词条 | Wastebasket taxon |
释义 |
Wastebasket taxon (also called a wastebin taxon,[1] dustbin taxon[2] or catch-all taxon[3]) is a term used by some taxonomists to refer to a taxon that has the sole purpose of classifying organisms that do not fit anywhere else. They are typically defined by either their designated members' often superficial similarity to each other, or their lack of one or more distinct character states or by their not belonging to one or more other taxa. Wastebasket taxa are by definition either paraphyletic or polyphyletic, and are therefore not considered to be valid taxa under strict cladistic rules of taxonomy. The name of a wastebasket taxon may in some cases be retained as the designation of an evolutionary grade, however. Examples
Wastebasket taxa in scienceFossil groups that are poorly known due to fragmentary remains are sometimes grouped together on gross morphology or stratigraphy, only later to be found to be wastebasket taxa, such as the crocodile-like Triassic group Rauisuchia.[8]One of the roles of taxonomists is to identify wastebasket taxa and reclassify the content into more natural units. Sometimes, during taxonomic revisions, the wastebasket taxa can be salvaged after doing thorough research on its members, and then imposing tighter restrictions on what continues to be included. Such techniques "saved" Carnosauria and Megalosaurus. Other times, the taxonomic name contains too much unrelated "baggage" to be successfully salvaged. As such, it is usually dumped in favour of a new, more restrictive name (for example, Rhynchocephalia or Thecodontia), or abandoned altogether (for example, Simia).{{fact|date=March 2019}} Related conceptsA related concept is that of form taxon, "wastebasket" groupings that are united by gross morphology. This is often result of a common mode of life, often one that is generalist, leading to generally similar body shapes by convergent evolution.{{fact|date=March 2019}} The term wastebasket taxon is sometimes employed in a derogatory fashion to refer to an evolutionary grade taxon.{{fact|date=March 2019}} See also
References1. ^{{cite journal|last=Friedman|first=M.|author2=Brazeau, M.D |title=Sequences, stratigraphy and scenarios: what can we say about the fossil record of the earliest tetrapods?|journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society|date=7 February 2011|volume=278|series=B|issue=1704|pages=432–439|doi=10.1098/rspb.2010.1321|pmid=20739322|pmc=3013411}} 2. ^{{Cite book | author1=Hallam, A.|authorlink = Anthony Hallam|author2= Wignall, P. B. | title=Mass extinctions and their aftermath | year=1997 | publisher=Oxford University Press | location=Oxford [England] | isbn=978-0-19-854916-1 | page=107|url=https://books.google.com/?id=06yrErJt_NsC&lpg=PA107&dq=%22dustbin%20taxon%22&pg=PA107}} 3. ^{{cite journal | author=Monks, N. | date=July 2002 | title= Cladistic analysis of a problematic ammonite group: the Hamitidae (Cretaceous, Albian-Turonian) and proposals for new cladistic terms | journal= Palaeontology | volume= 45 | pages=689–707 | doi=10.1111/1475-4983.00255 | issue=4}} 4. ^{{cite journal |author=Whittaker RH |title=New concepts of kingdoms or organisms. Evolutionary relations are better represented by new classifications than by the traditional two kingdoms |journal=Science |volume=163 |issue=3863 |pages=150–60 |date=January 1969 |pmid=5762760 |doi=10.1126/science.163.3863.150|citeseerx=10.1.1.403.5430 }} 5. ^{{cite journal |author=Young AM |year=2002 |title=Brief notes on the status of Family Hygrophoraceae Lotsy |journal=Australasian Mycologist |volume=21 |issue=3 |pages=114–6 }} 6. ^{{cite web |url=https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/tetrapod-zoology/phenacodontidae-i-feel-like-i-know-you/ |website=Tetrapod Zoology |publisher=Scientific American |title=Phenacodontidae, I feel like I know you |first=Darren |last=Naish |date=8 August 2013 }} 7. ^{{cite journal |doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0109232 |pmid=25295875 |pmc=4189980 |title=Anthracobunids from the Middle Eocene of India and Pakistan Are Stem Perissodactyls |journal=PLOS ONE |volume=9 |issue=10 |pages=e109232 |year=2014 |last1=Cooper |first1=Lisa Noelle |last2=Seiffert |first2=Erik R. |last3=Clementz |first3=Mark |last4=Madar |first4=Sandra I. |last5=Bajpai |first5=Sunil |last6=Hussain |first6=S. Taseer |last7=Thewissen |first7=J. G. M. |bibcode=2014PLoSO...9j9232C }} 8. ^{{cite journal |doi=10.1098/rsbl.2003.0066 |pmid=14667392 |pmc=1809943 |title=Arizonasaurus and its implications for archosaur divergence |journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences |volume=270 |pages=S234-7 |year=2003 |last1=Nesbitt |first1=Sterling J. }} 4 : Obsolete taxa|Taxonomy (biology)|Paraphyletic groups|Polyphyletic groups |
随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。