词条 | Biodiversity loss |
释义 |
Biodiversity loss is the extinction of species (plant or animal) worldwide, and also the local reduction or loss of species in a certain habitat. The latter phenomenon can be temporary or permanent, depending on whether the environmental degradation that leads to the loss is reversible through ecological restoration / ecological resilience or effectively permanent (e.g. through land loss). Global extinction has so far been proven to be irreversible. Even though permanent global species loss is a more dramatic phenomenon than regional changes in species composition, even minor changes from a healthy stable state can have dramatic influence on the food web and the food chain insofar as reductions in only one species can adversely affect the entire chain (coextinction), leading to an overall reduction in biodiversity, possible alternative stable states of an ecosystem notwithstanding. Ecological effects of biodiversity are usually counteracted by its loss. Reduced biodiversity in particular leads to reduced ecosystem services and eventually poses an immediate danger for food security, also for humankind.[1] Loss rate{{See also|alpha diversity|beta diversity|gamma diversity}}{{See also|Diversity–function debate}}The current rate of global diversity loss is estimated to be 100 to 1000 times higher than the (naturally occurring) background extinction rate and expected to still grow in the upcoming years.[1][2] Locally bounded loss rates can be measured using species richness and its variation over time. Raw counts may not be as ecologically relevant as relative or absolute abundances. Taking into account the relative frequencies, a considerable number of biodiversity indexes has been developed. Besides richness, evenness and heterogeneity are considered to be the main dimensions along which diversity can be measured.[3] As with all diversity measures, it is essential to accurately classify the spatial and temporal scope of the observation. "Definitions tend to become less precise as the complexity of the subject increases and the associated spatial and temporal scales widen.[4] Biodiversity itself is not a single concept but can be split up into various scales (e.g. ecosystem diversity vs. habitat diversity or even biodiversity vs. habitat diversity[4]) or different subcategories (e.g. phylogenetic diversity, species diversity, genetic diversity, nucleotide diversity). The question of net loss in confined regions is often a matter of debate but longer observation times are generally thought to be beneficial to loss estimates.[5][6] To compare rates between different geographic regions latitudinal gradients in species diversity should also be considered. FactorsMajor factors for biotic stress and the ensuing accelerating loss rate are, amongst other threats:[7]
Insect loss{{main|Decline in insect populations|Insect biodiversity|Pollinator decline|The Windshield Phenomenon}}In 2017, various publications describe the dramatic reduction in absolute insect biomass and number of species in Germany and North America over a period of 27 years.[11][12] As possible reasons for the decline, the authors highlight neonicotinoids and other agrochemicals. Writing in the journal PLOS One, authors Hallman, Sorg, et al (2017), conclude that "the widespread insect biomass decline is alarming."[13] Food and agricultureIn 2019, the UN's Food and Agriculture Organization produced its first report on The State of the World’s Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture. This warned that "Many key components of biodiversity for food and agriculture at genetic, species and ecosystem levels are in decline."[14][15] The 2019 IPBES study asserts that industrial farming is a significant factor in collapsing biodiversity.[16] See also{{colbegin}}
References1. ^{{cite journal | doi=10.1126/sciadv.1400253 | title=Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction | year=2015 | last1=Ceballos | first1=Gerardo | journal=Science Advances | volume=1 | issue=5| display-authors=etal}} 2. ^{{cite journal | doi=10.1111/cobi.12380 | title=Estimating the normal background rate of species extinction | year=2015 | last1=De Vos | first1= Jurriaan | journal=Conservation Biology | volume=29 | pages=452–462|issue=2| display-authors=etal}} 3. ^1 {{cite journal | doi=10.1038/nature11148 | title=Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity | year=2012 | last1=Cardinale | first1=Bradley | journal=Nature | volume=486 | pages=59–67|bibcode = 2012Natur.486...59C | pmid=22678280 | issue=7401|display-authors=etal|quote=...at the first Earth Summit, the vast majority of the world’s nations declared that human actions were dismantling the Earth’s ecosystems, eliminating genes, species and biological traits at an alarming rate. This observation led to the question of how such loss of biological diversity will alter the functioning of ecosystems and their ability to provide society with the goods and services needed to prosper.| url=http://pub.epsilon.slu.se/10240/7/wardle_d_etal_130415.pdf }} 4. ^1 {{cite web|title=Biological diversity and habitat diversity: a matter of Science and perception|url=http://www.unige.ch/sciences/near/pdf/Tagliapietra%20and%20Sigovini%202010.pdf}} 5. ^{{cite journal|journal=Ecology|year=2016 |volume=97|issue=8|pages=1949–1960|doi=10.1890/15-1759.1|title=Estimating local biodiversity change: a critique of papers claiming no net loss of local diversity.|quote=two recent data meta-analyses have found that species richness is decreasing in some locations and is increasing in others. When these trends are combined, these papers argued there has been no net change in species richness, and suggested this pattern is globally representative of biodiversity change at local scales}} 6. ^{{cite journal|title=Overlooked local biodiversity loss (letter and response)|author=Bradley Cardinale|url=http://science.sciencemag.org/content/344/6188/1098.1}} 7. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.cbd.int/gbo3/|title=Global Biodiversity Outlook 3|publisher=Convention on Biological Diversity |year=2010}} 8. ^{{cite journal|journal=Ecol. Lett. |volume=18|issue=8|pages=834–843|year=2015|doi=10.1111/ele.12469|pmc=4744976|title=Land use intensification alters ecosystem multifunctionality via loss of biodiversity and changes to functional composition}} 9. ^{{cite journal|last1=Daskin|first1=Joshua H.|last2=Pringle |first2=Robert M. |title=Warfare and wildlife declines in Africa’s protected areas| url=https://www.nature.com/articles/nature25194| journal=Nature |volume=553 |pages=328–332 |year=2018 |PMID=29320475 |doi=10.1038/nature25194}} 10. ^{{cite journal|journal=Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A|year=2016 |volume=13|issue=15|pages=4081–5|doi=10.1073/pnas.1600366113|pmc=4839401|title=Invasive species triggers a massive loss of ecosystem services through a trophic cascade.|author=Walsh JR1, Carpenter SR, Vander Zanden MJ.}} 11. ^{{cite journal | last=Dicks | first=Lynn V. | last2=Viana | first2=Blandina | last3=Bommarco | first3=Riccardo | last4=Brosi | first4=Berry | last5=Arizmendi | first5=María del Coro | last6=Cunningham | first6=Saul A. | last7=Galetto | first7=Leonardo | last8=Hill | first8=Rosemary | last9=Lopes | first9=Ariadna V. | last10=Pires | first10=Carmen | last11=Taki | first11=Hisatomo | last12=Potts | first12=Simon G. | title=Ten policies for pollinators | journal=Science | volume=354 | issue=6315 | date=2016-11-25 | issn=0036-8075 | pmid=27884996 | doi=10.1126/science.aai9226 | pages=975–976 | url=http://science.sciencemag.org/content/354/6315/975 | ref=harv | access-date=2017-10-20}} 12. ^{{cite web | title=Where have all the insects gone? | website=Science | AAAS | date=2017-05-09 | url=http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/05/where-have-all-insects-gone | access-date=2017-10-20}} 13. ^{{cite journal | last=Hallmann | first=Caspar A. | last2=Sorg | first2=Martin | last3=Jongejans | first3=Eelke | last4=Siepel | first4=Henk | last5=Hofland | first5=Nick | last6=Schwan | first6=Heinz | last7=Stenmans | first7=Werner | last8=Müller | first8=Andreas | last9=Sumser | first9=Hubert | last10=Hörren | first10=Thomas | last11=Goulson | first11=Dave | last12=de Kroon | first12=Hans | editor-last=Lamb | editor-first=Eric Gordon | title=More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas | journal=PLOS ONE | publisher=Public Library of Science (PLoS) | volume=12 | issue=10 | date=2017-10-18 | issn=1932-6203 | doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0185809 | page=e0185809 | ref=harv}} 14. ^{{citation |url=http://www.fao.org/state-of-biodiversity-for-food-agriculture/en/ |publisher=FAO Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture |year=2019 |editor=J. Bélanger & D. Pilling |location=Rome |title=The State of the World’s Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture}} 15. ^{{citation |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-47308235 |publisher=BBC |title=UN: Growing threat to food from decline in biodiversity |author=Matt McGrath |date=22 February 2019}} 16. ^{{cite news |last= Vidal|first=John|date=March 15, 2019 |title=The Rapid Decline Of The Natural World Is A Crisis Even Bigger Than Climate Change|url=https://www.huffpost.com/entry/nature-destruction-climate-change-world-biodiversity_n_5c49e78ce4b06ba6d3bb2d44|work=The Huffington Post |location= |access-date=March 16, 2019 }}
Further reading
Literature
External links
5 : Biodiversity|Biogeography|Environmental issues|Extinction|Food security |
随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。