| 词条 | Wisconsin v. City of New York |
| 释义 |
|Litigants=Wisconsin v. City of New York |ArgueDate=January 10 |ArgueYear=1996 |DecideDate=March 20 |DecideYear=1996 |FullName=Wisconsin v. City of New York, et al.[1][2][3] |USVol=517 |USPage=1 |ParallelCitations=116 S. Ct. 1091; 134 L. Ed. 2d 167 |Prior=The Secretary of Commerce determined that "actual Enumeration" would be best be resolved in the 1990 census not by using post-enumeration survey (PES) statistical regulation, which was devised to correct an undercount in the original enumeration.[1][2] |Subsequent= |Docket= |OralArgument=The U.S. Secretary of Commerce refused[3] to use post-enumeration survey statistical regulation to correct the 1990 census represented a violation of the Census Clause of the Constitution. |Holding= |SCOTUS=1994–2005 |Majority=Rehnquist |JoinMajority=unanimous |LawsApplied=Constitution's Census Clause }}Wisconsin v. City of New York, 517 U.S. 1 (1996), was a United States Supreme Court case that held that under the Constitution's Census Clause, Congress is granted with the authority[1][2] to conduct an "actual enumeration" of the American society, chiefly for the purpose of allocating congressional representation among the states.[1][2] Congress assigned the responsibility of conducting an "actual enumeration" of the American society to the Secretary of Commerce,[1] who in the 1990 census, decided not to implement the statistical correction,[1] better known as the post-enumeration survey (PES) to adjust an undercount in the initial population count. Furthermore, following several citizens' groups, states, and cities, Wisconsin disputed the Secretary's decision not to use PES declaring that it resulted in an undercounting of certain identifiable minority groups. See also
References1. ^1 2 3 4 5 {{cite web|url=https://www.oyez.org/cases/1995/94-1614|title=Wisconsin v. City of New York|last=|first=|work=Oyez.org|accessdate=February 4, 2016}} 2. ^1 2 3 {{cite web|url=https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/517/1/|title=Congress given responsibility to conduct "Actual Enumeration"|work=Supreme.justia.com|accessdate=February 4, 2016}} 3. ^1 {{cite web|url=https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/517/1/|title=Wisconsin v. City of New York Judges and Outcome|work=Lawjrank|accessdate=February 4, 2016}} External links
| case = Wisconsin v. City of New York, {{ussc|517|1|1996|el=no}} | courtlistener =https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/118009/wisconsin-v-city-of-new-york/ | justia =https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/517/1/ | loc =http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep517/usrep517001/usrep517001.pdf | oyez =https://www.oyez.org/cases/1995/94-1614 3 : United States Supreme Court cases|United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court|1996 in United States case law |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。