| 词条 | Talk America, Inc. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co. |
| 释义 |
|Litigants=Talk America, Inc. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co. |ArgueDate=March 30 |ArgueYear=2011 |DecideDate=June 9 |DecideYear=2011 |FullName=Talk America, Inc. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co. DBA AT&T Michigan |Docket=10-313 |OpinionAnnouncement=https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/10-313.pdf |OralArgument=https://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2010/2010_10_313/argument |USVol=564 |USPage=50 |ParallelCitations=131 S. Ct. 2254; 180 L. Ed. 2d 96 |Prior=Michigan Public Service Commission decision reversed sub nom. Mich. Bell Tel. Co. v. Lark, 2007 WL 2868633 (E.D. Mich. 2007); affirmed sub nom. Michigan Bell Telephone Co. v. Covad Communications Co., 597 F.3d 370 (6th Cir. 2010); cert. granted, {{ussc|562|1104|2010|el=no}}. |Subsequent= |Holding=The Federal Communications Commission had advanced a reasonable interpretation of its regulations in a dispute with AT&T. |SCOTUS=2010-2016 |Majority=Thomas |JoinMajority=Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor |Concurrence=Scalia |NotParticipating=Kagan |LawsApplied= }}Talk America, Inc. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co., 564 U.S. 50 (2011), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) had advanced a reasonable interpretation of its regulations in a dispute with AT&T.[1] See also
References1. ^[https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/10-313.pdf Talk America, Inc. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.] Syllabus p. 2 "Held: The FCC has advanced a reasonable interpretation of its regulations—i.e., that to satisfy its duty under §251(c)(2), an incumbent LEC must make its existing entrance facilities available to competitors at cost-based rates if the facilities are to be used for interconnection—and this Court defers to the FCC’s views." External links
| case = Talk America, Inc. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co., {{Ussc|564|50|2011|el=no}} | googlescholar =https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6145764192576947485 | justia =https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/564/50/ | oyez =https://www.oyez.org/cases/2010/10-313 | other_source1 = Supreme Court (slip opinion) | other_url1 =https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/10-313.pdf{{SCOTUS-case-stub}} 4 : 2011 in United States case law|United States Supreme Court cases|United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court|Legal history of Michigan |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。