词条 | Cancer vaccine targeting CD4+ T cells |
释义 |
}} Cancer vaccine targeting CD4+ T cells is a kind of vaccine used to treat existing cancer. Cancerous cells usually cannot be recognized by human immune system, so cancer would happen when the immune system fail to destroy the cancerous cells. Some researchers state that cancer can be treated by increasing the response of T cells, especially CD4+ T cells, to cancerous cells through cancer vaccine injection. MechanismCD4+ T cells promote antitumor immunity by numerous mechanisms including enhancing antigen presentation, co-stimulation, T cell homing, T cell activation, and effector function. These effects are mediated at sites of T cell priming and at the tumor microenvironment. Several cancer vaccine approaches induce durable CD4+ T cell responses and have promising clinical activity. This kind of vaccine can be realized by DNA recombinant fusion protein expressed in E. coli. The protein named MAGE-3 has already been used in lung cancer treatment and received very good feedback. AdvantagesRecent studies show the crucial role of proliferating, activated effector memory Th1 CD4+ T cells in effective antitumor immunity and reveal that CD4+ T cells induce more durable immune-mediated tumor control than CD8+ T cells. Given that CD4+ T cells are known to play such a central role in regulating virtually all antigen-specific immune responses, they are still not paid much attention to playing a role in immune responses to tumor antigens. The preferred attention to antitumor responses by CD8+ T cells stems from two facts: first, most tumors are positive for MHC class one but negative for MHC class two; and second, CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) are able to induce tumor killing upon direct recognition of peptide antigens, presented by the tumor’s MHC class one molecules. This preference has been bolstered by numerous adoptive transfer studies in which CD8+ T cell lines and CD8+ clones specific for tumor antigens—that have been stimulated in vitro—can mediate antitumor immunity when transferred back into tumor-bearing hosts;[1] furthermore, recent reports suggest that immunization—using either adjuvant or dendritic cells with pure tumor peptides—can result in productive antitumor immunity that is restricted by MHC class one.[2][3][4][5] Finally, elimination of CD8+ T cells from mice—at least partially abrogates antitumor immunity induced by most cancer vaccines.[6][7][8][9] Similarly, a critical role for CD4+ T cells in induced antitumor immunity has been consistently demonstrated in vaccine/challenge experiments employing antibody-mediated depletion of CD4+ T cells or using CD4-knockout mice. Abrogation of antitumor immunity in CD4-knockout mice or mice depleted of CD4+ T cells has been demonstrated in cases of cell-based vaccines, recombinant viral vaccines and recombinant bacterial vaccines. While most adoptive transfer experiments have been performed with tumor-specific CD8+ T cells, activated CD4+ T cell clones specific for the murine leukemias have been demonstrated to confer systemic antitumor immunity upon transfer into tumor-bearing hosts.[10] ExperimentsCD4+ T cells has already been successfully induced in nonsmall cell lung cancer patients vaccinated with MAGE-3 recombinant protein. Two cohorts were analyzed: one receiving MAGE-3 protein alone, and one receiving MAGE-3 protein with adjuvant AS028. Of nine patients in the first cohort, three developed marginal Ab titers and another one had a CD8+ T cell response to HLA-A2-restricted peptide MAGE-3 271-279. In contrast, of eight patients from the second cohort vaccinated with MAGE-3 protein and adjuvant, seven developed high-titered Abs to MAGE-3, and four had a strong concomitant CD4+ T cell response to HLA-DP4-restricted peptide 243-258. One patient simultaneously developed CD8+ T cells to HLA-A1-restricted peptide 168-176. The novel monitoring methodology used in this MAGE-3 study established that protein vaccination induces clear CD4+ T cell responses for further evaluating integrated immune responses in vaccine settings and for optimizing these responses for clinical benefit. Studies have indicated that CD4+ T cells in vivo have the capacity to enhance CD8+ T cell activity and, most importantly, help to maintain the immune response for sustained periods of time.[11] Therefore, it seems likely that optimal antitumor activity can only be achieved if both CD4+ and CD8+ tumor-specific T cells are induced.[12] The inclusion of CD4+ epitopes into MAGE-3 vaccination studies has recently been facilitated by the identification of several HLA-DR-restricted and one HLA-DP4-restricted epitope. Clinical trialsClinical vaccination studies using full-length recombinant proteins have the advantage that this form of Ag potentially includes the full range of epitopes for CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. In addition, it is likely that protein vaccination leads to presentation of epitopes in the context of various HLA alleles, and therefore this type of vaccine should be applicable to any patient regardless of HLA restriction. To date, only one clinical study using MAGE-3 protein as a vaccine has been reported.[13] Using a cloning approach, one patient was shown to have a CD4+ T cell response to HLA-DR1-restricted peptide 267-282. Future workThere has not enough data collected from human trials yet. As a result, the side effects or the long-term results are still unknown. What’s more, future work should further optimize vaccine adjuvants and combination therapies incorporating helper peptide vaccines. References1. ^Riddell, S.R. and Greenberg, P.D., 1995. Principles for adoptive T cell therapy of human viral diseases. Annual review of immunology, 13(1), pp.545-586.{{doi|10.1146/annurev.iy.13.040195.002553}} 2. ^Feltkamp, M.C., Smits, H.L., Vierboom, M.P., Minnaar, R.P., De Jongh, B.M., Drijfhout, J.W., Schegget, J.T., Melief, C.J. and Kast, W.M., 1993. Vaccination with cytotoxic T lymphocyte epitope‐containing peptide protects against a tumor induced by human papillomavirus type 16‐transformed cells. European journal of immunology, 23(9), pp.2242-2249.{{doi|10.1002/eji.1830230929}} 3. ^Noguchi, Y., Richards, E.C., Chen, Y.T. and Old, L.J., 1995. Influence of interleukin 12 on p53 peptide vaccination against established Meth A sarcoma. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 92(6), pp.2219-2223.{{doi|10.1073/pnas.92.6.2219}} 4. ^Mandelboim, O., Vadai, E., Fridkin, M., Katz-Hillel, A., Feldman, M., Berke, G. and Eisenbach, L., 1995. Regression of established murine carcinoma metastases following vaccination with tumour-associated antigen peptides. Nature medicine, 1(11), pp.1179-1183.{{doi|10.1038/nm1195-1179}} 5. ^Mayordomo, J.I., Zorina, T., Storkus, W.J., Zitvogel, L., Celluzzi, C., Falo, L.D., Melief, C.J., Ildstad, S.T., Kast, W.M., Deleo, A. and Lotze, M.T., 1995. Bone marrow-derived dendritic cells pulsed with synthetic tumour peptides elicit protective and therapeutic antitumour immunity. Nature medicine, 1(12), p.1297.{{doi|10.1038/nm1295-1297}} 6. ^Fearon, E.R., Pardoll, D.M., Itaya, T., Golumbek, P., Levitsky, H.I., Simons, J.W., Karasuyama, H., Vogelstein, B. and Frost, P., 1990. Interleukin-2 production by tumor cells bypasses T helper function in the generation of an antitumor response. Cell, 60(3), pp.397-403.{{doi|10.1016/0092-8674(90)90591-2}} 7. ^Golumbek, P.T., Lazenby, A.J., Levitsky, H.I., Jaffee, L.M., Karasuyama, H., Baker, M. and Pardoll, D.M., 1991. Treatment of established renal cancer by tumor cells engineered to secrete interleukin-4. Science, 254(5032), pp.713-716.{{doi|10.1126/science.1948050}} 8. ^Dranoff, G., Jaffee, E., Lazenby, A., Golumbek, P., Levitsky, H., Brose, K., Jackson, V., Hamada, H., Pardoll, D. and Mulligan, R.C., 1993. Vaccination with irradiated tumor cells engineered to secrete murine granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor stimulates potent, specific, and long-lasting anti-tumor immunity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 90(8), pp.3539-3543.{{doi|10.1073/pnas.90.8.3539}} 9. ^Pardoll, D.M. and Topalian, S.L., 1998. The role of CD4+ T cell responses in antitumor immunity. Current opinion in immunology, 10(5), pp.588-594.{{doi|10.1016/S0952-7915(98)80228-8}} 10. ^Greenberg, P.D., Kern, D.E. and Cheever, M.A., 1985. Therapy of disseminated murine leukemia with cyclophosphamide and immune Lyt-1+, 2-T cells. Tumor eradication does not require participation of cytotoxic T cells. Journal of Experimental Medicine, 161(5), pp.1122-1134.{{doi|10.1084/jem.161.5.1122}} 11. ^Husmann, L.A. and Bevan, M.J., 1988. Cooperation between helper T cells and cytotoxic T lymphocyte precursors. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 532(1), pp.158-169.{{doi|10.1111/j.1749-6632.1988.tb36335.x}} 12. ^Fischer, W.H., thor Straten, P., Terheyden, P. and Becker, J.C., 1999. Function and dysfunction of CD4+ T cells in the immune response to melanoma. Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, 48(7), pp.363-370. 13. ^Marchand, M., Punt, C.J.A., Aamdal, S., Escudier, B., Kruit, W.H.J., Keilholz, U., Håkansson, L., Van Baren, N., Humblet, Y., Mulders, P. and Avril, M.F., 2003. Immunisation of metastatic cancer patients with MAGE-3 protein combined with adjuvant SBAS-2: a clinical report. European Journal of Cancer, 39(1), pp.70-77.{{doi|10.1016/S0959-8049(02)00479-3}} 1 : Cancer vaccines |
随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。