“Vital Sign Alert System”的意思、由来-开放百科全书

Hospitalized patients often exhibit signs of deterioration several hours before experiencing cardiopulmonary arrest. These early warning signs frequently go unrecognized by nurses on medical–surgical units, who tend to have large caseloads.^[3]^[4] Over the past several years, the use of a rapid response team and an early warning scoring (EWS) system has been proposed as a possible solution to the problem.

A rapid response team is a designated group of clinicians with intensive care expertise, who can quickly assemble at a patient's bedside to institute immediate diagnostic and treatment measures in accordance with hospital protocol. Unfortunately, rapid response teams tend to be activated only after a patient's condition has deteriorated and destabilized to the point that emergency transfer to an ICU is required.

EWS systems are based on the premise that a decline in a patient's condition can be detected early through the assessment of an aggregate set of critical physiologic variables. Whereas a single abnormality among these variables may not signal a need for intervention, a combination of two or more irregularities, occurring together, may alert the nurse to a potentially dangerous change in the patient's condition.

Benefits

Theoretically, an EWS system facilitates early detection of life-threatening changes, giving the nurse time to confer with a physician and institute corrective measures to stabilize the patient's condition. Literature reviews conducted over the past decade, however, have found little evidence that EWS systems are effective in reducing adverse events.^[5]^[6]^[7] Furthermore, there is little evidence that such instruments are reliable or valid.^[8]^[9] EWS systems have been criticized for being too labor-intensive and complex for practical use on medical–surgical units. It's been suggested that the increased nursing workload associated with such systems, as well as general misunderstandings concerning their use and the significance of patients’ scores, may explain the failure of nurses to use them correctly and consistently.^[10]^[11]

References

1. ^{{cite web|url=http://journals.lww.com|title=LWW Journals|publisher=Lippincott Williams & Wilkins}}
2. ^{{cite journal|last=Jones|first=Barbara|year=2013|title=Developing a Vital Sign Alert System|journal=American Journal of Nursing|volume=113|issue=8|pages=36–44|doi=10.1097/01.naj.0000432962.33881.65}}
3. ^{{cite book|last=McArthur-Rouse|first=F|title=Critical care outreach services ad early warning scoring systems|year=2001|pages=696–704}}
4. ^{{cite web|title=National Patient safety Agency. Recognising and responding appropriately to early signs of deterioration in hospitalised patients|url=http://www.nrls.npsa.nhs.uk/resources/?entryid45=59834|work=London: National Health Service|accessdate=December 19, 2018}}
5. ^{{cite book|last=Esmonde|first=L|title=Investigating the effectiveness of critical care outreach services|year=2006|pages=1713–21}}
6. ^{{cite book|last=Kyriacos|first=U|title=Monitoring vital signs using early warning scoring systems|year=2011|pages=311–30}}
7. ^{{cite book|last=McGaughey|first=J|title=Outreach and early warning systems for the prevention of intensive care admission and death of cristically ill adult patients on general hospital wards|year=2007}}
8. ^{{cite book|last=Gao|first=H|title=Systematic review and evaluation of physiological track and trigger warning systems for identifying at-risk patients on the ward|year=2007|pages=667–79}}
9. ^{{cite book|last=Subbe|first=CP|title=Reproducibility of physiological track-and-trigger warning systems for identifying at-risk patients on the ward|year=2007|pages=619–24}}
10. ^{{cite book|last=Morris|first=A|title=Early warning scoring systems: observation of care in practice|year=2010|pages=1180–4}}
11. ^{{cite book|last=Oakey|first=RJ|title=Physiological observation track and trigger system|year=2006|pages=48–54}}

Process

Benefits

References