| 词条 | 2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Antonin Scalia |
| 释义 | {{SCOTUS-justice-listframe |firstname=Antonin |lastname=Scalia |image=File:Antonin Scalia, SCOTUS photo portrait.jpg |term=2005 |tenurecount=twentieth |startdate=October 3, 2005 |enddate=October 1, 2006 |majority=9 |concurrence=7 |concurrencedissent=1 |dissent=5 |other=0 |benchcount=21 |relatingtoorders=1 |inchambers=0 |unanimous=1 |mostjoinedby=Thomas (12) |leastjoinedby=O'Connor (2)[1] |notes=yes |url-courtopinions=https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/slipopinions.aspx?Term=05 |archiveurl-courtopinions=https://web.archive.org/web/20120516151603/https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/slipopinions.aspx?Term=05 |archivedate-courtopinions=May 16, 2012 |url-relatingtoorders=https://web.archive.org/web/20100527232514/https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/relatingtoorders.aspx?Term=05 |archiveurl-relatingtoorders=https://web.archive.org/web/20100527232514/https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/relatingtoorders.aspx?Term=05 |archivedate-relatingtoorders=May 27, 2010 |url-inchambers=https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/in-chambers.aspx?Term=05 |archiveurl-inchambers=https://web.archive.org/web/20120516151732/https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/in-chambers.aspx?Term=05 |archivedate-inchambers=May 16, 2012 |accessdate=December 15, 2016 |opinionstemplate=antoninscaliaopinions |courttemplate=SCOTUSterm2006-2008 |entries={{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=01 | case-article=Lockhart v. United States (2005) | case-display=Lockhart v. United States | type=concurrence | volume=546 | page=142 | year=2005 | wikisource= | issues=Debt Collection Act of 1982 {{*}} Social Security {{*}} student loan debt | joined= | otheropinion1author=O'Connor || otheropinion1type=majority || otheropinion1link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Sandra Day O'Connor#Lockhart v. United States | summary= }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=02 | case=United States v. Georgia | type=majority | volume=546 | page=151 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues= | joined=Unanimous | otheropinion1author=Stevens || otheropinion1type=concurrence || otheropinion1link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of John Paul Stevens#United States v. Georgia | summary= }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=03 | case=Brown v. Sanders | type=majority | volume=546 | page=212 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues= | joined=Roberts, O'Connor, Kennedy, Thomas | otheropinion2author=Stevens || otheropinion2type=dissent || otheropinion2link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of John Paul Stevens#Brown v. Sanders | otheropinion3author=Breyer || otheropinion3type=dissent || otheropinion3link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Stephen Breyer#Brown v. Sanders | summary= }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=04 | case=Gonzales v. Oregon | type=dissent | volume=546 | page=243 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues=Controlled Substances Act | joined=Roberts, Thomas | otheropinion1author=Kennedy || otheropinion1type=majority || otheropinion1link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Anthony Kennedy#Gonzales v. Oregon | otheropinion3author=Thomas || otheropinion3type=dissent || otheropinion3link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Clarence Thomas#Gonzales v. Oregon | summary= }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=05 | case=Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna | type=majority | volume=546 | page=440 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues= | joined=Roberts, Stevens, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer | otheropinion1author=Thomas || otheropinion1type=dissent || otheropinion1link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Clarence Thomas#Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna | summary= }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=06 | case=Domino's Pizza, Inc. v. McDonald | type=majority | volume=546 | page=470 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues=Civil Rights Act | joined=Roberts, Stevens, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer | summary=The Court ruled that the Civil Rights Act's protection of the right to make contracts free from racial discrimination did not extend to agents of the contractors, only those who would have enforceable rights under the contracts. Alito did not participate. }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=07 | case=Oregon v. Guzek | type=concurrence | volume=546 | page=517 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues= | joined=Thomas | otheropinion1author=Breyer || otheropinion1type=majority || otheropinion1link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Stephen Breyer#Oregon v. Guzek | summary= }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=08 | case=United States v. Grubbs | type=majority | volume=547 | page=90 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues= | joined=Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas; Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg (in part) | otheropinion2author=Souter || otheropinion2type=concurrence || otheropinion2link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of David Souter#United States v. Grubbs | summary= }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=09 | case=Georgia v. Randolph | type=dissent | volume=547 | page=103 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues= | joined= | otheropinion1author=Souter || otheropinion1type=majority || otheropinion1link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of David Souter#Georgia v. Randolph | otheropinion2author=Stevens || otheropinion2type=concurrence || otheropinion2link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of John Paul Stevens#Georgia v. Randolph | otheropinion3author=Breyer || otheropinion3type=concurrence || otheropinion3link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Stephen Breyer#Georgia v. Randolph | otheropinion4author=Roberts || otheropinion4type=dissent || otheropinion4link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of John Roberts#Georgia v. Randolph | otheropinion6author=Thomas || otheropinion6type=dissent || otheropinion6link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Clarence Thomas#Georgia v. Randolph | summary= }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=10 | case=Day v. McDonough | type=dissent | volume=547 | page=198 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues=Habeas corpus {{*}} Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act | joined=Thomas, Breyer | otheropinion1author=Ginsburg || otheropinion1type=majority || otheropinion1link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Ruth Bader Ginsburg#Day v. McDonough | otheropinion2author=Stevens || otheropinion2type=dissent || otheropinion2link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of John Paul Stevens#Day v. McDonough | summary=Scalia's dissent objected that the Court's affirmance of a district court's sua sponte dismissal of a habeas petition as untimely disregarded the clear provisions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP), which required the forfeiture of affirmative defenses when they are not raised. Scalia argued that if there was truly no "dispositive difference" as the Court said between a court allowing the State to amend its answer to include the limitations argument and dismissing sua sponte, "the natural conclusion would be that there is no compelling reason to disregard the Civil Rules. Legislatively enacted rules are surely entitled to more respect than this apparent presumption that, when nothing substantial hangs on the point, they do not apply as written." At a minimum, Scalia believed it "a nontrivial value in itself" to "observe[] the formalities of our adversary system" by requiring the State to amend its own pleading. Scalia also observed that in contrast to the "novel regime" adopted by the majority, there is already a well-developed body of law regarding whether a party should have leave to amend a pleading. "Ockham is offended by today's decision, even if no one else is." }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=11 | case=Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corp. | type=concurrence | volume=547 | page=451 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues= | joined= | otheropinion1author=Kennedy || otheropinion1type=majority || otheropinion1link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Anthony Kennedy#Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corp. | otheropinion3author=Thomas || otheropinion3type=concurrencedissent || otheropinion3link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Clarence Thomas#Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corp. | otheropinion4author=Breyer || otheropinion4type=concurrencedissent || otheropinion4link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Stephen Breyer#Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corp. | summary= }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=12 | case=Zedner v. United States | type=concurrence | volume=547 | page=489 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues= | joined= | otheropinion1author=Alito || otheropinion1type=majority || otheropinion1link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Samuel Alito#Zedner v. United States | summary=Scalia joined Alito's unanimous decision ruling that a criminal defendant cannot prospectively waive the protections of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974, except as to the part addressing the Act's legislative history. Scalia filed a separate concurrence to restate his objections to that method of statutory interpretation. }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=13 | case=Hudson v. Michigan | type=majority | volume=547 | page=586 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues= | joined=Roberts, Thomas, Alito; Kennedy (in part) | otheropinion2author=Kennedy || otheropinion2type=concurrence || otheropinion2link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Anthony Kennedy#Hudson v. Michigan | otheropinion3author=Breyer || otheropinion3type=dissent || otheropinion3link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Stephen Breyer#Hudson v. Michigan | summary= }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=14 | case=Kircher v. Putnam Funds Trust | type=concurrence | volume=547 | page=633 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues= | joined= | otheropinion1author=Souter || otheropinion1type=majority || otheropinion1link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of David Souter#Kircher v. Putnam Funds Trust | summary= }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=15 | case=Rapanos v. United States | type=majority | volume=547 | page=715 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues=Clean Water Act | joined=Roberts, Thomas, Alito | otheropinion2author=Roberts || otheropinion2type=concurrence || otheropinion2link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of John Roberts#Rapanos v. United States | otheropinion3author=Kennedy || otheropinion3type=concurrence || otheropinion3link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Anthony Kennedy#Rapanos v. United States | otheropinion4author=Stevens || otheropinion4type=dissent || otheropinion4link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of John Paul Stevens#Rapanos v. United States | otheropinion5author=Breyer || otheropinion5type=dissent || otheropinion5link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Stephen Breyer#Rapanos v. United States | summary= }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=16 | case=Davis v. Washington | type=majority | volume=547 | page=813 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues= | joined=Roberts, Stevens, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito | otheropinion1author=Thomas || otheropinion1type=concurrencedissent || otheropinion1link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Clarence Thomas#Davis v. Washington | summary= }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=17 | case=Youngblood v. West Virginia | type=dissent | volume=547 | page=867 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues= | joined=Thomas | otheropinion1author=per curiam || otheropinion1type=majority || otheropinion1link=2005 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States#Youngblood v. West Virginia | otheropinion2author=Kennedy || otheropinion2type=dissent || otheropinion2link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Anthony Kennedy#Youngblood v. West Virginia | summary= }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=18 | case1=Fidelity Federal Bank & Trust v. Kehoe | type=concurrence | volume=547 | page=1051 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues= | joined=Alito | summary=Scalia concurred in the Court's denial of certiorari. }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=19 | case=United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez | type=majority | volume=548 | page=140 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues=U.S. Const. amend. VI {{*}} right to counsel | joined=Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer | otheropinion2author=Alito || otheropinion2type=dissent || otheropinion2link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Samuel Alito#United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez | summary= }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=20 | case=Kansas v. Marsh | type=concurrence | volume=548 | page=163 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues=U.S. Const. amend. VIII {{*}} death penalty {{*}} balance of mitigating and aggravating sentencing factors | joined= | otheropinion1author=Thomas || otheropinion1type=majority || otheropinion1link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Clarence Thomas#Kansas v. Marsh | otheropinion3author=Stevens || otheropinion3type=dissent || otheropinion3link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of John Paul Stevens#Kansas v. Marsh | otheropinion4author=Souter || otheropinion4type=dissent || otheropinion4link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of David Souter#Kansas v. Marsh | summary= }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=21 | case=League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry | type=concurrencedissent | volume=548 | page=399 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues=legislative redistricting | joined=Thomas; Roberts, Alito (in part) | otheropinion1author=Kennedy || otheropinion1type=plurality || otheropinion1link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Anthony Kennedy#League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry | otheropinion2author=Roberts || otheropinion2type=concurrencedissent || otheropinion2link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of John Roberts#League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry | otheropinion3author=Stevens || otheropinion3type=concurrencedissent || otheropinion3link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of John Paul Stevens#League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry | otheropinion5author=Souter || otheropinion5type=concurrencedissent || otheropinion5link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of David Souter#League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry | otheropinion6author=Breyer || otheropinion6type=concurrencedissent || otheropinion6link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Stephen Breyer#League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry | summary= }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=22 | case=Hamdan v. Rumsfeld | type=dissent | volume=548 | page=557 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues= | joined=Thomas, Alito | otheropinion1author=Stevens || otheropinion1type=plurality || otheropinion1link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of John Paul Stevens#Hamdan v. Rumsfeld | otheropinion2author=Kennedy || otheropinion2type=concurrence || otheropinion2link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Anthony Kennedy#Hamdan v. Rumsfeld | otheropinion3author=Breyer || otheropinion3type=concurrence || otheropinion3link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Stephen Breyer#Hamdan v. Rumsfeld | otheropinion5author=Thomas || otheropinion5type=dissent || otheropinion5link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Clarence Thomas#Hamdan v. Rumsfeld | otheropinion6author=Alito || otheropinion6type=dissent || otheropinion6link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Samuel Alito#Hamdan v. Rumsfeld | summary=Scalia also joined Thomas' dissent, and Alito's dissent in part. }} }} |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。