| 词条 | Meyer v. Holley |
| 释义 |
|Litigants=Meyer v. Holley |ArgueDate=December 3 |ArgueYear=2002 |DecideDate=January 22 |DecideYear=2003 |FullName=Meyer v. Holley et al. |USVol=537 |USPage=280 |ParallelCitations=123 S. Ct. 824; 154 L. Ed. 2d 753 |Prior=Holley v. Crank, 258 F.3d [https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/258/1127/500249/ 1127] (9th Cir. 2001); cert. granted, {{ussc|535|1077|2002|el=no}}. |Subsequent= |Holding= |SCOTUS=1994-2005 |Majority=Breyer |JoinMajority=unanimous |Dissent= |JoinDissent= |Dissent2= |LawsApplied=Fair Housing Act ({{UnitedStatesCode|42|3604}}(b); {{UnitedStatesCode|42|3605}}(a)) }}Meyer v. Holley, 537 U.S. 280 (2003), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Fair Housing Act imposes strict liability on residential real estate corporations for racial discrimination, but the officers and owners of the corporation generally will not be held vicariously liable for offenses committed by the corporation's employees of agents.[1] In a unanimous opinion written by Justice Stephen Breyer, the Court held that the Fair Housing Act "imposes liability without fault upon the employer in accordance with traditional agency principles, i. e., it normally imposes vicarious liability upon the corporation but not upon its officers or owners."[2] See also
References{{bots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}1. ^{{ussc|name=Meyer v. Holley|volume=537|page=280|pin=282|year=2003}}. 2. ^Meyer, 537 U.S. at 282. External links
| case =Meyer v. Holley, {{ussc|537|280|2003|el=no}} | findlaw =https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/537/280.html | justia =https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/537/280/case.html | loc =http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep537/usrep537280/usrep537280.pdf | oyez =https://www.oyez.org/cases/2002/01-1120{{SCOTUS-stub}} 3 : United States Supreme Court cases|United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court|2003 in United States case law |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。