| 词条 | Tomlinson v Gill |
| 释义 |
| name = Tomlinson v Gill | court = | image = | caption = | date decided = | full name = | citations = (1756) Ambler 330 | judges = | prior actions = | subsequent actions = | opinions = Lord Hardwicke | transcripts = | keywords = Privity }} Tomlinson v Gill (1756) Ambler 330 is an English contract law case concerning privity of contract. It stands as an example of the flexible approach to privity under the earlier common law. Facts{{Expand section|date=April 2011}}JudgmentLord Hardwicke decided that a third person is entitled to sue if there can be spelt out of the contract an intention by one of the parties to contract as trustee for him, even though nothing was said about any trust in the contract, and there was no trust fund to be administered. See also{{Clist privity}}
NotesReferencesExternal links 3 : English contract case law|1756 in British law|Court of Chancery cases |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。