| 词条 | Brady v. Daly |
| 释义 |
|Litigants=Brady v. Daly |ArgueDate=October 18 |ArgueYear=1899 |DecideDate=November 20 |DecideYear=1899 |FullName=Brady v. Daly |USVol=175 |USPage=148 |ParallelCitations=20 S. Ct. 62; 44 L. Ed. 109 |Prior= |Subsequent= |Holding=The common law circuit court did have jurisdiction over the copyright infringement case because the statutory damages were not a penalty or forfeiture. |SCOTUS=1898–1902 |Majority= |JoinMajority= |Concurrence= |JoinConcurrence= |Concurrence2= |JoinConcurrence2= |Concurrence/Dissent= |JoinConcurrence/Dissent= |Dissent= |JoinDissent= |Dissent2= |JoinDissent2= |LawsApplied= }}Brady v. Daly, 175 U.S. 148 (1899), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held the common law circuit court did have jurisdiction over the copyright infringement case because the statutory damages were not a penalty or forfeiture.[1] This case is related to Webster v. Daly.[2] They arose from the same set of copyright infringement disputes regarding Under the Gaslight by Augustine Daly. The United States abolished the circuit court system involved in Webster v. Daly in 1912. The modern analog would be the district courts. References1. ^{{ussc|name=Brady v. Daly|volume=175|page=148|year=1899}} 2. ^{{ussc|name=Webster v. Daly|volume=163|page=155|year=1896}}. External links
| case = Brady v. Daly, {{ussc|175|148|1899|el=no}} | cornell = https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/175/148 | courtlistener =https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/95112/brady-v-daly/ | findlaw = https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/175/148.html | justia = https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/175/148/case.html | loc =http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep175/usrep175148/usrep175148.pdf{{SCOTUS-stub}} 4 : 1899 in United States case law|United States Supreme Court cases|United States Supreme Court cases of the Fuller Court|United States copyright case law |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。