| 词条 | Lockheed Corp. v. Spink |
| 释义 |
|Litigants=Lockheed Corp. v. Spink |ArgueDate=April 22 |ArgueYear=1996 |DecideDate=June 10 |DecideYear=1996 |FullName=Lockheed Corp., et al. v. Spink |USVol=517 |USPage=882 |ParallelCitations=116 S. Ct. 1783; 135 L. Ed. 2d 153; 1996 U.S. LEXIS 3717 |Docket=95-809 |OralArgument= |OpinionAnnouncement= |Prior=On writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit |Procedural= |Subsequent= |Holding= |SCOTUS=1994-2005 |Majority=Thomas |JoinMajority=Rehnquist, Stevens, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Ginsburg; Souter and Breyer (all but Part III-B) |Concurrence/Dissent=Breyer |JoinConcurrence/Dissent=Souter |LawsApplied=Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, {{USCSub|29|1106|a|1|D}} }} Lockheed Corp. v. Spink, 517 U.S. 882 (1996),[1] is a US labor law case, concerning occupational pensions. FactsMr Spink was denied full benefits from Lockheed Corporation after being rehired in 1988. He claimed that an amendment of the plan, to exclude people over 61, violated § 406(a)(1)(D) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA),[2] which prohibits a fiduciary from causing a plan to engage in a transaction that transfers plan assets to, or involves the use of plan assets for the benefit of, a party in interest. JudgmentJustice Thomas, writing for the majority, ruled that employers could amend plans. They were not bound by fiduciary duties while acting as sponsors. Justices Breyer and Souter dissented in part, preferring to withhold expression of any view on the proposition that "the payment of benefits pursuant to an amended plan, regardless of what the plan requires of the employee in return for those benefits, does not constitute a prohibited transaction." See also{{Slist pensions}}
References1. ^{{ussc|name=Lockheed Corp. v. Spink|volume=517|page=882|pin=|year=1996}}. 2. ^{{USCSub|29|1106|a|1|D}}. External links
| case = Lockheed Corp v. Spink, {{ussc|517|882|1996|el=no}} | courtlistener =https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/118039/lockheed-corp-v-spink-certiorari-to-the-united-states-court-of-appeals/ | justia =https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/517/882/ | loc =http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep517/usrep517882/usrep517882.pdf | oyez =https://www.oyez.org/cases/1995/95-809 4 : United States labor case law|United States Supreme Court cases|United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court|Employee Retirement Income Security Act |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。