| 词条 | 1999 term opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States |
| 释义 |
The 1999 term of the Supreme Court of the United States began October 4, 1999 and concluded October 1, 2000. The table illustrates which opinion was filed by each justice in each case and which justices joined each opinion. Table key{{SCOTUStablekey}}{{SCOTUS-termlist-start|Rehnquist|Stevens|O'Connor|Scalia|Kennedy|Souter|Thomas|Ginsburg|Breyer}}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry|#=1 |case=Brancato v. Gunn |volume=528 |page=1 |argue-date= |decision-date=October 12, 1999 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=dissent |justice2-sortcode=4 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=2 |case=Antonelli v. Caridine |volume=528 |page=3 |argue-date= |decision-date=October 12, 1999 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=dissent |justice2-sortcode=4 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=3 |case=Judd v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex. |volume=528 |page=5 |argue-date= |decision-date=October 12, 1999 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=dissent |justice2-sortcode=4 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=4 |case=Dempsey v. Martin |volume=528 |page=7 |argue-date= |decision-date=October 12, 1999 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=dissent |justice2-sortcode=4 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=5 |case=Prunty v. Brooks |volume=528 |page=9 |argue-date= |decision-date=October 12, 1999 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=dissent |justice2-sortcode=4 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=6 |case=Flippo v. West Virginia |volume=528 |page=11 |argue-date= |decision-date=October 18, 1999 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=joinmajority |justice2-sortcode=J1 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=7 |case=In re Bauer |volume=528 |page=16 |argue-date= |decision-date=October 18, 1999 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=dissent |justice2-sortcode=4 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=8 |case=Texas v. Lesage |volume=528 |page=18 |argue-date= |decision-date=November 29, 1999 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=joinmajority |justice2-sortcode=J1 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=9 |case-article=Fiore v. White (1999) |case-display=Fiore v. White |volume=528 |page=23 |argue-date=October 12, 1999 |decision-date=November 30, 1999 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=joinmajority |justice2-sortcode=J1 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=majority |justice9-sortcode=1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=10 |case=Los Angeles Police Dept. v. United Reporting Publishing Corp. |volume=528 |page=32 |argue-date=October 13, 1999 |decision-date=December 7, 1999 |justice1-opinion1=majority |justice1-sortcode=1 |justice2-opinion1=dissent |justice2-sortcode=4 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-opinion2=joinconcurrence |justice3-sortcode=J1J2 |justice4-opinion1=concurrence |justice4-opinion2=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=2J1 |justice5-opinion1=joindissent |justice5-sortcode=J4 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-opinion2=joinconcurrence |justice6-sortcode=J1J2 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-opinion2=joinconcurrence |justice7-sortcode=J1J2 |justice8-opinion1=concurrence |justice8-opinion2=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=2J1 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-opinion2=joinconcurrence |justice9-sortcode=J1J2 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=11 |case=Drye v. United States |volume=528 |page=49 |argue-date=November 8, 1999 |decision-date=December 7, 1999 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=joinmajority |justice2-sortcode=J1 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=majority |justice8-sortcode=1 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=12 |case=Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents |volume=528 |page=62 |argue-date=October 13, 1999 |decision-date=January 11, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=partjoinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1X |justice2-opinion1=concurrencedissent |justice2-opinion2=partjoinmajority |justice2-sortcode=3J1X |justice3-opinion1=majority |justice3-sortcode=1 |justice4-opinion1=partjoinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1X |justice5-opinion1=partjoinmajority |justice5-opinion2=joinconcurrencedissent |justice5-sortcode=J1XJ3 |justice6-opinion1=partjoinmajority |justice6-opinion2=joinconcurrencedissent |justice6-sortcode=J1XJ3 |justice7-opinion1=concurrencedissent |justice7-opinion2=partjoinmajority |justice7-sortcode=3J1X |justice8-opinion1=partjoinmajority |justice8-opinion2=joinconcurrencedissent |justice8-sortcode=J1XJ3 |justice9-opinion1=partjoinmajority |justice9-opinion2=joinconcurrencedissent |justice9-sortcode=J1XJ3 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=13 |case=New York v. Hill |volume=528 |page=110 |argue-date=November 2, 1999 |decision-date=January 11, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=joinmajority |justice2-sortcode=J1 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=majority |justice4-sortcode=1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=14 |case=Illinois v. Wardlow |volume=528 |page=119 |argue-date=November 2, 1999 |decision-date=January 12, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=majority |justice1-sortcode=1 |justice2-opinion1=concurrencedissent |justice2-sortcode=3 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=joinconcurrencedissent |justice6-sortcode=J3 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=joinconcurrencedissent |justice8-sortcode=J3 |justice9-opinion1=joinconcurrencedissent |justice9-sortcode=J3 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=15 |case=Reno v. Condon |volume=528 |page=141 |argue-date=November 10, 1999 |decision-date=January 12, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=majority |justice1-sortcode=1 |justice2-opinion1=joinmajority |justice2-sortcode=J1 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=16 |case=Martinez v. Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District |volume=528 |page=152 |argue-date=November 9, 1999 |decision-date=January 12, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=majority |justice2-sortcode=1 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=concurrence |justice4-sortcode=2 |justice5-opinion1=concurrence |justice5-opinion2=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=2J1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=concurrence |justice9-opinion2=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=2J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=17 |case=Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services, Inc. |volume=528 |page=167 |argue-date=October 12, 1999 |decision-date=January 12, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=concurrence |justice2-opinion2=joinmajority |justice2-sortcode=2J1 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=dissent |justice4-sortcode=4 |justice5-opinion1=concurrence |justice5-opinion2=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=2J1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=joindissent |justice7-sortcode=J4 |justice8-opinion1=majority |justice8-sortcode=1 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=18 |case=Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Slater |volume=528 |page=216 |argue-date= |decision-date=January 12, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=joinmajority |justice2-sortcode=J1 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=19 |case=Weeks v. Angelone |volume=528 |page=225 |argue-date=December 6, 1999 |decision-date=January 19, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=majority |justice1-sortcode=1 |justice2-opinion1=dissent |justice2-sortcode=4 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=partjoindissent |justice6-sortcode=J4X |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=joindissent |justice8-sortcode=J4 |justice9-opinion1=joindissent |justice9-sortcode=J4 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=20 |case=Gutierrez v. Ada |volume=528 |page=250 |argue-date=December 6, 1999 |decision-date=January 19, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=joinmajority |justice2-sortcode=J1 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=majority |justice6-sortcode=1 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=21 |case=Smith v. Robbins |volume=528 |page=259 |argue-date=October 5, 1999 |decision-date=January 19, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=dissent |justice2-opinion2=joindissent |justice2-sortcode=4J4 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=dissent |justice6-sortcode=4 |justice7-opinion1=majority |justice7-sortcode=1 |justice8-opinion1=joindissent |justice8-opinion2=joindissent |justice8-sortcode=J4J4 |justice9-opinion1=joindissent |justice9-sortcode=J4 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=22 |case=United States v. Martinez-Salazar |volume=528 |page=304 |argue-date=November 29, 1999 |decision-date=January 19, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=joinmajority |justice2-sortcode=J1 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=concurrence |justice4-sortcode=2 |justice5-opinion1=joinconcurrence |justice5-sortcode=J2 |justice6-opinion1=concurrence |justice6-opinion2=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=2J1 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=majority |justice8-sortcode=1 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=23 |case=Reno v. Bossier Parish School Bd. |volume=528 |page=320 |argue-date=October 6, 1999 |decision-date=January 24, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=partjoinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1X |justice2-opinion1=dissent |justice2-opinion2=joinconcurrencedissent |justice2-sortcode=4J3 |justice3-opinion1=partjoinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1X |justice4-opinion1=majority |justice4-sortcode=1 |justice5-opinion1=partjoinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1X |justice6-opinion1=concurrencedissent |justice6-sortcode=3 |justice7-opinion1=concurrence |justice7-opinion2=partjoinmajority |justice7-sortcode=2J1X |justice8-opinion1=joindissent |justice8-opinion2=joinconcurrencedissent |justice8-sortcode=J4J3 |justice9-opinion1=dissent |justice9-opinion2=joinconcurrencedissent |justice9-sortcode=4J3 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=24 |case=Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government PAC |volume=528 |page=377 |argue-date=October 5, 1999 |decision-date=January 24, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=concurrence |justice2-opinion2=joinmajority |justice2-sortcode=2J1 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joindissent |justice4-sortcode=J4 |justice5-opinion1=dissent |justice5-sortcode=4 |justice6-opinion1=majority |justice6-sortcode=1 |justice7-opinion1=dissent |justice7-sortcode=4 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-opinion2=joinconcurrence |justice8-sortcode=J1J2 |justice9-opinion1=concurrence |justice9-opinion2=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=2J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=25 |case=Baral v. United States |volume=528 |page=431 |argue-date=January 18, 2000 |decision-date=February 22, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=joinmajority |justice2-sortcode=J1 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=majority |justice7-sortcode=1 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=26 |case=Weisgram v. Marley Co. |volume=528 |page=440 |argue-date=January 18, 2000 |decision-date=February 22, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=joinmajority |justice2-sortcode=J1 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=majority |justice8-sortcode=1 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=27 |case=Hunt-Wesson, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board of California |volume=528 |page=458 |argue-date=January 12, 2000 |decision-date=February 22, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=joinmajority |justice2-sortcode=J1 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=majority |justice9-sortcode=1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=28 |case=Roe v. Flores-Ortega |volume=528 |page=470 |argue-date=November 1, 1999 |decision-date=February 23, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=partjoinmajority |justice2-opinion2=joinconcurrencedissent |justice2-sortcode=J1XJ3 |justice3-opinion1=majority |justice3-sortcode=1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=concurrencedissent |justice6-opinion2=partjoinmajority |justice6-sortcode=3J1X |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=concurrencedissent |justice8-opinion2=partjoinmajority |justice8-opinion3=joinconcurrencedissent|justice8-sortcode=3J1XJ3 |justice9-opinion1=concurrence |justice9-opinion2=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=2J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=29 |case=Rice v. Cayetano |volume=528 |page=495 |argue-date=October 6, 1999 |decision-date=February 23, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=dissent |justice2-sortcode=4 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=majority |justice5-sortcode=1 |justice6-opinion1=joinconcurrence |justice6-sortcode=J2 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=dissent |justice8-opinion2=partjoindissent |justice8-sortcode=4J4X |justice9-opinion1=concurrence |justice9-sortcode=2 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=30 |case=Rotella v. Wood |volume=528 |page=549 |argue-date=November 3, 1999 |decision-date=February 23, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=joinmajority |justice2-sortcode=J1 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=majority |justice6-sortcode=1 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=31 |case=Village of Willowbrook v. Olech |volume=528 |page=562 |argue-date=January 10, 2000 |decision-date=February 23, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=joinmajority |justice2-sortcode=J1 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=concurrence |justice9-opinion2=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=2J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=32 |case=Shalala v. Illinois Council on Long Term Care, Inc. |volume=529 |page=1 |argue-date=November 08, 1999 |decision-date=February 29, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=dissent |justice2-opinion2=joindissent |justice2-sortcode=4J4 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=dissent |justice4-opinion2=partjoindissent |justice4-sortcode=4J4X |justice5-opinion1=joindissent |justice5-sortcode=J4 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=dissent |justice7-sortcode=4 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=majority |justice9-sortcode=1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=33 |case-article=United States v. Johnson (2000) |case-display=United States v. Johnson |volume=529 |page=53 |argue-date=December 8, 1999 |decision-date=March 1, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=joinmajority |justice2-sortcode=J1 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=majority |justice5-sortcode=1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=34 |case=Portuondo v. Agard |volume=529 |page=61 |argue-date=November 1, 1999 |decision-date=March 6, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=concurrence |justice2-sortcode=2 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=majority |justice4-sortcode=1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=joindissent |justice6-sortcode=J4 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=dissent |justice8-sortcode=4 |justice9-opinion1=joinconcurrence |justice9-sortcode=J2 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=35 |case=United States v. Locke |volume=529 |page=89 |argue-date=December 7, 1999 |decision-date=March 6, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=joinmajority |justice2-sortcode=J1 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=majority |justice5-sortcode=1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=36 |case=FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. |volume=529 |page=120 |argue-date=December 1, 1999 |decision-date=March 21, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=joindissent |justice2-sortcode=J4 |justice3-opinion1=majority |justice3-sortcode=1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=joindissent |justice6-sortcode=J4 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=joindissent |justice8-sortcode=J4 |justice9-opinion1=dissent |justice9-sortcode=4 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=37 |case=Cortez Byrd Chips, Inc. v. Bill Harbert Construction Co. |volume=529 |page=193 |argue-date=January 10, 2000 |decision-date=March 21, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=joinmajority |justice2-sortcode=J1 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=majority |justice6-sortcode=1 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=38 |case=Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Brothers, Inc. |volume=529 |page=205 |argue-date=January 19, 2000 |decision-date=March 22, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=joinmajority |justice2-sortcode=J1 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=majority |justice4-sortcode=1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=39 |case=Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System v. Southworth |volume=529 |page=217 |argue-date=November 9, 1999 |decision-date=March 22, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=joinconcurrence |justice2-sortcode=J2 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=majority |justice5-sortcode=1 |justice6-opinion1=concurrence |justice6-sortcode=2 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=joinconcurrence |justice9-sortcode=J2 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=40 |case=Garner v. Jones |volume=529 |page=244 |argue-date=January 11, 2000 |decision-date=March 28, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=joindissent |justice2-sortcode=J4 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=concurrence |justice4-sortcode=2 |justice5-opinion1=majority |justice5-sortcode=1 |justice6-opinion1=dissent |justice6-sortcode=4 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=joindissent |justice8-sortcode=J4 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=41 |case=Florida v. J. L. |volume=529 |page=266 |argue-date=February 29, 2000 |decision-date=March 28, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-opinion2=joinconcurrence |justice1-sortcode=J1J2 |justice2-opinion1=joinmajority |justice2-sortcode=J1 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=concurrence |justice5-opinion2=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=2J1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=majority |justice8-sortcode=1 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=42 |case=City of Erie v. Pap's A. M. |volume=529 |page=277 |argue-date=November 10, 1999 |decision-date=March 29, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-opinion2=joinplurality |justice1-sortcode=J1J1X |justice2-opinion1=dissent |justice2-sortcode=4 |justice3-opinion1=majority |justice3-opinion2=plurality |justice3-sortcode=11X |justice4-opinion1=concurrence |justice4-sortcode=2 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-opinion2=joinplurality |justice5-sortcode=J1J1X |justice6-opinion1=concurrencedissent |justice6-opinion2=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=3J1 |justice7-opinion1=joinconcurrence |justice7-sortcode=J2 |justice8-opinion1=joindissent |justice8-sortcode=J4 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-opinion2=joinplurality |justice9-sortcode=J1J1X }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=43 |case=Free v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc. |volume=529 |page=333 |argue-date=March 27, 2000 |decision-date=April 3, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=joinmajority |justice2-sortcode=J1 |justice3-opinion1=didnotparticipate |justice3-sortcode=X |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=44 |case-article=Bond v. United States (2000) |case-display=Bond v. United States |volume=529 |page=334 |argue-date=February 29, 2000 |decision-date=April 17, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=majority |justice1-sortcode=1 |justice2-opinion1=joinmajority |justice2-sortcode=J1 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joindissent |justice4-sortcode=J4 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=dissent |justice9-sortcode=4 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=45 |case=Norfolk Southern Railroad Co. v. Shanklin |volume=529 |page=344 |argue-date=March 1, 2000 |decision-date=April 17, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=joindissent |justice2-sortcode=J4 |justice3-opinion1=majority |justice3-sortcode=1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=dissent |justice8-sortcode=4 |justice9-opinion1=concurrence |justice9-opinion2=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=2J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=46 |case=Williams v. Taylor |volume=529 |page=362 |argue-date=October 4, 1999 |decision-date=April 18, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=concurrencedissent |justice1-opinion2=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=3J1 |justice2-opinion1=majority |justice2-opinion2=plurality |justice2-sortcode=11X |justice3-opinion1=concurrence |justice3-opinion2=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=2J1 |justice4-opinion1=partjoinmajority |justice4-opinion2=joinconcurrencedissent |justice4-sortcode=J1XJ3 |justice5-opinion1=joinconcurrence |justice5-opinion2=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J2J1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-opinion2=joinplurality |justice6-sortcode=J1J1X |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-opinion2=joinconcurrencedissent |justice7-sortcode=J1J3 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-opinion2=joinplurality |justice8-sortcode=J1J1X |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-opinion2=joinplurality |justice9-sortcode=J1J1X }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=47 |case=Williams v. Taylor |volume=529 |page=420 |argue-date=February 28, 2000 |decision-date=April 18, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=joinmajority |justice2-sortcode=J1 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=majority |justice5-sortcode=1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=48 |case=Edwards v. Carpenter |volume=529 |page=446 |argue-date=February 28, 2000 |decision-date=April 25, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=joinconcurrence |justice2-sortcode=J2 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=majority |justice4-sortcode=1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=concurrence |justice9-sortcode=2 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=49 |case=Nelson v. Adams USA, Inc. |volume=529 |page=460 |argue-date=March 27, 2000 |decision-date=April 25, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=joinmajority |justice2-sortcode=J1 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=majority |justice8-sortcode=1 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=50 |case=Slack v. McDaniel |volume=529 |page=473 |argue-date=March 29, 2000 |decision-date=April 26, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=partjoinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1X |justice2-opinion1=concurrence |justice2-opinion2=joinmajority |justice2-sortcode=2J1 |justice3-opinion1=partjoinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1X |justice4-opinion1=concurrencedissent |justice4-opinion2=partjoinmajority |justice4-sortcode=3J1X |justice5-opinion1=majority |justice5-sortcode=1 |justice6-opinion1=partjoinmajority |justice6-opinion2=joinconcurrence |justice6-sortcode=J1XJ2 |justice7-opinion1=partjoinmajority |justice7-opinion2=joinconcurrencedissent |justice7-sortcode=J1XJ3 |justice8-opinion1=partjoinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1X |justice9-opinion1=partjoinmajority |justice9-opinion2=joinconcurrence |justice9-sortcode=J1XJ2 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=51 |case=Beck v. Prupis |volume=529 |page=494 |argue-date=November 3, 1999 |decision-date=April 26, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=dissent |justice2-sortcode=4 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=joindissent |justice6-sortcode=J4 |justice7-opinion1=majority |justice7-sortcode=1 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=52 |case=Carmell v. Texas |volume=529 |page=513 |argue-date=November 30, 1999 |decision-date=May 1, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joindissent |justice1-sortcode=J4 |justice2-opinion1=majority |justice2-sortcode=1 |justice3-opinion1=joindissent |justice3-sortcode=J4 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=joindissent |justice5-sortcode=J4 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=dissent |justice8-sortcode=4 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=53 |case=Christensen v. Harris County |volume=529 |page=576 |argue-date=February 23, 2000 |decision-date=May 1, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=dissent |justice2-sortcode=4 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=concurrence |justice4-opinion2=partjoinmajority |justice4-sortcode=2J1X |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=concurrence |justice6-opinion2=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=2J1 |justice7-opinion1=majority |justice7-sortcode=1 |justice8-opinion1=joindissent |justice8-opinion2=joindissent |justice8-sortcode=J4J4 |justice9-opinion1=dissent |justice9-opinion2=joindissent |justice9-sortcode=4J4 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=54 |case=United States v. Morrison |volume=529 |page=598 |argue-date=January 11, 2000 |decision-date=May 15, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=majority |justice1-sortcode=1 |justice2-opinion1=joindissent |justice2-opinion2=joindissent |justice2-sortcode=J4J4 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=dissent |justice6-opinion2=partjoindissent |justice6-sortcode=4J4X |justice7-opinion1=concurrence |justice7-opinion2=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=2J1 |justice8-opinion1=joindissent |justice8-opinion2=partjoindissent |justice8-sortcode=J4J4X |justice9-opinion1=dissent |justice9-opinion2=joindissent |justice9-sortcode=4J4 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=55 |case=Fischer v. United States |volume=529 |page=667 |argue-date=February 22, 2000 |decision-date=May 15, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=joinmajority |justice2-sortcode=J1 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joindissent |justice4-sortcode=J4 |justice5-opinion1=majority |justice5-sortcode=1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=dissent |justice7-sortcode=4 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=56 |case-article=Johnson v. United States (2000) |case-display=Johnson v. United States |volume=529 |page=694 |argue-date=February 22, 2000 |decision-date=May 15, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=joinmajority |justice2-sortcode=J1 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=dissent |justice4-sortcode=4 |justice5-opinion1=concurrence |justice5-opinion2=partjoinmajority |justice5-sortcode=2J1X |justice6-opinion1=majority |justice6-sortcode=1 |justice7-opinion1=concurrence |justice7-sortcode=2 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=57 |case=Public Lands Council v. Babbitt |volume=529 |page=728 |argue-date=March 1, 2000 |decision-date=May 15, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=joinmajority |justice2-sortcode=J1 |justice3-opinion1=concurrence |justice3-opinion2=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=2J1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-opinion2=joinconcurrence |justice7-sortcode=J1J2 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=majority |justice9-sortcode=1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=58 |case=Ohler v. United States |volume=529 |page=753 |argue-date=March 20, 2000 |decision-date=May 22, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=majority |justice1-sortcode=1 |justice2-opinion1=joindissent |justice2-sortcode=J4 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=dissent |justice6-sortcode=4 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=joindissent |justice8-sortcode=J4 |justice9-opinion1=joindissent |justice9-sortcode=J4 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=59 |case=Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States ex rel. Stevens |volume=529 |page=765 |argue-date=November 29, 1999 |decision-date=May 22, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=dissent |justice2-sortcode=4 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=majority |justice4-sortcode=1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=joindissent |justice6-sortcode=J4 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=concurrence |justice8-sortcode=2 |justice9-opinion1=concurrence |justice9-opinion2=joinmajority |justice9-opinion3=joinconcurrence |justice9-sortcode=2J1J2 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=60 |case=United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc. |volume=529 |page=803 |argue-date=November 30, 1999 |decision-date=May 22, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joindissent |justice1-sortcode=J4 |justice2-opinion1=concurrence |justice2-opinion2=joinmajority |justice2-sortcode=2J1 |justice3-opinion1=joindissent |justice3-sortcode=J4 |justice4-opinion1=dissent |justice4-opinion2=joindissent |justice4-sortcode=4J4 |justice5-opinion1=majority |justice5-sortcode=1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=concurrence |justice7-opinion2=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=2J1 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=dissent |justice9-sortcode=4 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=61 |case-article=Jones v. United States (2000) |case-display=Jones v. United States |volume=529 |page=848 |argue-date=March 21, 2000 |decision-date=May 22, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=concurrence |justice2-opinion2=joinmajority |justice2-sortcode=2J1 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-opinion2=joinconcurrence |justice4-sortcode=J1J2 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=concurrence |justice7-opinion2=joinmajority |justice7-opinion3=joinconcurrence |justice7-sortcode=2J1J2 |justice8-opinion1=majority |justice8-sortcode=1 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=62 |case=Geier v. American Honda Motor Co. |volume=529 |page=861 |argue-date=December 7, 1999 |decision-date=May 22, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=dissent |justice2-sortcode=4 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=joindissent |justice6-sortcode=J4 |justice7-opinion1=joindissent |justice7-sortcode=J4 |justice8-opinion1=joindissent |justice8-sortcode=J4 |justice9-opinion1=majority |justice9-sortcode=1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=63 |case=Hartford Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Union Planters Bank, N.A. |volume=530 |page=1 |argue-date=March 20, 2000 |decision-date=May 30, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=joinmajority |justice2-sortcode=J1 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=majority |justice4-sortcode=1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=64 |case=Raleigh v. Illinois Dept. of Revenue |volume=530 |page=15 |argue-date=April 17, 2000 |decision-date=May 30, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=joinmajority |justice2-sortcode=J1 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=majority |justice6-sortcode=1 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=65 |case=United States v. Hubbell |volume=530 |page=27 |argue-date=February 22, 2000 |decision-date=June 5, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=dissent |justice1-sortcode=4 |justice2-opinion1=majority |justice2-sortcode=1 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-opinion2=joinconcurrence |justice4-sortcode=J1J2 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=concurrence |justice7-opinion2=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=2J1 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=66 |case=Troxel v. Granville |volume=530 |page=57 |argue-date=January 12, 2000 |decision-date=June 5, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinplurality |justice1-sortcode=J1X |justice2-opinion1=dissent |justice2-sortcode=4 |justice3-opinion1=plurality |justice3-sortcode=1X |justice4-opinion1=dissent |justice4-sortcode=4 |justice5-opinion1=dissent |justice5-sortcode=4 |justice6-opinion1=concurrence |justice6-sortcode=2 |justice7-opinion1=concurrence |justice7-sortcode=2 |justice8-opinion1=joinplurality |justice8-sortcode=J1X |justice9-opinion1=joinplurality |justice9-sortcode=J1X }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=67 |case=Sims v. Apfel |volume=530 |page=103 |argue-date=March 28, 2000 |decision-date=June 5, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joindissent |justice1-sortcode=J4 |justice2-opinion1=joinmajority |justice2-opinion2=joinplurality |justice2-sortcode=J1J1X |justice3-opinion1=concurrence |justice3-opinion2=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=2J1 |justice4-opinion1=joindissent |justice4-sortcode=J4 |justice5-opinion1=joindissent |justice5-sortcode=J4 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-opinion2=joinplurality |justice6-sortcode=J1J1X |justice7-opinion1=majority |justice7-opinion2=plurality |justice7-sortcode=11X |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-opinion2=joinplurality |justice8-sortcode=J1J1X |justice9-opinion1=dissent |justice9-sortcode=4 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=68 |case=Castillo v. United States |volume=530 |page=120 |argue-date=April 24, 2000 |decision-date=June 5, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=joinmajority |justice2-sortcode=J1 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=partjoinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1X |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=majority |justice9-sortcode=1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=69 |case=Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. |volume=530 |page=133 |argue-date=March 21, 2000 |decision-date=June 12, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=joinmajority |justice2-sortcode=J1 |justice3-opinion1=majority |justice3-sortcode=1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=concurrence |justice8-opinion2=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=2J1 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=70 |case=Ramdass v. Angelone |volume=530 |page=156 |argue-date=April 18, 2000 |decision-date=June 12, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinplurality |justice1-sortcode=J1X |justice2-opinion1=dissent |justice2-sortcode=4 |justice3-opinion1=concurrence |justice3-sortcode=2 |justice4-opinion1=joinplurality |justice4-sortcode=J1X |justice5-opinion1=plurality |justice5-sortcode=1X |justice6-opinion1=joindissent |justice6-sortcode=J4 |justice7-opinion1=joinplurality |justice7-sortcode=J1X |justice8-opinion1=joindissent |justice8-sortcode=J4 |justice9-opinion1=joindissent |justice9-sortcode=J4 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=71 |case=Pegram v. Herdrich |volume=530 |page=211 |argue-date=February 23, 2000 |decision-date=June 12, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=joinmajority |justice2-sortcode=J1 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=majority |justice6-sortcode=1 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=72 |case=Harris Trust and Savings Bank v. Salomon Smith Barney Inc. |volume=530 |page=238 |argue-date=April 17, 2000 |decision-date=June 12, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=joinmajority |justice2-sortcode=J1 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=majority |justice7-sortcode=1 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=73 |case=Carter v. United States |volume=530 |page=255 |argue-date=April 19, 2000 |decision-date=June 12, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=joindissent |justice2-sortcode=J4 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=joindissent |justice6-sortcode=J4 |justice7-opinion1=majority |justice7-sortcode=1 |justice8-opinion1=dissent |justice8-sortcode=4 |justice9-opinion1=joindissent |justice9-sortcode=J4 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=74 |case=Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe |volume=530 |page=290 |argue-date=March 29, 2000 |decision-date=June 19, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=dissent |justice1-sortcode=4 |justice2-opinion1=majority |justice2-sortcode=1 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joindissent |justice4-sortcode=J4 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=joindissent |justice7-sortcode=J4 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=75 |case=Miller v. French |volume=530 |page=327 |argue-date=April 18, 2000 |decision-date=June 19, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=joindissent |justice2-sortcode=J4 |justice3-opinion1=majority |justice3-sortcode=1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=concurrencedissent |justice6-opinion2=partjoinmajority |justice6-sortcode=3J1X |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=partjoinmajority |justice8-opinion2=joinconcurrencedissent |justice8-sortcode=J1XJ3 |justice9-opinion1=dissent |justice9-sortcode=4 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=76 |case=Crosby v. National Foreign Trade Council |volume=530 |page=363 |argue-date=March 22, 2000 |decision-date=June 19, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=joinmajority |justice2-sortcode=J1 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=concurrence |justice4-sortcode=2 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=majority |justice6-sortcode=1 |justice7-opinion1=joinconcurrence |justice7-sortcode=J2 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=77 |case=Arizona v. California |volume=530 |page=392 |argue-date=April 25, 2000 |decision-date=June 19, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=concurrencedissent |justice1-sortcode=3 |justice2-opinion1=joinmajority |justice2-sortcode=J1 |justice3-opinion1=joinconcurrencedissent |justice3-sortcode=J3 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=joinconcurrencedissent |justice7-sortcode=J3 |justice8-opinion1=majority |justice8-sortcode=1 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=78 |case=Dickerson v. United States |volume=530 |page=428 |argue-date=April 19, 2000 |decision-date=June 26, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=majority |justice1-sortcode=1 |justice2-opinion1=joinmajority |justice2-sortcode=J1 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=dissent |justice4-sortcode=4 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=joindissent |justice7-sortcode=J4 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=79 |case=Apprendi v. New Jersey |volume=530 |page=466 |argue-date=March 28, 2000 |decision-date=June 26, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joindissent |justice1-opinion2=joindissent |justice1-sortcode=J4J4 |justice2-opinion1=majority |justice2-sortcode=1 |justice3-opinion1=dissent |justice3-sortcode=4 |justice4-opinion1=concurrence |justice4-opinion2=joinmajority |justice4-opinion3=partjoinconcurrence|justice4-sortcode=2J1J2X |justice5-opinion1=joindissent |justice5-sortcode=J4 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=concurrence |justice7-opinion2=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=2J1 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=dissent |justice9-opinion2=joindissent |justice9-sortcode=4J4 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=80 |case=California Democratic Party v. Jones |volume=530 |page=567 |argue-date=April 24, 2000 |decision-date=June 26, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=dissent |justice2-sortcode=4 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=majority |justice4-sortcode=1 |justice5-opinion1=concurrence |justice5-opinion2=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=2J1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=joindissent |justice8-sortcode=J4 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-sortcode=J1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=81 |case=Mobil Oil Exploration & Producing Southeast, Inc. v. United States |volume=530 |page=604 |argue-date=March 22, 2000 |decision-date=June 26, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=dissent |justice2-sortcode=4 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-sortcode=J1 |justice9-opinion1=majority |justice9-sortcode=1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=82 |case=Boy Scouts of America v. Dale |volume=530 |page=640 |argue-date=April 26, 2000 |decision-date=June 28, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=majority |justice1-sortcode=1 |justice2-opinion1=dissent |justice2-sortcode=4 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=J1 |justice4-opinion1=joinmajority |justice4-sortcode=J1 |justice5-opinion1=joinmajority |justice5-sortcode=J1 |justice6-opinion1=dissent |justice6-opinion2=joindissent |justice6-sortcode=4J4 |justice7-opinion1=joinmajority |justice7-sortcode=J1 |justice8-opinion1=joindissent |justice8-opinion2=joindissent |justice8-sortcode=J4J4 |justice9-opinion1=joindissent |justice9-opinion2=joindissent |justice9-sortcode=J4J4 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=83 |case=Hill v. Colorado |volume=530 |page=703 |argue-date=January 19, 2000 |decision-date=June 28, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinmajority |justice1-sortcode=J1 |justice2-opinion1=majority |justice2-sortcode=1 |justice3-opinion1=joinmajority |justice3-opinion2=joinconcurrence |justice3-sortcode=J1J2 |justice4-opinion1=dissent |justice4-sortcode=4 |justice5-opinion1=dissent |justice5-sortcode=4 |justice6-opinion1=concurrence |justice6-opinion2=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=2J1 |justice7-opinion1=joindissent |justice7-sortcode=J4 |justice8-opinion1=joinmajority |justice8-opinion2=joinconcurrence |justice8-sortcode=J1J2 |justice9-opinion1=joinmajority |justice9-opinion2=joinconcurrence |justice9-sortcode=J1J2 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=84 |case=Mitchell v. Helms |volume=530 |page=793 |argue-date=December 1, 1999 |decision-date=June 28, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=joinplurality |justice1-sortcode=J1X |justice2-opinion1=joindissent |justice2-sortcode=J4 |justice3-opinion1=concurrence |justice3-sortcode=2 |justice4-opinion1=joinplurality |justice4-sortcode=J1X |justice5-opinion1=joinplurality |justice5-sortcode=J1X |justice6-opinion1=dissent |justice6-sortcode=4 |justice7-opinion1=plurality |justice7-sortcode=1X |justice8-opinion1=joindissent |justice8-sortcode=J4 |justice9-opinion1=joinconcurrence |justice9-sortcode=J2 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-entry |#=85 |case=Stenberg v. Carhart |volume=530 |page=914 |argue-date=April 25, 2000 |decision-date=June 28, 2000 |justice1-opinion1=dissent |justice1-opinion2=joindissent |justice1-opinion3=joindissent |justice1-sortcode=4J4J4 |justice2-opinion1=concurrence |justice2-opinion2=joinmajority |justice2-opinion3=joinconcurrence|justice2-sortcode=2J1J2 |justice3-opinion1=concurrence |justice3-opinion2=joinmajority |justice3-sortcode=2J1 |justice4-opinion1=dissent |justice4-opinion2=joindissent |justice4-sortcode=4J4 |justice5-opinion1=dissent |justice5-sortcode=4 |justice6-opinion1=joinmajority |justice6-sortcode=J1 |justice7-opinion1=dissent |justice7-sortcode=4 |justice8-opinion1=concurrence |justice8-opinion2=joinmajority |justice8-opinion3=joinconcurrence|justice8-sortcode=2J1J2 |justice9-opinion1=majority |justice9-sortcode=1 }}{{SCOTUS-termlist-end|Rehnquist|Stevens|O'Connor|Scalia|Kennedy|Souter|Thomas|Ginsburg|Breyer}} 1999 term membership and statisticsThis was the fourteenth term of Chief Justice Rehnquist's tenure, and the sixth consecutive term in which the Court's membership had not changed. {{SCOTUS-termlist-statistics|CJ-first=William |CJ-last=Rehnquist |CJ-POTUSfirst=Richard |CJ-POTUSlast=Nixon |CJ-date=January 7, 1972 |CJ-confirmation-note=[1] |CJ-agreeing=76 |CJ-participated=85 |CJ-majority=9 |CJ-concurrence=0 |CJ-concurrencedissent=2 |CJ-dissent=3 |AJ1-first=John Paul |AJ1-last=Stevens |AJ1-POTUSfirst=Gerald |AJ1-POTUSlast=Ford |AJ1-date=December 19, 1975 |AJ1-agreeing=52 |AJ1-participated=85 |AJ1-majority=7 |AJ1-concurrence=7 |AJ1-concurrencedissent=2 |AJ1-dissent=22 |AJ2-first=Sandra Day |AJ2-last=O'Connor |AJ2-POTUSfirst=Ronald |AJ2-POTUSlast=Reagan |AJ2-date=September 25, 1981 |AJ2-agreeing=80 |AJ2-participated=84 |AJ2-majority=8 |AJ2-concurrence=6 |AJ2-concurrencedissent=0 |AJ2-dissent=1 |AJ3-first=Antonin |AJ3-last=Scalia |AJ3-POTUSfirst=Ronald |AJ3-POTUSlast=Reagan |AJ3-date=September 26, 1986 |AJ3-agreeing=70 |AJ3-participated=85 |AJ3-majority=8 |AJ3-concurrence=8 |AJ3-concurrencedissent=1 |AJ3-dissent=8 |AJ4-first=Anthony |AJ4-last=Kennedy |AJ4-POTUSfirst=Ronald |AJ4-POTUSlast=Reagan |AJ4-date=February 18, 1988 |AJ4-agreeing=75 |AJ4-participated=85 |AJ4-majority=10 |AJ4-concurrence=5 |AJ4-concurrencedissent=0 |AJ4-dissent=4 |AJ5-first=David |AJ5-last=Souter |AJ5-POTUSfirst=George H. W. |AJ5-POTUSlast=Bush |AJ5-date=October 9, 1990 |AJ5-agreeing=66 |AJ5-participated=85 |AJ5-majority=8 |AJ5-concurrence=5 |AJ5-concurrencedissent=4 |AJ5-dissent=6 |AJ6-first=Clarence |AJ6-last=Thomas |AJ6-POTUSfirst=George H. W. |AJ6-POTUSlast=Bush |AJ6-date=October 23, 1991 |AJ6-agreeing=72 |AJ6-participated=85 |AJ6-majority=8 |AJ6-concurrence=8 |AJ6-concurrencedissent=1 |AJ6-dissent=4 |AJ7-first=Ruth Bader |AJ7-last=Ginsburg |AJ7-POTUSfirst=Bill |AJ7-POTUSlast=Clinton |AJ7-date=August 10, 1993 |AJ7-agreeing=62 |AJ7-participated=85 |AJ7-majority=8 |AJ7-concurrence=4 |AJ7-concurrencedissent=1 |AJ7-dissent=5 |AJ8-first=Stephen |AJ8-last=Breyer |AJ8-POTUSfirst=Bill |AJ8-POTUSlast=Clinton |AJ8-date=August 3, 1994 |AJ8-agreeing=68 |AJ8-participated=85 |AJ8-majority=8 |AJ8-concurrence=8 |AJ8-concurrencedissent=0 |AJ8-dissent=9 }} Notes1. ^Rehnquist was initially appointed by Nixon to the Court as an Associate Justice. He was subsequently appointed to serve as Chief Justice by President Ronald Reagan and confirmed in that position September 26, 1986. References{{refbegin}}
1 : Lists of United States Supreme Court opinions by term |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。