| 词条 | National AIDS Trust v NHS Service Commissioning Board |
| 释义 |
|name = National AIDS Trust v NHS Commissioning Board |court = High Court of Justice, Court of Appeal of England and Wales |image = |imagesize = |imagelink = |imagealt = |caption = |full name = |date decided = {{Plainlist}}
|citations = {{Plainlist}}
|ECLI = |transcripts = |judges = {{Plainlist}}
|number of judges = |decision by = |concurring = |dissenting = |concur/dissent = |prior actions = |appealed from = |appealed to = |subsequent actions = |related actions = |opinions = |keywords = }} National AIDS Trust v NHS Commissioning Board, [2016] EWHC 2005 (Admin), was a court case before the High Court of Justice seeking judicial review regarding National Health Service funding for pre-exposure prophylaxis. The provision of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in the British National Health Service to prevent HIV infection has been the subject of much controversy. AIDS campaigners have lobbied for the NHS to approve the treatment to prevent the spread of HIV among members of high-risk groups such as gay men. NHS management considered PrEP to be a preventative treatment that they were not legally able to provide funding for, but should instead be funded by local councils.[1][2] The issue was taken by the National AIDS Trust to a judicial review by the High Court.[3] In 2016, the High Court determined that NHS England had the power to provide PrEP treatment to these groups. Following the defeat at trial, NHS England announced a plan to appeal the judgment in the Court of Appeal,[4] while also making plans to prepare to implement the wider use of PrEP. To ensure it had sufficient funding to cover the £10m–20m annual cost of PrEP if it was prioritised, NHS England announced that it could no longer guarantee it would be able to commission nine other treatments and services which it had provisionally earmarked for funding.[5] NHS England lost the appeal,[6] with Lady Justice Eleanor King and Lord Justices Andrew Longmore and Nicholas Underhill finding in favour of the National AIDS Trust on 10 November 2016,[7] with Public Health England announcing a 3-year large-scale trial seeking to enrol over 10,000 people a few weeks later.[8] Subsequent freedom of information requests showed that NHS England spent over £100,000 fighting the case,[9] not including NAT's legal fees, estimated at a further £8,000.[9] See also
References1. ^{{Cite web |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-36946000|title=HIV campaigners win NHS drug battle |date=2 August 2016 |website=BBC News Online |access-date=2016-08-02 }} 2. ^{{Cite web |url=http://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=27884%253Acouncils-and-charity-win-high-court-battle-over-hiv-treatment-decision&catid=174&Itemid=99 |title=Councils and charity win High Court battle over HIV treatment decision |date=2 August 2016 |website=Local Government Lawyer |access-date=2016-08-02 }} 3. ^{{Cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/jul/13/judge-urged-overturn-nhs-decision-not-fund-hiv-prevention-treatment-prep |title=Judge urged to overturn NHS decision not to fund HIV prevention treatment |date=2016-07-13 |newspaper=The Guardian |agency=Press Association |issn=0261-3077 |access-date=2016-08-02 |via=}} 4. ^{{Cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/aug/02/nhs-can-fund-game-changing-prep-hiv-drug-court-says |title=NHS can fund 'game-changing' PrEP HIV drug, court says |last=Boseley |first=Sarah |date=2016-08-02 |newspaper=The Guardian |issn=0261-3077 |access-date=2016-08-02 }} 5. ^{{cite news |title=NHS England loses HIV drug judicial review |url=https://www.hsj.co.uk/sectors/commissioning/nhs-england-loses-hiv-drug-judicial-review/7009685.article |accessdate=27 October 2016 |work=Health Service Journal |date=2 August 2016 }} 6. ^[2016] EWCA (Civ) 1100 7. ^{{cite news |url=https://www.buzzfeed.com/patrickstrudwick/court-of-appeal-nhs-can-provide-the-hiv-prevention-drug |title=NHS England loses its appeal and could now provide the HIV prevention drug |first=Patrick |last=Strudwick |authorlink=Patrick Strudwick |work=BuzzFeed |date=10 November 2016 |accessdate=11 March 2017 }} 8. ^{{cite news |url=https://www.buzzfeed.com/patrickstrudwick/nhs-england-announces-it-will-provide-prep-the-hiv-preventio |title=The HIV prevention drug will now be made available to thousands of people |first=Patrick |last=Strudwick |authorlink=Patrick Strudwick |work=BuzzFeed |date=4 December 2016 |accessdate=11 March 2017 }} 9. ^1 {{cite news |url=https://www.buzzfeed.com/patrickstrudwick/this-is-how-much-the-nhs-spent-trying-to-avoid-paying-for-th |title=This is how much the NHS spent trying to avoid paying for the HIV prevention drug |first=Patrick |last=Strudwick |authorlink=Patrick Strudwick |work=BuzzFeed |date=5 January 2017 |accessdate=11 March 2017 }} External links
6 : HIV/AIDS in the United Kingdom|2016 in the United Kingdom|Pre-exposure prophylaxis|United Kingdom administrative case law|2016 in case law|National Health Service (England) |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。