| 词条 | Pringle v Government of Ireland |
| 释义 |
| name = Pringle v Government of Ireland | court = CJEU | image = | caption = | date decided = | full name = | citations = (2012) C‑370/12 | judges = | prior actions = | subsequent actions = | opinions = | transcripts = | keywords = Health }} Pringle v Government of Ireland (2012) C‑370/12 is an EU law case, which held the European Stability Mechanism was lawful. FactsThomas Pringle, an anti-austerity Independent MP (Teachta Dála) in Ireland, claimed that the European Stability Mechanism was unlawful, because it exceeded the EU’s exclusive competence for monetary policy, and went beyond the TFEU powers. The ESM was created by Commission Decision 2011/199, adopted under TEU art 48(6) in a simplified Treaty revision procedure. It added TFEU art 136(3), to allow member states to safeguard the Euro’s stability. On 27 September 2012, member states created a €500bn fund to lend to Eurozone member countries (replacing the European Financial Stability Facility and European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism). Member states could get money if they signed a ‘Memorandum of Understanding’. JudgmentIrish Supreme CourtThe Irish Supreme Court made a reference for preliminary ruling to the CJEU. It asked whether the simplified revision procedure could be used, if the principles of effective judicial protection and legal certainty prevented the ESM Treaty. European Court of JusticeThe CJEU held that the European Stability Mechanism was lawful. {{Sect-stub|date=February 2018}}See also{{Clist banking}}
Notes{{refs|2}}ReferencesExternal links
2 : United Kingdom enterprise case law|Court of Justice of the European Union case law |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。