| 词条 | District of Columbia v. Wesby |
| 释义 |
|Litigants=District of Columbia v. Wesby |ArgueDate=October 4 |ArgueYear=2017 |DecideDate=January 22 |DecideYear=2018 |FullName=District of Columbia, et al. v. Theodore Wesby, et al. |USVol=583 |USPage=___ |ParallelCitations=138 S. Ct. 577; 199 L. Ed. 2d 453 |Docket=15-1485 |OpinionAnnouncement= |Prior=Wesby v. District of Columbia, 841 F. Supp. 2d [https://www.leagle.com/decision/infdco20120119d18 20] (D.D.C. 2012); affirmed, 765 F.3d [https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20140902156 13], 412 U.S. App. D.C. 246 (D.C. Cir. 2014); rehearing en banc denied, 816 F.3d [https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20160208100 96], 421 U.S. App. D.C. 391 (D.C. Cir. 2016); cert. granted, 137 S. Ct. 826 (2017). |Subsequent= |Holding= |SCOTUS= |Majority=Thomas |JoinMajority=Roberts, Kennedy, Breyer, Alito, Kagan, Gorsuch |Concurrence=Sotomayor |Concurrence2=Ginsburg |LawsApplied= }}District of Columbia v. Wesby, 583 U.S. ___ (2018), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that police officers had probable cause to arrest those attending a party in Washington, D.C.[1] Facts and procedural historyIn March 2008, police officers in Washington, D.C. were called to a residence due to noise complaints.[2] When asked, guests gave conflicting reasons for why they were in the residence, and the homeowner ultimately indicated he had not given permission for the party and that the party's host, "Peaches", had not yet signed a lease for the residence.[3] Though the 21 attendees were arrested, charges were later dropped. A jury later awarded those arrested $680,000 in damage, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit determined that the arresting officers did not have immunity from legal repercussions for the arrests.[4][2] The Supreme Court reversed and remanded this decision, and held that the officers had probable cause to arrest the party attendees and were entitled to qualified immunity.[1] See also
References1. ^1 {{ussc|name=District of Columbia v. Wesby|volume=583|year=2017|docket=15-1485}}. 2. ^1 {{cite web|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/supreme-court-rules-for-police-officers-in-dc-house-party-case-that-involved-mystery-hostess-called-peaches/2018/01/22/87e5eb4a-fed3-11e7-bb03-722769454f82_story.html?noredirect=on|title=Supreme Court rules for police officers in D.C. house party case that involved mystery hostess called ‘Peaches’|last=Barnes|first=Robert|date=22 January 2018|publisher=Washington Post|accessdate=22 August 2018}} 3. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.oyez.org/cases/2017/15-1485|title=District of Columbia v. Wesby|date=22 January 2018|publisher=Oyez|accessdate=22 August 2018}} 4. ^{{cite court |litigants=Wesby v. District of Columbia |vol=765 |reporter=F.3d |opinion=13 |pinpoint= |court=D.C. Cir. |date=2014 |url=https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20140902156 |accessdate=2018-12-31 |quote=}} External links
| case = District of Columbia v. Wesby, 583 U.S. ___ (2018) | justia =https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/583/15-1485/ | oyez =https://www.oyez.org/cases/2017/15-1485 | other_source1 = Supreme Court (slip opinion) | other_url1 =https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/15-1485_new_8n59.pdf{{SCOTUS-case-stub}} 4 : United States class action case law|United States Supreme Court cases|United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court|2018 in United States case law |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。