| 释义 |
- Candidates Libertarian Republican
- Campaign
- Results Overall By county
- See also
- References
{{Use mdy dates | date=November 2017}}{{Infobox election
| election_name = 2006 United States Senate election in Indiana
| country = Indiana
| type = presidential
| ongoing = no
| previous_election = 2000 United States Senate election in Indiana
| previous_year = 2000
| next_election = 2012 United States Senate election in Indiana
| next_year = 2012
| election_date = November 7, 2006
| image_size = 125x136px
| image1 = Dick Lugar official photo 2010.JPG
| nominee1 = Richard Lugar
| party1 = Republican Party (United States)
| popular_vote1 = 1,171,553
| percentage1 = 87.3%
| image2 =
| nominee2 = Steve Osborn
| party2 = Libertarian Party (United States)
| popular_vote2 = 168,820
| percentage2 = 12.6%
| map_image = Indiana Senate Election Results by County, 2006.svg
| map_size = 155px
| map_caption = County Results
Lugar: {{legend0|#d75d5d|60-70%}} {{legend0|#d72f30|70-80%}} {{legend0|#c21b18|80-90%}} {{legend0|#a80000|90-100%}}
| title = U.S. Senator
| before_election = Richard Lugar
| before_party = Republican Party (United States)
| after_election = Richard Lugar
| after_party = Republican Party (United States)
}}{{ElectionsIN}}The 2006 United States Senate election in Indiana was held November 7, 2006. Incumbent Republican United States Senator Richard Lugar was unopposed by any Democratic Party candidate and was re-elected to his sixth six-year term with 87.3% of the vote. This would be Lugar's last successful race of his decades long political career. This is also the last time that the counties of Lake, Monroe, and Porter have voted for a Republican candidate for Senate. Candidates Libertarian - Steve Osborn, radio operator
Republican - Richard Lugar, incumbent U.S. Senator
Campaign Lugar faced no opposition from the Democratic Party, as they felt Lugar was unbeatable. The Indiana Senate race was the only one in 2006 where the incumbent faced no challenger from the other major party. Also running was Libertarian Steve Osborn. Osborn was from La Porte, Indiana and was an amateur radio operator. Exit polls projected a landslide victory for Lugar which was borne out by the result. Results Overall The election was not close as Lugar faced only a Libertarian candidate, as no Democrat filed to run. Osborn's best performance was in Switzerland County where he received just over 22% of the vote. This is one of the best statewide showings for a third party candidate in Indiana. {{Election box begin
| title = 2006 United States Senate election, Indiana[1]}}{{Election box winning candidate with party link
| party = Republican Party (United States)
| candidate = Richard Lugar (Incumbent)
| votes = 1,171,553
| percentage = 87.3%
| change =
}}{{Election box candidate with party link
| party = Libertarian Party (United States)
| candidate = Steve Osborn
| votes = 168,820
| percentage = 12.6%
| change =
}}{{Election box candidate
| party = No party
| candidate = Write-Ins
| votes = 738
| percentage = 0.1%
| change =
}}{{Election box majority
| votes = 1,002,733
| percentage =
| change =
}}{{Election box turnout
| votes = 1,341,111
| percentage = 40%
| change =
}}{{Election box hold with party link
|winner = Republican Party (United States)
|swing =
}}{{Election box end}} By county Lugar won all 92 of Indiana's counties by varying margins.[2] | County | Lugar | Votes | Osborn | Votes | Other | Votes | Total |
|---|
| Adams | 90.6% | 7,143 | 9.4% | 743 | 0.0% | 3 | 7,889 | | Allen | 89.3% | 65,782 | 10.6% | 7,838 | 0.1% | 38 | 73,658 | | Bartholomew | 90.0% | 16,544 | 10.0% | 1,834 | 0.0% | 9 | 18,387 | | Benton | 87.1% | 2,086 | 12.9% | 310 | 0.0% | 0 | 2,396 | | Blackford | 85.7% | 2,902 | 14.3% | 483 | 0.0% | 0 | 3,385 | | Boone | 91.5% | 11,428 | 8.5% | 1,058 | 0.0% | 0 | 12,486 | | Brown | 84.9% | 4,181 | 15.1% | 743 | 0.0% | 1 | 4,925 | | Carroll | 86.3% | 4,859 | 13.6% | 768 | 0.1% | 3 | 5,630 | | Cass | 88.1% | 8,066 | 11.9% | 1,094 | 0.1% | 1 | 9,161 | | Clark | 86.6% | 21,690 | 13.4% | 3,358 | 0.0% | 0 | 25,048 | | Clay | 86.9% | 6,597 | 13.0% | 987 | 0.1% | 4 | 7,588 | | Clinton | 87.6% | 6,076 | 12.3% | 856 | 0.1% | 7 | 6,939 | | Crawford | 82.6% | 2,318 | 17.4% | 488 | 0.0% | 0 | 2,806 | | Daviess | 91.4% | 6,193 | 8.6% | 586 | 0.0% | 1 | 6,780 | | Dearborn | 83.7% | 9,091 | 16.2% | 1,759 | 0.1% | 11 | 10,861 | | Decatur | 89.7% | 5,575 | 10.3% | 660 | 0.0% | 0 | 6,415 | | DeKalb | 86.4% | 7,967 | 13.6% | 1,258 | 0.0% | 0 | 9,225 | | Delaware | 88.7% | 21,571 | 11.3% | 2,740 | 0.0% | 0 | 24,311 | | Dubois | 90.4% | 9,432 | 9.6% | 1,007 | 0.0% | 0 | 10,439 | | Elkhart | 89.9% | 34,342 | 9.9% | 3,798 | 0.2% | 74 | 38,214 | | Fayette | 83.2% | 4,704 | 16.8% | 951 | 0.0% | 0 | 5,655 | | Floyd | 88.0% | 16,941 | 12.0% | 2,300 | 0.0% | 0 | 19,241 | | Fountain | 86.4% | 4,267 | 13.6% | 671 | 0.0% | 0 | 4,938 | | Franklin | 83.6% | 5,061 | 16.3% | 989 | 0.1% | 7 | 6,057 | | Fulton | 88.7% | 5,493 | 11.3% | 697 | 0.1% | 1 | 6,191 | | Gibson | 92.3% | 8,395 | 7.7% | 969 | 0.0% | 2 | 9,094 | | Grant | 89.4% | 13,758 | 10.6% | 1,638 | 0.0% | 0 | 15,396 | | Greene | 88.0% | 7,757 | 11.7% | 1,031 | 0.3% | 28 | 8,788 | | Hamilton | 92.0% | 49,077 | 7.9% | 4,226 | 0.1% | 47 | 53,350 | | Hancock | 89.6% | 13,810 | 10.4% | 1,605 | 0.0% | 0 | 15,415 | | Harrison | 85.4% | 9,484 | 14.6% | 1,625 | 0.0% | 0 | 11,109 | | Hendricks | 89.8% | 25,216 | 10.1% | 2,841 | 0.1% | 15 | 28,072 | | Henry | 85.4% | 10,375 | 14.6% | 1,776 | 0.0% | 0 | 12,151 | | Howard | 86.2% | 17,660 | 13.7% | 2,804 | 0.1% | 25 | 20,489 | | Huntington | 87.0% | 7,392 | 13.0% | 1,104 | 0.0% | 0 | 8,496 | | Jackson | 89.1% | 9,887 | 10.8% | 1,203 | 0.0% | 5 | 11,095 | | Jasper | 85.3% | 5,122 | 14.6% | 876 | 0.1% | 7 | 6,005 | | Jay | 85.9% | 4,850 | 14.1% | 795 | 0.0% | 0 | 5,645 | | Jefferson | 85.6% | 6,838 | 14.4% | 1,150 | 0.0% | 0 | 7,988 | | Jennings | 87.7% | 6,751 | 12.3% | 948 | 0.0% | 0 | 7,699 | | Johnson | 90.8% | 24,333 | 9.1% | 2,434 | 0.1% | 36 | 26,803 | | Knox | 87.2% | 8,764 | 12.8% | 1,290 | 0.0% | 0 | 10,054 | | Kosciusko | 88.3% | 15,231 | 11.5% | 1,983 | 0.2% | 32 | 17,246 | | LaGrange | 87.4% | 5,063 | 12.6% | 730 | 0.0% | 0 | 5,793 | | Lake | 81.8% | 47,868 | 18.1% | 10,575 | 0.1% | 61 | 58,504 | | LaPorte | 79.9% | 18,967 | 20.1% | 4,773 | 0.0% | 0 | 23,740 | | Lawrence | 87.3% | 9,404 | 12.4% | 1,335 | 0.3% | 36 | 10,775 | | Madison | 85.8% | 25,963 | 14.2% | 4,294 | 0.0% | 11 | 30,268 | | Marion | 89.0% | 127,898 | 11.0% | 15,866 | 0.0% | 0 | 143,764 | | Marshall | 89.7% | 10,958 | 10.3% | 1,253 | 0.0% | 0 | 12,211 | | Martin | 86.4% | 2,765 | 13.6% | 435 | 0.0% | 0 | 3,200 | | Miami | 84.8% | 6,771 | 14.9% | 1,192 | 0.3% | 21 | 7,984 | | Monroe | 83.2% | 21,998 | 16.8% | 4,451 | 0.0% | 0 | 26,449 | | Montgomery | 88.9% | 7,639 | 11.1% | 948 | 0.0% | 4 | 8,591 | | Morgan | 87.7% | 12,254 | 12.3% | 1,720 | 0.0% | 0 | 13,974 | | Newton | 81.8% | 2,915 | 18.2% | 647 | 0.0% | 0 | 3,562 | | Noble | 87.9% | 8,800 | 12.1% | 1,209 | 0.0% | 0 | 10,009 | | Ohio | 80.1% | 1,523 | 19.9% | 378 | 0.0% | 0 | 1,901 | | Orange | 88.2% | 4,503 | 11.8% | 605 | 0.0% | 0 | 5,108 | | Owen | 87.2% | 4,418 | 12.8% | 650 | 0.0% | 0 | 5,068 | | Parke | 89.1% | 4,182 | 10.9% | 512 | 0.0% | 1 | 4,695 | | Perry | 85.9% | 3,916 | 14.1% | 640 | 0.0% | 0 | 4,556 | | Pike | 87.6% | 3,649 | 12.3% | 511 | 0.1% | 3 | 4,163 | | Porter | 81.5% | 25,385 | 18.2% | 5,658 | 0.3% | 90 | 31,133 | | Posey | 89.7% | 7,636 | 10.3% | 877 | 0.0% | 0 | 8,513 | | Pulaski | 85.9% | 3,625 | 14.1% | 595 | 0.0% | 2 | 4,222 | | Putnam | 89.8% | 7,352 | 10.1% | 826 | 0.1% | 8 | 8,186 | | Randolph | 87.5% | 5,587 | 12.5% | 799 | 0.0% | 2 | 6,388 | | Ripley | 84.7% | 6,224 | 15.2% | 1,117 | 0.1% | 7 | 7,348 | | Rush | 89.5% | 4,340 | 10.5% | 506 | 0.0% | 2 | 4,848 | | Saint Joseph | 88.8% | 52,437 | 11.2% | 6,587 | 0.0% | 0 | 59,024 | | Scott | 84.3% | 4,267 | 15.4% | 778 | 0.3% | 14 | 5,059 | | Shelby | 89.5% | 9,070 | 10.2% | 1,035 | 0.3% | 26 | 10,131 | | Spencer | 92.8% | 5,483 | 7.1% | 699 | 0.1% | 8 | 9,777 | | Starke | 76.3% | 4,560 | 23.7% | 1,415 | 0.0% | 0 | 5,975 | | Steuben | 83.6% | 6,728 | 16.4% | 1,314 | 0.0% | 2 | 8,044 | | Sullivan | 85.1% | 4,489 | 14.9% | 783 | 0.0% | 0 | 5,272 | | Switzerland | 77.7% | 1,615 | 22.3% | 463 | 0.0% | 0 | 2,078 | | Tippecanoe | 84.9% | 25,707 | 15.0% | 4,535 | 0.1% | 39 | 30,281 | | Tipton | 88.1% | 4,554 | 11.9% | 616 | 0.0% | 0 | 5,170 | | Union | 85.1% | 1,913 | 14.9% | 336 | 0.0% | 0 | 2,249 | | Vanderburgh | 87.9% | 39,898 | 12.1% | 5,474 | 0.0% | 0 | 45,372 | | Vermillion | 82.9% | 3,380 | 17.1% | 696 | 0.0% | 0 | 4,076 | | Vigo | 86.4% | 19,242 | 13.6% | 3,025 | 0.0% | 10 | 22,277 | | Wabash | 86.9% | 5,653 | 13.1% | 855 | 0.0% | 0 | 6,508 | | Warren | 87.2% | 2,221 | 12.7% | 325 | 0.0% | 0 | 2546 | | Warrick | 89.5% | 15,038 | 10.4% | 1,748 | 0.1% | 11 | 16,797 | | Washington | 85.7% | 6,494 | 14.0% | 1,060 | 0.3% | 19 | 7,575 | | Wayne | 80.5% | 10,846 | 19.5% | 2,631 | 0.0% | 0 | 13,477 | | Wells | 87.9% | 7,389 | 12.1% | 1,011 | 0.0% | 2 | 8,402 | | White | 86.4% | 5,930 | 13.6% | 935 | 0.0% | 0 | 6,865 | | Whitley | 87.5% | 7,855 | 12.5% | 1,123 | 0.0% | 0 | 8,978 |
See also - United States Senate elections, 2006
- United States House of Representatives elections in Indiana, 2006
References 1. ^{{cite web | url = http://www.in.gov/apps/sos/election/general/general2006?page=office&countyID=-1&officeID=4&districtID=514&candidate= | title = United States Senator | publisher = Indiana of Secretary of State | date = November 7, 2006 | accessdate = November 8, 2008}}
2. ^{{cite web | url = http://www.in.gov/apps/sos/election/general/general2006?page=district&countyID=-1&officeID=4&districtID=514&candidate= | title = United States Senator by County | publisher = Indiana Secretary of State | date = November 7, 2006 | accessdate = November 8, 2008}}
{{United States elections, 2006}}{{US Third Party Election}} 3 : United States Senate elections in Indiana|2006 United States Senate elections|2006 Indiana elections |