| 词条 | Buck v. Davis |
| 释义 |
|Litigants=Buck v. Davis |ArgueDate=October 5 |ArgueYear=2016 |DecideDate=February 22 |DecideYear=2017 |FullName=Duane Edward Buck v. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |USVol=580 |USPage=___ |ParallelCitations=137 S. Ct. 759; 197 L. Ed. 2d 1 |Docket=15-8049 |OpinionAnnouncement= |OralArgument= |Prior=Buck v. Stephens, 623 F. App'x 668 (5th Cir. 2015); cert. granted, 136 S. Ct. 2409 (2016). |Procedural=On writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit |Subsequent=865 F.3d [https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20170413108 215] (5th Cir. 2017) |Holding= |SCOTUS=2016 |Majority=Roberts |JoinMajority=Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan |Dissent=Thomas |JoinDissent=Alito |LawsApplied=U.S. Const. amend. VI }}Buck v. Davis, 580 U.S. ___ (2017), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court reversed the death sentence of the defendant Duane Buck after the defendant's attorney introduced evidence that suggested the defendant would be more likely to commit violent acts in the future because he was black.[1] Opinion of the CourtIn a 6-2 opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts, the Court held that the defendant was denied effective assistance of counsel under Strickland v. Washington.[2][3] Chief Justice Roberts' ruling rejected the District Court's argument that the discussion of race at trial was de minimis and therefore not prejudicial.[4] Rather, Chief Justice Roberts wrote: "when a jury hears expert testimony that expressly makes a defendant’s race directly pertinent on the question of life or death, the impact of that evidence cannot be measured simply by how much air time it received at trial or how many pages it occupies in the record. Some toxins can be deadly in small doses."[5] See also
References{{bots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}1. ^{{ussc|name=Buck v. Davis|volume=580|year=2017|docket=15-8049}}. 2. ^[https://harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/263-272_Online.pdf The Supreme Court, 2016 Term — Leading Cases,] 131 Harv. L. Rev. 263 (2017). 3. ^Buck, slip op. at 15-20 (citing Strickland v. Washington, {{ussc|volume=466|page=668|year=1984}}). 4. ^Buck, slip op. at 19. 5. ^Buck, slip op. at 19-20. External links
| case = Buck v. Davis, {{ussc|580|___|2017|el=no}} | justia =https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/580/15-8049/ | oyez =https://www.oyez.org/cases/2016/15-8049 | other_source1 = Supreme Court (slip opinion) | other_url1 =https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/16pdf/15-8049_f2ah.pdf
3 : United States Supreme Court cases|United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court|2017 in United States case law |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。