请输入您要查询的百科知识：

　

词条 List of support and opposition to High Speed 2
释义

  1. Support

  2. Opposition

  3. Other

  4. See also

  5. References

The planned high-speed railway in the UK known as High Speed 2 has encountered significant support and opposition from various groups and organisations.

Support

Organisations that support the HS2 project include:

  • The three major UK political parties: Conservative,[1] Labour (albeit with some criticism of the proposed route)[2] and the Liberal Democrats.[3]
  • Greengauge 21, a not-for-profit research company which focuses on investigating high-speed rail technology,[4]
  • The Campaign for HSR,[5] a campaign group led by Professor David Begg which aims to canvas support from businesses across the UK to promote the case for proposed high-speed rail. The campaign currently has support from over 400 UK businesses.{{Citation needed|date=January 2012}}
  • HSR:UK, a group of city councils: Birmingham, Bristol, Cardiff, Edinburgh, Glasgow, Leeds, Liverpool, Manchester, Newcastle, Nottingham, and Sheffield.[6]
  • Go-HS2,[7] a group comprising Centro, Birmingham City Council, Birmingham Chamber of Commerce, Birmingham Airport and the NEC Group. The objective of the group is to promote the benefits that its members believe HS2 will bring to Birmingham and the West Midlands.
  • The Passenger Transport Executives Group (PTEG), which represents six Passenger Transport Executives.[8]
  • The Scottish Government, which is generally supportive of the HS2 project and has been engaged in discussions with the UK Government about the development of a Scottish high-speed railway connecting to London and continental Europe, with the aim of reducing journey times to London from Scotland to under 3 hours.[9]
  • The North East Chamber of Commerce and the Greater Manchester Chamber of Commerce. Support has been confirmed by local authorities in the North of England such as Manchester and Leeds City Councils[10]
  • Hammersmith and Fulham Council, which reaffirmed its support for the project in January 2012. The council's cabinet member for strategy was reported as saying "HS2 is the fastest way to deliver much-needed new homes, jobs and opportunities in one of London's poorest areas."[11]

Opposition

High Speed 2 is opposed by:

  • The 51m group, which consists of 19 local authorities along or adjacent to the Phase One route. It suggests the project will cost each Parliamentary Constituency £51 million.[12] Constituent members of 51m include Buckinghamshire County Council,[13] London Borough of Hillingdon,[14] Warwickshire County Council,[15] Leicestershire County Council,[16] Oxfordshire County Council,[17] Coventry City Council[18] and Camden Borough Council.[19] The other councils that have declared their opposition are Northamptonshire[20] and Staffordshire[21] County Councils.
  • StopHS2, which represents local action groups along the route.[22][23]
  • The HS2 Action Alliance,[24] an umbrella group for opposition groups[25] including ad hoc entities, residents' associations, and parish councils.[26] The Alliance's primary aim is to prevent HS2 from happening; secondary aims include evaluating and minimising the impacts of HS2 on individuals, communities and the environment, and communication of facts about HS2, and its compensation scheme.[24] Even after the latest changes made to the scheme to mitigate concerns, it continues to be opposed by some MPs and personalities on the line of route.[27] A member{{who|date=April 2011}} of the 'HS2 Action Alliance' has criticised the Department of Transport's demand forecasts as being too high, as well as having other shortcomings in the assessment methodology.[28][29]
  • The UK Independence Party (UKIP), which is fully opposed nationally and locally to the proposed HS2 plans. UKIP says there is no business case, no environment case and no money to pay for it.[30] UKIP has been campaigning against HS2 as it is also part of the EU's Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) Policy. It had previously proposed a much larger and more expensive three-line high-speed network running from London to Newcastle (and on to Scotland), London to Bristol (and on to Wales) and London to Birmingham along with upgrading several other sections of the WCML and Scottish rail to high speed in its 2010 manifesto.[31]
  • The Green Party, which voted to oppose the HS2 plans at its Spring 2011 conference on environmental and economic grounds.[32] Alan Francis, the party transport spokesperson, had previously outlined its support for high-speed rail in principle in terms of benefits to capacity, reduced journey times and reduced carbon emissions, but recommended a line restricted to {{convert|300|to|320|km/h}} which would enable it to use existing transport corridors to a greater extent and increase efficiency.[33]
  • The New Economics Foundation, a think-tank promoting environmentalism, localism and anti-capitalism. It published a formal response to the public consultation in August 2011[34] which concluded that the case for a high-speed rail link was incomplete and that the benefits of the scheme had been "over-emphasised" by its promoters.[35]
  • The Taxpayers Alliance, an anti-tax pressure group, which describes the project as a white elephant.[36][37]
  • The Independent newspaper, which considers the costs excessive and the benefits uncertain.[38] An investigation published in February 2013 claimed that 350 wildlife sites would be destroyed by the new HS2 line[39] and an accompanying editorial argued that environmentalists should oppose the project.[40] A separate investigation published in March 2013 suggests that the project was unlikely to keep within its £33 billion budget.[41]
  • Lord Mandelson, a supporter of HS2 when in office, admitted in July 2013 that the cost estimates were "almost entirely speculative" and said the Labour Government had only proposed it to "paint an upbeat view of the future" during the financial crash.[42]
  • Alistair Darling, former Labour chancellor and transport secretary, withdrew support for the project, stating to go ahead would be "foolish".[43]
  • Boris Johnson, the ex Mayor of London, repeatedly criticised the project, and stated that the costs would spiral over £70 billion.[44][45] His father Stanley Johnson was required to sell his home in Primrose Hill under the HS2 "need to sell scheme" as it was {{convert|10|m|abbr=off}} from the new track.[46]
  • Liam Fox a candidate for the Conservative Party leadership in July 2016, stated he would scrap the HS2 project if he became prime minister.[47]
  • Christian Wolmar an ex London mayoral candidate and high profile transport writer.[48]

Other

Organisations with noncommittal, ambiguous or dissatisfied positions include:

  • 20MM (Twenty Miles More). A campaign group based in Liverpool with the aim to extend HS2 track an extra {{convert|20|mi|km|sigfig=1}} into the city to give a full high-speed rail service into the city centre and free existing classic lines for freight for the expanded Port of Liverpool.[49]
  • The Right Lines Charter, an umbrella group established in 2011 for several environmental and other organisations that support the principle of a high-speed rail network but believe that the current HS2 scheme is unsound. Members include the Campaign for Better Transport,[50] the Campaign to Protect Rural England, Friends of the Earth,[51] Greenpeace, and Railfuture.[52]
  • Railfuture, a railway campaigning organisation, which supports high-speed rail in principle, but stated in its submission to the Transport Select Committee Inquiry that it sees no benefit in trains running at up to {{convert|250|mph|sigfig=2|order=flip}} and therefore is not in favour of the current proposal and route, and suggests that alternatives be investigated.[53]
  • The Campaign to Protect Rural England,[54] which believes that lower speeds would increase journey times only slightly, while allowing the line to run along existing motorway and railway corridors, reducing intrusion.[54]
  • The Woodland Trust opposes the current route of the proposed High Speed 2 rail link because of its impact on ancient woodland. It reports that 108 ancient woods are threatened with loss or damage from the project.[55]
  • The Wildlife Trusts, which have criticised the proposals, stating that the former Government's policy on High Speed Rail (March 2010) underestimated the effect on wildlife habitats (with 4 SSSIs and over 50 of other types of nature site affected), as well as noting that the proposals had not comprehensively shown any significant effect on transport carbon emissions and questioning the economic benefits of a line. The trusts called for additional research to be done on the effects of a high-speed line.[56]
  • The Federation of Small Businesses, which has expressed scepticism over the need for high-speed rail, stating that roads expenditure was more useful for its members.[57]
  • The Coventry and Warwickshire Chamber of Commerce, which opined that HS2 offered no benefit to its area.[58]
  • Derby City Council was disappointed at the chosen location for the East Midlands Hub station in Toton, preferring a route that would make use of the existing Derby railway station.[59] These plans are opposed by Derbyshire County Council,[60] Nottingham City Council,[61] and Rushcliffe Borough Council.[62]
  • The National Trust[63]
  • The Commons Transport Committee, which in November 2011 reported that the scheme had "a good case" and offered "a new era of inter-urban travel in Britain."[64] However, it also said there should be a firm commitment made now to extend the line to Manchester and Leeds and that other investment in rail should not suffer, and noted a poor level of public debate which had failed to address the facts and had resorted to name-calling and accusations of nimbyism.[65] While questioning some data, it found a good economic case for the project bringing more benefits than a conventional classic rail line, that the noise impact would be less than feared and that while it would not reduce carbon dioxide emissions they would be smaller than under further motorway or air traffic expansion and that the business case for diverting via Heathrow had not been made. The report's findings were welcomed by the Association of Train Operating Companies, the Campaign for Better Transport, the Countryside Alliance and the Campaign to Protect Rural England. Action Groups Against High Speed Two (AGHAST) condemned the authors as a 'partisan committee' though they welcomed some of the findings, saying it poked holes in the Government's arguments.

See also

  • Rail transport in Great Britain

References

1. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.conservatives.com/Policy/Where_we_stand/Transport.aspx|title=Transport|work=Conservative party|deadurl=yes|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120106060912/http://www.conservatives.com/Policy/Where_we_stand/Transport.aspx|archivedate=6 January 2012|df=dmy-all}}
2. ^{{cite news |url=http://www.railnews.co.uk/news/general/2011/11/01-labours-new-hs2-fails-to.html |title=Labour's new HS2 fails to impress supporters or critics |date=1 November 2011 |work=RailNews |location =Stevenage}}
3. ^{{cite news |url= https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/liberaldemocrats/8775798/Liberal-Democrats-Party-Conference-2011-September-19-as-it-happened.html |title=Liberal Democrats Party Conference 2011: September 19 as it happened |work= The Daily Telegraph |location =London |author =Holehouse, Matthew |date= 20 September 2011}}
4. ^{{cite web|title=About Greengauge 21 |url= http://www.greengauge21.net/about/|work=Greengauge 21 website|accessdate=10 January 2012}}
5. ^{{cite web |url= http://www.campaignforhsr.com/about |title= About |work= Campaign for HSR |deadurl= yes |archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20120128032956/http://www.campaignforhsr.com/about |archivedate= 28 January 2012 |df= dmy-all }}
6. ^Campaign for HSR. Retrieved 14 April 2012.
7. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.go-hs2.com/ |title=Go-HS2 |publisher=Go-HS2 |date= |accessdate=28 October 2013}}
8. ^[https://www.webarchive.org.uk/wayback/archive/20111227231107/http://www.pteg.net/NR/rdonlyres/DC090336-3B9F-4B63-8E54-EA649644EF58/0/ptegHighSpeedRailResponse20110728Final.pdf Passenger Transport Executive Group response to HS2 consultation July 2011]. Retrieved 14 January 2012.
9. ^{{cite web |url= http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Built-Environment/planning/National-Planning-Policy/npf/HSRLondon |title= NPF2 Action Programme – Action 3: Develop High Speed Rail Link to London |publisher= The Scottish Government |accessdate= 29 November 2010}}
10. ^{{cite news | url= http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/5e0dae48-3bb6-11e1-82d3-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1jSQI3qGI |title= Business chiefs welcome green light for HS2 |work= Financial Times |location =London |date = 10 January 2012 |accessdate= 14 January 2012 |author=Bounds, Andrew |author2= Tighe, Chris |author3= Murray Brown, John}}
11. ^{{cite news |title=Old Oak in Shepherd's Bush set for transformation after rail plan go-ahead |url= http://www.fulhamchronicle.co.uk/fulham-and-hammersmith-news/local-fulham-and-hammersmith-news/2012/01/10/old-oak-in-shepherd-s-bush-set-for-tranformation-after-rail-plan-go-ahead-82029-30092801/#ixzz1jTZO16Vg |work=Fulham & Hammersmith Chronicle |date= 10 January 2012 |accessdate=14 January 2012 |author= Courtney, Adam}}
12. ^51m membership Retrieved 3 June 2011
13. ^{{cite news |url= http://www.buckinghamshireexaminer.co.uk/south-bucks-news/highspeedrail/2010/12/08/we-don-t-want-it-here-we-don-t-want-high-speed-rail-anywhere-114018-27797131/ |newspaper= Buckinghamshire Examiner |location= Uxbridge |title= We don't want it here, we don't want high speed rail anywhere |first= Lawrence |last= Poole |date= 8 December 2010 |deadurl= yes |archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20110911095029/http://www.buckinghamshireexaminer.co.uk/south-bucks-news/highspeedrail/2010/12/08/we-don-t-want-it-here-we-don-t-want-high-speed-rail-anywhere-114018-27797131/ |archivedate= 11 September 2011 |df= dmy-all }}
14. ^{{cite news |url= http://www.uxbridgegazette.co.uk/west-london-news/local-uxbridge-news/2010/12/06/council-to-robustly-resist-high-speed-rail-113046-27775496/ |newspaper= Uxbridge Gazette |title= Council to 'robustly resist' high speed rail |date= 6 December 2010}}
15. ^{{cite press release |url= http://www.warwickshire.gov.uk/corporate/newsstor.nsf/PublicByCategories/4205CBF6C662A7EC802577F9005C201C |title= County council opposes HS2 |date= 15 December 2010 |publisher= Warwickshire County Council |deadurl= yes |archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20110427072428/http://www.warwickshire.gov.uk/corporate/newsstor.nsf/PublicByCategories/4205CBF6C662A7EC802577F9005C201C |archivedate= 27 April 2011 |df= dmy-all }}
16. ^"Leicestershire is in – another local authority confirms it's challenging HS2" 51m website {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120326024125/http://www.51m.co.uk/news/leicestershire-another-local-authority-confirms-its-challenging-hs2 |date=26 March 2012 }}. Retrieved 3 June 2011.
17. ^Three Rivers DC and Oxfordshire CC join 51m. Retrieved 29 August 2011 {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110928040528/http://www.51m.co.uk/news/buckinghamshirecounty-council-consutation-submission |date=28 September 2011 }}
18. ^{{cite news |title= City council unites in opposition to HS2 |url= http://www.coventryobserver.co.uk/story-City-council-unites-in-opposition-to-HS2--31172.html |date= 15 December 2010 |first= Matthew |last= Bates |newspaper= Coventry Observer |deadurl= yes |archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20110724052811/http://www.coventryobserver.co.uk/story-City-council-unites-in-opposition-to-HS2--31172.html |archivedate= 24 July 2011 |df= dmy-all }}
19. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.camden.gov.uk/ccm/navigation/environment/planning-and-built-environment/major-developments/high-speed-2/impact-of-hs2/ |title=Impact of HS2 – Camden Council |publisher=Camden.gov.uk |date=30 July 2010 |accessdate=23 April 2014}}
20. ^{{cite web |publisher= Northamptonshire County Council |url= http://www.northamptonshire.gov.uk/en/councilservices/environ/bigidea/pages/northamptonshirearc.aspx |title= Northamptonshire Arc |at= High Speed Two (HS2) |quote= the County Council objects strongly to the current published routes and insists that HS2 should only go ahead if a route can be found through consultation which minimises the potential adverse effect on local amenity, landscape and the environment |deadurl= yes |archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20110913171722/http://www.northamptonshire.gov.uk/en/councilservices/environ/bigidea/pages/northamptonshirearc.aspx |archivedate= 13 September 2011 |df= dmy-all }}
21. ^{{cite press release |url= http://www.lichfieldagainsthighspeedtrains.org.uk/SCC%20media%20release.pdf |date= 18 November 2010 |title= High Speed 2:Staffordshire County Council set to oppose plans |publisher= Staffordshire County Council |deadurl= yes |archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20120326024050/http://www.lichfieldagainsthighspeedtrains.org.uk/SCC%20media%20release.pdf |archivedate= 26 March 2012 |df= dmy-all }}
22. ^{{cite web |url=http://stophs2.org/about/|title=StopHS2|quote=We oppose the HS2 High Speed Rail link, because the business case is based on unrealistic assumptions, the environmental impact has not been assessed, it is not green, the strategic benefits are questionable, and the money could be better spent on other things.}}
23. ^{{cite news |url= https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/road-and-rail-transport/9007642/Tory-MPs-face-high-speed-rail-backlash.html |title=Tory MPs face high speed rail backlash |quote=Another campaigner, Penny Gaines, chairman of stop HS2. accused Mrs Gillan of "bottling out" by appearing to welcome the concessions announced by Justine Greening, the Transport Secretary.|work=The Daily Telegraph |date=12 January 2012 |last=Millward|first=David |location=London}}
24. ^1 {{cite web |url= http://www.hs2actionalliance.org/aboutus.php |title=About us |publisher= HS2 Action Alliance |location= Amersham |year= 2010 |accessdate= 18 May 2010}}
25. ^{{cite news |url= https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/highspeed-rail-route-to-be-announced-2164607.html |title= High-speed rail route to be announced |first= Peter |last= Woodman |date= 19 December 2010 |newspaper= The Independent |location= London}}
26. ^{{cite web |url= http://www.hs2actionalliance.org/yourlocalgroup.php |title= HS2 action groups (and other HS2 active organisations) |year= 2010 |publisher= HS2 Action Alliance |accessdate= 18 May 2010}}
27. ^{{cite news |last= Groves |first =Jason |title=Middle England in revolt: Tory shires furious as high-speed rail link gets go-ahead |url= http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2084959/HS2-Tory-shires-furious-high-speed-rail-link-gets-ahead.html |accessdate=11 January 2012 |newspaper=Daily Mail |location =London |date=10 January 2012}}
28. ^{{cite web |url= https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmselect/cmtran/writev/economy/te30.htm |title= Transport and the economy, Memorandum from Wharf Weston (TE 30) |date=November 2010 |publisher= UK Parliament}}
29. ^{{cite web |url=https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmselect/cmtran/writev/economy/te07.pdf |at=7. Problems with the current forecasting and analysis methodology |title= Memorandum from Bluespace Thinking Ltd (TE 07) |date=September 2010 |publisher= UK Parliament}}
30. ^{{cite web |title= UKIP Say No To HS2 |url= http://www.ukip.org/content/latest-news/2416-ukip-says-no-to-hs2. |publisher= UK Independence Party |accessdate= 5 August 2011 |date= August 2011 |deadurl= yes |archiveurl= https://archive.is/20130416021128/http://www.ukip.org/content/latest-news/2416-ukip-says-no-to-hs2. |archivedate= 16 April 2013 |df= dmy-all }}
31. ^{{cite web |author=Category: 2010 Policy documents |url=http://www.ukip.org/component/content/article/49-policy/2010-policy-documents/538-transport-2010 |title=Transport 2010 |publisher=UK Independence Party |accessdate=28 October 2013 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://archive.is/20130905034635/http://www.ukip.org/component/content/article/49-policy/2010-policy-documents/538-transport-2010 |archivedate=5 September 2013 |df=dmy-all }}
32. ^{{cite web |url= http://www.greenparty.org.uk/news/26-02-2011-high-speed-rail-decision.html |title= Greens oppose HS2: "it wouldn't do what it says on the tin" |date= 26 February 2011 |accessdate= 26 February 2011 |publisher= Green Party}}
33. ^{{cite web |url= http://www.chilterngreenparty.org.uk/news/25/54/Concern-over-route-for-HS2.html |title= Updated Green Party proposals on HS2 route |publisher= Green Party |date= 22 March 2010}}
34. ^{{cite web |url =http://www.neweconomics.org/publications/response-to-the-hs2-consultation |title= Response to the HS2 Consultation |publisher=New Economics Foundation |date =5 August 2011}}
35. ^{{cite web |title= Response to the HS2 Consultation |url= http://www.neweconomics.org/sites/neweconomics.org/files/Response_to_the_HS2_Consultation.pdf |archive-url= https://www.webarchive.org.uk/wayback/archive/20120513230038/http://www.neweconomics.org/sites/neweconomics.org/files/Response_to_the_HS2_Consultation.pdf |dead-url= yes |archive-date= 2012-05-13 |publisher= New Economics Foundation |accessdate= 10 January 2012 |date= August 2011 }}
36. ^{{cite news |url= http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK-News/HS2-Rail-Link-Between-London-And-Birmingham-A-White-Elephant-Says-Taxpayers-Alliance/Article/201102115922708?f=vg |title= High Speed Rail Link A 'White Elephant' |date= 4 February 2011 |first= Rob |last= Cole |work= Sky News Online }}{{dead link|date=November 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}
37. ^{{cite web |url= http://www.taxpayersalliance.com/highspeedrail.pdf |title= Research Note 82: High Speed Rail |date= 4 February 2011 |author= Stokes, Chris |publisher= Taxpayers' Alliance |deadurl= yes |archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20110408051958/http://www.taxpayersalliance.com/highspeedrail.pdf |archivedate= 8 April 2011 |df= dmy-all }}
38. ^{{cite news |title=Editorial: High-speed rail is not the best way to spend £32bn |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/editorials/editorial-highspeed-rail-is-not-the-best-way-to-spend-32bn-8470654.html |newspaper=The Independent |location=London |date=28 January 2013 |accessdate=3 February 2013}}
39. ^{{cite news |title=IoS investigation: HS2 – the hidden cost to Britain's wildlife |author1= Randall, David |author2=Owen, Jonathan |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/environment/nature/ios-investigation-hs2--the-hidden-cost-to-britains-wildlife-8478609.html|newspaper=The Independent on Sunday |location=London |date=3 February 2013 |accessdate=3 February 2013}}
40. ^{{cite news |title= Editorial: Light green is not green enough |url= https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/editorials/editorial-light-green-is-not-green-enough-8478435.html |newspaper=The Independent on Sunday |date=3 February 2013 |accessdate=3 February 2013 |location=London}}
41. ^{{cite news |title=Revealed: HS2's £33bn budget already derailed before a track is laid |url= https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/revealed-hs2s-33bn-budget-already-derailed-before-a-track-is-laid-8527920.html |newspaper=The Independent on Sunday |date=10 March 2013 |accessdate=10 March 2013 |location=London |first1=Mark |last1=Leftly |first2=Jane |last2=Merrick}}
42. ^{{cite news |url= https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/jul/02/lord-mandelson-hs2-expensive-mistake |location=London |work=The Guardian |first=David |last=Batty |title=Lord Mandelson warns HS2 will be an 'expensive mistake' |date=2 July 2013}}
43. ^{{cite news |url= http://news.sky.com/story/1132304/hs2-project-attacked-by-alistair-darling |title=HS2 Project Attacked By Alistair Darling |work=Sky News |date=24 August 2013 |accessdate=28 October 2013}}
44. ^{{cite news |url= https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/road-and-rail-transport/10165446/HS2-will-cost-over-70billion-says-Boris-Johnson.html |location=London |work=The Daily Telegraph |first=Christopher |last=Hope |title=HS2 'will cost over £70billion', says Boris Johnson |date=7 July 2013}}
45. ^{{Cite news |last = Pickard |first = Jim |date = 27 March 2014 |title = London mayor criticises cost of HS2 |url = http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/bec122b6-b5a2-11e3-81cb-00144feabdc0.html |work = ft.com |accessdate = 27 March 2014 }}
46. ^{{cite news|last1=Clementine|first1=Katherine|title=Boris Johnson's dad compensated for HS2 home sale while Ruislip residents miss out|url=http://www.getwestlondon.co.uk/news/west-london-news/boris-johnsons-dad-compensated-hs2-11003930|accessdate=14 March 2016|work=Get West London|date=7 March 2016}}
47. ^{{cite web|author=Joseph Watts |url=https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/liam-fox-ill-scrap-hs2-if-i-become-pm-a3287531.html |title=Liam Fox will 'scrap HS2' if he becomes PM and Conservative leader | Politics | News | London Evening Standard |publisher=Standard.co.uk |date=4 July 2016 |accessdate=26 August 2016}}
48. ^http://www.christianwolmar.co.uk/2017/08/why-i-remain-opposed-to-hs2-response-to-ian-walmsley/
49. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.20milesmore.com|title=20 Miles More – Campaigning to give Liverpool a dedicated HS2 link|work=20 Miles More|accessdate=1 December 2015}}
50. ^{{cite web |url= http://www.bettertransport.org.uk/campaigns/trains/high-speed-white+paper |title= Briefing on White Paper on High Speed Rail, White Paper Response |publisher= Campaign for Better Transport |date= n.d. |deadurl= yes |archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20110920085513/http://www.bettertransport.org.uk/campaigns/trains/high-speed-white+paper |archivedate= 20 September 2011 |df= dmy-all }}
51. ^{{cite web |url= http://www.foe.co.uk/resource/briefings/high_speed_rail.pdf |publisher=Friends of the Earth |title=High Speed Rail: Friends of the Earth's views |date=October 2010}}
52. ^{{cite web |url= http://rightlines.org.uk/about/ |title= About the Charter |publisher= Right Lines Charter |year= 2011 |deadurl= yes |archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20120203213805/http://rightlines.org.uk/about/ |archivedate= 3 February 2012 |df= dmy-all }}
53. ^[https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmtran/writev/rail/m13.htm Written evidence from Railfuture to the Transport Select Committee.] UK Parliament. May 2011. Retrieved 7 July 2011.
54. ^1 {{cite press release |url= http://www.cpre.org.uk/news/view/709 |title= Is High Speed 2 on the Wrong Track? |publisher= Campaign to Protect Rural England |date= 4 November 2010 |deadurl= yes |archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20101111133452/http://www.cpre.org.uk/news/view/709 |archivedate= 11 November 2010 |df= dmy-all }}
55. ^{{cite web |url= https://www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/get-involved/campaign-with-us/our-campaigns/hs2-rail-link/ |date= August 2013 |title=High Speed 2}}
56. ^{{cite web |url= http://www.warwickshire-wildlife-trust.org.uk/media/57738/hs2%20twt%20position%20statement%20oct%202010%20final.pdf |title= The Wildlife Trust's position statement on High Speed Rail 2 (HS2) |publisher= Warwickshire Wildlife Trust |date= October 2010 |deadurl= yes |archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20110725134558/http://www.warwickshire-wildlife-trust.org.uk/media/57738/hs2%20twt%20position%20statement%20oct%202010%20final.pdf |archivedate= 25 July 2011 |df= dmy-all }}
57. ^{{cite news |url= http://www.birminghampost.net/news/2010/12/03/business-call-for-high-speed-rail-cash-to-be-spent-on-roads-65233-27762155/ |title= Business call for high speed rail cash to be spent on roads |newspaper= Birmingham Post |date= 3 December 2010 |author=Walker, Jonathan |archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20120928111131/http://www.birminghampost.net/news/2010/12/03/business-call-for-high-speed-rail-cash-to-be-spent-on-roads-65233-27762155/ |archivedate=28 September 2012}}
58. ^{{cite news |title= HS2 route will only benefit Birmingham, says Coventry business boss |url=http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/2010/11/24/hs2-route-will-only-benefit-birmingham-says-coventry-business-boss-92746-27707036/#ixzz17T8QC95l |newspaper= Coventry Evening Telegraph |date=24 November 2010 |archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20110315001614/http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/2010/11/24/hs2-route-will-only-benefit-birmingham-says-coventry-business-boss-92746-27707036/ |archivedate= 15 March 2011}}
59. ^{{cite news|last=Johnson|first=Robin|title=HS2 Derby route to "be considered"|url=http://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/HS2-Derby-route-considered/story-19534585-detail/story.html|accessdate=12 December 2013|newspaper=Derby Telegraph|date=18 July 2013|deadurl=yes|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20131215002835/http://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/HS2-Derby-route-considered/story-19534585-detail/story.html|archivedate=15 December 2013|df=dmy-all}}
60. ^{{cite news|last=Jones, Severn|first=Chris, Joey|title=County council veto for HS2 alternative|url=http://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/County-council-veto-HS2-alternative/story-19499822-detail/story.html|accessdate=12 December 2013|newspaper=Derby Telegraph|date=10 July 2013|deadurl=yes|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20131215002817/http://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/County-council-veto-HS2-alternative/story-19499822-detail/story.html|archivedate=15 December 2013|df=dmy-all}}
61. ^{{cite news|last=Henesey|first=Bryan|title=Toton 'still best choice' for high-speed rail line|url=http://www.nottinghampost.com/Toton-best-choice-high-speed-rail-line/story-19494242-detail/story.html|accessdate=12 December 2013|newspaper=Nottingham Post|date=9 July 2013|deadurl=yes|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20131215044235/http://www.nottinghampost.com/Toton-best-choice-high-speed-rail-line/story-19494242-detail/story.html|archivedate=15 December 2013|df=dmy-all}}
62. ^{{cite news|title=Parkway backed for HS2 station|url=http://www.nottinghampost.com/Parkway-backed-HS2-station/story-20251972-detail/story.html|accessdate=12 December 2013|newspaper=Nottingham Post|date=3 December 2013|deadurl=yes|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20131206154233/http://www.nottinghampost.com/Parkway-backed-HS2-station/story-20251972-detail/story.html|archivedate=6 December 2013|df=dmy-all}}
63. ^{{cite news |url= https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/road-and-rail-transport/8114604/National-Trust-anger-over-High-Speed-2-railway.html |title= National Trust anger over High Speed 2 railway |newspaper= The Sunday Telegraph |location= London |date= 7 November 2010 |first= Michael |last= Howie}}
64. ^{{cite news |url= https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-15619461 |work=BBC News |title=HS2: Good case for high-speed rail link, say MPs |date=8 November 2011}}
65. ^{{cite web |url= https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmtran/1185/118502.htm |title= Transport Committee – Tenth Report: High Speed Rail |publisher =UK Parliament |date =1 November 2011}}

4 : High Speed 2|Transport advocacy groups of the United Kingdom|United Kingdom politics-related lists|British railway-related lists
随便看

　

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

　

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间：2024/9/22 7:16:03