请输入您要查询的百科知识:

 

词条 Terrell v Secretary of State for the Colonies
释义

  1. Facts

  2. Judgment

  3. References

{{orphan|date=December 2017}}{{unreferenced|date=December 2017}}{{italic title}}{{Infobox court case|name=Terrell v Secretary of State for the Colonies|court=High Court, Queen's Bench Division|date decided=19 June 1953|citations=[1953] 2 QB 482; [1953] 3 WLR 331|judge=Lord Goddard CJ}}

Terrell v Secretary of State for the Colonies [1953] 2 QB 482 is an English case concerning the tenure of colonial judges.

Facts

In 1930, Terrell was appointed to be a puisne judge of the Supreme Court of Malaya. By a letter written on behalf of the Secretary of State for the Colonies, he was informed that his compulsory retirement age as judge was 62. In 1942, Malaya was invaded and occupied by Japan. As a result, the Secretary of State informed Terrell that his service was no longer required, and his appointment was terminated on 7 July 1942, 17 months before his mandatory retirement age.

Terrell contested the validity of his retirement. The case was referred to an arbitrator, who found against Terrell, who appealed to the High Court.

Judgment

Lord Goddard found that the termination of Terrell's appointment was valid. In particular, he rejected the contention that Terrell could only be removed by the Sovereign on presentation of addresses by both houses of Parliament, pursuant to the procedure set out in section 3 of the Act of Settlement. Colonial judges, unlike judges of English superior courts, held their offices at the Sovereign's pleasure, and could be dismissed at any time before their mandatory retirement age.

References

3 : 1953 in British law|1953 in case law|High Court of Justice cases

随便看

 

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

 

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间:2024/11/12 4:49:44