| 词条 | Jennifer Nagel |
| 释义 |
Jennifer Nagel is a Canadian philosopher in the Department of Philosophy at the University of Toronto.[1][2][3] Her research focuses on epistemology, philosophy of mind, and metacognition. She has also written on 17th century (Western) philosophy, including on John Locke and René Descartes. Education and careerAfter a B.A. in Philosophy at the University of Toronto, Nagel earned her M.A. (1994) and Ph.D. (2000) in Philosophy at the University of Pittsburgh. Her dissertation, The Role of Necessity in Empirical Knowledge, was written under the supervision of John McDowell.[4] From July 2013 through June 2016, Nagel was associate chair of the University of Toronto's Department of Philosophy.[4] In September 2015, Nagel founded a group called Room for More, a Toronto-based group sponsoring Syrian Refugees coming to Canada, in partnership with Humanity First.[1][5] ResearchMuch of Nagel's research draws on empirical developments from the cognitive sciences and experimental philosophy in order to address longstanding questions in epistemology and philosophy of mind. For example, Nagel is well-known for defending the value of intuitions in philosophical methodology.[6][7][8] While the emergence of experimental philosophy in the 21st century has often cast doubt on the reliability of intuitions,[9] Nagel argues that intuitions about particular cases and thought experiments are a legitimate source of knowledge and justification. Nagel also argues, building on suggestions made by Timothy Williamson, that knowledge is a mental state. Whereas knowledge is traditionally thought to be reducible to a form of belief, i.e., a justified and true belief, Nagel argues that knowledge should itself be counted among the fundamental types of mental state, on a par with beliefs, desires, intentions, and so on. Nagel is the author of Knowledge: A Very Short Introduction, which has been praised as an "admirably clear and engaging" introduction to epistemology.[10] Nagel considers classic questions, including about skepticism, rationalism, and empiricism, as well as more contemporary concerns, such as whether Wikipedia, "where most articles have multiple and anonymous authors", can be a reliable source of knowledge.[11] Publications
References1. ^1 {{Cite news|url=http://www.pri.org/stories/2015-11-20/private-canadians-are-coming-out-droves-again-resettle-refugees|title=Canadians are coming out in droves, again, to resettle refugees — on their own dime|newspaper=Public Radio International|language=en-US|access-date=2016-10-09}} {{Authority control}}{{DEFAULTSORT:Nagel, Jennifer}}2. ^{{Cite news|url=http://www.philosophy.utoronto.ca/directory/jennifer-nagel/|title=Jennifer Nagel - Department of Philosophy|newspaper=Department of Philosophy|language=en-US|access-date=2016-10-09}} 3. ^{{Cite web|url=http://individual.utoronto.ca/jnagel/Home_Page.html|title=Home Page|website=individual.utoronto.ca|access-date=2016-10-09}} 4. ^1 {{Cite web|url=http://individual.utoronto.ca/jnagel/CV.html|title=CV|website=individual.utoronto.ca|access-date=2016-10-10}} 5. ^{{Cite news|url=https://themedium.ca/features/theres-room-for-more-refugees/|title=There’s "Room for More" refugees {{!}} The Medium|last=Ayub|first=Mahnoor|date=2016-01-11|newspaper=The Medium|language=en-US|access-date=2016-10-09}} 6. ^{{Cite journal|last=Nagel|first=Jennifer|date=2012-11-01|title=Intuitions and Experiments: A Defense of the Case Method in Epistemology|journal=Philosophy and Phenomenological Research|language=en|volume=85|issue=3|pages=495–527|doi=10.1111/j.1933-1592.2012.00634.x|issn=1933-1592|url=https://philpapers.org/rec/NAGIAE}} 7. ^{{Cite journal|last=Stich|first=Stephen|date=2013-07-01|title=Do Different Groups Have Different Epistemic Intuitions? A Reply to Jennifer Nagel|journal=Philosophy and Phenomenological Research|language=en|volume=87|issue=1|pages=151–178|doi=10.1111/j.1933-1592.2012.00590.x|issn=1933-1592|url=https://philpapers.org/rec/STIDDG}} 8. ^{{Cite journal|last=Nagel|first=Jennifer|date=2013-07-01|title=Defending the Evidential Value of Epistemic Intuitions: A Reply to Stich|journal=Philosophy and Phenomenological Research|language=en|volume=87|issue=1|pages=179–199|doi=10.1111/phpr.12008|issn=1933-1592|url=https://philpapers.org/rec/NAGDTE}} 9. ^{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/?id=HXd7CwAAQBAJ&pg=PA151&lpg=PA151&dq=experimental+philosophy+casts+doubt+on+the+value+of+our+intuitions#v=onepage&q=experimental%20philosophy%20casts%20doubt%20on%20the%20value%20of%20our%20intuitions&f=false|title="Intuitions and the Theory of Reference" Advances in Experimental Philosophy and Philosophical Methodology|last=Nado|first=Jennifer and Michael Johnson|date=2016-03-24|publisher=Bloomsbury Publishing|isbn=9781474223225|location=|pages=151|language=en|via=}} 10. ^{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/oct/16/knowledge-very-short-introduction-review-jennifer-nagel|title=Knowledge: A Very Short Introduction review – the sceptic chuckles darkly|last=Poole|first=Steven|date=2014-10-16|newspaper=The Guardian|language=en-GB|issn=0261-3077|access-date=2016-10-10}} 11. ^{{Cite book|url=https://global.oup.com/academic/product/knowledge-a-very-short-introduction-9780199661268?cc=us&lang=en&|title=Knowledge: A Very Short Introduction|last=Nagel|first=Jennifer|publisher=Oxford|year=2014|isbn=9780199661268|location=|pages=72|via=|series=Very Short Introductions}} 12 : Living people|Year of birth missing (living people)|Canadian philosophers|Canadian women philosophers|University of Toronto alumni|University of Pittsburgh alumni|Epistemologists|Philosophers of mind|University of Toronto faculty|21st-century philosophers|20th-century Canadian philosophers|Philosophy academics |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。