词条 | Trace inequality |
释义 |
In mathematics, there are many kinds of inequalities involving matrices and linear operators on Hilbert spaces. This article covers some important operator inequalities connected with traces of matrices.[1][2][3][4] Basic definitionsLet Hn denote the space of Hermitian {{mvar|n}}×{{mvar|n}} matrices, Hn+ denote the set consisting of positive semi-definite {{mvar|n}}×{{mvar|n}} Hermitian matrices and Hn++ denote the set of positive definite Hermitian matrices. For operators on an infinite dimensional Hilbert space we require that they be trace class and self-adjoint, in which case similar definitions apply, but we discuss only matrices, for simplicity. For any real-valued function {{mvar|f}} on an interval {{mvar|I}} ⊂ ℝ, one may define a matrix function {{math|f(A)}} for any operator {{math|A ∈ Hn}} with eigenvalues {{mvar|λ}} in {{mvar|I}} by defining it on the eigenvalues and corresponding projectors {{mvar|P}} as given the spectral decomposition Operator monotoneA function {{math|f: I → ℝ}} defined on an interval {{mvar|I}} ⊂ ℝ is said to be operator monotone if ∀{{mvar|n}}, and all {{math|A,B ∈ Hn}} with eigenvalues in {{mvar|I}}, the following holds, where the inequality {{math|A ≥ B}} means that the operator {{math|A − B ≥ 0}} is positive semi-definite. One may check that {{math|f(A){{=}}A2}} is, in fact, not operator monotone! Operator convexA function is said to be operator convex if for all and all {{math|A,B ∈ Hn}} with eigenvalues in {{mvar|I}}, and , the following holds Note that the operator has eigenvalues in , since and have eigenvalues in {{mvar|I}}. A function is operator concave if is operator convex, i.e. the inequality above for is reversed. {{anchor|Joint_convexity_function_2016_10}}Joint convexityA function , defined on intervals is said to be jointly convex if for all and all with eigenvalues in and all with eigenvalues in , and any the following holds A function {{mvar|g}} is jointly concave if −{{mvar|g}} is jointly convex, i.e. the inequality above for {{mvar|g}} is reversed. Trace functionGiven a function {{mvar|f}}: ℝ → ℝ, the associated trace function on Hn is given by where {{mvar|A}} has eigenvalues {{mvar|λ}} and Tr stands for a trace of the operator. Convexity and monotonicity of the trace functionLet {{mvar|f}}: ℝ → ℝ be continuous, and let {{mvar|n}} be any integer. Then, if is monotone increasing, so is on Hn. Likewise, if is convex, so is on Hn, and it is strictly convex if {{mvar|f}} is strictly convex. See proof and discussion in,[1] for example. Löwner–Heinz theoremFor , the function is operator monotone and operator concave. For , the function is operator monotone and operator concave. For , the function is operator convex. Furthermore, is operator concave and operator monotone, while is operator convex. The original proof of this theorem is due to K. Löwner who gave a necessary and sufficient condition for {{mvar|f}} to be operator monotone.[5] An elementary proof of the theorem is discussed in [1] and a more general version of it in.[6] {{anchor|Klein2016_10}}Klein's inequalityFor all Hermitian {{mvar|n}}×{{mvar|n}} matrices {{mvar|A}} and {{mvar|B}} and all differentiable convex functions {{mvar|f}}: ℝ → ℝ with derivative {{math|f ' }}, or for all positive-definite Hermitian {{mvar|n}}×{{mvar|n}} matrices {{mvar|A}} and {{mvar|B}}, and all differentiableconvex functions {{mvar|f}}:(0,∞) → ℝ, the following inequality holds, {{Equation box 1|indent =: |equation = |cellpadding= 6 |border |border colour = #0073CF |bgcolor=#F9FFF7}} In either case, if {{mvar|f}} is strictly convex, equality holds if and only if {{mvar|A}} = {{mvar|B}}. A popular choice in applications is {{math|f(t) {{=}} t log t}}, see below. ProofLet {{math|C {{=}} A − B}} so that, for 0 < {{mvar|t}} < 1, Define By convexity and monotonicity of trace functions, {{mvar|φ}} is convex, and so for all 0 < {{mvar|t}} < 1, and, in fact, the right hand side is monotone decreasing in {{mvar|t}}. Taking the limit {{mvar|t}}→0 yields Klein's inequality. Note that if {{mvar|f}} is strictly convex and {{mvar|C}} ≠ 0, then {{mvar|φ}} is strictly convex. The final assertion follows from this and the fact that is monotone decreasing in {{mvar|t}}. Golden–Thompson inequality{{main|Golden–Thompson inequality}}In 1965, S. Golden [7] and C.J. Thompson [8] independently discovered that For any matrices , This inequality can be generalized for three operators:[9] for non-negative operators , Peierls–Bogoliubov inequalityLet be such that Tr eR = 1. Defining {{math|g {{=}} Tr FeR}}, we have The proof of this inequality follows from the above combined with Klein's inequality. Take {{math|f(x) {{=}} exp(x), A{{=}}R + F, and B {{=}} R + gI}}.[10] Gibbs variational principleLet be a self-adjoint operator such that is trace class. Then for any with with equality if and only if Lieb's concavity theoremThe following theorem was proved by E. H. Lieb in.[9] It proves and generalizes a conjecture of E. P. Wigner, M. M. Yanase and F. J. Dyson.[11] Six years later other proofs were given by T. Ando [12] and B. Simon,[3] and several more have been given since then. For all matrices , and all and such that and , with the real valued map on given by
Here stands for the adjoint operator of Lieb's theoremFor a fixed Hermitian matrix , the function is concave on . The theorem and proof are due to E. H. Lieb,[9] Thm 6, where he obtains this theorem as a corollary of Lieb's concavity Theorem. The most direct proof is due to H. Epstein;[13] see M.B. Ruskai papers,[14][15] for a review of this argument. Ando's convexity theoremT. Ando's proof [12] of Lieb's concavity theorem led to the following significant complement to it: For all matrices , and all and with , the real valued map on given by is convex. {{anchor|Joint_convexity_2016_10}}Joint convexity of relative entropyFor two operators define the following map For density matrices and , the map is the Umegaki's quantum relative entropy. Note that the non-negativity of follows from Klein's inequality with . StatementThe map is jointly convex. ProofFor all , is jointly concave, by Lieb's concavity theorem, and thus is convex. But and convexity is preserved in the limit. The proof is due to G. Lindblad.[16] Jensen's operator and trace inequalitiesThe operator version of Jensen's inequality is due to C. Davis.[17] A continuous, real function on an interval satisfies Jensen's Operator Inequality if the following holds for operators with and for self-adjoint operators with spectrum on . See,[17][18] for the proof of the following two theorems. Jensen's trace inequalityLet {{mvar|f}} be a continuous function defined on an interval {{mvar|I}} and let {{mvar|m}} and {{mvar|n}} be natural numbers. If {{mvar|f}} is convex, we then have the inequality for all ({{mvar|X}}1, ... , {{mvar|X}}n) self-adjoint {{mvar|m}} × {{mvar|m}} matrices with spectra contained in {{mvar|I}} and all ({{mvar|A}}1, ... , {{mvar|A}}n) of {{mvar|m}} × {{mvar|m}} matrices with Conversely, if the above inequality is satisfied for some {{mvar|n}} and {{mvar|m}}, where {{mvar|n}} > 1, then {{mvar|f}} is convex. Jensen's operator inequalityFor a continuous function defined on an interval the following conditions are equivalent:
for all bounded, self-adjoint operators on an arbitrary Hilbert space with spectra contained in and all on with
every self-adjoint operator with spectrum in .
Araki–Lieb–Thirring inequalityE. H. Lieb and W. E. Thirring proved the following inequality in [19] in 1976: For any , and In 1990 [20] H. Araki generalized the above inequality to the following one: For any , and for and for The Lieb–Thirring inequality also enjoys the following generalization:[21] for any , and Effros's theorem and its extensionE. Effros in [22] proved the following theorem. If is an operator convex function, and and are commuting bounded linear operators, i.e. the commutator , the perspective is jointly convex, i.e. if and with (i=1,2), , Ebadian et al. later extended the inequality to the case where and do not commute . [23] Von Neumann's trace inequality and related resultsVon Neumann's trace inequality, named after its originator John von Neumann, states that for any n × n complex matrices A, B with singular values and respectively,[24] A simple corollary to this is the following result[25]: For hermitian n × n complex matrices A, B where now the eigenvalues are sorted decreasingly ( and , respectively), See also
References1. ^1 2 E. Carlen, Trace Inequalities and Quantum Entropy: An Introductory Course, Contemp. Math. 529 (2010) 73–140 {{doi|10.1090/conm/529/10428}} 2. ^R. Bhatia, Matrix Analysis, Springer, (1997). 3. ^1 B. Simon, Trace Ideals and their Applications, Cambridge Univ. Press, (1979); Second edition. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, (2005). 4. ^M. Ohya, D. Petz, Quantum Entropy and Its Use, Springer, (1993). 5. ^K. Löwner, "Uber monotone Matrix funktionen", Math. Z. 38, 177–216, (1934). 6. ^W.F. Donoghue, Jr., Monotone Matrix Functions and Analytic Continuation, Springer, (1974). 7. ^S. Golden, Lower Bounds for Helmholtz Functions, Phys. Rev. 137, B 1127–1128 (1965) 8. ^C.J. Thompson, Inequality with Applications in Statistical Mechanics, J. Math. Phys. 6, 1812–1813, (1965). 9. ^1 2 E. H. Lieb, Convex Trace Functions and the Wigner–Yanase–Dyson Conjecture, Advances in Math. 11, 267–288 (1973). 10. ^D. Ruelle, Statistical Mechanics: Rigorous Results, World Scient. (1969). 11. ^E. P. Wigner, M. M. Yanase, On the Positive Semi-Definite Nature of a Certain Matrix Expression, Can. J. Math. 16, 397–406, (1964). 12. ^1 . Ando, Convexity of Certain Maps on Positive Definite Matrices and Applications to Hadamard Products, Lin. Alg. Appl. 26, 203–241 (1979). 13. ^H. Epstein, Remarks on Two Theorems of E. Lieb, Comm. Math. Phys., 31:317–325, (1973). 14. ^M. B. Ruskai, Inequalities for Quantum Entropy: A Review With Conditions for Equality, J. Math. Phys., 43(9):4358–4375, (2002). 15. ^M. B. Ruskai, Another Short and Elementary Proof of Strong Subadditivity of Quantum Entropy, Reports Math. Phys. 60, 1–12 (2007). 16. ^G. Lindblad, Expectations and Entropy Inequalities, Commun. Math. Phys. 39, 111–119 (1974). 17. ^1 C. Davis, A Schwarz inequality for convex operator functions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 8, 42–44, (1957). 18. ^F. Hansen, G. K. Pedersen, Jensen's Operator Inequality, Bull. London Math. Soc. 35 (4): 553–564, (2003). 19. ^E. H. Lieb, W. E. Thirring, Inequalities for the Moments of the Eigenvalues of the Schrödinger Hamiltonian and Their Relation to Sobolev Inequalities, in Studies in Mathematical Physics, edited E. Lieb, B. Simon, and A. Wightman, Princeton University Press, 269–303 (1976). 20. ^H. Araki, On an Inequality of Lieb and Thirring, Lett. Math. Phys. 19, 167–170 (1990). 21. ^Z. Allen-Zhu, Y. Lee, L. Orecchia, Using Optimization to Obtain a Width-Independent, Parallel, Simpler, and Faster Positive SDP Solver, in ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, 1824–1831 (2016). 22. ^E. Effros, A Matrix Convexity Approach to Some Celebrated Quantum Inequalities, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, n.4, 1006–1008 (2009). 23. ^A. Ebadian, I. Nikoufar, and M. Gordjic, "Perspectives of matrix convex functions," Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 108(18), 7313–7314 (2011) 24. ^{{cite journal|last1=Mirsky|first1=L.|title=A trace inequality of John von Neumann|journal=Monatshefte für Mathematik|date=December 1975|volume=79|issue=4|pages=303–306|doi=10.1007/BF01647331}} 25. ^{{cite book|last1=Marshall|first1=Albert W.|last2=Olkin|first2=Ingram|last3=Arnold|first3=Barry|title=Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and Its Applications|date=2011|edition=2nd|location=New York |publisher=Springer|page=340-341|isbn=978-0-387-68276-1}}
3 : Operator theory|Matrix theory|Inequalities |
随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。