释义 |
- Reasons
- References
The list below consists of the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 1992. This list, however, does not include decisions on motions. Reasons{{SCCOpinionKey}}Case name | Argued | Decided | Lamer | La Forest | L'Heureux-Dubé | Sopinka | Gonthier | Cory | McLachlin | Stevenson | Iacobucci | Major |
---|
Friends of the Oldman River Society v. Canada (Minister of Transport), [1992] 1 SCR 3 | January 23, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. Bain, [1992] 1 SCR 91 | January 23, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. Lohnes, [1992] 1 SCR 167 | January 23, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | M. (M.E.) v. L. (P.), [1992] 1 SCR 183 | January 23, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Reference re Manitoba Language Rights, [1992] 1 SCR 212 | January 23, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Canadian Council of Churches v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), [1992] 1 SCR 236 | January 23, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. Morin, [1992] 3 SCR 286 | January 30, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | T. (K.N.) v. P. (G.R.), [1992] 1 SCR 210 | February 5, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. Généreux, [1992] 1 SCR 259 | February 13, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. Forster, [1992] 1 SCR 339 | February 13, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Lapointe v. Hôpital Le Gardeur, [1992] 1 SCR 351 | February 13, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Lapointe v. Hôpital Le Gardeur, [1992] 1 SCR 382 | February 13, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Thomson v. Canada (Deputy Minister of Agriculture), [1992] 1 SCR 385 | February 13, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Québec (Communauté urbaine) v. Services de santé du Québec, [1992] 1 SCR 426 | February 13, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Life Underwriters Assn. of Canada v. Provincial Assn. of Quebec Life Underwriters, [1992] 1 SCR 449 | February 26, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Case name | Argued | Decided | Lamer | La Forest | L'Heureux-Dubé | Sopinka | Gonthier | Cory | McLachlin | Stevenson | Iacobucci | Major |
---|
R. v. Butler, [1992] 1 SCR 452 | February 27, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. Wise, [1992] 1 SCR 527 | February 27, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Sinclair v. Quebec (Attorney General), [1992] 1 SCR 579 | February 27, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. Clunas, [1992] 1 SCR 595 | February 27, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. Green, [1992] 1 SCR 614 | February 27, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. Moore, [1992] 1 SCR 619 | February 28, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Quebec (Attorney General) v. Transport G. Courchesne Inc., [1992] 1 SCR 621 | February 28, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Lefebvre v. HOJ Industries Ltd., [1992] 1 SCR 831 | March 2, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Newfoundland Telephone Co. v. Newfoundland (Board of Commissioners of Public Utilities), [1992] 1 SCR 623 | March 5, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Frenette v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., [1992] 1 SCR 647 | March 12, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. Milne, [1992] 1 SCR 697 | March 26, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) v. Chiarelli, [1992] 1 SCR 711 | March 26, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. T. (V.), [1992] 1 SCR 749 | March 26, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. Morin, [1992] 1 SCR 771 | March 26, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. Sharma, [1992] 1 SCR 814 | March 26, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Case name | Argued | Decided | Lamer | La Forest | L'Heureux-Dubé | Sopinka | Gonthier | Cory | McLachlin | Stevenson | Iacobucci | Major |
---|
R. v. Duncanson, [1992] 1 SCR 836 | March 30, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. Martin, [1992] 1 SCR 838 | March 30, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. Ellis-Don Ltd., [1992] 1 SCR 840 | March 31, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. CIP Inc., [1992] 1 SCR 843 | April 9, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Reference re Milgaard (Can.), [1992] 1 SCR 866 | April 14, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Williams v. Canada, [1992] 1 SCR 877 | April 16, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | United Nurses of Alberta v. Alberta (Attorney General), [1992] 1 SCR 901 | April 16, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Tremblay v. Quebec (Commission des affaires sociales), [1992] 1 SCR 952 | April 16, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. Van Haarlem, [1992] 1 SCR 982 | April 27, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. M. (W.H.), [1992] 1 SCR 984 | April 27, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. Pasini, [1992] 1 SCR 1017 | April 29, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Machtinger v. HOJ Industries Ltd., [1992] 1 SCR 986 | April 30, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. Neverson, [1992] 1 SCR 1014 | April 30, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Canadian National Railway Co. v. Norsk Pacific Steamship Co., [1992] 1 SCR 1021 | April 30, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Canada Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Canadian Commercial Bank, [1992] 2 SCR 3 | May 6, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Case name | Argued | Decided | Lamer | La Forest | L'Heureux-Dubé | Sopinka | Gonthier | Cory | McLachlin | Stevenson | Iacobucci | Major |
---|
Bovey v. Gananoque (Town), [1992] 2 SCR 5 | May 6, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Canadian Union of Public Employees v. Canadian Broadcasting Corp., [1992] 2 SCR 7 | May 7, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Re Canada Labour Code, [1992] 2 SCR 50 | May 21, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. Downey, [1992] 2 SCR 10 | May 21, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. D. (S.), [1992] 2 SCR 161 | June 4, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. Murdock, [1992] 2 SCR 164 | June 4, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Reference re Milgaard (Can.), [1992] 1 SCR 875 | June 4, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. J. (M.A.), [1992] 2 SCR 166 | June 5, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. Bennett, [1992] 2 SCR 168 | June 5, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Strang v. Strang, [1992] 2 SCR 112 | June 11, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. W. (R.), [1992] 2 SCR 122 | June 11, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | McInerney v. MacDonald, [1992] 2 SCR 138 | June 11, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. Kelly, [1992] 2 SCR 170 | June 11, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. Arnold, [1992] 2 SCR 208 | June 11, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. Guthrie, [1992] 2 SCR 222 | June 16, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Case name | Argued | Decided | Lamer | La Forest | L'Heureux-Dubé | Sopinka | Gonthier | Cory | McLachlin | Stevenson | Iacobucci | Major |
---|
Norberg v. Wynrib, [1992] 2 SCR 226 | June 18, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Zurich Insurance Co. v. Ontario (Human Rights Commission), [1992] 2 SCR 321 | June 25, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Chrysler Canada Ltd. v. Canada (Competition Tribunal), [1992] 2 SCR 394 | June 25, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Reference re Goods and Services Tax, [1992] 2 SCR 445 | June 25, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Garcia Transport Ltée v. Royal Trust Co., [1992] 2 SCR 499 | June 25, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Bank of Montreal v. Bail Ltée, [1992] 2 SCR 554 | June 25, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. Nova Scotia Pharmaceutical Society, [1992] 2 SCR 606 | July 9, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. Deruelle, [1992] 2 SCR 663 | July 9, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Schachter v. Canada, [1992] 2 SCR 679 | July 9, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. Zundel, [1992] 2 SCR 731 | August 27, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. Barbeau, [1992] 2 SCR 845 | August 27, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. Sims, [1992] 2 SCR 858 | August 27, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. Parks, [1992] 2 SCR 871 | August 27, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. Smith, [1992] 2 SCR 915 | August 27, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Pax Management Ltd. v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, [1992] 2 SCR 998 | September 24, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Case name | Argued | Decided | Lamer | La Forest | L'Heureux-Dubé | Sopinka | Gonthier | Cory | McLachlin | Stevenson | Iacobucci | Major |
---|
R. v. Z. (D.A.), [1992] 2 SCR 1025 | September 24, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Vidéotron Ltée v. Industries Microlec Produits Électroniques Inc., [1992] 2 SCR 1065 | September 24, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Dickason v. University of Alberta, [1992] 2 SCR 1103 | September 24, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Norberg v. Wynrib, [1992] 2 SCR 318 | September 24, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. DeSousa, [1992] 2 SCR 944 | September 24, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Central Okanagan School District No. 23 v. Renaud, [1992] 2 SCR 970 | September 24, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. Rube, [1992] 3 SCR 159 | October 9, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. Ewert, [1992] 3 SCR 161 | October 14, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Haig v. Canada (Chief Electoral Officer), [1992] 3 SCR 163 | October 22, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | M.(K.) v. M.(H.), [1992] 3 SCR 6 | October 29, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Brissette Estate v. Westbury Life Insurance Co.; Brissette Estate v. Crown Life Insurance Co., [1992] 3 SCR 87 | October 29, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Ciba-Geigy Canada Ltd. v. Apotex Inc., [1992] 3 SCR 120 | October 29, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Lakeside Colony of Hutterian Brethren v. Hofer, [1992] 3 SCR 165 | October 29, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Kelvin Energy Ltd. v. Lee, [1992] 3 SCR 235 | October 29, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Lalonde v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada, [1992] 3 SCR 261 | October 29, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Case name | Argued | Decided | Lamer | La Forest | L'Heureux-Dubé | Sopinka | Gonthier | Cory | McLachlin | Stevenson | Iacobucci | Major |
---|
London Drugs Ltd. v. Kuehne & Nagel International Ltd., [1992] 3 SCR 299 | October 29, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. Hawkins, [1992] 3 SCR 463 | November 2, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. Atkinson, [1992] 3 SCR 465 | November 2, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. Babinski, [1992] 3 SCR 467 | November 4, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. Lebeau, [1992] 3 SCR 469 | November 6, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. N. (C.), [1992] 3 SCR 471 | November 13, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. Comeau, [1992] 3 SCR 473 | November 13, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Peel (Regional Municipality) v. Canada; Peel (Regional Municipality) v. Ontario, [1992] 3 SCR 762 | November 19, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | McVey (Re); McVey v. United States of America, [1992] 3 SCR 475 | November 19, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Canada Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Canadian Commercial Bank, [1992] 3 SCR 558 | November 19, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. Mellenthin, [1992] 3 SCR 615 | November 19, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Idziak v. Canada (Minister of Justice), [1992] 3 SCR 631 | November 19, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. Pearson, [1992] 3 SCR 665 | November 19, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. Morales, [1992] 3 SCR 711 | November 19, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. Kearney, [1992] 3 SCR 807 | December 1, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Case name | Argued | Decided | Lamer | La Forest | L'Heureux-Dubé | Sopinka | Gonthier | Cory | McLachlin | Stevenson | Iacobucci | Major |
---|
R. v. Sawyer, [1992] 3 SCR 809 | December 2, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | R. v. W. (B. A.), [1992] 3 SCR 811 | December 4, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | | Moge v. Moge, [1992] 3 SCR 813 | December 17, 1992 | | | | | | | | | | |
References{{Supreme Court of Canada}} 3 : 1992 in Canada|Supreme Court of Canada reasons by year|1992 in Canadian case law |