive/bp1000/bp154-e.pdf|title=National Dairy Policy |series=Backgrounder|date=October 14, 1986|number=BP-154E |first1=Frechette |last1=Jean-Denis|first2=Sally |last2=Rutherford|publisher=Research Branch Library of Parliament|pages=39 |access-date=July 18, 2018}}
28. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.cdc-ccl.gc.ca/CDC/index-eng.php?link=114 |title=Supply management |work=CDC |date=nd |access-date=August 17, 2018}}
29. ^{{cite report |url=https://www.fraserinstitute.org/sites/default/files/egg-marketing-board.pdf |format=PDF |first1=Thomas |last1=Borcherding |first2=Gary W. |last2=Dorosh|work=Fraser Institute |date=1981 |title=The Egg Marketing Board |access-date=September 15, 2018 |pages=117 |isbn=9780889750197 |series=Agricultural economics}}
30. ^{{cite news| last =Cox| first =Kevin| title =Be glad to pay farmers fair price for eggs, CEMA tells Canadians,| work =The Globe and Mail | date =Jul 21, 1981}}
31. ^{{cite news| last =Cox| first =Kevin| title =Artificially high egg prices linked to marketing| work =The Globe and Mail | date =Jul 16, 1981}}
32. ^{{cite news| title =The unkindest crack| work =The Globe and Mail| date =Jul 22, 1981}}
33. ^{{cite news | title =How to scramble eggs| work =The Globe and Mail | date =Sep 8, 1981}}
34. ^{{cite web |url=https://sfu.academia.edu/DonaldGutstein |work=Simon Fraser University |date=nd |access-date=September 15, 2018 |title=Donald Gutstein}}
35. ^{{cite book |title=Harperism: How Stephen Harper and his think tank colleagues have transformed Canada |publisher=James Lorimer & Company |location=Toronto, Ontario |isbn=9781459406636 |pages=288|date=2014-08-31 }}
36. ^In Harperism (2014), Gutstein groups think tanks, such as the Fraser Institute, C.D. Howe, Atlantic Institute for Market Studies (AIMS), the Montreal Economic Institute (MEI), Frontier Centre for Public Policy, and the School of Public Policy, University of Calgary as a pro-economic freedom, neo-liberal think tanks who focus on eliminating supply management because they say it is market distorting.
37. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.international.gc.ca/trade-commerce/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/united_states-etats_unis/fta-ale/background-contexte.aspx?lang=eng |title=Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement (CUSTFA) |date=nd |access-date=January 19, 2018 |publisher=Government of Canada}}
38. ^¹{{cite web |url=http://www.international.gc.ca/trade-commerce/assets/pdfs/agreements-accords/cusfta-e.pdf |access-date=July 19, 2018 |date=January 1, 1989 |pages=315 |title=Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement (CUSTFA)}}
39. ^¹²³{{Cite news|url=http://business.financialpost.com/commodities/agriculture/cheese-ninjas-to-the-rescue-why-canadas-supply-management-system-needs-reform|title=‘Cheese ninjas’ to the rescue: Why Canada’s supply management system needs reform|date=December 20, 2017|work=Financial Post|access-date=July 22, 2018|language=en-CA |first=Jesse |last=Snyder}}
40. ^{{cite conference |title=Overview of Canadian Agricultural Policy Systems |url=https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ffaf95/16747.html|citeseerx=10.1.1.564.3042 |first=Richard R. |last=Barichello |year=1995 |number=16747 |conference=Understanding Canada\\United States Grain Disputes; Proceedings of the 1st Canada\\U.S. Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshop |publisher=Farm Foundation, Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshops |access-date=June 28, 2018 |pages=37–}}
41. ^¹²³⁴{{cite web|url=https://www.cdhowe.org/sites/default/files/attachments/research_papers/mixed/backgrounder_90.pdf|title=Great Wine, Better Cheese: How Canada Can Escape the trap of Agricultural Supply Management|last=Hart|first=Michael|year=2005|series=Backgrounder|publisher=C.D. Howe|location=Toronto|pages=10|access-date=June 26, 2018|number=90}}
42. ^¹²³{{cite news |last=Nickel |first=Rod |date=June 8, 2018 |access-date=June 26, 2018 |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-canada-dairy-explainer/explainer-trump-sours-on-canadas-sheltered-dairy-system-idUSKCN1J42PL |title=Explainer: Trump sours on Canada's sheltered dairy system |work=Reuters |quote="the United States shipped nearly C$600 million worth of dairy north in 2016, five times greater than Canadian sales to the United States...Farm dairy sales amount to around C$6 billion ($4.6 billion) annually. Processed dairy shipments are worth C$15 billion, according to 2016 government figures."}}
43. ^{{Cite news|url=http://ca.reuters.com/article/topNews/idCAKBN17L0KY-OCATP|title=Canada's resilient dairy sector girds for Trump fight|last=Weir|first=Benjamin|date=April 19, 2017|work=Reuters|access-date=June 22, 2018|language=en-CA}}
44. ^{{Cite news|url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/supply-management-is-as-bad-as-emerson-said/article1325739|title=Supply management is as bad as Emerson said|date= March 8, 2007|access-date=July 12, 2018 |series=Opinion |work=Globe and Mail}}
45. ^¹²{{cite report |title=Defending Supply Management at the WTO |series=Report of the Standing Committee on International Trade |author=Standing Committee on International Trade (CIIT)|editor-first=Lee |editor-last=Richardson |date=September 17, 2009 |edition=6 |pages=8|access-date=June 25, 2018 |publisher=40th Parliament, 2nd Session |url=https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Committee/402/CIIT/Reports/RP4206172/402_CIIT_Rpt06/402_CIIT_Rpt06-e.pdf |format=PDF |location=Ottawa, ON}}
46. ^¹²{{citation|last1=Drache|first1=Daniel|title=Pitfalls and Promises of the Canada-European Union Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement|date=June 24, 2010|url=http://www.yorku.ca/drache/academic/papers/pitfallsandpromises.pdf|pages=33|access-date=June 25, 2018|last2=Trew|first2=Stuart}}
47. ^¹{{cite news |last=Simpson |first=Jeffrey |title=Canada’s a double-dealer in world trade |newspaper=Globe and Mail |date=April 21, 2010 |access-date=June 25, 2018 |url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/canadas-a-double-dealer-in-world-trade/article4315677/}}{{Subscription required}}
48. ^¹²{{cite report |last=Doyon |first=Maurice |date=October 2011 |url=http://www.cirano.qc.ca/pdf/publication/2011DT-01.pdf |format=PDF |title=Canada's Dairy Supply Management: Comprehensive Review and Outlook for the Future |access-date=June 22, 2018}}
49. ^¹²³{{cite report |last=Mussell |first=Al |year=2010 |title=Making Sense out of a Stale Debate: Milk Supply Management in Canada |publisher=George Morris Centre|url=http://www.georgemorris.org/publications/Supply_Management_112210.pdf |format=PDF |access-date=June 22, 2018}}
50. ^¹²{{cite news |last=Bond |first=David E. |date=October 21, 2010 |access-date=June 22, 2018 |title=How dairy farmers milk Canada's taxpayers |newspaper=The Globe and Mail |url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/economy/economy-lab/how-dairy-farmers-milk-canadas-taxpayers/article4399488/}}{{Subscription required}}
51. ^Bond wrote that, "The federal government imposes tariffs that run between 200 per cent and 300 per cent on virtually all dairy imports, even from those nations with which we have free-trade agreements." He concluded that, "It is the largest agricultural subsidy given to Québec, and therefore politically untouchable." The highest tariff Bond cited, 300% TRQ on butter, is actually never applied as Canada does not import butter above the TRQ threshold.
52. ^{{cite news |url=https://www.producer.com/2007/10/outside-forces-threaten-supply-management-critic |title=Outside forces threaten supply management: critic |first=Karen |last=Briere |publisher=The Western Producer |date=October 11, 2007 |access-date=September 30, 2018 }}
53. ^{{cite journal |last1=Tamilia |first1=Robert D. |last2=Charlebois |first2=Sylvain |date=2007 |title=The importance of marketing boards in Canada: a twenty-first century perspective |journal=British Food Journal |volume= 109 |number=2 |pages=119–144 |doi=10.1108/00070700710725491 |url=https://www.canadianpoultrymag.com/images/stories/george_morris_report.pdf |access-date=September 29, 2018}}
54. ^{{cite news |url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/rob-commentary/the-many-failings-of-canadas-supply-management-system-are-governments-fault-not-farmers/article34793275/ |title=The many failings of Canada’s supply-management system are government’s fault, not farmers’|first=Sylvain |last=Charlebois |work=The Globe and Mail |date=April 23, 2017}}
55. ^{{cite news |url=https://globalnews.ca/news/4404306/conservative-supply-management-dairy/ |work=Global |date=August 23, 2018 |title=Phase out supply management? Tories’ debate a ‘healthy exercise,’ expert says |first=Josh K. |last=Elliott}}
56. ^¹{{cite news |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/global-opinions/wp/2018/06/11/why-trudeau-doesnt-have-the-high-ground-on-trade/ |title=Why Trudeau doesn’t have the high ground on trade |first=J.J. |last=McCullough |date=June 11, 2018 |access-date=July 20, 2018 |newspaper=Washington Post |series=Global opinions}}
57. ^¹{{cite news|last=Hall Findlay|first=Martha|title=Politicians need courage to dismantle supply management|url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/second-reading/politicians-need-courage-to-dismantle-supply-management/article4359234/|accessdate=30 November 2012|newspaper=Globe and Mail|date=21 June 2012}}
58. ^{{cite web |url=https://www.macleans.ca/economy/economicanalysis/how-to-scrap-supply-management-a-lesson-from-down-under/ |title=How to scrap supply management—a lesson from down under: If we followed Australia's lead, we could boost the dairy industry and have cheaper milk |first=Martha |last=Hall Findlay |date=May 16, 2014 |access-date=June 22, 2018}}
59. ^{{cite book |title=Harperism: How Stephen Harper and his think tank colleagues have transformed Canada |publisher=James Lorimer & Company |location=Toronto, Ontario |isbn=9781459406636 |pages=288|date=2014-08-31 }}
60. ^¹²³{{cite web |url=https://www.cigionline.org/sites/default/files/cigi_paper_30.pdf |publisher=Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI) |date=April 15, 2014 |access-date=August 17, 2018 |title=Crying over Spilt Milk: The History of Dairy Supply Management and Its Role in Recent Trade Negotiations}}
61. ^¹{{cite journal |title=Milked and Feathered: The Regressive Welfare Effects of Canada's Supply Management Regime |date=March 2015|first1=Ryan |last1=Cardwell |first2=Chad |last2=Lawley |first3=Di |last3=Xiang |journal=Canadian Public Policy |volume=41 |number=1 |pages=14 |doi=10.3138/cpp.2013-062 }}
62. ^{{cite conference |title=Milked and Feathered: The Regressive Welfare Effects of Canada’s Supply Management Regime |date=October 2014|first1=Ryan |last1=Cardwell |first2=Chad |last2=Lawley |first3=Di |last3=Xiang |conference=Faculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences Faculty Seminar |work=University of Manitoba, Faculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences Faculty Seminar |location=Winnipeg, MB}}
63. ^{{cite web |url=http://www23.statcan.gc.ca/imdb/p2SV.pl?Function=getSurvey&Id=5607 |title=Food Expenditure in Canada |publisher=Statistics Canada |date=2001 |location=Ottawa, Ontario}}Catalogue number 62-554-XIE
64. ^In June 2016, Cardwell and Lawley received the Canadian Economics Association's John Vanderkamp Prize for best CPP 2016 article.
65. ^{{cite web |url=http://news.umanitoba.ca/milked-and-feathered-and-awarded/ |title=Milked and feathered, and awarded |date=June 6, 2016|access-date=September 22, 2018 |publisher=University of Manitoba |newspaper=University of Manitoba News Today}}
66. ^¹²³⁴{{cite news |url=https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2018/06/13/a-trumped-up-charge-against-canadian-dairy-tariffs |title=A Trumped-up charge against Canadian dairy tariffs |first1=Roger |last1=Noll |first2=Robert E. |last2=Litan |date=June 13, 2018|access-date=July 11, 2018 |work= Brookings Institution}}
67. ^Thus, the only reason import restrictions on dairy products are even an issue is because the U.S. withdrew from the TPP.
68. ^¹{{cite news |title=Trans-Pacific Partnership offers dairy sector good news, bad news and a question mark: The deal marks a nudge toward competitive change, but more uncertainty than the dairy sector is used to |first=Janyce |last=McGregor |work=CBC News |date=October 5, 2015 |access-date=July 11, 2018 |url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-election-2015-tpp-dairy-analysis-1.3257280}}
69. ^¹{{cite news |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38721056 |title=Trump executive order pulls out of TPP trade deal |date=January 24, 2017 |access-date=July 11, 2018}}
70. ^{{Cite news|url=https://ca.reuters.com/article/topNews/idCAKBN17L0KY-OCATP|title=Canada's resilient dairy sector girds for Trump fightand |first2=Benjamin|last2=Weir|first1=Rod |last1=Nickel |work=Reuters |date=April 19, 2017|access-date=June 22, 2018|language=en-CA |location=Winnipeg/Sydney }}
71. ^{{Cite news|url=https://www.hilltimes.com/2018/06/04/dairy-farmers-calls-trudeaus-nbcs-meet-press-comments-nafta-talks-deeply-troubling/146478|title=Dairy farmers call Trudeau’s NBC's Meet the Press comments on dairy in NAFTA talks ‘deeply troubling’|work=The Hill Times|access-date=July 22, 2018|language=en-CA |first=Jolson |last=Lim |date=June 4, 2018}}
72. ^{{cite web |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/meet-press-june-3-2018-n879611 |date=June 3, 2018 |access-date=July 22, 2018 |title=Meet the Press - June 3, 2018 |work=NBC |series=Meet the Press |author=Chuck Todd}}
73. ^{{Cite web|url=http://www.maximebernier.com/my_chapter_on_supply_management|title=Live or die with supply management|last=Bernier|first=Maxime|date=April 2018|series=Doing Politics Differently: My Vision for Canada|access-date=June 14, 2018}}
74. ^{{Cite news|url=http://plus.lapresse.ca/screens/52ae5ea0-68d4-4424-a1e8-9c5b6eef9574__7C___0.html|title=Bernier prédit la fin de la gestion de l'offre|date=April 10, 2018|work=La Presse|access-date=July 22, 2018|language=fr-CA}}
75. ^{{cite news |url=https://ici.radio-canada.ca/nouvelle/1020973/la-mobilisation-des-agriculteurs-quebecois-coutera-t-elle-la-victoire-a-maxime-bernier |title=La mobilisation des agriculteurs québécois coûtera-t-elle la victoire à Maxime Bernier? |date=March 8, 2017 |access-date=July 22, 2018 |first=Raphaël |last=Bouvier-Auclair |publisher=Radio Canada |series=ICI Radio-Canada}}
76. ^{{cite news |url=https://www.hilltimes.com/2017/04/26/tory-leadership-candidates-courting-supply-management-group-support/104485 |title=Tory leadership candidates courting supply management group for support |first=Peter |last=Mazereeuw |date=April 26, 2017 |access-date=July 22, 2018 |newspaper=Hill Times}}
77. ^{{Cite news|url=https://nationalpost.com/opinion/andrew-coyne-tories-cry-foul-as-maxime-bernier-spills-the-beans-er-milk-on-leadership-race#comments-area|title=Tories cry foul as Maxime Bernier spills the beans, er, milk on leadership race|last=Coyne|first=Andrew|date=April 12, 2018|work=National Post|access-date=July 20, 2018}}
78. ^{{Cite news|url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/bernier-scheer-leadership-book-1.4625038|title=Bernier pulls book that accuses Scheer of using 'fake Conservatives' to win leadership|date=April 18, 2018|work=CBC News|access-date=July 20, 2018}}
79. ^{{Cite news|url=https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2018/04/26/bernier-stands-by-comments-that-scheer-won-the-tory-leadership-thanks-to-fake-conservatives.html|title=Bernier stands by comments that Scheer won the Tory leadership thanks to ‘fake Conservatives’ |work=The Star|access-date=June 14, 2018|language=en}}
80. ^{{Cite news|url=https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/bernier-s-lack-of-loyalty-not-supply-management-behind-demotion-scheer-1.3972050|title=Bernier's lack of loyalty, not supply management, behind demotion: Scheer|date=2018-06-13|work=CTVNews|access-date=2018-06-14|language=en-CA}}
81. ^{{Cite news|url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-excerpt-mp-maxime-bernier-details-impact-of-supply-management-lobby/|title=Excerpt: MP Maxime Bernier details impact of supply-management lobby on Tory leadership bid|access-date=2018-07-22}}
82. ^{{Cite news|url=http://www.lapresse.ca/actualites/politique/politique-canadienne/201806/13/01-5185647-bernier-expulse-du-cabinet-fantome-des-deputes-daccord-avec-scheer.php|title=Bernier expulsé du cabinet fantôme: des députés d'accord avec Scheer|last=Marquis|first=Mélanie|date=June 13, 2018|work=La Presse|access-date=July 20, 2018|language=fr-FR}}
83. ^{{cite news |title=U.S. not trying to get Canada to end supply management: agriculture secretary |work=CTV News |url=https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/u-s-not-trying-to-get-canada-to-end-supply-management-agriculture-secretary-1.3974682 |first=Brett |last=Bundale|date=June 15, 2018 |access-date=July 13, 2018}}via The Canadian Press
84. ^{{Cite news|url=https://www.wisfarmer.com/story/news/2018/07/02/perdue-canada-can-keep-supply-management-not-class-7/753000002/|title=Perdue: Canada can keep supply management, not Class 7|work=Wisconsin State Farmer|access-date=July 13, 2018 |date=July 2, 2018|language=en |first=Anna-Lisa |last=Laca}}
85. ^¹{{cite news |title=Canada seeks intensive NAFTA talks, even if Trump's in no rush to sign |first=Andy |last=Blatchford |date=July 4, 2018 |access-date=July 22, 2018 |url=https://www.nationalobserver.com/2018/07/04/news/canada-seeks-intensive-nafta-talks-even-if-trumps-no-rush-sign |work=National Observer}}
86. ^¹{{cite news|url=https://www.thestar.com/business/2017/08/18/us-dairy-divided-over-canadas-supply-management-system-in-nafta.html|title=U.S. dairy divided over Canada’s supply management system in NAFTA|last=Panetta|first=Alexander|date=August 18, 2017|newspaper=Toronto Star|access-date=June 26, 2018}}
87. ^{{Cite news|url=https://globalnews.ca/news/4417114/canadian-dairy-farmers-receive-250-million-boost/|title=Canadian dairy farmers receive a $250-million boost by feds |date=August 29, 2018|work=Global News |first=Kraig |last=Krause|access-date=September 5, 2018|language=en}}
88. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.agr.gc.ca/eng/programs-and-services/dairy-farm-investment-program/?id=1491935919994 |title=Dairy Farm Investment Program: 1. What this program offers |publisher=Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada|access-date=September 23, 2018}}
89. ^{{Cite news|url=https://nationalpost.com/opinion/colby-cosh-the-dairy-lobbys-vile-plan-to-screw-us-all-revealed|title=Colby Cosh: The dairy lobby’s vile plan to screw us all — revealed!|date=2018-08-28|work=National Post|access-date=2018-09-11|language=en-US}}
90. ^¹{{cite web |url=http://web.lacoop.coop/fr/sites/lacoopfr.coop/files/etude_lcf-pwc_supply_management_egg_and_poultry.pdf |title=Supply Management in Egg and Poultry: The Economic Impacts of Changes to Canada's Supply Management System |date=January 2018 |access-date=July 11, 2018 |publisher=La Coop Fédérée |location=Montréal, Québec}} This study was funded by La Coop Fédérée in partnership with Exceldor coopérative Burnbrae Farms Limited / Fermes Burnbrae Ltée Nutrigroupe and the collaboration of Fédération des producteurs d’œufs du Québec, Les Éleveurs de volailles du Québec, and Producteurs d’œufs d’incubation du Québec
91. ^¹{{cite web |url=http://www.cdc-ccl.gc.ca/CDC/index-eng.php?link=116 |title=MSQ |date=nd |access-date=July 10, 2018|publisher=CDC}}
92. ^¹{{cite web |url=https://www.ontariodairies.ca/Public/DairyProcessingIndustry/Supply_Management/Public/D/Supply_Management.aspx?hkey=73dcef07-a3d1-44b4-af65-600b16b2c615 |title=Supply Management |work=Ontario Dairy Council |date=nd |access-date=June 21, 2018 |series=Dairy Processing Industry}}
93. ^¹{{cite news|last1=McGregor|first1=Janyce|title=Supply management in Canada: Why politicians defend farm marketing boards |quote="The boards, a frequent whipping boy in international trade talks, are both a boon and a bogeyman"|url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/supply-management-in-canada-why-politicians-defend-farm-marketing-boards-1.3166329|accessdate=May 3, 2017|work=CBC News|date=July 26, 2015}} Due to the value of the quota, by 2015, most banks would loan Canadian dairy farmers up to $30,000 per cow, while banks in the USA (non-supply managed) will only loan $3,000 per cow.
94. ^{{cite web |url=https://business.financialpost.com/commodities/agriculture/trudeau-has-billions-of-reasons-to-dig-in-against-trump-on-dairy |work=Financial Post |first1=Josh |last1=Wingrove |first2=Erik |last2=Hertzberg |date=June 19, 2018 |access-date=July 25, 2018 |title=Trudeau has billions of reasons to dig in against Trump on dairy supply management: Justin Trudeau's defence of Canadian dairy tariffs isn't just about farmers and politics, it's about debt, too — billions of dollars worth}}
95. ^{{cite web |url=https://farmersforum.com/dairy-farmers-net-farm-income-increases-for-first-time-in-six-years/ |title=Profits for Canadian dairy farmers lowest they've been in a decade according to report |first=Tom |last=Collins|date=August 22, 2017 |access-date=September 22, 2018 |work= Farmers Forum Newspaper |location=Guelph, Ontario}}
96. ^¹{{cite web |url=https://farmersforum.com/dairy-farmers-net-farm-income-increases-for-first-time-in-six-years/ |title=Dairy farmers net farm income increases for first time in six years |date=August 27, 2018 |access-date=September 22, 2018 |work= Farmers Forum Newspaper |location=Ontario}}
97. ^{{cite report |url=https://www.milk.org/corporate/pdf/Publications-ODFAPReport.pdf |format=PDF |series=Ontario Dairy Farm Accounting Project |title=Annual Report 2017 |publisher=Co-operative project of the Canadian Dairy Commission and Dairy Farmers of Ontario |location=Ontario |date=June 2018 |pages=22 |access-date=September 22, 2018}}
98. ^¹²³⁴⁵{{cite journal | title =OECD Policy Brief: Economic Survey of Canada, 2008 | journal =OECD Observer | volume =| issue =June 2008 | pages = | publisher =OECD | date =June 11, 2008 | url = https://www.oecd.org/eco/greeneco/economicsurveyofcanada2008achievinglong-termsustainabilityoftheenergysector.htm | accessdate=June 26, 2018 }}
99. ^¹{{Cite news|url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/canadians-paying-high-price-for-supply-management-system/article21983265/|title=A strong voice challenges an anchor on the Canadian economy|access-date=2018-07-12}}
100. ^¹{{cite web |url=http://www.cdc-ccl.gc.ca/CDC/index-eng.php?id=3809 |title=Support Prices |publisher=Canadian Dairy Commission |date=nd |access-date=June 21, 2018}}
101. ^¹{{cite report |title=Regime Change in Canadian Dairy Policy: A Cautionary Tale |series=Independent Agri-Food Policy Note |date=July 2018 |first1=Al |last1=Mussell |first2=Douglas |last2=Hedley |url=http://www.agrifoodecon.ca/uploads/userfiles/files/dairy%20policy%20reform-cautionary%20july-18(1).pdf |format=PDF|publisher=Agri-Food Economic Systems |location=Guelph Ontario |pages=6}}
102. ^¹²³⁴⁵{{cite report |title = Report for Congress: Agriculture: A Glossary of Terms, Programs, and Laws Agriculture: A Glossary of Terms, Programs, and Laws, 2005 Edition |date=June 2005|url = https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs7246/m1/1/high_res_d/97-905_2005Jun16.pdf |format=PDF|first= Jasper |last=Womach |pages=282 }}
103. ^¹²³⁴⁵⁶⁷{{cite web |last=Mussell |first=Al |date=May 2016 |title=Understanding the Dynamics of Milk Pricing and Revenue in a Time of Change |series=Independent Agri-Food Policy Note |publisher=Agri-Food Economic Systems Newsletter |location=Guelph, Ontario |access-date=June 21, 2018 |url=http://www.agrifoodecon.ca/uploads/userfiles/files/milk%20pricing%20briefing%20note%20may%2018%202016.pdf }}
104. ^¹{{cite news |first=Paul |last=Withers |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/surplus-milk-may-be-dumped-due-to-nova-scotia-glut-1.3123556 |title=Surplus milk may be dumped due to Nova Scotia glut: Marketing board struggles to manage demand |newspaper=CBC News |date=June 22, 2015 |access-date=September 23, 2018}}
105. ^¹{{cite news |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/n-z-u-s-dairy-farmers-call-on-canada-to-open-its-market-amid-deadlocked-trade-talks-1.3184738 |title=N.Z., U.S. dairy farmers call on Canada to open its market amid deadlocked trade talks |work=CBC |date=August 9, 2015 |access-date=July 6, 2018}}
106. ^{{Cite news|url=https://nationalpost.com/news/its-not-a-pretty-picture-ontario-dairy-farmers-dumping-skim-milk-into-manure-pits-and-sewer-lagoons#comments-area|title=‘It’s not a pretty picture’: Ontario dairy farmers dumping skim milk into manure pits and sewer lagoons|date=June 2, 2016|work=National Post|access-date=June 25, 2018|language=en-CA}}
107. ^Global Dairy Ingredients Market Dairy ingredients market include whey ingredients, milk powder, milk protein isolates (MPI), milk protein concentrates (MPCs), casein, caseinates, lactose, and others.
108. ^{{cite web |url=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/dairy-ingredients-market-grow-swiftly-102000028.html |title=Dairy Ingredients Market to Grow Swiftly Due to Rising Awareness About Benefits of Healthy & Nutritious Diet Till 2024 |work=PR Newswire |date=June 5, 2018 |access-date=June 25, 2018}}
109. ^{{cite news |last=Barrett |first=Rick |date=April 11, 2017 |title=Canada says don't blame it for Wisconsin dairy woes |newspaper=Milwaukee Journal Sentinel }}
110. ^¹²³⁴{{cite news |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/canada-dairy-usa-idUSL2N17B1E4 |series=Market News |date=June 7, 2016 |access-date=June 25, 2018 |title=Canada weighs options as farmers spar over U.S. milk proteins |first=Rod |last=Nickel |location=Winnipeg, Manitoba}}
111. ^¹²{{citation |last1=Doyle |first1=Pierre |last2=Asgarali |first2=Aamir |last3=Beaulieu-Charbonneau |first3=Olivier |title=Canada's Dairy Industry's Dairy Industry: Position for the future |work=Department of Agriculture and Agri-Food (AAFC) |year=2011 }}
112. ^{{cite web |url=https://www.agcanada.com/daily/agropur-halts-its-diafiltered-milk-imports |title=Agropur halts its diafiltered milk imports: Co-operative has criticized loophole allowing high-protein ingredient |work=AGCanada |date=May 10, 2016 |access-date=June 25, 2018}}
113. ^¹{{cite news |last=Magnarelli |first=Tony |date=April 17, 2018 |title=Schumer calls for an end to Canadian program hurting upstate dairy farmers |work=WRVO Public Media |url=http://wrvo.org/post/schumer-calls-end-canadian-program-hurting-upstate-dairy-farmers |access-date=June 25, 2018}}
114. ^{{cite web|title=Dairy 101: The Canada-U.S. milk spat explained|last=Johnson|first=Kelsey|url=https://ipolitics.ca/2017/04/22/dairy-101-the-canada-u-s-milk-spat-explained/|date=April 22, 2017|work=ipolitics.ca|access-date=September 7, 2018}}
115. ^{{cite news|url=https://calgaryherald.com/opinion/columnists/verboven-its-hard-to-believe-dairy-farmers-hold-the-key-to-nafta|title=It's hard to believe dairy farmers hold the key to NAFTA|last=Verboven|first=Will|date=June 16, 2018|newspaper=The Calgary Herald|access-date=June 25, 2018 }}
116. ^{{Cite news|url=https://ipolitics.ca/2018/04/25/canadas-abusive-dairy-policies-need-to-go-congressmen/|title=Canada's 'abusive' dairy policies need to go|work=iPolitics|language=en-US |first=Kelsey |last=Johnson |date=April 25, 2018 |access-date=July 13, 2018}}
117. ^¹{{cite web |url=https://www.radionz.co.nz/news/country/334113/canada-s-policies-depress-milk-prices |title=Canada's policies depress milk prices |date=June 29, 2017 |access-date=July 14, 2018 |first=Alexa |last=Cook |location=New Zealand |work=Radio New Zealand}}
118. ^{{cite news |url=https://ca.reuters.com/article/businessNews/idCAKBN1J82NF-OCABS |title=Sheltered Canadian dairy sector skimming global exports, U.S. complains |first1=Rod |last1=Nickel |first2=Julie |last2=Ingwersen |location=Winnipeg and Chicago |work=Reuters |date=June 12, 2018 |access-date=July 14, 2018}}
119. ^¹{{cite web |url=https://www.realagriculture.com/2018/04/dairy-price-study-finds-canadians-dont-pay-more-for-milk/ |title=Dairy price study finds Canadians don't pay more for milk |first=Kelvin |last=Heppner |date=April 9, 2018 |access-date=September 16, 2017 |work=RealAgriculture}}
120. ^¹{{cite report |series=Dairy systems around the world |title=Are Canadian Consumers and Farmers Better Off with the Canadian Model? |date=April 2018 |url=https://www.exportactionglobal.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Dairy-Systems-Around-The-World_Export-Action-Global_April-2018.pdf |format=PDF |access-date=July 25, 2018 |pages=44 |work=Export Action Global |first1=Adam |last1=Taylor |first2=Fion |last2=Anastassiades}}
121. ^{{cite news |url=https://depquebec.com/en/for-the-first-time-the-regie-grants-retailers-an-exclusive-price-increase/ |title=For The First Time, The Régie Grants Retailers An Exclusive Price Increase 3 January 2018 |work=DepQuébec |access-date=July 14, 2018}}
122. ^{{Cite news|url=https://montreal.ctvnews.ca/bureaucrats-raise-minimum-price-of-milk-in-quebec-1.3786591|title=Bureaucrats raise minimum price of milk in Québec|date=February 2, 2018|location=Montreal|access-date=July 10, 2018|language=en-CA |work=CTV News}}
123. ^¹²{{cite web |url=https://www.milk.org/Corporate/PDF/Media-OntarioMilkIndustry.pdf |title=The Ontario Industry: A Guide for Urban Journalists |date=nd |access-date=July 18, 2018 |location=Mississauga, Ontario |publisher=Dairy Farmers of Ontario}}
124. ^¹{{cite web|title=Trade|url=http://www.cdc-ccl.gc.ca/CDC/index-eng.php?id=3803|website=Canadian Dairy Commission|accessdate=April 6, 2017}}
125. ^{{cite journal |last1=O'Connor |first1=Bernard |last2=Gubel |first2=Sebastien |last3=Bertolotto |first3=Elena |title=The Allocation of Agricultural Tariff Rate Quotas among Supplying Countries under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade |date=May 30, 2013 |series=UCD Working Papers in Law, Criminology & Socio-Legal Studies Number=05/2013 |doi=10.2139/ssrn.2272026 |ssrn = 2272026}}
126. ^¹{{cite web |url=https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=6707d79e-dcd2-4180-a84f-9adac166d5a7 |title=The EU is in breach of its WTO obligations because of the way it allocates shares in quotas for the import of many agricultural goods |location=European Union |date=April 29, 2013 |access-date=July 18, 2018}}
127. ^¹{{cite web|url=https://albertamilk.com/news/2018/06/alberta-dairy-farmers-stand-up-against-president-trump/|title=Alberta Dairy Farmers Stand Up Against President Trump|last=Conway|first=Karlee|date=June 11, 2018|publisher=Alberta Milk|access-date=June 22, 2018}}
128. ^{{cite web |url=https://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/american-dairy-farmers-depend-on-government-subsidies-673374473.html |work=Grey, Clark, Shih and Associates Limited |date=February 8, 2018 |title=American dairy farmers depend on government subsidies |access-date=June 25, 2018 |quote="he study, which focuses on changes introduced by the 2014 Farm Bill, shows that in 2015, the American government doled out approximately $22.2 billion in direct and indirect subsidies to the U.S dairy sector."}}
129. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.dairyweb.ca/Resources/WDD82/WDD8204.pdf |date=2007 |publisher=Western Dairy Digest |title=What you should know about butter |access-date=July 11, 2018}}
130. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.international.gc.ca/controls-controles/prod/agri/tarif.aspx?lang=eng |title=Tariff Rate Quotas : Agricultural Products |publisher=Government of Canada |date=September 26, 2013 |access-date=June 25, 2018}}
131. ^¹²³⁴⁵{{cite web|title=The $25,000 cow|url=http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/15/the-25000-cow/|first=Andrew |last=Coyne|date=August 15, 2011|publisher=Maclean's | access-date=October 22, 2013 |quote="These range from 168 per cent for eggs, to 238 per cent for chicken, 246 per cent for cheese...these apply only above certain "minimum access commitments" required by the World Trade Organization (WTO), allowing a certain amount of imports to enter at much lower tariffs."}}
132. ^The same figures Coyne (2011) uses are cited in Findlay (2012:4) who is citing Hart (2005:3). "The tariff on the over quota (ranging from 168 percent for eggs, 238 percent for chicken, 246 percent for cheese, to almost 300 percent for butter) means that the prices of imports are so high that virtually no one bothers."
133. ^¹²{{citation|title=The case for reforming Canada's supply management systems|date=August 8, 2012|url=http://thebusinesscouncil.ca/publications/the-case-for-reforming-canadas-supply-management-systems/|location=Ottawa, ON|publisher=Business Council of Canada (BCC)|access-date=June 24, 2018}}
134. ^{{Cite journal|last1=Beaulieu |last2=Venkatachalam|first1=Eugene |first2=V. Balaji|date=March 2018|title=Nafta Renegotiations: An Opportunity for Canadian Dairy?|url=https://www.policyschool.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/NAFTA-Renegotiations-Beaulieu-final.pdf|journal=The School of Public Policy Publications|volume=11 |number=10|pages=|via=University of Calgary |series=SSR}}
135. ^{{Cite web|url=http://business.financialpost.com/opinion/terence-corcoran-its-trudeau-chance-to-save-us-from-supply-management-hes-blowing-it|title=It's Trudeau's chance to save us from supply management. He's blowing it|last=Corcoran|first=Terence|date=March 23, 2018 |series=Opinion|newspaper=Financial Post|language=en-CA|access-date=June 11, 2018}}
136. ^¹²{{cite web|url=http://www.cdc-ccl.gc.ca/CDC/index-eng.php?id=3787|title=Mandate|date=March 19, 2010|publisher=Canadian Dairy Commission|accessdate=October 19, 2013}}
137. ^¹{{cite web |work=Council of Canadians |date=November 20, 2017 |title=Factsheet: NAFTA and Farming |location=Ottawa, Ontario |url=https://canadians.org/factsheet-nafta-farming |access-date=September 7, 2018}}
138. ^{{cite web|url=http://thebusinesscouncil.ca/news/canadian-council-of-chief-executives-adopts-new-name-elects-linda-hasenfratz-as-chair|title=Canadian Council of Chief Executives adopts new name, elects Linda Hasenfratz as Chair|date=January 28, 2016|publisher=Business Council of Canada|access-date=June 23, 2018}}
139. ^The BCC, known as the Canadian Council of Chief Executives (CCCE) until c. 2009, was first established as the Business Council on National Issues (BCNI) in 1976 and operated under that name until c.2000. Its membership includes CEOs of 150 of Canada's leading corporations. By 2016, these corporations accounted for over 50% of the value of the Toronto Stock Exchange.
140. ^{{Cite news|url=https://nationalpost.com/opinion/john-manley-if-ottawa-truly-wants-to-tear-down-provincial-trade-barriers-it-should-start-with-supply-management|title=John Manley: If Ottawa truly wants to tear down provincial trade barriers, it should start with supply management|date=January 13, 2015|work=National Post|access-date=June 22, 2018|language=en-CA}}
141. ^¹{{Cite news|url=http://www.macleans.ca/politics/ottawa/conservatives-say-free-the-beer-but-not-the-millk/|title=Conservatives say 'Free the beer' but not the milk - Maclean's|last=Geddes|first=John|date=December 6, 2017|work=Maclean's|access-date=June 22, 2018|language=en-CA}}
142. ^{{Cite news|url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/supreme-court-interprovincial-trade-alcohol-comeau-new-brunswick-1.4381048|title=New Brunswick needs alcohol revenue to cover social costs of drinking, Supreme Court told CBC News|last=MacKinnon|first=Bobbi-Jean|date=December 6, 2017|work=CBC News|access-date=2018-06-11}}
143. ^CPTPP is a revised version of TPP.
144. ^¹{{citation |url=https://www.policyalternatives.ca/publications/monitor/food-sovereignty-canada |title=Food Sovereignty In Canada: Movement growing to control our own food and agriculture|first1=Hannah |last1=Wittman |first2=Annette Aurélie |last2=Desmarais |date=September 1, 2012 |access-date=June 24, 2018 |publisher=Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (CCPA)}}
145. ^{{cite book |url=http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2017/september/tradoc_156062.pdf |title=Guide to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership |pages=35 |date=July 2017 |isbn=978-92-79-68000-7 |doi=10.2781/647649}}
146. ^{{cite news |url=https://www.timescolonist.com/trump-approves-of-new-continental-trade-deal-as-winners-and-losers-are-assessed-1.23447871 |title=Trump approves of new continental trade deal as winners and losers are assessed |first=Mike |last=Blanchfield |newspaper=Times Colonist via The Canadian Press |date=October 1, 2018 |access-date=October 1, 2018}}
147. ^{{cite news |url=https://www.timescolonist.com/trump-approves-of-new-continental-trade-deal-as-winners-and-losers-are-assessed-1.23447871 |title=Trump approves of new continental trade deal as winners and losers are assessed |first=Mike |last=Blanchfield |newspaper=Times Colonist via The Canadian Press |date=October 1, 2018 |access-date=October 1, 2018}}
148. ^{{cite news |title=Canada, U.S. reach new NAFTA|url=https://www.thestar.com/news/world/2018/09/30/canada-us-reach-nafta-deal.html |work=The Star |location=Ottawa, Ontario |language=en |first1=Daniel |last1=Dale |first2=Tonda |last2=MacCharles |date=September 30, 2018 |access-date=October 1, 2018}}
149. ^¹²³{{cite report |url=http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/125246/2/SM_report__5_2012_wc.pdf |format=PDF |title=A Primer on the Economics of Supply Management and Food Supply Chains |first1=Bruno |last1=Larue |first2=Rémy |last2=Lambert |location=Québec City, QC. |date=2012 |number=2012‐9 |series=Working Paper |publisher=Structure and Performance of Agriculture and Agri-products industry Network (SPAA Network) |access-date=June 29, 2018 |pages=71}}
150. ^{{Cite news|url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/canadians-paying-high-price-for-supply-management-system/article21983265/|title=A strong voice challenges an anchor on the Canadian economy|last=McKenna|first=Barrie|date=December 7, 2014|newspaper=The Globe and Mail|access-date=June 11, 2018}}{{Subscription required}}
151. ^{{Cite web|url=http://www.macleans.ca/politics/ottawa/its-time-for-the-conservatives-to-abandon-dairy-cow-marxism/amp/|title=It's time for Conservatives to ditch dairy cow Marxism - Macleans.ca|last=Milke|first=Mark|date=September 1, 2017|website=www.macleans.ca|language=en-CA|access-date=2017-11-26}}
152. ^[https://thewalrus.ca/the-new-life-of-brian-mulroney/ "The New Life of Brian Mulroney"]. The Walrus, Ira Wells, Apr. 19, 2018
153. ^It was Mulroney's "crucial role" that led to the signing of the controversial 1989 Canada-United States Free Trade Agreement, NAFTA's precursor. In the 1980s, there was "fierce" opposition to free trade in Canada.
154. ^{{Cite news|url=https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/full-text-the-dairy-lobby-briefing-binder-found-on-the-floor-of-the-conservative-convention|title=Full text: The dairy lobby briefing binder found on the floor of the Conservative convention|date=2018-08-28|work=National Post|access-date=2018-09-11|language=en-US}}
155. ^{{cite news|title=Opinion|last=Beauchemin|first=Simon|date=November 17, 2014|newspaper=La Presse}}
156. ^{{Cite news|url=http://www.lapresse.ca/affaires/economie/canada/201805/28/01-5183589-un-conseiller-de-trudeau-favorable-a-labolition-de-la-gestion-de-loffre.php|title=Un conseiller de Trudeau favorable à l'abolition de la gestion de l'offre {{!}} Joël-Denis Bellavance {{!}} Canada|date=2018-05-29|work=La Presse|access-date=2018-07-12|language=fr-CA}}
157. ^¹²{{cite news|url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-dont-let-supply-management-myths-spoil-the-milk/|title=Don’t let supply management myths spoil the milk|last1=Elton|first1=Sarah|date=June 20, 2018|newspaper=The Globe and Mail|access-date=June 22, 2018|last2=MacRae|first2=Rod}}{{Subscription required}}
158. ^¹{{cite web|url=http://www.broadbentinstitute.ca/supply_management_folly_tpp|title=Supply management and the folly of the TPP|last=Muirhead|first=Bruce|date=October 15, 2015|access-date=June 22, 2018}}
159. ^{{cite book|title=Globalization, Governments and the Transformation of Rural Communities|date=September 2001|publisher=University of Alberta Press via Parkland Institute|isbn=978-0-88864-378-0|editor-last1=Epp|editor-first1=Roger|pages=368|quote=Some of the most intense effects of globalization can be seen in rural communities. Despite a booming world economy, rural communities—and the people who work in natural-resource industries like farming, forestry, mining or fishing—have been hard hit by recent international trade agreements." Epp and Whitson wrote that by 2001, "corporate agribusiness was making inroads into North America's dairy production". In California plans were underway for what would be the largest dairy farm in the world with 47,000 cows on 7000 acres (p.22). {{rp|22}} They wrote that, "Canada's supply-management system helped keep dairy production in the hands of farm families, but the system was "under attack from corporate interests and the American government at WTO talks and elsewhere." They cautioned that, if the system fails the "resulting restructuring will transfer Canadian dairy production to a few corporate producers."(p.22)|editor-last2=Whitson|editor-first2=Dave}}
160. ^{{cite report |title=Putting The Market Back in Dairy Marketing |url=https://www.cdhowe.org/sites/default/files/attachments/research_papers/mixed/Commentary_374_0.pdf |format=PDF |publisher=C.D. Howe Institute |access-date=June 22, 2018 |series=Commentary |number=374 |first1=Colin |last1=Busby |first2=Daniel |last2=Schwanen |date=March 2013 |isbn=978-0-88806-894-1 |pages=21}}
161. ^{{cite web |last=Robson |first=William |first2=Colin |last2=Busby |year=2010 |title=Freeing Up Food: The Ongoing Cost, and Potential Reform, of Supply Management |url=https://www.cdhowe.org/freeing-food-ongoing-cost-and-potential-reform-supply-management |format=|series=Backgrounder |number=128 |location=Toronto |publisher=C.D. Howe Institute |access-date=September 7, 2018}}
162. ^{{cite web |last=Lippert |first=Owen |year=2001 |title=The Perfect Food in a Perfect Mess: The Cost of Milk in Canada |url=https://www.fraserinstitute.org/sites/default/files/PerfectFoodinaPerfectMess.pdf |series=Public Policy Sources |number=52 |location= Vancouver |publisher=The Fraser Institute}}
163. ^¹²³⁴⁵⁶⁷⁸⁹¹⁰¹¹¹²¹³¹⁴{{cite journal|last=Hall Findlay|first=Martha|authorlink=Martha Hall Findlay|author2=Margarita Gres|date=June 2012|title=Supply Management: Problems, Politics – And Possibilities|url=https://www.policyschool.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/supply-management-hall-findlay.pdf|journal=The School of Public Policy SPP Research Papers|publisher=University of Calgary School of Public Policy|volume=5|issue=19|pages=1–33|accessdate=June 21, 2018}}
164. ^Hall Findlay's 2012 report "Supply Management: Problems, Politics – And Possibilities", was criticized by the Dairy Farmers of Canada as flawed. [Findlay] cited the "Canadian price for 4 litres of milk as $9.60, which is $3 to $4 more than what most consumers paid [in 2012]...In fact, data collected by the firm Neilsen indicates the weighted average retail price of milk in Canada, is $1.45, cheaper than the $1.65 per litre in New Zealand and $1.55 per litre in Australia."; "Since 1986, Canada has concluded NAFTA and bilateral agreements with Jordan, Colombia, Peru, Costa Rica, Chile, Israel and EFTA (Switzerland, Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein)"; "the dairy industry is a Canadian success story, present in all ten provinces and is one of the top two agricultural sectors in 7 of the 10 provinces...There was a 1% excess in world supply of milk in 2008-2009, and dairy farmers faced a 30% decrease in price. This kind of price volatility has led to government bailouts in the U.S. and Europe. In Canada, the markets for everyone in the dairy industry and consumers remained stable ([https://www.dairyfarmers.ca/news-centre/news/policy/supply-management-the-facts-and-proudly-canadian Beaulieu 2012])."
165. ^{{cite web |url=https://www.dairyfarmers.ca/news-centre/news/policy/supply-management-the-facts-and-proudly-canadian |first=Thérèse |last=Beaulieu |title=Supply Management: The Facts and Proudly Canadian: Flawed Martha Hall Findlay report uses misleading research |date=June 21, 2012 |access-date=June 21, 2018 |location=Ottawa |publisher=Dairy Farmers of Canada (DFC)}}
166. ^¹²{{Cite web|url=http://books1.scholarsportal.info/viewdoc.html?id=578583|title=The supply management cartel: collective inaction and the failure of reform|last=Merkley|first=Eric|year=2013|work=Canadian Electronic Library|series=Frontier Centre for Public Policy|language=en|via=Scholars Portal Books|access-date=June 14, 2018}} Paywalled
167. ^{{cite report |url=https://www.macdonaldlaurier.ca/files/pdf/Supply-Management-Essays-June-2012.pdf |format=PDF |title=Milking the System: How Agricultural Supply Management Impedes Trade Opportunities and Egregiously Transfers Income |date=June 2012 |access-date=June 26, 2018 |editor-first1=Jason |editor-last1=Clemens |editor-first2=Brian Lee |editor-last2=Crowley |series=Hungry for Change}}
168. ^¹{{cite news|url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/commentary/editorials/the-price-of-eggs-and-the-throne-speech/article14878907/|title=The price of eggs and the Throne Speech|last=|first=|date=October 15, 2013|newspaper=The Globe and Mail|accessdate=October 19, 2013|publisher=|location=|series=Editorial}}{{Subscription required}}
169. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.conferenceboard.ca/e-Library/abstract.aspx?did=3294|title=Making Milk: The Practices, Players, and Pressures Behind Dairy Supply Management|last=Goldfarb|first=Danielle|date=November 23, 2009|publisher=The Conference Board of Canada|pages=7–16}} Chapter 2. Locked. Available only to CB membership. Cited in [https://www.policyschool.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/supply-management-hall-findlay.pdf Hall Findlay 2016:4]
170. ^¹{{Cite news|url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/rob-commentary/canadas-supply-management-system-for-dairy-is-no-longer-defensible/article36029788/|title=Canada’s supply management system for dairy is no longer defensible|date=August 18, 2017|work=Globe and Mail|access-date=June 26, 2018}} {{Subscription required}}
171. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.realagriculture.com/2018/05/this-is-the-only-dairy-system-in-the-world-that-is-thriving-graham-lloyd/|title="This is the only dairy system in the world that is thriving" – Graham Lloyd|last=Haney|first=Shaun|date=May 3, 2018|access-date=July 10, 2018|quote="An even stronger number was that sixty percent of respondents believe that the extent to which the federal government will protect the interests of Canada’s dairy industry will have an impact on their vote in the upcoming election. In fact, 25% of the respondents stated, “it will affect their vote a lot."}}
172. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-polls/canadian-feds-should-make-more-effort-dairy-nafta|title=A strong majority of Canadians agree that the federal government should defend Canada's dairy farmers in the NAFTA renegotiation|last=Dallaire|first=Sébastien|date=May 3, 2018|publisher=Ipsos|location=Montréal, Québec|access-date=July 10, 2018}}
173. ^{{cite web|url=http://abacusdata.ca/trade-trump-milk-how-canadians-react-to-tough-talk/|title=Trade, Trump & Milk: How Canadians React To Tough Talk|last1=Anderson|first1=Bruce|last2=Coletto|first2=David|date=April 25, 2017}}
174. ^{{Cite news|url=http://angusreid.org/supply-management-nafta-renegotiation/|title=Supply Management: Most Canadians say scrapping system should be on the table during NAFTA talks - Angus Reid Institute|date=2017-08-01|work=Angus Reid Institute|access-date=July 10, 2018|language=en-CA}}
175. ^{{cite web|url=https://lobbycanada.gc.ca/app/secure/ocl/lrs/do/vwRg?cno=514®Id=634659&blnk=1|title=Registration - In-house Organization|date=nd|work=Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying of Canada|access-date=June 24, 2018}} The BCC registered as a lobby group in March 26, 1996. Based on the period from October 29 to January 13, 2012, the BCC submitted 578 Communication Reports to parliament with 24 in 2011. In 2011 then-MP Martha Hall Findlay was one of five Designated Public Office Holders who participated in the communications.
176. ^The BCC registered as a lobby group in March 26, 1996. Based on the [https://lobbycanada.gc.ca/app/secure/ocl/lrs/do/vwRg?cno=514®Id=634659&blnk=1 period from October 29 to January 13, 2012], the BCC submitted 578 Communication Reports to parliament with 24 in 2011. In 2011 then-MP Martha Hall Findlay was one of five Designated Public Office Holders who participated in the communications.
177. ^{{cite news|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2011/11/20/canada-supply-management-free-trade_n_1103657.html|title=Canada Supply Management: Free Trade Talks Could End Food Pricing System|date=November 20, 2011|newspaper=The Huffington Post Canada|accessdate=October 22, 2013|agency=The Canadian Press}}
178. ^{{Cite news|url=https://www.politico.eu/article/on-canadian-dairy-europe-and-trump-see-eye-to-eye/|title=EU dairy sector finds unlikely ally: Donald Trump|date=2018-06-26|work=POLITICO|access-date=2018-06-28|language=en-US}}
179. ^{{Cite news|url=https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/supply-management-is-the-most-staggeringly-unconservative-thing-the-conservatives-support|title=Supply management is the most staggeringly unconservative thing the Conservatives support|date=June 11, 2018 |work=National Post|access-date=July 12, 2018|language=en-US}}
180. ^{{Cite news|url=https://ipolitics.ca/2017/08/28/make-it-clear-prime-minister-supply-management-is-here-to-stay/|title=Make it clear, prime minister — supply management is here to stay - iPolitics|date=2017-08-28|work=iPolitics|access-date=2018-07-11|language=en-US}}
181. ^{{cite news |url=http://thechronicleherald.ca/opinion/1583836-surette-world-dairy-chaos-makes-supply-management-a-success |title=World dairy chaos makes supply management a success |first=Ralph |last=Surette |date=July 14, 2018 |access-date=August 17, 2018 |newspaper=The Chronicle Herald |location=Halifax, Nova Scotia}}
182. ^{{Cite news|url=https://www.hilltimes.com/2018/06/04/dairy-farmers-calls-trudeaus-nbcs-meet-press-comments-nafta-talks-deeply-troubling/146478|title=Dairy farmers call Trudeau’s NBC's Meet the Press comments on dairy in NAFTA talks ‘deeply troubling’ - The Hill Times|last=Times|first=The Hill|date=2018-06-04|work=The Hill Times|access-date=2018-07-11|language=en-US}}
183. ^{{cite report |last=Goff |first= Patricia |title=Canadian Trade Negotiations in an Era of Deep Integration |series=CIGI Papers|number= 88 |date=February 2016 |location=Ontario |publisher=Center for international Governance Innovation (CIGI) |url= https://www.cigionline.org/sites/default/files/cigi_paper_no.88_web_0.pdf |format=PDF |access-date=July 12, 2018}}
184. ^{{cite news |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/ceta-cheese-trqs-1.4230138 |title=Canada carves out more European cheese for retailers after EU concerns: European trade deal takes hold Sept. 21 with 18,000 tonnes of new cheese imports phased in over 5 years |first=Janyce |last=McGregor |work=CBC News |date=August 1, 2017 |access-date=July 12, 2018}}
185. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.natlawreview.com/article/canada-reaches-comprehensive-and-progressive-trans-pacific-partnership-agreement|title=Canada Reaches Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement|date=January 19, 2018|publisher=National Law Review|accessdate=9 March 2018}}
186. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.nydailynews.com/newswires/news/business/11-nations-sign-pacific-trade-pact-plans-tariffs-article-1.3863220|title=11 nations to sign Pacific trade pact as US plans tariffs|date=March 8, 2018|publisher=nydailynews.com|access-date=June 24, 2018}}
187. ^{{cite news|url=https://www.thestar.com/opinion/editorialopinion/2012/06/27/tear_down_the_supply_management_wall_in_canada.html|title=Tear down the supply management wall in Canada|last=Lee|first=Ian|date=June 27, 2012|newspaper=Toronto Star|accessdate=June 22, 2018}}
188. ^{{Cite news|url=https://www.realagriculture.com/2018/01/new-tpp-deal-without-the-u-s-same-concessions-for-canadas-supply-managed-sectors/|title=New TPP deal, same concessions for Canada’s supply managed sectors|last=Heppner|first=Kelvin|date=January 23, 2018|work=Real Agriculture|access-date=June 22, 2018|language=en-US}}
189. ^{{Cite news|url=https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/supply-management-is-the-most-staggeringly-unconservative-thing-the-conservatives-support#comments-area|title=Supply management is the most staggeringly unconservative thing the Conservatives support|date=2018-06-11|work=National Post|access-date=2018-07-10|language=en-US}}
190. ^{{Cite web|url=https://twitter.com/pnpcbc/status/1007395536863809536|language=en|access-date=June 27, 2018 |work=CBC News: Power & Politics |date=June 14, 2018 |title=Former QC Premier Jean Charest on Pres. Trump's attacks on supply management}}
191. ^{{Cite web|url=https://www.macdonaldlaurier.ca/new-conservative-leader-should-be-open-to-new-ideas-stanley-hartt-for-inside-policy/|title=New Conservative leader should be open to new ideas: Stanley Hartt for Inside Policy {{!}} Macdonald-Laurier Institute|website=www.macdonaldlaurier.ca|language=en-US|access-date=2018-09-21}}
192. ^{{Cite news|url=https://ottawacitizen.com/opinion/columnists/charlebois-milking-nafta-why-supply-management-may-finally-be-doomed|title=Charlebois: Milking NAFTA – Why supply management may finally be doomed|date=2017-08-08|work=Ottawa Citizen|access-date=2017-12-10|language=en-CA}}
193. ^{{cite news |last=Barber |first=John |date=June 9, 2018 |title=Why Canadian milk infuriates Donald Trump |newspaper=The Guardian |location= UK |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/commentisfree/2018/jun/09/milk-canada-us-trade-war |access-date=June 22, 2018}}
194. ^¹²{{Cite news|url=http://www.macleans.ca/economy/economicanalysis/now-is-our-chance-to-scrap-the-milk-tax-once-and-for-all/|title=Now is our chance to scrap the milk tax once and for all|date=April 20, 2017|work=Maclean's|access-date=2017-11-26|language=en-CA |first=Trevor |last=Tombe}}
195. ^According to the Canadian Dairy Commission (CDC), "The overall number of cows has decreased over the past 5 years, however the production per cow has increased by 9.7%. In 2011, there were 965,600 cows in Canada producing an average of 80.5 hl of milk per cow. In 2016, there were approximately 959,100 dairy cows in Canada, producing an average of 88.3 hl of milk per cow."
196. ^¹{{Cite web|url=https://business.financialpost.com/opinion/its-really-time-to-kick-canadas-2-6-billion-dairy-cartel-er-habit|title=It really is time to kick Canada's $2.6-billion dairy habit |newspaper=Financial Post|last= Osborne|first=Michael|date=July 6, 2018|language=en-CA|access-date=July 19, 2018}}
197. ^{{Cite news|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-04-29/milk-wars-curdled-u-s-canada-relationship-long-ago|title=Milk Wars Curdled U.S.-Canada Relationship Long Ago|last=Mihm|first=Stephen|date=April 29, 2017|work=Bloomberg L.P.|access-date=June 21, 2018|language=en|quote="Trump blames Canada, but both sides have been fighting dirty since the 1930s. ... But the U.S. is equally guilty of treating its dairy industry as a sacred cow. Indeed, both countries have gone to extraordinary lengths to prop up their dairies since the 1930s."}} Paywall
198. ^¹{{cite web|url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/milk-dairy-cost-supply-management-1.3612834|title=Does supply management really mean Canadians pay more for milk? A new look at global retail milk prices says Canucks pay a fair price for milk|last=Powers|first=Lucas|date=June 3, 2016|work=CBC News|access-date=June 22, 2018}}
199. ^{{Cite web|url=https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/06/11/canada-is-running-a-milk-racket/|author=Jonathan Kay |title=Justin Trudeau Is Running a Milk Racket|website=Foreign Policy|language=en|access-date=2018-06-22}}
200. ^{{Cite news|url=https://nationalpost.com/opinion/christie-blatchford-how-much-do-i-love-max-bernier-let-me-count-the-cartels|title=Christie Blatchford: How much do I love Max Bernier? Let me count the cartels|date=2018-08-29|work=National Post|access-date=2018-09-05|language=en-US}}
201. ^{{Cite news|url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/rob-commentary/worried-about-price-fixing-check-out-the-dairy-aisle/article37394007/|title=Loblaw’s behaviour is outrageous. But so are other schemes to fix the cost of food|last=McKenna|first=Barrie|date=December 20, 2017|newspaper=The Globe and Mail|access-date=June 11, 2018}}{{Subscription required}}
202. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.go5quebec.ca/en/gestion.php|title=WTO and Agriculture — Supply management|year=2013|publisher=GO5, Coalition for a Fair Farming Model, Supply Management|accessdate=October 22, 2013}}
203. ^¹²³{{Cite news|url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/don-t-fear-political-fallout-from-dairy-farmers-ex-mp-says-1.1217862|title=Don't fear political fallout from dairy farmers, ex-MP says|work=CBC News|access-date=April 1, 2018|language=en |first=Laura |last=Payton}}
204. ^{{Cite web|url=https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/type/data?text=40200|title=Data|last=Canada|first=Government of Canada, Statistics|website=www150.statcan.gc.ca|language=en|access-date=2018-06-11}}
205. ^{{cite web |url=https://www.macleans.ca/economy/economicanalysis/why-your-milk-costs-so-much-in-canada/ |work=Maclean's |title=Why your milk costs so much and what to do about it: It's time to put Canada's most sacred cow, supply management, out to pasture |date=May 12, 2014 |first=Martha |last=Hall Findlay}}
206. ^This is Part 1 of a series of three, Part 2: "Why the dairy industry’s defence of supply management is so flawed", Part 3: How to scrap supply management—a lesson from down under
207. ^{{Cite news|url=https://thewalrus.ca/youre-paying-too-much-for-milk/|title=You’re Paying Too Much for Milk|work=The Walrus|access-date=2018-07-12|language=en-CA}}
208. ^{{Cite news|url=http://www.macleans.ca/economy/economicanalysis/why-the-dairy-industrys-defence-of-supply-management-is-so-flawed/|title=Why the dairy industry's defence of supply management is so flawed|last=Hall Findlay|first=Martha|date=May 14, 2014|work=Maclean's|access-date=June 22, 2018|language=en-CA}}
209. ^{{cite web |url=http://thebusinesscouncil.ca/publications/the-case-for-reforming-canadas-supply-management-systems/ |title=The case for reforming Canada's supply management systems |date=August 8, 2012 |access-date=July 13, 2018 |publisher=Business Council of Canada |location=Ottawa, Ontario}}
210. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.dairyfarmers.ca/who-we-are/our-partners|title=Partners|date=nd|work=Dairy Farmers of Canada|access-date=June 26, 2018}}
211. ^¹²{{cite news|url=http://www.swnews4u.com/archives/37536/|title=Canada’s Dairy Supply Management Can Offer Farmers A Stable Pay Price|last=Pomplun|first=Gillian|date=April 20, 2018|access-date=July 18, 2018|location=Vernon County, Wisconsin}} Participants included Wisconsin State Senator Jennifer Shilling, State Representative Lee Nerison, aides of U.S. Senators Tammy Baldwin and Ron Johnson, and U.S. Representative Ron Kind, as well as Darrin Von Ruden, President of Wisconsin Farmers Union, Kevin Walleser of the Wisconsin Milk Marketing Board, Al Hass of Organic Valley and more.
212. ^{{cite web|url=http://milkboard.dgtlpub.com/issues/2018-04-30/pdf/milkboard_2018-04-30.pdf|title=Optimism Amidst Challenges: Canada's dairy industry experiences resurgence and renewed interest as it faces threats to system and its future prosperity|date=April 30, 2018|editor-last=Laidlaw|editor-first=Sharon|series=Milk Producer|publisher=Dairy Farmers of Ontario|location=Mississauga, Ontario|pages=56|issn=0030-3038|access-date=July 18, 2018|volume=94|number=4}}
213. ^{{Cite news|url=https://thewalrus.ca/youre-paying-too-much-for-milk/|title=You’re Paying Too Much for Milk|last=Hall Findlay|first=Martha|date=August 1, 2017|work=The Walrus|access-date=June 22, 2018|language=en-CA}}
214. ^¹{{cite news |url=https://nationalpost.com/news/world/growing-number-of-u-s-dairy-farmers-look-to-supply-management-to-solve-crisis-as-trump-urges-canada-to-kill-it |title=Growing number of struggling U.S. dairy farmers look to supply management, as Trump urges Canada to kill it |date=July 25, 2018 |first=Tom |last=Blackwell |access-date=August 17, 2018 |newspaper=National Post}}
215. ^¹{{cite report|url=https://www.agropur.com/sites/default/files/2018-01/RapportAnnuel_2015_ANG_PDF_final.pdf|title=Annual Report|pages=72|access-date=June 26, 2018|format=PDF|work=Agropur|year=2015}}
216. ^¹²³{{cite report|url=https://www.agropur.com/sites/default/files/documents/Analysis_of_%20impacts_of_supply_management_Canadian_dairy_inudstry-EN.pdf|title=Analysis of the potential impacts of the end of supply management in the Canadian dairy industry|last1=Benoit|first1=Dominique|last2=Corriveau|first2=Alexandra|date=December 2015|pages=55|access-date=June 26, 2018|format=PDF|work=Boston Consulting Group via Agropur (BCG)}}
217. ^¹²{{Cite news|url=http://www.macleans.ca/politics/ottawa/why-the-dairy-lobby-is-so-powerful/|title=Why the dairy lobby is so powerful - Macleans.ca|last=Wherry|first=Aaron|date=October 5, 2010|work=Macleans.ca|access-date=June 25, 2018|language=en-CA}}
218. ^{{cite web |url=https://www.manitobacooperator.ca/comment/how-the-supply-management-lobby-influences-politics/ |title=Comment: How the supply management lobby influences politicsMy unsuccessful federal leadership campaign is proof the sector has outsized political influence — for now |first=Maxime |last=Bernier |date=July 10, 2018 |access-date=July 13, 2018 |publisher=Glacier Media Glacier Farm Media Limited Partnership |series=Manitoba Co-operator}}
219. ^{{cite web |url=https://www.macleans.ca/news/canada/in-the-lobby/ |title=The 10 lobby groups with the most contact with federal officials |work=Maclean's |date=November 27, 2012 |access-date=July 13, 2018}}
220. ^{{cite news |last=McGregor |first=Janyce |date=August 2, 2017 |url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/feihe-plant-kingston-construction-1.4228501 |title=A winning formula? China invests in Canadian dairy to help feed its baby boom: Feihe International investing $225 million to build infant formula plant in Kingston, Ontario |work=CBC News|access-date=June 26, 2018}}
221. ^Feihe chose Canada instead of New Zealand, despite its proximity, because of the bad press surrounding New Zealand's Fonterra, which owned a 43% stake in Sanlu, the company whose product poisoned hundreds of thousands of babies in the melamine scandal in 2008. As a result Chinese consumers no longer trust milk from New Zealand.
222. ^{{cite news |last=Lee |first=Klaudia |date=September 16, 2008 |access-date=June 26, 2018 |url=https://www.smh.com.au/world/nz-pm-alerted-china-to-tainted-baby-milk-20080915-4gfh.html |title=NZ alerted China to tainted milk, PM says |newspaper=South China Morning Post |location=Hong Kong}}
223. ^{{cite news |last=Ritchie |first=Kerri |date=December 28, 2009 |url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/2009-01-28/fonterra-denies-advocating-melamine-use-in-milk/275912 |title=Fonterra denies advocating melamine use in milk scandal |location=New Zealand |work= ABC |access-date=June 26, 2018}}
224. ^{{Cite news|url=http://business.financialpost.com/legal-post/yoplait-danone-battle-to-keep-chobani-yogourt-out-of-canada|title=Yoplait, Danone battle to keep Chobani yogourt out of Canada|date=2012-04-02|work=Financial Post|access-date=2017-12-10|language=en-US}}
225. ^{{Cite web|url=http://www.thewhig.com/2013/01/29/chobani-sours-on-canada|title=Chobani sours on Canada|last=nurun.com|website=The Kingston Whig-Standard|language=en-CA|access-date=2017-12-10}}
226. ^¹{{Cite news|url=http://business.financialpost.com/investing/theres-a-global-butter-boom-but-supply-management-has-canada-stuck-on-the-sidelines|title=There’s a global butter boom, but supply management has Canada stuck on the sidelines|date=November 1, 2017|work=Financial Post|access-date=September 23, 2018|language=en-US |first=Joe |last=Chidley}}
227. ^{{cite news |url=http://www.wisconsinagriculturist.com/dairy/us-butter-consumption-nears-50-year-record-high |title=U.S. butter consumption nears 50-year record high: Dairy Outlook: Butter consumption is forecast to jump 8% in 2017 |first=Fran |last=O'Leary |date=March 27, 2017 |access-date=June 26, 2018}}
228. ^{{cite news |url=http://money.cnn.com/2017/08/09/news/economy/butter-shortage-europe/index.html |title=Europe is running out of butter |first=Ivana |last=Kottasová |date=August 10, 2017|access-date=June 25, 2018}}
229. ^{{Cite news|url=https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/how-canadas-zany-dairy-system-affects-daily-life-from-cheese-bandits-to-dessert-starved-newfoundlanders#comments-area |first=Tristin |last=Hopper|title=How Canada’s zany dairy system affects daily life, from cheese bandits to dessert-starved Newfoundlanders|date=November 15, 2016|work=National Post|access-date=June 26, 2018|language=en-CA}}
230. ^{{cite web|first=Fran |last=Howard |date=April 27, 2018 |url=https://www.milkbusiness.com/article/canadas-growing-milk-output-outpacing-demand |title=Canada's Growing Milk Output Outpacing Demand |website=milkbusiness.com}}
231. ^¹{{cite report |publisher=Conference Board of Canada |date=March 2014 |title=Canada's Reforming Dairy Supply Management: The Case for Growth |location=Ottawa, Ontario |first1=Michael |last1=Grant |first2=Richard |last2=Barichello |first3=Mark |last3=Liew |first4=Vijay |last4=Gill}}
232. ^The CSE represents the value of annual transfers between consumers of agricultural commodities and producers, measured at the farm gate resulting from agricultural policy mechanisms that support agriculture.
233. ^{{cite report |publisher=OECD |title=Producer and Consumer Support Estimates |url=https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=MON20123_2 |date=2012 |access-date=September 22, 2018}}
234. ^{{cite news|url=https://www.thestar.com/opinion/editorials/2017/04/23/trump-is-wrong-about-dairy-protectionism-but-canada-should-still-scrap-it-editorial.html|title=Trump is wrong about dairy protectionism, but Canada should still scrap it: Editorial|date=April 23, 2017|newspaper=The Star|access-date=June 22, 2018|location=Toronto|series=Editorial}}
235. ^{{Cite news|url=https://nationalpost.com/news/politics/supply-management-costs-poor-families-five-times-more-relative-to-household-income-study|title=Supply management costs poor families five times more relative to household income: study|last=Csanady|first=Ashley|date=February 26, 2015|work=National Post|access-date=June 22, 2018|language=en-CA}}
236. ^{{Cite news|url=http://business.financialpost.com/opinion/supply-management-is-literally-driving-tens-of-thousands-of-canadians-into-poverty|title=Supply management is literally driving tens of thousands of Canadians into poverty|date=2016-08-31|work=Financial Post|access-date=2018-01-08|language=en-US}}
237. ^{{Cite book|date=2016|editor-last=Geo-JaJa|editor-first=MacLeans A.|editor2-last=Majhanovich|editor2-first=Suzanne|title=Effects of Globalization on Education Systems and Development|doi=10.1007/978-94-6300-729-0|isbn=978-94-6300-729-0}}
238. ^¹²³{{Citation|title=Nearly all Canadian farmers prosper without supply management |work=Montreal Economic Institute |via=Newswire|first=Alexandre |last=Moreau|date=August 21, 2017|url=https://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/nearly-all-canadian-farmers-prosper-without-supply-management-640869313.html|accessdate=2018-01-15}}
239. ^¹{{Cite news|url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/rob-commentary/canadas-supply-management-system-for-dairy-is-no-longer-defensible/article36029788/|title=Canada’s supply management system for dairy is no longer defensible|access-date=September 17, 2018 |date=August 18, 2017 |first=Martha |last=Hall Findlay}}
240. ^¹²{{Cite news|date=August 18, 2017|url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/farmers-nafta-supply-management-dairy-farmers-renegotiation-1.4251369|title=Western farmers worry they'll pay the price of saving supply management under NAFTA |first=Kate |last=MacNamara|work=CBC News|access-date=June 22, 2018|language=en-CA}}
241. ^{{Cite news|url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/rob-commentary/why-is-canada-letting-dairy-farmers-imperil-nafta/article37089835/|title=Why is Canada letting dairy farmers imperil NAFTA? |newspaper=Globe and Mail |first=Aaron |last=Gairdner |date=November 26, 2017|access-date=June 22, 2018}} Paywall
242. ^{{Cite news|url=https://ipolitics.ca/2015/12/05/supply-management-is-expensive-irrational-and-doomed/|title=Supply management is expensive, irrational — and doomed |publisher=iPolitics|date=December 5, 2015|work=iPolitics|access-date=November 14, 2017|language=en-US |first=Alan |last=Freeman}}