请输入您要查询的百科知识:

 

词条 Draft:Artifact Evaluation
释义

  1. Conferences and journals

  2. Formalization

  3. References

{{AFC submission|d|nn|u=Maxplank67|ns=118|decliner=Kvng|declinets=20181106143629|ts=20180823065015}} {{AFC comment|1=No INDEPENDENT sources cited. This seems to be a ACM and CTuning thing but apparently has not yet received significant attention outside these circles. All information I found on this subject is self-reported by these organizations. ~Kvng (talk) 14:36, 6 November 2018 (UTC)}}

Artifact Evaluation (or AE for short) is a process

adopted by a number of academic conferences

to reproduce experimental results

from published articles.[1][2][3][4]

Authors are usually invited to submit the supporting materials

(code, data, models, experimental workflows, results)

for their papers to the AE process. A special committee

then assess how these artifacts support the work described

in the papers. Camera-ready papers that successfully go through

the AE process receive a set of approval badges[2]

and include an Artifact Appendix.[5][6]

Conferences and journals

Many leading computer systems and machine learning conferences and journals including

PLDI,

OOPSLA,

PPoPP,

SysML, TOMS and Supercomputing

use Artifact Evaluation to promote reproducibility of experimental results

and encourage code and data sharing.[3][4]

Formalization

The ACM Task Force on Data, Software, and Reproducibility in Publication

was set up in 2015 to formalize Artifact Evaluation[7]. It produced the ACM Artifact Review and Badging Policy now adopted

by major computer science conferences and journals sponsored by ACM.[2] [4]

References

1. ^{{cite journal | first1=Bruce R. | last1=Childers | first2=Grigori | last2=Fursin | first3=Shriram | last3=Krishnamurthi | first4=Andreas | last4=Zeller | title=Artifact Evaluation for Publications (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 15452) | journal=Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 15452 | volume=5 | issue=11 | pages=29–35 | doi=10.4230/DagRep.5.11.29 | date=2015 }}
2. ^{{citation |url=https://www.acm.org/publications/policies/artifact-review-badging |title=ACM Artifact Review and Badging Policy}}
3. ^{{citation |url=http://www.artifact-eval.org |title=Artifact evaluation for software conferences}}
4. ^{{citation |url=http://cTuning.org/ae |title=Artifact Evaluation for computer systems and machine learning conferences}}
5. ^{{citation |url=http://ctuning.org/ae/templates/ae-20180713.tex |title=Artifact Appendix Template}}
6. ^{{citation |url=https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3126948 | title=Example of a paper PDF with a set of ACM artifact evaluation badges and an Artifact Appendix}}
7. ^{{citation |url=https://www.acm.org/publications/task-force-on-data-software-and-reproducibility |title=The ACM Task Force on Data, Software, and Reproducibility in Publication}}
随便看

 

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

 

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间:2024/9/28 21:24:32