| 词条 | The Canary (website) |
| 释义 |
| name = The Canary | favicon = | logo = The Canary logo.png | screenshot = | caption = | url = {{url|https://www.thecanary.co}} | commercial = | type = New media outlet | registration = | author = | editor = Kerry-Anne Mendoza | launch date = 2015 | current status = Active | alexa = 4811 (UK 01/2019)[1] | revenue = £250,000 (2016) }}The Canary is a left-wing news website based in the United Kingdom. Its editor-in-chief Kerry-Anne Mendoza. While it focuses on UK political affairs, it also has a "Global" section, a satire section ("Off the Perch"), and "Science", "Environment", and "Health" sections.[2] HistoryThe Canary was created in October 2015 with five founding members in an attempt to "diversify the media", according to editor-in-chief Kerry-Anne Mendoza.[3] The website is funded by advertising and monthly contributions from around 1,500 supporters.[4]A major factor motivating The Canary{{'s}} founders, Mendoza said, was scepticism of the mainstream media, a scepticism shared by Corbyn. In his first address as Labour leader, he attacked pundits for not understanding the discontent among many ordinary British voters, and talked about the "power of social media".[4] Follining the 2017 United Kingdom general election, the BBC reported that "Sites such as The Canary, The Skwawkbox, and Another Angry Voice are making a huge impact and earning a massive following."[3] Business modelIn April 2016, Mendoza said in Free & Fearless (a magazine produced by Hacked Off) that: we are attracting an audience of 3.5 million unique users per month. On top of this: every two hours, 24 hours a day, seven days a week – someone becomes a paid subscriber of The Canary ... Our growing traffic is attracting advertisers who are now offering us a floor RPM (payment per 1,000 hits) of £3 and a ceiling of £9."[4] The website explains its business model: "Each writer and section editor is paid in two ways. Firstly, each and every article receives a flat-rate equal payment from our monthly income from supporters. So with each new supporter, the pay per article goes up for everyone every month. Secondly, each article receives a top-up payment based directly on the percentage of web traffic, and therefore advertising income, that articles generate during a given calendar month."[5] This pay-per-click model has been criticised for promoting clickbait as writers are only paid for their work if it becomes viral.[6] Mendoza disputes this, claiming that the payment structure means that people who generate the revenues get a fair share.[4] In 2016, the website had an editorial team of around 30, although only 5 of The Canary{{'s}} staff earn enough money to work full-time.[4] As of the end of 2018, according to the website, it has five main editors and around 30 active contributors.[7] The Canary had a turnover of £250,000/year in 2016, according to Mendoza.[8] Regulation and accuracyIn August 2017 The Canary joined the voluntary state-approved press regulator IMPRESS.[9] According to the 2017/18 annual report from IMPRESS, they had received 58 complaints about The Canary's news reporting, two of which were upheld.[10] The Media Bias/Fact Check website rates the site's level of factual reporting as "HIGH".[11] In a video posted on Twitter in November 2018, The Canary insisted that "in the last 3 years, we've published more than 9,000 unique articles" and that "the number of significant mistakes can be counted on one hand". Mendoza has said "We are human beings and we make mistakes. We clean up the mess and make sure it’s clear to our readership".[12] Political standpointDescribing her website to Journalism.co.uk, Canary editor-in-chief Kerry-Anne Mendoza said that: For us, this is ultimately about democracy. Informed consent in the public is the bedrock of democracy, and if that informed consent isn't there because people aren't aware of the kind of information that they need to be, they won't be equipped to make the decent democratic decisions that they need to, say, for example, on climate change, the justice system, or whether austerity is a positive economic policy.[13]The Canary is generally supportive of Jeremy Corbyn, the leader of the Labour Party, but has also supported Natalie Bennett (former leader of the Green Party) and the Greens' "radical alternative" to the "Tory-lite" policies of "the neoliberal Labour Party" asserting "The Green Party's rise to viability preceded the election of Jeremy Corbyn" and the emergence of Momentum.[14] Mendoza claims that it was "a complete coincidence" that the website was created shortly after Corbyn's leadership victory. "We don't have any affiliations with political parties, we don't have any affiliations with political organisations, and we're not actually ostensibly left-wing", she added, calling the site's editorial stance "a counterpoint to conservative media" and "broadly liberal".[20] Mendoza also stated that The Canary was "biased in favour of social justice, equal rights – those are non-negotiable things. We’re in this as an issue-driven organisation.” and stated "Every press organisation has an editorial stance and we’re certainly no different,”"[15] The website did not have a standpoint on the 2016 EU referendum.[16] ResponsesSupportMax Keiser, in his programme for the RT channel, has said that the site "really digs into some of the salient points that need to be made about austerity", saying in an interview with Kerry-Anne Mendoza that he has "been following this site for a while now".[17] Former Respect MP George Galloway also praised the website on his show Sputnik, also for RT.[18]CriticismJasper Jackson in the New Statesman labelled sites like The Canary as "hyper-partisan", owing to its mainly pro-Corbyn content.[19] Michael Deacon in The Daily Telegraph described it as the "maddest left-wing website in the world"[20][21][22] "It's the perfect journal for Corbynism in that it has no connection to reality", Nick Cohen wrote for The Observer.[21] Carl Miller of Demos told Alex Spence of the Politico website that, while the "digital world" has been "democratizing", he has mixed feelings: {{quote|The Canary is an echo chamber. It’s reflecting a single worldview [cut in the source]. Corbyn’s opponents are the enemy; the Tories are contemptible, and so on. These echo chambers cut down on dissenting information, they eliminate us happening on other points of view. This is likely to make people even angrier, more outraged, more certain that that [sic] people we disagree with are evil... This isn’t good for our capacity to hold reasoned, civil debate in public life.[21]}}The Canary has also been criticised by leftwing commentator Owen Jones, who told PR Week that the website "really promotes conspiracy theories and a lot of things that just aren't right. I worry about the Canary-isation of the left, where it ends up in a bizarre sub-culture that anyone who doesn't agree is seen as part of a conspiracy. But then you do get those blogs on left and right."[23]A Sunday Times investigation into Labour Party antisemitism referenced an article in The Canary entitled "The inconvenient truths that prove it is not anti-semitic to compare Israel to Nazi Germany", which juxtaposed an image of a poster from Berlin in 1935 saying "Germans must only buy from Germans" with one in Jerusalem in 2014 saying "Jews must only hire Jews".[24] In early 2019, an anonymous supposedly anti-fake news campaign, Stop Funding Fake News, was launched to pressure advertisers not to allow their ads to run on left wing websites such as The Canary and Evolve Politics, and the right wing Westmonster, which is backed by Arron Banks. The campaign was supported by anti-left campaigner Rachel Riley and led Macmillan Cancer Support to suspend advertising on the website while it reviewed online ad placement.[25] Notable articlesThe Canary has published a number of stories which have been notable enough to be picked up by mainstream media outlets. Electoral fraud investigationsRegarding allegations of electoral fraud in the 2015 general election, The Canary "dug into assorted expense claims and activities in several such seats crucial to Cameron's success", according to Michael White in the Guardian.[26] A whistleblower contacted the website with allegations of telephone push polling, claiming that people acting for the Conservative Party also paid telephone companies to conduct misleading surveys on voters which were biased in favour of the Conservatives, thus breaking election law in regard to the private polling they are allowed to do during campaigns.[26][27][28] Suicide storyA report in The Canary about a junior doctor committing suicide was described by Private Eye as failing to follow Samaritans' guidelines on the coverage of such stories, despite quoting from the selfsame guidelines.[29][30][31] Mendoza responded on social media “we’ve so flustered the establishment they’re throwing a tantrum!”[31] Portland Communications storyA piece in June 2016 saying that that summer's parliamentary revolt against Corbyn "appears to have been orchestrated" by Portland Communications went viral on pro-Corbyn social media, and was repeated by Len McCluskey, the general secretary of the Unite union, on Andrew Marr's Sunday morning BBC programme. The article listed links between the PR firm and members of the centre-left Fabian Society within the Labour Party. It was widely dismissed as a conspiracy theory.[32][33][34] US presidential campaignIn November 2016, BBC News stated that, during the 2016 US presidential campaign, The Canary misled "with claims that 'a major media outlet just revealed who won the US election... a week in advance'."[35] The Canary article[36] further said "many have suggested the election is rigged. In October, the BBC and The Guardian both ran stories questioning the veracity of the election results",[36] but the BBC stated that its article in question assessed "the validity of claims that the US election is rigged, finding that there's 'no justification for concern about widespread voter fraud'".[35] Charlie Brooker's 2016 WipeIn January 2017, The Canary described Charlie Brooker's 2016 Wipe, a satirical programme, as "a hatchet job on Jeremy Corbyn in its section on the Labour leadership election" which "cements a fabricated smear campaign from media pundits, the pro-Israel lobby, Conservative MPs, and Blairites". In particular, the Canary disliked a reference to 'Traingate' and suggestions that Corbyn was unable to recognise antisemitism and was unfit to be Prime Minister.[37] This criticism was widely mocked on social media by both supporters and opponents of Jeremy Corbyn. Brooker jokingly said to the author beforehand that "We originally planned a 25min pro-Corbyn musical number but our shadowy Blairite handlers insisted we scrap it".[38] The New Statesman{{'s}} Media Mole responded to the controversy by suggesting humorous pro-Corbyn joke alternatives.[39] Laura KuenssbergThe Canary has been critical of Laura Kuenssberg's coverage of Jeremy Corbyn, and politics more generally, on BBC News,[40] particularly following the on-air resignation of Labour MP Stephen Doughty, and promoted a petition hosted by 38 Degrees (which was later taken down) which called for her resignation.[41][42] Between the withdrawal of the 38 Degrees petition in May 2016 and 20 July 2017, according to Jasper Jackson of the New Statesman, The Canary ran "at least 17 articles specifically criticising Kuenssberg.[40] The Canary repeated Craig Murray's view that the petition was taken down due to "Establishment pressure",[43] as opposed to the assertion from 38 Degrees that the petition was taken down due to "sexist and hateful abuse made towards Laura Kuenssberg".[44] Ian Middleton in The Huffington Post contested this, writing that: "if one looks at the list of comments published ... it's difficult to find anything remotely aggressive or sexist" and the accusations of abuse "may have been part of an orchestrated campaign on behalf of those looking to discredit the petition itself".[45]In September 2017, The Canary published a story with the inaccurate headline that "(Kuenssberg's) listed as a speaker at the Tory Party conference". The article itself stated correctly that she had been invited to speak at a fringe event. The Canary later modified its headline to acknowledge that she was an invited speaker and added the BBC's statement, received after the publication deadline, that she would not be speaking at the event. However, Impress, the press regulator, adjudicated in December 2017 that the website had broken its code by publishing an inaccurate headline, not making sufficient efforts to check the facts with the event organisers or the BBC prior to publication, and failing to correct the inaccuracy with due prominence.[46] Helen Lewis, deputy editor of the New Statesman, said that the site targets Kuenssberg as "a traffic-driver for hate-clicks".[47][48] ReadershipDuring July 2016, The Canary achieved over 7.5 million page views, ranking 97th in readership among British media organisations, slightly higher than The Spectator and The Economist. The site's publishers, Canary Media, rose 47 spots from 126th in June to 79th in July among the top UK publishers.[49] The majority of its site traffic comes from Facebook.[21] See also
References1. ^{{cite web |url=https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/thecanary.co |title=thecanary.co Traffic Statistics |publisher=Alexa |accessdate=23 January 2019}} 2. ^{{cite news|url=http://www.thecanary.co/|title=Official website|work=The Canary|accessdate=14 August 2016|date=14 August 2016}} 3. ^{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-40255428|title=Five election lessons for the media|last=Rajan|first=Amol|date=13 June 2017|accessdate=30 March 2019|publisher=BBC}} 4. ^{{cite news|last1=Mendoza|first1=Kerry-Anne|title=The Canary is a new media outlet shaking up journalism in a radical way.|url=http://hackinginquiry.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/HackedOff_FF1.pdf|accessdate=2 June 2016|work=Free & Fearless|format=PDF|publisher=Hacked Off|date=April 2016|page=6}} 5. ^{{cite news|url=https://www.thecanary.co/values/|title=Values|accessdate=4 December 2018|date=4 December 2018}} 6. ^{{cite news|title=Canary Wings It|work=Private Eye|url=https://i.imgur.com/sL5NVs3.jpg|format=JPEG image|issue=1419|page=10|publisher=Pressdram Ltd|date=26 May 2016}} 7. ^{{cite news|url=https://www.thecanary.co/team/|title=Team|accessdate=4 December 2018|date=4 December 2018}} 8. ^{{cite news |url=http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/the-canary-from-500-start-up-to-top-100-uk-news-website-in-the-space-of-a-year/ |title=The Canary: From £500 start-up to top-100 UK news website in the space of a year |last=Mayhew |first=Freddy |newspaper=Press Gazette |date=20 October 2016 |accessdate=22 March 2018}} 9. ^{{cite news|url=http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/the-canary-joins-impress-to-become-alternative-press-regulators-66th-member/ |title=The Canary joins Impress to become alternative press regulator's 66th member |last=Mayhew |first=Freddy |date=24 August 2017 |website=Press Gazette |access-date=2 January 2018}} 10. ^{{cite web|last=Tobitt |first=Charlotte |url=https://www.pressgazette.co.uk/left-wing-website-the-canary-most-complained-about-impress-regulated-publication-of-2017-18/ |title=Left-wing website The Canary most complained about Impress-regulated publication of 2017/18 |publisher=Press Gazette |date= |accessdate=2019-02-07}} 11. ^{{cite news|url=https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-canary-uk/|title=Media Bias/Fact Check|accessdate=4 December 2018|date=4 December 2018}} 12. ^{{cite news|title=Can you trust the mainstream media?|url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/aug/06/can-you-trust-mainstream-media|last=Harrison|first=Andrew|date=6 August 2017|accessdate=30 March 2019|work=The Guardian}} 13. ^1 {{cite news|last1=Scott|first1=Caroline|title=How news outlet The Canary aims to 'diversify media'|url=https://www.journalism.co.uk/news/how-news-outlet-the-canary-aims-to-diversify-media-/s2/a576960/|accessdate=2 June 2016|work=Journalism.co.uk|date=23 October 2015}} 14. ^{{cite news|title=The Green Party just got an opportunity to become the next big contender|url=http://www.thecanary.co/2016/05/16/green-party-just-got-opportunity-become-next-big-contender/|website=The Canary|accessdate=2 June 2016|date=16 May 2016}} 15. ^{{cite web |last1=Water son |first1=Jim |title=The Rise Of The Alt-Left British Media |url=https://www.buzzfeed.com/jimwaterson/the-rise-of-the-alt-left |publisher=Buzzfeed |accessdate=31 March 2019 |date=6 May 2017}} 16. ^{{cite web|title=Reply to comment|url=https://www.facebook.com/plugins/comment_embed.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2FTheCanaryPosts%2Fposts%2F1103729389665853%3Fcomment_id%3D1103800532992072%26reply_comment_id%3D1103810389657753&include_parent=false|website=Facebook|publisher=The Canary|accessdate=8 June 2016|quote=We don't have a stance either way.}} 17. ^{{cite av media|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJYCXjXiu9k|publisher=RT UK|title=Kerry-anne Mendoza, Editor-in-Chief of The Canary|work=Keiser Report|date=1 February 2016}} 18. ^Galloway, George. [https://www.rt.com/shows/sputnik/356593-noxious-gases-conflicts-profits/ "'Sputnik' with George Galloway"]. RT Shows. Episode 138. 19. ^{{cite news|last=Jackson|first=Jasper|url=http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/media/2017/06/hyper-partisan-corbynite-websites-show-how-left-can-beat-tabloids-online|title=Hyper-partisan Corbynite websites show how the left can beat the tabloids online|work=New Statesman}} 20. ^{{cite news|last1=Deacon|first1=Michael|title=Great news for Corbynistas... it's the maddest Left-wing website in the world|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/Jeremy_Corbyn/12175084/Great-news-for-Corbynistas...-its-the-maddest-Left-wing-website-in-the-world.html|accessdate=4 June 2016|work=The Daily Telegraph|date=26 February 2016}} 21. ^1 2 3 4 5 6 7 {{cite news|last1=Spence|first1=Alex|title=Jeremy Corbyn and the disruptive Canary|url=https://www.politico.eu/blogs/on-media/2016/08/jeremy-corbyn-and-the-disruptive-canary-uk-politics-labour-leader/|accessdate=30 November 2017|work=POLITICO|date=18 August 2016}} 22. ^{{cite news|title=Canary Wings It|work=Private Eye|url=https://i.imgur.com/sL5NVs3.jpg|format=JPEG image|issue=1419|page=10|publisher=Pressdram Ltd|date=26 May 2016}} 23. ^{{cite news|last1=Burne-James|first1=Sam|title=Grilled: Owen Jones, Guardian columnist, author, activist... and sushi socialist?|url=http://www.prweek.com/article/1418744/grilled-owen-jones-guardian-columnist-author-activist-sushi-socialist|accessdate=25 January 2017|work=PRWeek|date=9 January 2017}} 24. ^{{cite news|url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/anti-semites-lurking-in-jeremy-corbyns-twitter-nest-76bqxbfzm|title=Anti-semites lurking in Jeremy Corbyn's Twitter nest|first1=Jon|last1=Ungoed-Thomas|first2=Tim|last2=Shipman|first3=Gabriel|last3=Pogrund|date=22 April 2018|work=The Times}} 25. ^{{cite news |last1=Frot |first1=Mathilde |title=Anti fake news activists persuade cancer charity to remove advert on The Canary |url=https://jewishnews.timesofisrael.com/anti-fake-news-activists-persuade-cancer-charity-to-remove-advert-on-canary/ |accessdate=29 March 2019 |work=Jewish News |date=27 March 2019}} 26. ^1 {{cite news|last1=White|first1=Michael|title=Why is there so little noise about the Tory election fraud claims?|url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/jun/01/channel-4-leads-the-way-on-tory-election-claims|accessdate=3 June 2016|work=The Guardian|date=1 June 2016}} 27. ^{{cite news|author1=Editorial|title=The Guardian view on policing elections: harder, but no less important|url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jun/02/the-guardian-view-on-policing-elections-harder-but-no-less-important|accessdate=3 June 2016|work=The Guardian|date=2 June 2016}} 28. ^{{cite news|last1=Crick|first1=Michael|title=Could referendum 'push-polling' influence the result?|url=https://www.channel4.com/news/by/michael-crick/blogs/referendum-pushpolling-influence-result|work=Channel 4 News|date=21 June 2016}} 29. ^{{cite news|title=Canary in the Pit|work=Private Eye|url=http://i.imgur.com/UFcqSKa.jpg|format=JPEG image|issue=1418|page=7|publisher=Pressdram Ltd|date=26 May 2016}} 30. ^{{cite book |title=Post-Truth: How Bullshit Conquered the World |first= James |last=Ball |quote=In another instance, the site ran a story titled 'A junior doctor has killed herself, leaving a message to Jeremy Hunt in her suicide note'. The piece failed to follow multiple ethical guidelines set out by the Samaritans, including not attributing suicide to a single source and not basing news stories on the contents of suicide notes}} 31. ^1 https://www.buzzfeed.com/marieleconte/the-rise-of-the-canary 32. ^1 {{cite news|last1=Le Conte|first1=Marie|title=How A Pro-Corbyn Viral Website With A Pay-Per-Click Business Model Is Taking Over Social Media|url=https://www.buzzfeed.com/marieleconte/the-rise-of-the-canary|accessdate=15 August 2016|work=BuzzFeed|date=10 August 2016}} 33. ^{{cite news|last1=Singleton|first1=David|title=Is it true that a PR firm full of Blairites is orchestrating the Labour coup?|url=http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/media/2016/06/it-true-pr-firm-full-blairites-orchestrating-labour-coup|accessdate=21 August 2016|work=New Statesman|date=29 June 2016}} 34. ^{{cite news|title=Canary in the Pit (pt 94)|work=Private Eye|issue=1424|publisher=Pressdram Ltd.|date=August 2016|page=8}} 35. ^1 {{cite news|title=US election: Fake news becomes the news|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-37896753|accessdate=10 December 2016|work=BBC News|date=7 November 2016}} 36. ^1 {{cite web |last1=Gay |first1=Jessica |title=A major media outlet just revealed who won the US election… a week in advance |url=http://www.thecanary.co/2016/11/04/major-media-outlet-just-revealed-won-us-election-week-advance/ |website=The Canary |accessdate=2018-12-24 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20161104204343/http://www.thecanary.co/2016/11/04/major-media-outlet-just-revealed-won-us-election-week-advance/ |archivedate=2016-11-04 |date=2016-11-04}} 37. ^Davies, Jack (3 January 2017). "The jaw-dropping moment Charlie Brooker character-assassinated Jeremy Corbyn". The Canary. 38. ^{{cite news|last1=York|first1=Chris|title=The Canary Tried To Take Down Charlie Brooker And It Didn't Quite Go To Plan|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/charlie-brooker-canary-corbyn_uk_586cf53ee4b0f24da6ea183e|work=The Huffington Post|date=4 January 2017}} 39. ^{{cite news|author1=Media Mole|title=What jokes would The Canary allow Charlie Brooker to make about Jeremy Corbyn?|url=http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/media/2017/01/what-jokes-would-canary-allow-charlie-brooker-make-about-jeremy-corbyn|work=New Statesman|date=4 January 2017}} 40. ^1 {{cite news|last=Jackson|first=Jasper|url=https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/media/2017/07/do-canary-and-co-have-skill-and-stamina-take-popular-press|title=Do the Canary and co have the skill and stamina to take on the popular press?|work=New Statesman|date=20 July 2017|accessdate=30 November 2017}} 41. ^{{cite news|last1=Bloodworth|first1=James|title=Beware those critics that prefer Putin's propaganda to the BBC|url=http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/beware-those-critics-that-prefer-putins-propaganda-bbc-1559123|accessdate=2 June 2016|work=International Business Times UK|date=9 May 2016}} 42. ^{{cite news|last1=Dunt|first1=Ian|title=The activist left is conspiring in the demolition of the BBC|url=http://www.politics.co.uk/blogs/2016/05/09/the-activist-left-is-conspiring-in-the-demolition-of-the-bbc|accessdate=2 June 2016|work=politics.co.uk}} 43. ^{{cite news|title=Petition to sack BBC's Laura Kuenssberg was 'probably' removed 'under establishment pressure', says former UK ambassador|url=http://www.thecanary.co/2016/05/11/38-degrees-removed-petition-to-sack-bbcs-laura-kuenssberg-under-establishment-pressure/|accessdate=2 June 2016|work=The Canary|date=11 May 2016}} 44. ^{{cite news|last=Jackson|first=Jasper|url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/may/10/laura-kuenssberg-petition-sexist-abuse-38-degrees-bbc |title=Laura Kuenssberg petition taken down over sexist abuse |work=The Guardian|date=10 May 2016 |accessdate=10 May 2016}} 45. ^{{cite news|last=Middleton|first=Ian|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/ian-middleton/laura-kuenssberg-petition_b_9915680.html |title=It's Going to Take More Than an Online Petition to Stamp Out Bias at the BBC |work=The Huffington Post|date=12 May 2016 |accessdate=16 May 2016}} 46. ^{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-42430083|title=Canary's story about Laura Kuenssberg 'breached press code'|publisher=BBC News|date=20 December 2017|accessdate=20 December 2017}} 47. ^{{cite news|last=Lewis|first=Helen|url=https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/media/2017/09/canary-running-sexist-hate-campaign-against-laura-kuenssberg-clicks|title=The Canary is running a sexist hate campaign against Laura Kuenssberg for clicks|work=New Statesman|date=27 September 2017|accessdate=27 September 2017}} 48. ^{{cite news|last1=Di Stefano|first1=Mark|last2=Waterson|first2=Jim|url=https://www.buzzfeed.com/markdistefano/laura-kuenssberg-was-attacked-for-speaking-at-a-tory-event|title=This Website Said Laura Kuenssberg Agreed To Speak At A Tory Event, Even Though She Hadn't|work=Buzz Feed|date=27 September 2017|accessdate=20 December 2017}} 49. ^{{cite web|title=UK Media Publishers and Publications – Ranked for July 2016|url=https://www.similarweb.com/blog/uk-media-publishers-july-2016|website=similarweb.com|accessdate=19 September 2016}} External links
7 : British political websites|Internet properties established in 2015|2015 establishments in the United Kingdom|Left-wing politics in the United Kingdom|Alternative journalism organizations|Media in Bristol|British news websites |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。