请输入您要查询的百科知识:

 

词条 Market overt
释义

  1. References

  2. Further reading

Market overt or Marché ouvert (Law French for "open market") is an English legal concept originating in mediaeval times governing subsequent ownership of stolen goods.[1] The rule was abolished in England and Wales but it is still good law in some common law jurisdictions such as Hong Kong.

In general, the sale of stolen goods does not convey effective title. However, under 'marché ouvert', if goods were openly sold in designated markets between sunrise and sunset, provenance could not be questioned and effective title of ownership was obtained.[2][3] The law originated centuries ago when people did not travel much; if the victim of a theft did not bother to look in his local market on market day—the only place where the goods were likely to be—he was not being suitably diligent.{{Citation needed|date=April 2013}}

The Sale of Goods (Amendment) Act 1994[4]

was enacted to abolish 'Marché ouvert' in 1995. (This Amendment made no other changes to the Sale of Goods Act 1979).

One designated market was Bermondsey Market in south London. A relatively recent case of stolen goods sold there was in the early 1990s when several portraits by well-known eighteenth century portrait painters, stolen from Lincoln's Inn, each sold for less than £100 from an outside stall. Since they had been sold in 'market overt', the purchaser could keep them.[5][6] To quote Minister for the Arts Estelle Morris in July 2003 during the Second Reading of the Dealing In Cultural Objects (Offences) Bill:

I did not have information about marché ouvert in the deep recesses of my mind, but experts reliably inform me that it no longer exists. The hon. Member for Uxbridge (Mr. Randall) will be surprised to learn that it has been abolished only recently. It used to exist in designated markets, including Bermondsey. I am sure that the promoter will be interested in telling the hon. Member for Southwark, North and Bermondsey (Simon Hughes) about that. In it, items could be sold {{sic|before sunrise}}. Believe it or not, in this land of ours, people could sell stolen—my officials put "dodgy" in brackets, but we do not use that term—objects. I assure hon. Members that it has been abolished. I hope that that deals with the fears of the hon. Member for Uxbridge.[7]

References

1. ^{{cite web |date=25 June 2000 |title=Appendix 60: Memorandum submitted by the Council for the Prevention of Art Theft |work=Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport: Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence|url=https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199900/cmselect/cmcumeds/371/371ap72.htm |pages=section 3.1 |location=London |publisher=British House of Commons}}
2. ^{{cite web|last=O'Connell |first=Anna |date=October 2005 |title=The Controversial Rule of Market Overt |url=http://www.tracemagazine.co.uk/legal/legalarchive.php?id=1 |publisher=Art Loss Review |accessdate=2007-08-31 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20071008095819/http://www.tracemagazine.co.uk/legal/legalarchive.php?id=1 |archivedate=2007-10-08 |df= }}
3. ^{{cite journal |last=Lennon |first=Peter |title=A safe little earner |url=http://arts.guardian.co.uk/features/story/0,11710,913320,00.html|journal=The Guardian |date=15 March 2003 |accessdate=2007-08-31}}
4. ^{{cite book |year=1994 |title=Sale of Goods (Amendment) Act 1994 |publisher=Her Majesty's Stationery Office|url=http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1994/pdf/ukpga_19940032_en.pdf |isbn=0-10-543294-6}}
5. ^{{cite journal |last=Burroughs |first=Katrina |date=30 May 2001 |title=In the market for a bargain|url=https://www.questia.com/newspaper/1G1-75164720/in-the-market-for-a-bargain |journal=Evening Standard |accessdate=2015-10-11}}
6. ^{{cite journal |date=26 August 1993 |journal=Wall Street Journal |volume= |page=A9}}
7. ^{{cite hansard|url=http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm200203/cmhansrd/vo030704/debtext/30704-08.htm |house=House of Commons |date=4 July 2003 |column_start=663 |column_end=664 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20070311053912/http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm200203/cmhansrd/vo030704/debtext/30704-08.htm |archivedate=11 March 2007 |df= }}

Further reading

  • {{cite journal |first=Edmund H.|last=Bennett |title=High Court of Justice. Queen's Bench Division. Walker v. Matthews |journal=American Law Register |volume=30 |issue=9 |pages=574–576 |date=September 1882 |doi=10.2307/3305040 |jstor=3305040}}
  • {{Cite book |title=Sale of Goods Act, 1893 |place=London |publisher=Her Majesty's Stationery Office |year=1893|url=http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1977/PDF/ukpga_19770071_en.pdf |isbn=0-10-850177-9 |pages=section 22 |postscript=}}
  • {{cite journal |first=J. G.|last=Pease |title=The Change of the Property in Goods by Sale in Market Overt |journal=Columbia Law Review|volume=8 |issue=5 |pages=375–383 |date=May 1908 |doi=10.2307/1110070 |jstor=1110070}}
  • {{cite journal |title=Sale of Goods. Market Overt. Custom of City of London. Shop. Auction Room. Trover. Demand and Refusal before Writ|journal=Virginia Law Register |volume=17 |issue=12 |pages=269 |date=April 1912 |doi=10.2307/1104530}}
  • {{cite journal |first=Courtenay |last=Ilbert |title=Unification of Commercial Law|journal=Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law |volume=2 |issue=1 |pages=77–80 |year=1920}}
  • {{cite journal |first=John Barker |last=Waite |title=Caveat Emptor and the Judicial Process |journal=Columbia Law Review |volume=25 |issue=2|pages=129–151 |date=February 1925 |doi=10.2307/1114303 |jstor=1114303}}
  • {{cite journal |title=Market Overt: Common Law, What Is |journal=Michigan Law Review |volume=27 |issue=2 |pages=218 |date=December 1928|doi=10.2307/1279299 |jstor=1279299}}
  • {{cite journal |first=L. C. B. |last=Gower |title=Sale of Goods in Market Overt |journal=Modern Law Review |volume=12 |issue=3 |pages=371–372|date=July 1949}}
  • {{cite journal |first=Phanor J. |last=Eder |title=Venezuela. Conditional Sales |journal=American Journal of Comparative Law |volume=5 |issue=1|pages=119–120 |date=Winter 1956 |doi=10.2307/838145 |jstor=838145}}
  • {{cite journal |first=Daniel E. |last=Murray |title=Sale in Market Overt |journal=International and Comparative Law Quarterly |volume=9|issue=1 |pages=24–52 |date=January 1960 |doi=10.1093/iclqaj/9.1.24}}
  • {{cite journal |first=W. G.|last=Belinfante |author2=J. G. van der Burgt |title=Sale in Market Overt |journal=International and Comparative Law Quarterly |volume=9 |issue=4 |pages=676–677 |date=October 1960 |doi=10.1093/iclqaj/9.4.676}}
  • {{cite journal |first=Aubrey L.|last=Diamond |title=Law Reform Committee: Twelfth Report on the Transfer of Title to Chattels |journal=Modern Law Review |volume=29 |issue=4 |pages=413–419 |date=July 1966}}
  • {{cite journal |first=Saul |last=Levmore |title=Variety and Uniformity in the Treatment of the Good-Faith Purchaser |journal=Journal of Legal Studies |volume=16 |issue=1 |pages=43–65 |date=January 1987 |doi=10.1086/467823}}
  • {{cite journal |first=Graham |last=Battersby |title=The Sale of Stolen Goods: A Dilemma for the Law |journal=Modern Law Review |volume=54|issue=5 |pages=752–757 |date=September 1991 |doi=10.1111/j.1468-2230.1991.tb02669.x}}
  • {{cite journal |first=Peter |last=Smith |title=Valediction to Market Overt |journal=American Journal of Legal History |volume=41 |issue=2|pages=225–249 |date=April 1997 |doi=10.2307/845597 |jstor=845597}}
{{law-term-stub}}

1 : Retail markets in England

随便看

 

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

 

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间:2024/9/20 12:40:02