| 词条 | Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Ass'n |
| 释义 |
|Litigants=Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Association |ArgueDate=December 1 |ArgueYear=2014 |DecideDate=March 9 |DecideYear=2015 |FullName=Thomas E. Perez, Secretary of Labor, et al., Petitioners v. Mortgage Bankers Association, et al.; Jerome Nickols, et al., Petitioners v. Mortgage Bankers Association |Docket=13–1041 |Docket2=13–1052 |USVol=575 |USPage=___ |ParallelCitations=135 S. Ct. 1199; 191 L. Ed. 2d 186 |Prior=Mortg. Bankers Ass'n v. Harris, 720 F.3d [https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20130702145 966], 405 U.S. App. D.C. 429 (D.C. Cir. 2013) |Subsequent= |Holding=Notice-and-comment procedures are not required when agencies enact interpretive rules, and they should not be required to make subsequent interpretations. |SCOTUS=2010-2016 |Majority=Sotomayor |JoinMajority=Roberts, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan; Alito (expect part III-B) |Concurrence=Alito |Concurrence2=Scalia |Concurrence3=Thomas |LawsApplied=Administrative Procedure Act }}Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Association, 575 U.S. ___ (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the D.C. Circuit's Paralyzed Veterans doctrine is contrary to a clear reading of the Administrative Procedure Act and "improperly imposes on agencies an obligation beyond the Act's maximum procedural requirements."[1] Opinion of the CourtAssociate Justice Sonia Sotomayor authored the opinion of the Court.[2]Associate Justices Samuel Alito, Antonin Scalia, and Clarence Thomas authored concurring opinions. See also{{Portal|Law}}
References1. ^http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/perez-v-mortgage-bankers-association/ 2. ^https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/13-1041_0861.pdf External links
| case = Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Association, {{Ussc|575|___|2015|el=no}} | justia =https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/575/13-1041/ | oyez =https://www.oyez.org/cases/2014/13-1041 | other_source1 = Supreme Court (slip opinion) | other_url1 =https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/13-1041_0861.pdf
3 : United States Supreme Court cases|United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court|2015 in United States case law |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。