词条 | United States v. Davila |
释义 |
|Litigants=United States v. Davila |ArgueDate=April 15 |ArgueYear=2013 |DecideDate=June 13 |DecideYear=2013 |FullName=United States, Petitioner v. Anthony Davila |USVol=569 |USPage=597 |ParallelCitations=133 S. Ct. 2139; 186 L. Ed. 2d 139; 2013 U.S. LEXIS 4541; 81 U.S.L.W. 4394 |Docket=12-167 |OralArgument=https://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2012/2012_12_167/argument |Prior=664 F.3d [https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20111221102 1355] (11th Cir. 2011) |Subsequent= |Holding= |SCOTUS=2010–2016 |Majority=Ginsburg |JoinMajority=Roberts, Kennedy, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor, Kagan |Concurrence=Scalia |JoinConcurrence=Thomas |LawsApplied= }}United States v. Davila, 569 U.S. 597 (2013), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that when a federal judge participates in the plea process in violation of rule 11(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, a guilty plea need not be vacated if the record shows prejudice to the decision to plea due to rule 11(h).[1] Notes1. ^Syllabus p. 2 References{{refbegin}}
External links
| case = United States v. Davila, {{Ussc|569|597|2013|el=no}} | courtlistener =https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/902264/united-states-v-davila/ | googlescholar = https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=16073450094486408713 | justia =https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/569/597/ | oyez =https://www.oyez.org/cases/2012/12-167{{SCOTUS-case-stub}} 3 : 2013 in United States case law|United States Supreme Court cases|United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court |
随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。