| 词条 | Fox Film Corp. v. Knowles |
| 释义 |
|Litigants=Fox Film Corp. v. Knowles |ArgueDate= February 27 |ArgueYear= 1923 |DecideDate= March 12 |DecideYear=1923 |FullName=Fox Film Corp. v. Knowles |USVol=261 |USPage=326 |ParallelCitations=43 S. Ct. 365; 67 L. Ed. 680 |Prior=279 F. 1018 (2d Cir. 1922) |Subsequent= |Holding=The statute intends that an executor, there being no widow, widower, or child, shall have the same right to renew a copyright for a second term as his testator might have exercised had he continued to survive. |SCOTUS=1923–1925 |Majority=Holmes |JoinMajority=a unanimous court |LawsApplied=Copyright Act of 1909 }}Fox Film Corp. v. Knowles, 261 U.S. 326 (1923), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held the statute intends that an executor, there being no widow, widower, or child, shall have the same right to renew a copyright for a second term as his testator might have exercised had he continued to survive.[1] This case was reaffirmed in Miller Music Corp. v. Charles N. Daniels, Inc..[2] References1. ^{{ussc|name=Fox Film Corp. v. Knowles|volume=261|page=326|year=1923}}. 2. ^{{ussc|name=Miller Music Corp. v. Charles N. Daniels, Inc.|volume=362|page=373|pin=|year=1960}}. External links
| case = Fox Film Corp. v. Knowles, {{ussc|261|326|1923|el=no}} | cornell = https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/261/326 | justia = https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/261/326/case.html | loc =http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep261/usrep261326/usrep261326.pdf{{SCOTUS-case-stub}} 4 : 1923 in United States case law|United States copyright case law|United States Supreme Court cases|United States Supreme Court cases of the Taft Court |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。