| 词条 | X v Canada (Commissioner of Patents) |
| 释义 |
| name = X v Canada (Commissioner of Patents) | court = Federal Court of Appeal | image = | imagesize = | imagelink = | imagealt = | caption = | full name = | date decided = November 16, 1981 | citations = [1981] F.C.J. No. 1013, 59 C.P.R. (2d) 7 | transcripts = | judges = Thurlow C.J., Ryan J., and Kelly D.J. | prior actions = | subsequent actions = | opinions = | keywords = Patent, Utility }}{{italic title|all=yes|noerror}} X v Canada (Commissioner of Patents) is a decision by the Federal Court of Appeal concerning the utility requirement for patenting an invention in Canada. BackgroundThe patent application in issue was for a "death ray", more particularly, a device that creates a path of ionized air using a laser beam to transmit electrical energy without wires. The invention had not been constructed by the inventor because of the significant cost of doing so. The Commissioner of Patents refused the patent application on the ground that the death ray was "inoperable for the purpose for which it was designed." DecisionChief Justice Thurlow, for the Court, found that the patent did not disclose how a technical challenge would be addressed and was not written clearly enough to enable a person skilled in the art to make or use the invention. In addition, he concluded the Commissioner's comments concerning the absence of a working model of the invention and describing the invention as an abstract theorem were obiter and were not relevant to the application's refusal. In view of the above, the Court dismissed the inventor's appeal and affirmed the decision of the Commissioner of Patents. See also
3 : Canadian patent case law|1981 in Canadian case law|Federal Court of Appeal (Canada) case law |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。