请输入您要查询的百科知识:

 

词条 A Doctor's Report on Dianetics
释义

  1. About the author

  2. Main points

  3. Critical reception

  4. References

  5. External links

{{Infobox book
| name = A Doctor's Report on Dianetics
| title_orig =
| translator =
| image = File:A Doctor's Report on Dianetics.jpg
| caption = Cover of the first edition
| author = Joseph A. Winter
| illustrator =
| cover_artist =
| country = United States
| language = English
| series =
| subject = Dianetics
| publisher = Julian Messner
Crown Publishing Group
| release_date = 1951, 1987
| english_release_date =
| media_type = Print (Hardcover)
| pages =
| isbn = 0-517-56421-1
| preceded_by =
| followed_by =
}}

A Doctor's Report on Dianetics: Theory and Therapy is a non-fiction book analyzing Dianetics. The book was authored by physician Joseph Augustus Winter, with an introduction by German Gestalt Therapy research psychiatrist Frederick Perls.

The book was first published in hardcover by the Julian Press Julian Messner, in 1951, and published again in 1987, by Crown Publishing Group. The work was the first book published that was professionally critical of L. Ron Hubbard.[1]

About the author

Joseph Augustus Winter, an American medical doctor and "psychosomatacist",[2] had previously served on the board of directors and as the medical director of L. Ron Hubbard's Dianetic Research Foundation. He also wrote the 1950 original introduction to Hubbard's The Modern Science of Mental Health.[3] Winter resigned from the HDRF foundation in October 1950, stating "there was a difference between the ideals inherent within the dianetics hypothesis and the actions of the Foundation".[1][2] He also felt that Dianetic techniques were potentially dangerous if performed without medical training and disapproved of the lack of scientific evidence supporting Hubbard's claims.[1] Prior to their falling out, Winter had stated that the Dianetic technique of auditing had cured his six-year-old son of fears of ghosts and the dark.[2]

Main points

According to a 1951 article in Time magazine, in A Doctor's Report on Dianetics "Winter tries to filter Hubbard's strange mixture and pick out the scraps fit for human consumption".[2] Winter wrote that auditing could be a useful technique for psychiatrists to use during psychoanalysis and agreed with Hubbard's conceptualization of prenatal "engrams" that traumatic memories can be formed and stored during the prenatal stage, but Winter was skeptical about "sperm dreams", stating they were likely imagined and not true memories.[9]

Winter also objected to patients recalling deaths from previous reincarnations, Hubbard's authoritarian attitude and disregard for using the scientific method, and Hubbard's view that anyone could become an auditor without medical training.[1][2][9][3] Winter wrote that Hubbard's techniques sometimes harmed clients,[14] and that he had yet to observe a single "Clear" (Hubbard's term for people with an allegedly "optimum brain" after being cleared of all engrams).[1][14][4] Though Hubbard claimed that a Clear had been obtained after twenty-four hours of therapy, Winter wrote that he never observed an individual reach the state of Clear or display any of the unique abilities Hubbard attributed to a Clear.[4] Winter also believed that some people became psychotic due to their involvement with Dianetics, and he included a case study in the book.[5]

Winter also rebuked Hubbard's "Guk" program, which was a combination of vitamins and glutamic acid that was meant to make Dianetics subjects "run better".[1][2][22]

Critical reception

The Princeton Theological Seminary called it an important new book on psychotherapy, in Pastoral Psychology.[6]

Martin Gardner analyzes the book extensively in Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science.[7] Gardner wrote that the "most revealing" material in A Doctor's Report on Dianetics, were the records of the author's own auditing sessions.[7] Pitirim Sorokin wrote in The Ways and Power of Love that though Winter wrote an enthusiastic introduction to Hubbard's Dianetics, his own book exposed some of Hubbard's more "charlatanish" claims.[8]

The book was also reviewed in The American Journal of Psychology[9] and The American Journal of Psychiatry.[10] In a review of the book in Psychosomatic Medicine,[11] Frank Egloff wrote that Winter did a "relatively good, factual job" and provided a "fairly clear, dispassionate view of dianetics".[11]

The book is referenced in Rodney Stark's The Future of Religion,[12] and in Frank Gerbode's Beyond Psychology.[13]

References

1. ^{{cite book|last=Atack|first=Jon|authorlink=Jon Atack|title=A Piece of Blue Sky|publisher=Carol Publishing Group|date=August 19, 1990|location=|pages=Chapter 2|url=http://www.apologeticsindex.org/A%20Piece%20of%20Blue%20Sky.pdf|isbn=0-8184-0499-X}}
2. ^{{cite news|author=Staff|title=Departure in Dianetics|work=Time Magazine|publisher=Time Warner|date=September 3, 1951|url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,821638,00.html}}
3. ^{{cite news|last=Staff|first=| title=A Doctor's Report on Dianetics|work=The Fredericksburg News|date=November 22, 1951}}
4. ^{{cite journal|last=Bainbridge |first=William Sims |author2=Rodney Stark |title=Scientology: To Be Perfectly Clear |journal=Sociological Analysis |year=1980 |url=http://www.anti-scientologie.ch/pdf-books/To_Be_Perfectly_Clear_-_Bainbridge_Stark.pdf |doi=10.2307/3709904 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20070928030618/http://www.anti-scientologie.ch/pdf-books/To_Be_Perfectly_Clear_-_Bainbridge_Stark.pdf |archivedate=2007-09-28 |df= }}
5. ^{{cite book|last=Cooper|first=Paulette|authorlink=Paulette Cooper|title=The Scandal of Scientology|publisher=Tower Publications|year=1971|pages=Chapter 1|url=http://www.clambake.org/archive/books/tsos/sos-01.html}}
6. ^{{cite book|author=Princeton Theological Seminary|title=Pastoral Psychology|year=1950|pages=6, 7|issn=0031-2789}}
7. ^{{cite book|last=Gardner|first=Martin|title=Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science|publisher=Courier Dover Publications|year=1957|pages=274, 275|isbn=0-486-20394-8|url=http://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/wp-content/uploads/Martin-Gardner-Fads-and-Fallacies-in-the-Name-of-Science.pdf}}
8. ^{{cite book|last=Sorokin|first=Pitirim|author2= Stephen Garrard Post|title=The Ways and Power of Love: Types, Factors, and Techniques of Moral Transformation|publisher=Templeton Foundation Press|year=2002|pages=508|isbn=1-890151-86-6}}
9. ^{{Cite journal|last=Marcuse|first=F. L.|last2 =Winter|first2 =J. A.|title=A Doctor's Report on Dianetics by J. A. Winter|journal=The American Journal of Psychology|volume=65|issue=1|pages=154–155|date=January 1952|doi=10.2307/1418860|publisher=University of Illinois Press|jstor =1418860}}
10. ^{{Cite journal|last=Peck|first=Robert E.|title=A Doctor's Report on Dianetics|journal=The American Journal of Psychiatry|volume=109|pages=70–71|date=July 1952|doi=10.1176/appi.ajp.109.1.70-b}}
11. ^{{cite journal|last=Egloff|first=Frank R. L.|title=A Doctor's Report on Dianetics - Theory and Therapy|journal=Psychosomatic Medicine|volume=15|issue=4|pages=370|url=http://www.psychosomaticmedicine.org/cgi/reprint/15/4/368-b.pdf}}
12. ^{{cite book|last=Stark|first=Rodney|author2= William Sims Bainbridge|title=The Future of Religion|publisher=University of California Press|date=January 16, 1986|isbn =978-0-520-05731-9}}
13. ^{{cite book|last=Gerbode|first=Frank A.|title=Beyond Psychology: An Introduction to Metapsychology, 3rd Edition|publisher=Institute for Research in Metapsychology|date=August 1995|id={{ISBN|1-887927-00-X}} , {{ISBN|978-1-887927-00-0}}}}

External links

Reviews
  • [https://www.jstor.org/stable/1418860 The American Journal of Psychology], January 1952
  • The American Journal of Psychiatry, July 1952
{{Scientology}}{{DEFAULTSORT:Doctors Report On Dianetics, A}}

3 : 1951 books|Books critical of Scientology|1951 in religion

随便看

 

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

 

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间:2024/11/13 16:01:57