| 词条 | Wittman v. Personhuballah |
| 释义 |
|Litigants=Wittman v. Personhuballah |ArgueDate=March 21 |ArgueYear=2016 |DecideDate=May 23 |DecideYear=2016 |FullName=Robert J. Wittman, et al., Appellants v. Gloria Personhuballah, et al. |USVol=578 |USPage=___ |Docket=14–1504 |ParallelCitations=136 S. Ct. 1732; 195 L. Ed. 2d 37 |OpinionAnnouncement=https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/14-1504_6khn.pdf |Prior= |Subsequent= |Holding= |SCOTUS=2016 |Majority=Breyer |JoinMajority=unanimous |LawsApplied= }}Wittman v. Personhuballah, 578 U.S. ___ (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the appellants lacked standing under Article III of the United States Constitution to pursue their appeal.[1] The case dealt with redistricting by the Virginia Legislature of Virginia's 3rd congressional district and allegations of gerrymandering based upon race.[1] The appeal was brought by Congressmen David Brat, Randy Forbes, and Rob Wittman.[1] References1. ^1 2 {{ussc|name=Wittman v. Personhuballah|volume=578|year=|docket=14-1504}}, 136 S. Ct. 1732, 1733 (2016). External links
| case = Wittman v. Personhuballah, {{Ussc|578|___|2016|el=no}} | justia =https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/578/14-1504/ | oyez =https://www.oyez.org/cases/2015/14-1504 | other_source1 = Supreme Court (slip opinion) | other_url1 =https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/14-1504_6khn.pdf{{SCOTUS-case-stub}} 5 : Congressional districts of Virginia|Gerrymandering|United States Supreme Court cases|United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court|2016 in United States case law |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。