请输入您要查询的百科知识:

 

词条 Paige v. Banks
释义

  1. Notes

  2. References

  3. External links

{{Infobox SCOTUS case
|Litigants=Paige v. Banks
|ArgueDate=Apr. 11, 16
|ArgueYear=1872
|DecideDate=May 6
|DecideYear=1872
|FullName=Paige v. Banks
|USVol=80
|USPage=608
|ParallelCitations=13 Wall. 608; 20 L. Ed. 709
|Prior=
|Subsequent=
|Holding=An agreement that transfers a copyright from the original author to a second party for perpetuity does not end with the statutory limit of copyright at the time the parties made the deal. If a later act of Congress extends copyright and the extension is available to the work, the second party still controls the copyright or perpetual license to that copyright.
|SCOTUS=1870–1872
|Majority=
|JoinMajority=
|Concurrence=
|JoinConcurrence=
|Concurrence2=
|JoinConcurrence2=
|Concurrence/Dissent=
|JoinConcurrence/Dissent=
|Dissent=
|JoinDissent=
|Dissent2=
|JoinDissent2=
|LawsApplied=
}}Paige v. Banks, 80 U.S. (13 Wall.) 608 (1872), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held an agreement that transfers a copyright from the original author to a second party for perpetuity does not end with the statutory limit of copyright at the time the parties made the deal. If a later act of Congress extends copyright and the extension is available to the work, the second party still controls the copyright or perpetual license to that copyright.[1]

This is a notable departure from the Statute of Anne, a 1709 law from Great Britain that was influential in the United States's copyright history. That statute, from which the United States borrowed for the Copyright Act of 1790,{{sfn|Bracha|2010|p=1453}} provided for a maximum of two fourteen year terms of the author controlling a work's copyright monopoly before it entered the public domain. Under that British scheme, an author could sign away their copyright during the first term and it would automatically return to them at the beginning of the second term.{{sfn|Bracha|2010|p=1438}}

Notes

1. ^{{ussc|name=Paige v. Banks|volume=80|page=608 |year=1872|reporter=Wall.|reporter-volume=13}}

References

{{refbegin}}
  • {{cite journal|last=Bracha|first=Oren|year=2010|title=The Adventures of the Statute of Anne in the Land of Unlimited Possibilities: The Life of a Legal Transplant|url=https://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1856&context=btlj|journal=Berkeley Technology Law Journal|publisher=UC Berkeley School of Law|volume=25|issue=1|issn=1086-3818|ref=CITEREFBracha2010}}
{{refend}}

External links

  • {{caselaw source

| case = {{ussc|name=Paige v. Banks|volume=80|page=608|year=1872|reporter=Wall.|reporter-volume=13|el=no}}
| justia =https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/80/608/
| loc =http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep080/usrep080608/usrep080608.pdf{{SCOTUS-case-stub}}

4 : 1872 in United States case law|United States Supreme Court cases|United States Supreme Court cases of the Chase Court|United States copyright case law

随便看

 

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

 

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间:2024/11/11 21:06:49