词条 | List of .NET libraries and frameworks | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
释义 |
This article contains a list of notable libraries that can be used in .NET languages. While the .NET framework provides a basis for application development, which provides platform independence, language interoperability and extensive framework libraries, the development ecosystem around .NET is dependent on user libraries that are developed independently of the framework. Standard Libraries (CLI) (including the Base Class Library (BCL)) are not included in this article because they have a separate article. Application development in .NET FrameworkPrograms written for .NET Framework execute in a software environment known as Common Language Runtime (CLR), an application virtual machine that provides services such as security, memory management, and exception handling. Framework includes a large class library called Framework Class Library (FCL), which together with CLR constitute the .NET framework. Thanks to the hosting virtual machine, different .NET CLI compliant languages can operate on the same kind of data structures. Therefore, all CLI compliant languages can use the Framework Class Library and other .NET libraries that are written in one of the CLI compliant languages. When source code of a CLI compliant language is compiled, the compiler generates a platform independent code in the Common Intermediate Language (also referred to as bytecode), which is stored in CLI assemblies. When a .NET application is executed, the just-in-time compiler (JIT) turns the CIL code into platform specific machine code. To improve performance, the .NET Framework also comes with Native Image Generator (NGEN), which performs ahead-of-time compilation to machine code. This architecture has several implications. The framework provides language interoperability (each language can use code written in other languages) across the .NET CLI compliant languages programming languages. Calls from one language to another are exactly the same as would be within a single programming language. If a library is written in one CLI language, it can be used in any other CLI language. Moreover, applications that consist only of pure .NET assemblies, can be transferred to any platform that contains implementation of .NET framework and executed on that platform. For example, an application written for Microsoft .NET on Windows can also be executed on Mono (a cross platform alternative implementation of .NET) on Linux or macOS. Such applications are automatically cross-platform (or platform independent) to the extent to which the .NET framework itself is ported to different platforms. Ability to transfer applications across platforms is extremely important for software developers, because in this way they can use the same code base for the application on any platform, enabling code reuse and avoiding code duplication. Both lead to reduced development and maintenance costs. However, platform independence is only guaranteed in the described way when none of the assemblies constituting an application depends on any code that is not pure .NET code. Many .NET libraries, however, make use of native libraries (written e.g. in C or C++) or system calls through interoperability mechanisms such as COM interoperability and the P/Invoke feature, which makes possible to call native code and thus call into libraries written in compiled languages (as opposed to managed) such as C or C++. In these cases, platform independence of applications written for the .NET framework also depends on the ability to transfer non-.NET libraries, on which application depends, to target platforms. Any additional such library may add significantly to the effort necessary to transfer the application to other platforms. Sometimes, the best solution is to re-implement the parts of application that depend on such a library for each targeted platform. In many cases, the vast majority of the application's code base can be easily transferred across platforms, and only small specific portions of code dependent on problematic libraries must be re-implemented for each platform. Sometimes, a special compatibility layer is introduced that provides a uniform API to the platform dependent parts of code. Then, even if the higher level code heavily depends on platform dependent parts, dependence is resolved through API calls that are the same on all platforms, and the same high level code can still be used on different target platforms. A notable example is the Windows Forms graphical (GUI) class library. The library provides access to Windows User Interface Common Controls by wrapping the Windows API in managed code.[1] The library is therefore not easily transferred to platforms other than Windows. In spite of that, the cross-platform .NET implementation Mono implements the library. Because of that, an application that depends on Windows Forms, can be ported to other forms by using the Mono runtime on which the Windows Forms library is implemented (beside Windows, this includes Unix and OSX). The Mono's implementation of the library is written in C# in order to avoid Windows dependence.[2] Most of the Windows Forms API works on Mono, except for some minor incompatibilities and implementation bugs. However, many .NET libraries that were written on Windows and depend on Windows Forms, also make direct P/Invoke calls straight to the Windows API and bypass the Windows Forms API (this is sometimes done to avoid limitations of the Windows Forms). Such libraries will be broken when transferred to platforms other than Windows, although Windows Forms itself is available on these platforms via Mono implementation. For a GUI class library, the Mono project endorses use of the GTK# library,{{citation needed|date=April 2016}} which is a .NET binding for the Gtk+ toolkit written in C. GUI libraries are not the only critical area of interest for .NET developers. Other libraries that may be problematic include 3D graphics libraries, sound and video libraries and device dependent libraries in general. While some areas are very well covered by core .NET libraries (such as database connectivity, file I/O, sockets, HTTP, XML manipulation, standard cryptography), the others (such as numerical libraries, general parsing libraries) are easy to implement in pure .NET but may be under represented as compared to availability of corresponding native libraries. For developers of both proprietary and open source software (including free software), licensing information is also critically important. Entries in the list therefore provide information about the scope of the listed libraries, main dependencies (especially when these affect platform dependence), and licensing information. Historical backgroundThe .NET Framework has long supported cross-platform software development. The framework has been designed from the beginning for language interoperability, and parts of it were standardized in open standard (The Common Language Infrastructure and framework's most used programming language, C#). The original framework was first implemented only on Windows operating systems. Microsoft, the framework developer, and its partners, were working towards making their patents that cover some .NET - implemented technologies essential for framework implementation, available under "reasonable and non-discriminatory terms", which evolved into several patent promises issued by Microsoft. This made alternative third party implementations of the framework possible such as Mono, Portable.NET, and emulation CrossNet.[3] In spite of that, it has long been a concern within the Open source community that using alternative .NET implementations for cross-platform development, especially of free software, is unsafe because of the possibility of Microsoft patent claims against such implementations. The Free Software Foundation's Richard Stallman has openly opposed inclusion of C# implementations in the default installation of GNU/Linux distributions and stated that they (the community) should discourage people from writing programs in C#. Primary concerns were parts of the framework implementations that were not subject to standards and were not explicitly included in Microsoft's patent promises. The 2010s saw some significant shifts in Microsoft's approach towards the Open software community. The company open sourced the .NET Compiler Platform ("Roslyn") and the ASP.NET in April 2014, and later the .NET Core (open sourced on November 2014[4]) and other software. In February 2016, Microsoft acquired Xamarin, developer of Mono, an open source and cross platform implementation of .NET. On March 31, 2016 Microsoft announced at Microsoft Build that they will completely re-license Mono under the MIT license.[5] Microsoft issued the Patent Promise for Mono stating that they won't assert any "applicable patents" against parties that are "using, selling, offering for sale, importing, or distributing Mono".[6][7] It was also announced that the Mono Project was contributed to the .NET Foundation, a nonprofit organization established by Microsoft in March 2014 to improve open-source software development and collaboration around the .NET Framework.[8] In light of these developments, a strong open source community has begun to develop around the .NET framework (especially on GitHub), starting a number of libraries and software projects[9] targeting the .NET framework for its cross platform character. Libraries and frameworks{{Multiple issues|section=yes|{{Expand section|date=April 2016}}{{Refimprove section|date=April 2016}}}} This section lists a number of notable .NET libraries (both open source and proprietary) arranged by topics. .NET implementations{{Anchor|.NET Standard}}{{Redirect|.NET Standard|open specification (technical standard) behind .NET standardized by ISO and ECMA|ECMA 335}}There are four primary .NET implementations that are actively developed and maintained:
The table lists the minimum supported implementation version for each version of .NET Standard.
Each implementation of .NET includes the following components:
Optionally, implementations can also include:
Software frameworks
Web frameworks
Logging frameworks
Numerical libraries{{Main|List of Numerical Libraries for .NET}}{{Expand section|date=April 2016}}Open-source numerical libraries
Proprietary numerical libraries
2D graphicsOpen-source 2D graphics libraries
Proprietary 2D graphics libraries
3D graphicsOpen-source 3D graphics libraries
Proprietary 3D graphics libraries
Image processing
Graphical user interface frameworksOpen-source GUI frameworks
a cross-platform XAML-based user interface (UI) framework. It has been inspired by Microsoft's Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF) (which was codenamed Avalon at an early development stage), and beside XAML for definition of widget controls it also features flexible CSS - like styling system (unlike the WPF's styling where styles are stored in the "Resources" collection). It supports the following operating systems: Windows (.NET Framework, .NET Core), Linux (GTK), MacOS, Android and iOS. It is released under the MIT license. Avalonia is currently in beta stage.[38][39]
a cross-platform desktop and mobile user interface framework released under the BSD license.[40][39]
C# wrappers around the underlying GTK+ and GNOME libraries, written in C and available on Linux, MacOS and Windows.[39]
C# bindings for the Qt framework.[39]
an open source cross-platform graphical user interface for building applications that allow Universal Windows Platform - based code to run on iOS, Android, and WebAssembly.[41] Platform is released under the Apache 2.0 license.
a Microsoft's GUI framework. The original Microsoft implementation runs on Windows operating systems and provides access to Windows User Interface Common Controls by wrapping the Windows API in managed code.[1] The alternative Mono's implementation is open source and cross-platform (it runs on Windows, Linux, Unix and OS X). It is mainly compatible with the original implementation but not completely. The library is written in C# in order to avoid Windows dependence.[2] At the Microsoft Connect event on December 4, 2018, Microsoft announced releasing of Windows Forms as open source project on [https://github.com/dotnet/winforms GitHub]. It is released under the MIT License. Windows Forms has become available for projects targeting the .NET Core framework. However, the framework is still available only on Windows platform and the Mono's incomplete implementation of WinForms remains the only cross-platform implementation.[42][43]
At the Microsoft Connect event on December 4, 2018, Microsoft announced releasing of WPF as open source project on [https://github.com/dotnet/wpf?WT.mc_id=-blog-scottha GitHub]. It is released under the MIT License. Windows Presentation Foundation has become available for projects targeting the .NET Core framework. However, the system is still available only on Windows platform.[42][43]
Proprietary GUI frameworks
Security and identity management
Quality assurance
Object-relational mapping.NET Framework natively provides utilities for object-relational mapping[47] through ADO.NET, a part of .NET stack since .NET 1.0. In addition, a number of third-party object-relational libraries have emerged, especially in earlier years of the .NET development, in order to fill some perceived gaps of the framework.[48][49][50] As the framework has evolved, additional object-relational tools were added, such as the Entity Framework included with the .NET Framework 3.5. LINQ to SQL was also introduced with .NET 3.5. This somehow reduced significance and popularity of third-party object-relational libraries. Open source object-relational mapping tools
Proprietary object-relational mapping tools
Serialization and data formats.NET Framework comes with a wide set of utilities for serialization of objects. The framework provides native object serialization to and from XML, JSON and binary streams. In spite of that, there are numerous third-party libraries that support serialization to target formats and working with these formats.
See also
Notes{{Notelist}}References1. ^1 {{cite web|url=http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=2048355&seqNum=4|title=C# 4.0 Unleashed By Bart De Smet. Sams Publishing, Jan 4, 2011 Chapter 5}} 2. ^1 {{cite web |url=http://www.mono-project.com/docs/gui/| title=GUI Toolkits| last= | first= | work=Mono site| publisher= | date=21 April 2016| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160402171119/http://www.mono-project.com/docs/gui/ | archive-date=2016-04-02|access-date=2016-04-21}} 3. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.codeplex.com/crossnet |title=CrossNet |publisher=Codeplex.com |date= |accessdate=17 April 2012}} 4. ^{{cite web |title=.NET Core is Open Source|url=http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dotnet/archive/2014/11/12/net-core-is-open-source.aspx|website=.NET Framework Blog|publisher=Microsoft |accessdate=30 December 2014|date=12 November 2014|first=Immo|last=Landwerth}} 5. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/03/31/xamarin_tools_code_free_and_open_source/|title=Microsoft to make Xamarin tools and code free and open source.|work=The Register|date=31 March 2016|first=Tim|last=Anderson}} 6. ^{{cite web|url=http://techreport.com/news/29929/xamarin-now-comes-free-with-visual-studio|title=Xamarin now comes free with Visual Studio.|work=The Tech Report|date=31 March 2016|first=Bruno|last=Ferraira}} 7. ^{{cite web | url=https://github.com/mono/mono/blob/master/PATENTS.TXT| title=Microsoft Patent Promise for Mono | last= | first= | work=Mono on GitHub| publisher= Mono Project| date= 2016-03-28 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20160416133644/https://github.com/mono/mono/blob/master/PATENTS.TXT | archivedate=2016-04-16|accessdate=16 April 2016}} 8. ^{{cite web |last1=Lardinois |first1=Frederic |date=April 3, 2014 |title=Microsoft Launches .NET Foundation To Foster The .NET Open Source Ecosystem |url=https://techcrunch.com/2014/04/03/microsoft-launches-net-foundation-to-foster-the-net-open-source-ecosystem/ |website=TechCrunch}} 9. ^{{cite web|url=https://github.com/Microsoft/dotnet/blob/master/dotnet-developer-projects.md|title=.NET Open Source Developer Projects|work=GitHub|date=15 April 2015|first=|last=|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160415164104/https://github.com/Microsoft/dotnet/blob/master/dotnet-developer-projects.md|archive-date=2016-04-15|access-date=2016-04-15|deadurl=yes|df=}} 10. ^{{cite web |title=.NET Standard |url=https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/standard/net-standard |website=docs.microsoft.com |language=en-us}} 11. ^{{cite web |title=This repo is building the .NET Standard. Contribute to dotnet/standard development by creating an account on GitHub |url=https://github.com/dotnet/standard/blob/master/docs/versions.md |publisher=.NET Foundation |date=3 April 2019}} 12. ^There are no plans for the .NET Framework to support .NET Standard 2.1 13. ^{{cite web |title=Announcing .NET Standard 2.1 |url=https://devblogs.microsoft.com/dotnet/announcing-net-standard-2-1/ |website=.NET Blog |date=5 November 2018}} 14. ^{{cite web|url=http://docs.asp.net/en/latest/conceptual-overview/aspnet.html#unify|title=Introduction to ASP.NET 5 — ASP.NET 0.0.1 documentation|work=asp.net}} 15. ^{{cite web | url=https://www.infoq.com/news/2018/04/net-browser-ooui | title=Running .NET in the Browser with Ooui |author= Jeff Martin | work= |date=18 April 2018 | publisher= | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181126171403/https://www.infoq.com/news/2018/04/net-browser-ooui |archive-date=2018-11-26 |access-date=2018-11-26 }} 16. ^1 2 {{cite web |url=https://stackify.com/nlog-vs-log4net-vs-serilog/ | title=NLog vs log4net vs Serilog: Compare .NET Logging Frameworks | last=Timms | first=Simon | work=Developer Tips, Tricks & Resources | publisher=Stackify | date=27 August 2018 | archive-url= | archive-date=2018-12-19|access-date=2018-12-19 }} 17. ^{{cite web |url=https://stackify.com/log4net-guide-dotnet-logging/ | title=Ultimate log4net Tutorial for .NET Logging – 14 Best Practices, Resources and Tips | last=Watson | first=Matt | work=Developer Tips, Tricks & Resources | publisher=Stackify | date=9 February 2017 | archive-url= | archive-date=2018-12-19 |access-date=2018-12-19 }} 18. ^1 2 3 4 5 6 7 {{cite web | url=http://fsharp.org/guides/math-and-statistics/ |title=Guide - Math and Statistics Programming with F# | last= | first= | work=| publisher=fsharp.org|date=| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160425104519/http://fsharp.org/guides/math-and-statistics/ | archive-date=2016-04-25|access-date=2016-04-25 }} 19. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.4guysfromrolla.com/articles/072507-1.aspx#postadlink| title= ASP.NET Charting with NPlot| last=Lerflaten | first=Olav | work=| publisher= | date=25 July 2007| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20160423002508/http://www.4guysfromrolla.com/articles/072507-1.aspx| archive-date=2016-04-23|access-date=2016-04-21 }} 20. ^{{cite web | url=http://oceanairdrop.blogspot.com/2018/03/oxyplot-charting-control.html | title=OxyPlot Charting Control | last=Airdrop | first=Ocean | work=Ocean Airdrop | publisher= | date=10 March 2018 | archive-url= |access-date=2018-10-26 }} 21. ^{{cite web | url=http://aspnet.4guysfromrolla.com/articles/120804-1.aspx| title=A Look at WebCharts, a Free .NET Charting Control| last=Mitchell| first=Scott| work=| publisher= | date=8 December 2004| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20160423004424/http://aspnet.4guysfromrolla.com/articles/120804-1.aspx |archive-date=2016-04-23 |access-date=2016-04-21 }} 22. ^{{cite web | url= https://www.openhub.net/p/8629| title=Project Summary at OpenHUB | last=| first=| work=| publisher= | date=| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20160423011917/https://www.openhub.net/p/8629| archive-date=2016-04-23|access-date=2016-04-21 }} 23. ^{{cite web | url=http://www.webdistortion.com/2008/11/12/web-application-graphing-solutions-from-around-the-web/| title=28 useful graphing solutions for web developers| last=Anthony| first=Paul| work=| publisher= |date=12 November 2008| access-date=2016-04-21 }} 24. ^{{cite web |url=https://www.cs.ubc.ca/~tmm/courses/cpsc533c-05-fall/projects/mcora/report.pdf | title=ShadyStats: Visualizing Game Statistics using Hierarchical Parallel Coordinates. A scientific article using Zedgraph. |last= Cora| first= Mike| work=| publisher= | date=| archive-url=https://www.cs.ubc.ca/~tmm/courses/cpsc533c-05-fall/projects/mcora/report.pdf |archive-date=2016-04-21|access-date=2016-04-21 }} 25. ^{{cite web |url=http://imtuoradea.ro/auo.fmte/files-2014-v1/Roman%20%20Lucian-SOFTWARE%20APPLICATION%20FOR%20ASSESSMENT%20THE%20RELIABILITY%20OF%20SUSPENSION%20SYSTEM%20AT%20OPEL%20CARS%20AND%20OF%20ROAD%20PROFILES.pdf | title=Software Application for Assessment the Reliability of the Suspension System at Opel Cars and of Road Profiles. A scientific article using Zedgraph. |last=Roman |first= Lucian | work= Fascicle of Management and Technological Engineering | publisher=| date=May 2014 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160423014508/http://imtuoradea.ro/auo.fmte/files-2014-v1/Roman%20%20Lucian-SOFTWARE%20APPLICATION%20FOR%20ASSESSMENT%20THE%20RELIABILITY%20OF%20SUSPENSION%20SYSTEM%20AT%20OPEL%20CARS%20AND%20OF%20ROAD%20PROFILES.pdf |archive-date=2016-04-23 | access-date=2016-04-21 }} 26. ^{{cite web | url=http://www.prweb.com/releases/2011/1/prweb8101442.htm| title=Kitware’s ActiViz .NET Tool is Now Free and Open Source| last=Messier | first=Nicole | work=| publisher= |date= 31 January 2011| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160422214713/http://www.prweb.com/releases/2011/1/prweb8101442.htm | archive-date=2016-04-22|access-date=2016-04-21 }} 27. ^{{cite web | url=https://github.com/helix-toolkit/helix-toolkit|title=Helix repository on GitHub| last= | first= | work=| publisher= GitHub| date=| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160425094825/https://github.com/helix-toolkit/helix-toolkit | archive-date=2016-04-25|access-date=2016-04-25 }} 28. ^{{cite web | url=https://github.com/helix-toolkit/helix-toolkit/wiki/Getting-started-with-WPF-3D|title=Getting started with WPF 3D| last= | first= | work=| publisher= GitHub| date=| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160425095827/https://github.com/helix-toolkit/helix-toolkit/wiki/Getting-started-with-WPF-3D| archive-date=2016-04-25|access-date=2016-04-25 }} 29. ^{{cite web | url=http://helix-toolkit.org/|title=Helix Toolkit web site| last= | first= | work=| publisher=GitHub |date=| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160425100102/http://helix-toolkit.org/ | archive-date=2016-04-25|access-date=2016-04-25 }} 30. ^Monogame at Build 2012 | Channel 9 Live at BUILD 2012 | Channel 9 31. ^Introducing Windows Presentation Foundation 32. ^{{cite web | url = http://blogs.msdn.com/tims/archive/2007/07/27/what-s-new-in-wpf-3-5-here-s-fifteen-cool-features.aspx | title = What's New in WPF 3.5? Here's Fifteen Cool Features... | accessdate = 2007-10-14}} 33. ^{{cite interview | interviewer=Dean Takahashi | first=John | last=Riccitiello | date=October 23, 2014| url=https://venturebeat.com/2014/10/23/john-riccitiello-sets-out-to-identify-the-engine-of-growth-for-unity-technologies-interview/|title=John Riccitiello sets out to identify the engine of growth for Unity Technologies (interview)|work=VentureBeat|accessdate=January 18, 2015}} 34. ^{{cite web |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267769423_Real-time_Static_and_Dynamic_Hand_Gesture_Recognition_for_Human-Computer_Interaction |title=Real-time, Static and Dynamic Hand Gesture Recognition for Human-Computer Interaction | authors=S M Hassan Ahmed, Todd C Alexander, Georgios Anagnostopoulos | work= | publisher=University of Miami | date=May 2015 | archive-url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267769423_Real-time_Static_and_Dynamic_Hand_Gesture_Recognition_for_Human-Computer_Interaction |archive-date=2018-11-26 |access-date=2018-11-26 }} 35. ^{{cite web |url=https://www.academia.edu/3996497/Development_of_an_eye-tracking_control_system_using_AForge.NET_framework |title=Development of an eye-tracking control system using AForge.NET framework | authors=Suraj Verma, Prashant Pillai, Yim-Fun Hu | work=Int. J. Intelligent Systems Technologies and Applications, Vol. 11 | publisher=Inderscience Enterprises | date=2012 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181126130207/http://www.academia.edu/3996497/Development_of_an_eye-tracking_control_system_using_AForge.NET_framework |archive-date=2018-11-26 |access-date=2018-11-26 }} 36. ^{{cite web |url=http://crsouza.com/2010/05/20/accord-net-framework-an-extension-to-aforge-net/ |title=Accord.NET Framework – An extension to AForge.NET | last=Souza| first=César | work= | publisher= | date=20 May 2010 | archive-url=http://crsouza.com/2010/05/20/accord-net-framework-an-extension-to-aforge-net/ |archive-date=2018-11-26 |access-date=2018-11-26 }} 37. ^{{cite web | url=http://accord-framework.net/docs/html/R_Project_Accord_NET.htm | title=Framework Modules| last=| first=| work=Accord.NET Framework documetation| publisher= | date=| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181126122705/http://accord-framework.net/docs/html/R_Project_Accord_NET.htm |archive-date=2018-11-26 |access-date=2018-11-26 }} 38. ^{{cite web | url=https://www.hanselman.com/blog/WhatWouldACrossplatformNETUIFrameworkLookLikeExploringAvalonia.aspx| title=What would a cross-platform .NET UI Framework look like? Exploring Avalonia| last=Hanselman| first=Scott | work=| publisher= | date=September 2017| archive-url=https://www.hanselman.com/blog/WhatWouldACrossplatformNETUIFrameworkLookLikeExploringAvalonia.aspx |archive-date=2018-11-26 |access-date=2018-11-26 }} 39. ^1 2 3 4 5 {{cite web | url=https://blog.lextudio.com/the-story-about-net-cross-platform-ui-frameworks-dd4a9433d0ea | title=The Story About .NET Cross Platform UI Frameworks |author=Lex Li | work=3 July 2017 | publisher= | date= | archive-url=https://blog.lextudio.com/the-story-about-net-cross-platform-ui-frameworks-dd4a9433d0ea?gi=ed6c9cc36c51 |archive-date=2018-11-26 |access-date=2018-11-26 }} 40. ^{{cite web | url=https://dotnetcoretutorials.com/2018/03/19/cross-platform-winforms-kinda/ | title=Cross Platform WinForms (Kinda) |author=Wade | work=.NET Core Tutorials | publisher= | date=19 March 2018 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181126153207/https://dotnetcoretutorials.com/2018/03/19/cross-platform-winforms-kinda/ |archive-date=2018-11-26 |access-date=2018-11-26 }} 41. ^{{cite web |url=https://hackernoon.com/cross-platform-mobile-apps-with-net-and-uno-dee2b024281d | title=Cross Platform Mobile Apps with .NET and Uno | last=Billson| first=Alex | work= | publisher= | date=15 Jul 2018 | archive-url= | archive-date=2019-01-20|access-date=2019-01-20 }} 42. ^1 2 {{cite web |url=https://www.infoq.com/news/2018/12/msft-open-source-wpf-winforms | title=Microsoft Open Sources WPF, WinForms, and WinUI | last=Martin | first=Jeff | work=InfoQ | publisher= | date=4 December 2018| archive-url= | archive-date=2018-12-06|access-date=2018-12-06 }} 43. ^1 2 {{cite web |url=https://www.hanselman.com/blog/AnnouncingWPFWinFormsAndWinUIAreGoingOpenSource.aspx | title=Announcing WPF, WinForms, and WinUI are going Open Source | last=Hanselman | first=Scott | work= | publisher= | date=4 December 2018| archive-url= | archive-date=2018-12-06|access-date=2018-12-06 }} 44. ^MSDN.NET Development: WPF: XAML Overview 45. ^{{cite web | url=https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/xamarin/xamarin-forms/get-started/hello-xamarin-forms/quickstart?pivots=windows | title=Xamarin.Forms Quickstart |authors= | work=Microsoft Docs | publisher=Microsoft | date= | archive-url= |archive-date=2018-11-26 |access-date=2018-11-26 }} 46. ^{{cite web | url=https://arctouch.com/blog/xamarin-forms-more-capable-than-you-think/ | title=Xamarin.Forms is Much More Capable Than You Think |author=Nathan Williams | work= | publisher=ArcTouch | date= | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181126155602/https://arctouch.com/blog/xamarin-forms-more-capable-than-you-think/ |archive-date=2018-11-26 |access-date=2018-11-26 }} 47. ^{{cite web | url=http://www.agiledata.org/essays/mappingObjects.html | title=Mapping Objects to Relational Databases: O/R Mapping In Detail | last=Ambler | first=Scott | work= | publisher=Agile Data | date= | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181103222615/http://www.agiledata.org/essays/mappingObjects.html | archive-date=2018-11-03 |access-date=2018-11-03 }} 48. ^{{cite web | url=https://www.agile-code.com/blog/microsoft-net-or-mapper-choose-your-own/ | title=Microsoft.NET O/R mapper: choose your own! | last=Maksimovic | first=Zoran | work=| publisher=agile-code.com | date=November 2, 2017 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181103220259/https://www.agile-code.com/blog/microsoft-net-or-mapper-choose-your-own/ | archive-date=2018-11-03 |access-date=2018-11-03 }} 49. ^{{cite web | url=https://baladotnettips.wordpress.com/2014/02/28/list-of-orms-available-for-net/ | title=List of ORM’s available for .NET | last= | first= | work=Bala.NET Tips | publisher=WordPress | date=February 28, 2014 | archive-url=https://baladotnettips.wordpress.com/2014/02/28/list-of-orms-available-for-net/ | archive-date=2018-11-03 |access-date=2018-11-03 }} 50. ^{{cite web | url=http://wiki.c2.com/?ObjectRelationalToolComparisonDotNet | title=Object Relational Tool Comparison Dot Net | last= | first= | work= | publisher=WikiWikiWeb | date=April 10, 2014 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181103222039/http://wiki.c2.com/?ObjectRelationalToolComparisonDotNet | archive-date=2018-11-03 |access-date=2018-11-03 }} 51. ^{{cite news|last=Krill|first=Paul|url=http://www.infoworld.com/d/application-development/microsoft-open-sources-entity-framework-198213|title=Microsoft open-sources Entity Framework|accessdate=24 July 2012|newspaper=InfoWorld|date=20 July 2012}} 52. ^{{cite web | url=https://www.openhub.net/p/NConstruct-Lite | title=NConstruct Lite - Project summary on GitHub| last= | first= | work=| publisher= GitHub| date=| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160528112838/https://www.openhub.net/p/NConstruct-Lite | archive-date=2016-05-28|access-date=2016-05-28 }} External linksGeneral:
Numerical libraries:
Data:
7 : .NET Framework software|Computer programming tools|Lists of software|Computer libraries|Numerical libraries|Graphics libraries|Free and open-source software |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。