| 词条 | 2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of John Paul Stevens |
| 释义 | {{SCOTUS-justice-listframe |firstname=John Paul |lastname=Stevens |image=File:John Paul Stevens, SCOTUS photo portrait.jpg |term=2005 |tenurecount=thirty-first |startdate=October 3, 2005 |enddate=October 1, 2006 |majority=7 |concurrence=6 |concurrencedissent=1 |dissent=14 |other=2 |benchcount=28 |relatingtoorders=2 |inchambers=0 |unanimous=2 |mostjoinedby=Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer (11) |leastjoinedby=O'Connor, Alito (2)[1] |url-courtopinions=https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/slipopinions.aspx?Term=05 |archiveurl-courtopinions=https://web.archive.org/web/20120516151603/https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/slipopinions.aspx?Term=05 |archivedate-courtopinions=May 16, 2012 |url-relatingtoorders=https://web.archive.org/web/20100527232514/https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/relatingtoorders.aspx?Term=05 |archiveurl-relatingtoorders=https://web.archive.org/web/20100527232514/https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/relatingtoorders.aspx?Term=05 |archivedate-relatingtoorders=May 27, 2010 |url-inchambers=https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/in-chambers.aspx?Term=05 |archiveurl-inchambers=https://web.archive.org/web/20120516151732/https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/in-chambers.aspx?Term=05 |archivedate-inchambers=May 16, 2012 |accessdate=December 14, 2016 |opinionstemplate=johnpaulstevensopinions |courttemplate=SCOTUSterm2005 |notes=yes |entries={{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=01 | case=IPB, Inc. v. Alvarez | type=majority | volume=546 | page=21 | year=2005 | wikisource= | issues= | joined=Unanimous | summary= }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=02 | case=Schaffer v. Weast | type=concurrence | volume=546 | page=49 | year=2005 | wikisource= | issues=Individuals with Disabilities Education Act {{*}} individualized education program challenges {{*}} burden of proof | joined= | otheropinion1author=O'Connor || otheropinion1type=majority || otheropinion1link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Sandra Day O'Connor#Schaffer v. Weast | otheropinion2author=Ginsburg || otheropinion2type=dissent || otheropinion2link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Ruth Bader Ginsburg#Schaffer v. Weast | otheropinion3author=Breyer || otheropinion3type=dissent || otheropinion3link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Stephen Breyer#Schaffer v. Weast | summary=Stevens joined O'Connor's 6-2 decision and filed a separate concurrence. }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=03 | case=United States v. Georgia | type=concurrence | volume=546 | page=151 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues= | joined=Ginsburg | otheropinion1author=Scalia || otheropinion1type=majority || otheropinion1link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Antonin Scalia#United States v. Georgia | summary=Stevens also joined Scalia's unanimous opinion. }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=04 | case=Volvo Trucks North America v. Reeder-Simco GMC | type=dissent | volume=546 | page=164 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues= | joined=Thomas | otheropinion1author=Ginsburg || otheropinion1type=majority || otheropinion1link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Ruth Bader Ginsburg#Volvo Trucks North America v. Reeder-Simco GMC | summary= }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=05 | case=Evans v. Chavis | type=concurrence | volume=546 | page=189 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues= | joined= | otheropinion1author=Breyer || otheropinion1type=majority || otheropinion1link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Stephen Breyer#Evans v. Chavis | summary=Stevens concurred in the judgment of Breyer's 8-justice opinion. }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=06 | case=Brown v. Sanders | type=dissent | volume=546 | page=212 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues= | joined=Souter | otheropinion1author=Scalia || otheropinion1type=majority || otheropinion1link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Antonin Scalia#Brown v. Sanders | otheropinion3author=Breyer || otheropinion3type=dissent || otheropinion3link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Stephen Breyer#Brown v. Sanders | summary= }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=07 | case=Central Virginia Community College v. Katz | type=majority | volume=546 | page=356 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues= | joined=O'Connor, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer | otheropinion1author=Thomas || otheropinion1type=dissent || otheropinion1link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Clarence Thomas#Central Virginia Community College v. Katz | summary=Thomas filed a dissent. }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=08 | case=Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. v. Swift-Eckrich, Inc. | type=dissent | volume=546 | page=394 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues= | joined=Kennedy | otheropinion1author=Thomas || otheropinion1type=majority || otheropinion1link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Clarence Thomas#Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. v. Swift-Eckrich, Inc. | summary= }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=09 | case=Lance v. Dennis | type=dissent | volume=546 | page=459 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues= | joined= | otheropinion1author=per curiam || otheropinion1type=majority || otheropinion1link=2005 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States#Lance v. Dennis | otheropinion2author=Ginsburg || otheropinion2type=concurrence || otheropinion2link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Ruth Bader Ginsburg#Lance v. Dennis | summary=Stevens dissented from the Court's per curiam opinion. }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=10 | case=Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc. | type=majority | volume=547 | page=28 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues=Patents {{*}} antitrust | joined=Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer | summary=Stevens wrote for the Court that a patented product in a tying arrangement is not presumed to have market power for purposes of antitrust law. }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=11 | case=Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Dabit | type=majority | volume=547 | page=71 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues=Securities regulation {{*}} federal preemption | joined=Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer | summary=Stevens wrote for the Court that the Securities Litigation Reform Act preempted state law holder claims, even though such claims could not be brought under federal law. }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=12 | case=Georgia v. Randolph | type=concurrence | volume=547 | page=103 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues= | joined= | otheropinion1author=Souter || otheropinion1type=majority || otheropinion1link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of David Souter#Georgia v. Randolph | otheropinion3author=Breyer || otheropinion3type=concurrence || otheropinion3link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Stephen Breyer#Georgia v. Randolph | otheropinion4author=Roberts || otheropinion4type=dissent || otheropinion4link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of John Roberts#Georgia v. Randolph | otheropinion5author=Scalia || otheropinion5type=dissent || otheropinion5link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Antonin Scalia#Georgia v. Randolph | otheropinion6author=Thomas || otheropinion6type=dissent || otheropinion6link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Clarence Thomas#Georgia v. Randolph | summary=Stevens also joined Souter's 5-3 decision. }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=13 | case=Day v. McDonough | type=dissent | volume=547 | page=198 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues=Habeas corpus | joined=Breyer | otheropinion1author=Ginsburg || otheropinion1type=majority || otheropinion1link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Ruth Bader Ginsburg#Day v. McDonough | otheropinion3author=Scalia || otheropinion3type=dissent || otheropinion3link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Antonin Scalia#Day v. McDonough | summary=Stevens filed one of two dissents from Ginsburg's 5-4 decision ruling that courts could dismiss a habeas petition filed outside the statute of limitations sua sponte. Though Stevens agreed with this interpretation, he dissented from the Court's decision to announce its judgment when a relevant case would be decided later in the term. The Court had recently granted certiorari in Lawrence v. Florida, a case which would answer the question of whether Day's petition was actually barred by the statute of limitations. Stevens wrote that "[i]t seems improvident to affirm a possibly erroneous Court of Appeals judgment that dismissed Day's habeas petition without an evaluation of its merits when we have already granted certiorari to address the issue on which the Court of Appeals may have erred." He suggested the lower court may still avoid a "miscarriage of justice" by keeping Day's case on its docket until after Lawrence is decided, "but it would be better practice for us to do so ourselves." }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=14 | case=Ark. Dep't of Human Servs. v. Ahlborn | type=majority | volume=547 | page=268 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues=Medicaid | joined=Unanimous | summary=The Court ruled that a federal statutory prohibition against liens on personal property to recover Medicaid expenditures applied to settlements, so that only the portion of the settlement that represented payment for past medical expenses could be claimed by the state. }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=15 | case=Marshall v. Marshall | type=concurrence | volume=547 | page=293 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues=Bankruptcy {{*}} jurisdiction | joined= | otheropinion1author=Ginsburg || otheropinion1type=majority || otheropinion1link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Ruth Bader Ginsburg#Marshall v. Marshall | summary= }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=16 | case=Brigham City v. Stuart | type=concurrence | volume=547 | page=398 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues= | joined= | otheropinion1author=Roberts || otheropinion1type=majority || otheropinion1link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of John Roberts#Brigham City v. Stuart | summary=Stevens also joined Roberts' unanimous decision. }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=17 | case=Garcetti v. Ceballos | type=dissent | volume=547 | page=410 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues= | joined= | otheropinion1author=Kennedy || otheropinion1type=majority || otheropinion1link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Anthony Kennedy#Garcetti v. Ceballos | otheropinion3author=Souter || otheropinion3type=dissent || otheropinion3link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of David Souter#Garcetti v. Ceballos | otheropinion4author=Breyer || otheropinion4type=dissent || otheropinion4link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Stephen Breyer#Garcetti v. Ceballos | summary=Stevens filed one of three dissents from Kennedy's 5-4 decision, and also joined Souter's. }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=18 | case=Rapanos v. United States | type=dissent | volume=547 | page=715 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues=Environmental regulation | joined=Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer | otheropinion1author=Scalia || otheropinion1type=plurality || otheropinion1link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Antonin Scalia#Rapanos v. United States | otheropinion2author=Roberts || otheropinion2type=concurrence || otheropinion2link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of John Roberts#Rapanos v. United States | otheropinion3author=Kennedy || otheropinion3type=concurrence || otheropinion3link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Anthony Kennedy#Rapanos v. United States | otheropinion5author=Breyer || otheropinion5type=dissent || otheropinion5link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Stephen Breyer#Rapanos v. United States | summary= }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=19 | case=Samson v. California | type=dissent | volume=547 | page=843 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues= | joined=Souter, Breyer | otheropinion1author=Thomas || otheropinion1type=majority || otheropinion1link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Clarence Thomas#Samson v. California | summary=Stevens dissented from Thomas' 6-3 decision. }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=20 | case1=Moreland v. Federal Bureau of Prisons | type=other | volume=547 | page=1106 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues=Statutory interpretation | joined= | summary=Stevens filed a statement respecting the denial of certiorari, in which he clarified that the Court's action was not an endorsement of the lower court's interpretation of the federal sentencing provision for "good-time" credits. }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=21 | case1=Rangel-Reyes v. United States | type=other | volume=547 | page=1200 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues=Rights of the accused {{*}} U.S. Const. amend. VI {{*}} right to a jury trial | joined= | otheropinion1author=Thomas || otheropinion1type=dissent || otheropinion1link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Clarence Thomas#Rangel-Reyes v. United States | summary=Stevens filed a statement respecting the Court's denial of certiorari in which he expressed that he still believed Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U. S. 224 (1998), was wrongly decided, but "that is not a sufficient reason for revisiting the issue" in light of stare decisis. "The denial of a jury trial on the narrow issues of fact concerning a defendant’s prior conviction history, unlike the denial of a jury trial on other issues of fact that give rise tomandatory minimum sentences will seldom create any significant risk of prejudice to the accused." Thomas filed a dissent from the denial of cert., believing that Almendarez-Torres should be overruled. }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=22 | case=Dixon v. United States | type=majority | volume=548 | page=1 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues= | joined=Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Alito | otheropinion2author=Kennedy || otheropinion2type=concurrence || otheropinion2link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Anthony Kennedy#Dixon v. United States | otheropinion3author=Alito || otheropinion3type=concurrence || otheropinion3link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Samuel Alito#Dixon v. United States | otheropinion4author=Breyer || otheropinion4type=dissent || otheropinion4link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Stephen Breyer#Dixon v. United States | summary= }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=23 | case=Fernandez-Vargas v. Gonzales | type=dissent | volume=548 | page=30 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues= | joined= | otheropinion1author=Souter || otheropinion1type=majority || otheropinion1link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of David Souter#Fernandez-Vargas v. Gonzales | summary= }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=24 | case=Woodford v. Ngo | type=dissent | volume=548 | page=81 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues= | joined=Souter, Ginsburg | otheropinion1author=Alito || otheropinion1type=majority || otheropinion1link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Samuel Alito#Woodford v. Ngo | otheropinion2author=Breyer || otheropinion2type=concurrence || otheropinion2link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Stephen Breyer#Woodford v. Ngo | summary= }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=25 | case=Kansas v. Marsh | type=dissent | volume=548 | page=163 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues=Death penalty | joined= | otheropinion1author=Thomas || otheropinion1type=majority || otheropinion1link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Clarence Thomas#Kansas v. Marsh | otheropinion2author=Scalia || otheropinion2type=concurrence || otheropinion2link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Antonin Scalia#Kansas v. Marsh | otheropinion4author=Souter || otheropinion4type=dissent || otheropinion4link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of David Souter#Kansas v. Marsh | summary=Stevens filed one of two dissents from Thomas' 5-4 decision, and joined Souter's. }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=26 | case=Washington v. Recuenco | type=dissent | volume=548 | page=212 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues= | joined= | otheropinion1author=Thomas || otheropinion1type=majority || otheropinion1link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Clarence Thomas#Washington v. Recuenco | otheropinion2author=Kennedy || otheropinion2type=concurrence || otheropinion2link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Anthony Kennedy#Washington v. Recuenco | otheropinion4author=Ginsburg || otheropinion4type=dissent || otheropinion4link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Ruth Bader Ginsburg#Washington v. Recuenco | summary=Stevens also joined Ginsburg's dissent. }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=27 | case=League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry | type=concurrencedissent | volume=548 | page=399 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues=Electoral redistricting | joined=Breyer (in part) | otheropinion1author=Kennedy || otheropinion1type=plurality || otheropinion1link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Anthony Kennedy#League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry | otheropinion2author=Roberts || otheropinion2type=concurrencedissent || otheropinion2link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of John Roberts#League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry | otheropinion4author=Scalia || otheropinion4type=concurrencedissent || otheropinion4link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Antonin Scalia#League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry | otheropinion5author=Souter || otheropinion5type=concurrencedissent || otheropinion5link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of David Souter#League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry | otheropinion6author=Breyer || otheropinion6type=concurrencedissent || otheropinion6link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Stephen Breyer#League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry | summary= }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=28 | case=Randall v. Sorrell | type=dissent | volume=548 | page=230 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues= | joined= | otheropinion1author=Breyer || otheropinion1type=plurality || otheropinion1link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Stephen Breyer#Randall v. Sorrell | otheropinion2author=Kennedy || otheropinion2type=concurrence || otheropinion2link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Anthony Kennedy#Randall v. Sorrell | otheropinion3author=Thomas || otheropinion3type=concurrence || otheropinion3link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Clarence Thomas#Randall v. Sorrell | otheropinion4author=Alito || otheropinion4type=concurrence || otheropinion4link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Samuel Alito#Randall v. Sorrell | otheropinion6author=Souter || otheropinion6type=dissent || otheropinion6link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of David Souter#Randall v. Sorrell | summary= }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=29 | case=Beard v. Banks | type=dissent | volume=548 | page=521 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues= | joined=Ginsburg | otheropinion1author=Breyer || otheropinion1type=plurality || otheropinion1link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Stephen Breyer#Beard v. Banks | otheropinion2author=Thomas || otheropinion2type=concurrence || otheropinion2link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Clarence Thomas#Beard v. Banks | otheropinion4author=Ginsburg || otheropinion4type=dissent || otheropinion4link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Ruth Bader Ginsburg#Beard v. Banks | summary= }}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry | #=30 | case=Hamdan v. Rumsfeld | type=majority | volume=548 | page=557 | year=2006 | wikisource= | issues= | joined=Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer; Kennedy (in part) | otheropinion2author=Kennedy || otheropinion2type=concurrence || otheropinion2link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Anthony Kennedy#Hamdan v. Rumsfeld | otheropinion3author=Breyer || otheropinion3type=concurrence || otheropinion3link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Stephen Breyer#Hamdan v. Rumsfeld | otheropinion4author=Scalia || otheropinion4type=dissent || otheropinion4link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Antonin Scalia#Hamdan v. Rumsfeld | otheropinion5author=Thomas || otheropinion5type=dissent || otheropinion5link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Clarence Thomas#Hamdan v. Rumsfeld | otheropinion6author=Alito || otheropinion6type=dissent || otheropinion6link=2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Samuel Alito#Hamdan v. Rumsfeld | summary= }} }} |
| 随便看 |
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。